Rspec testing complex code with undefined variables - ruby-on-rails-3

Just need alittle bit of help with rspec testing... very new to it and dont quite know how to test this piece of code
# Get a list of tasks recently used by the user
recent_task_ids = Effort.all( :select => "project_task_id",
:conditions => { :user_id => #user_id },
:group => "project_task_id",
:order => "MAX( week_commencing )" )
# For each of the task ids, get the actual project task records
#recent_tasks = []
recent_task_ids.each do |effort|
if ProjectTask.find_by_id( effort.project_task_id ) != nil
#recent_tasks.push( ProjectTask.find( effort.project_task_id ) )
end
end
Not sure if your even supposed to test undefined variables this way but any help would be great

You can stub out the Effort.all method.
it "tests with nil values" do
Effort.stub(:all).and_return(nil)
end
Source: http://rspec.info/documentation/mocks/stubs.html and http://rspec.info/documentation/mocks/

Related

How do I call SetHITTypeNotification in Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) using RTurk?

I'm trying to make this kind of request:
https://mechanicalturk.amazonaws.com/?Service=AWSMechanicalTurkRequester
&AWSAccessKeyId=[the Requester's Access Key ID]
&Operation=SetHITTypeNotification
&Signature=[signature for this request]
&Timestamp=[your system's local time]
&HITTypeId=T100CN9P324W00EXAMPLE
&Notification.1.Destination=janedoe#example.com
&Notification.1.Transport=Email
&Notification.1.Version=2006-05-05
&Notification.1.EventType=AssignmentSubmitted
based on the documentation here: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSMechTurk/latest/AWSMturkAPI/ApiReference_SetHITTypeNotificationOperation.html
Here's my code:
RTurk.SetHITTypeNotification(:hit_type_id => "3M36IJVRR974ABAC76WQ0TCVKX9SIA", :notification => { :destination => "https://sqs.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/971351813114/MechanicalTurk", :transport => "SQS", :version => "2006-05-05", :event_type => "assignment_accepted" }, :active => true)
and here's the error that I'm seeing:
NoMethodError: undefined method `to_param_hash' for #<Hash:0x007ffe1ed82858>
Anyone know what the to_param_hash error means or how to address it?
Spent a couple hours on this problem. Answering here in case it helps others with the same situation. It turns out that I need to create a Notification object, which makes a lot of sense when you look at how to work with Notifications in RTurk in other contexts. Here's a snippet that works:
n = RTurk::Notification.new("https://sqs.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/971351813114/MechanicalTurk", "SQS", "2006-05-05", "AssignmentAccepted")
a = RTurk.SetHITTypeNotification(:hit_type_id => "3M36IJVRR974ABAC76WQ0TCVKX9SIA", :notification => n, :active => true)
t = RTurk.SendTestEventNotification(:notification => n, :test_event_type => "AssignmentAccepted")
Hope this helps others in the same situation!

How to make tests with find and date conditions?

