I've started using git-svn for an SVN-based project, so that I can make local commits.
However, the SVN repository contains a lot of directories that I don't need to work with. When I solely used SVN, I was able to partly check-out stuff with:
svn co <repos-url> --depth empty
and then update the needed directories:
svn up <repos-dir>/<subdir>
As far as I've understood, partly checking out a project isn't an option with Git, so I'm looking for alternative way of saving some space. Any suggestions?
Edit: what I am thinking myself is something in the lines of creating a branch thatonly contains the files I need. I'd then want to be able to push the changes to these files without pushing any removal of the files I don't need. But I am not too deply into the way Git works to figure out if this is possible?
Are the extra directories really that big? One advantage of Git is that you do most of your work from your local harddrive (you commit to your own branch, not to the server) so it's fast even when there are many files.
Related
I use git to keep track of certain directories modifications, and to avoid file duplication or file inconsistencies. For backup, I store these directories on Github. Now, these directories are over 1GB, and I am thinking of taking them out of Github, but I don't know what is the best way to back up these files and still keep track of file duplication or file inconsistency.
I thought of creating a git server where I store all my repos. I thought of using complex scripts for rsync, or even using borg.
Do you have any suggestions?
I'm looking for a way to control versions of my project through IntelliJ. However, I know Git can manage it the best way and I already did started experiencing Git with the help of Madara Uchiha's Git tutorial. I must say it is incredibly useful, but I rather have version control arranged on my harddrive which is constantly backed up.
I decided doing my version control manually and it's pretty slow and annoying. Is there an easier and more efficient way to clone the current project files in another folder?
For example, clone the current project files on another folder named v1.4.2 outside my project structure without relocating my project files, also having them refactored as project on its own so they be runnable whenever.
Set up a local Git repository for the project. It will start with a master branch. Then create a working branch that you make your changes in. You can merge this branch back in to master as you are ready. You can create as many branches as you need and switch between them very quickly. All using the one directory.
If you are new to git you can use something like Sourcetree - (a GUI for Git) it will allow you to manage the repository. It makes it really fast to switch between branches of your repository. It also helps with pushing changes to another location. GitHub, Bitbucket, etc.
For backup, you could always set up the project on Bitbucket. You can create public and private repositories for free. I really recommend setting this part up.
Depending on the environment that you are building on, you could build a shell script / batch script that would copy files to the duplicate location. Without knowing what type of project you are developing in/for it is hard to say what would be the best strategy.
Ideally if your project has a build output you could have the compiler/IntelliJ IDEA place the results into your result folder. You could then copy the results to your Builds/v1.4.2 folder or wherever. Whether you check in the files that are built will depend on your project. You can always exclude files/folders like your ../Builds that you don't want to track via your .gitignore file.
I try to write a file store based on libgit2.
Software snapshots should be saved as branches mysoftware and specific versions committed and tagged. Then later I want to checkout the tags to different directories.
When looking at git_checkout_tree, it seems like there is only one working tree for a repository and thus it does not even seem possible to checkout multiple working trees concurrently.
Is this correct!?
EDIT:
Additionally, I would like for this thing to work on Windows without the need for cygwin!
The git_checkout_opts structure in libgit2 contains a target_directory option that will allow git_checkout_tree() to write to a