I'm trying to develop some tests for a method which is responsible for retrieve some users created after some date. I don't know how to mock tests for it. The method is the following:
def user_list
render :nothing => true, :status => 422 if params[:time_param].blank?
time = Time.parse(params[:time_param])
#users = User.find(:all, :select => 'id, login, email',
:conditions => ["created_at > ?", time])
render :json => { :users => #users }
end
end
This is my spec:
describe UsersController do
context "when receiving time parameter" do
before (:each) do
#time_param = "2013-01-25 00:01:00"
user1 = mock_model(User, :created_at => Time.parse('2013-01-25 00:00:00'))
user2 = mock_model(User, :created_at => Time.parse('2013-01-25 00:01:00'))
user3 = mock_model(User, :created_at => Time.parse('2013-01-25 00:02:00'))
#users = []
#users << user1 << user2 << user3
end
it "should retrieve crimes after 00:01:00 time" do
User.stub(:find).with(:all, :select => 'id, login, email').and_return(#users)
get :user_list, { :time_param => #time_param }
JSON.parse(response.body)["users"].size.should eq 1
end
end
end
The problem is that it always returns all users despite of returning just one. (the last one). Where am I mistaking?
Help me =)
You are not testing what you have to test there, on a controller spec you only need to test that the method that you want is called with the parameters that you want, in your case, you have to test that the User model receives :find with parameters :all, :select => 'id, login, email', :conditions => ["created_at > ?", time] (with time the value that should be there.
Also, that logic does not belong to the controller, you should have a class method on User, something like select_for_json(date) to wrap around that find method (you can find a better name for it)
Then your controller becomes:
def user_list
render :nothing => true, :status => 422 if params[:time_param].blank?
time = Time.parse(params[:time_param])
#users = User.select_for_json(time)
render :json => { :users => #users }
end
your spec would be
before(:each) do
#users = mock(:users)
#time_param = "2013-01-25 00:01:00"
end
it "retrieve users for json" do
User.should_receive(:select_for_json).once.with(#time).and_return(#users)
get :user_list, { :time_param => #time }
assigns(:users).should == #users
end
that way you are sure that your action does what it does and the spec is A LOT faster since you are not creating users
then you can test that method on the model specs, there you have to create some users, invoke that method and check the users returned (don't stub/mock anything on your model spec)
Your stub call is telling find to ignore what it thought it was supposed to do and return #users instead. It will not attempt to match the conditions.
Unfortunately, to do your test I think you're going to have to allow the find to execute through your database which means you can't use mock_models. You probably will want to do either User.create(...) or FactoryGirl.create(:user) (or some other factory / fixture).
Of course doing it this way, you may hit MassAssignment issues if you use attr_accessible or attr_protected, but those are easy enough to stub out.
I hope that helps.

Testing a before_save callback with Rspec and Factory Girl

I am pretty sure I am missing something really basic here.
I want to test if a before_save callback does what it is supposed to do, not just that it is called.
I wrote the following test:
it 'should add lecture to question_type' do
#course = Factory :course,
:start_time => Time.now - 1.hour,
:end_time => Time.now
#question = Factory.create(:question,
:course_id => #course.id,
:created_at => Time.now - 10.minutes)
#question.question_type.should == 'lecture'
end
And I have the following factories for course and question:
Factory.define :course do |c|
c.dept_code {"HIST"}
c.course_code { Factory.next(:course_code) }
c.start_time { Time.now - 1.hour }
c.end_time { Time.now }
c.lecture_days { ["Monday", Time.now.strftime('%A'), "Friday"] }
end
Factory.define :question do |q|
q.content {"Why don't I understand this class!?"}
q.association :course
end
And I wrote the following callback in my Question model:
before_save :add_type_to_question
protected
def add_type_to_question
#course = Course.find(self.course_id)
now = Time.now
if (time_now > lecture_start_time && time_now < lecture_end_time ) && #course.lecture_days.map{|d| d.to_i}.include?(Time.now.wday)
self.question_type = "lecture"
end
end
The test keeps failing saying that "got: nil" for question_type instead of 'lecture'
Since I didn't see anything obviously wrong with my implementation code, I tried the callback in my development environment and it actually worked adding 'lecture' to question_type.
This makes me think that there might be something wrong with my test. What am I missing here? Does Factory.create skip callbacks by default?
I would not use Factory.create to trigger the process. FactoryGirl should be used to create the test setup, not to trigger the actual code you want to test. Your test would then look like:
it 'should add lecture to question_type' do
course = Factory(:course, :start_time => Time.now - 1.hour, :end_time => Time.now)
question = Factory.build(:question, :course_id => course.id, :created_at => Time.now - 10.minutes, :question_type => nil)
question.save!
question.reload.question_type.should == 'lecture'
end
If this test still fails, you can start debugging:
Add a puts statement inside add_type_to_question and another one inside the if statement and see what happens.

Rails assigning names to variables

I'm building a user ranking system, and am trying to assign user.rank values with a name.
I wanted to define something like this in my User model and then be able to reference it when displaying each user's rank, but this probably isn't the best way:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
RANK_NAMES = {
'Peasant' => (0..75),
'Craftsman' => (76..250),
'Vassal' => (251..750),
'Noble' => (750..1500),
'Monarch' => (1501..999999)
}
Perhaps it would be better to define a method in a controller or helper like:
if user.rank == 0..75
rank_name = "Peasant"
elsif...
But not sure how to do that. Anyone have any thoughts? I'm not even sure what to call what it is I'm trying to do, thus making it difficult to research on my own.
It could be something even as simple as this, assuming user.rank exists.
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
...
def rank_name
case self.rank
when 0..75
'Peasant'
when 76..250
'Craftsman'
when 251..750
'Vassal'
when 750..1500
'Noble'
when 1501..999999
'Monarch'
end
end
...
end
If rank_name is specific to the User, I'd make it a method of User.
You could try something like below. It might give you some ideas.
class User
RANKS = [
{:name => 'Peasant', :min => 0, :max => 75},
{:name => 'Craftsman', :min => 76, :max => 250}
# ...
]
attr_accessor :rank
def rank_name
# TODO what happens if rank is out of range of all ranks or rank is nil
# or not an integer
User::RANKS[rank_index][:name]
end
private
def rank_index
User::RANKS.index { |r| (r[:min]..r[:max]).include? #rank }
end
end
user = User.new
user.rank = 76
puts user.rank_name # -> Craftsman

Will_Paginate and order clause not working

I'm calling a pretty simple function, and can't seem to figure out whats going on. (I'm using rails 3.0.3 and the master branch of 'will_paginate' gem). I have the following code:
results = Article.search(params) # returns an array of articles
#search_results = results.paginate :page => params[:page], :per_page=>8, :order => order_clause
No matter what I make the order_clause (for example 'article_title desc' and 'article_title asc'), the results are always the same in the same order. So when I check using something like #search_results[0], the element is always the same. In my view, they are obviously always the same as well. Am I totally missing something?
I'm sure its something silly, but I've been banging my head against the wall all night. Any help would be much appreciated!
Edited to Add: The search clause does the following:
def self.search(params)
full_text_search(params[:query].to_s).
category_search(params[:article_category].blank? ? '' : params[:article_category][:name]).
payout_search(params[:payout_direction], params[:payout_value]).
length_search(params[:length_direction], params[:length_value]).
pending.
distinct.
all
end
where each of these guys is a searchlogic based function like this:
#scopes
scope :text_search, lambda {|query|
{
:joins => "INNER JOIN users ON users.id IN (articles.writer_id, articles.buyer_id)",
:conditions => ["(articles.article_title LIKE :query) OR
(articles.description LIKE :query) OR
(users.first_name LIKE :query) OR
(users.last_name LIKE :query)", { :query => "%#{query}%" }]
}
}
scope :distinct, :select => "distinct articles.*"
#methods
def self.payout_search(dir, val)
return no_op if val.blank?
send("payment_amount_#{dir.gsub(/\s+/,'').underscore}", val)
end
def self.length_search(dir, val)
return no_op if val.blank?
send("min_words_#{dir.gsub(/\s+/,'').underscore}", val)
end
Thanks.
If you look at the example from the will_paginate github page you can spot one important difference between their use of the :order clause and yours:
#posts = Post.paginate :page => params[:page], :order => 'created_at DESC'
This calls paginate on the Post object (with no objects being selected yet - no SQL has been executed before paginate comes along). This is different in your example: as you state in the first line of code "returns an array of articles". The simplest I can come up with showing the problem is
results = Model.limit(5).all
#results = results.paginate :order => :doesnt_matter_anymore
won't sort, but this will:
results = Model.limit(5)
#results = results.paginate :order => :matters
It should suffice to take the all out of the search method. It makes ActiveRecord actually perform the SQL query when calling this method. Will_paginate will do that for you when you call paginate (if you let it...). Check out the section on Lazy Loading in this post about Active Record Query Interface 3.0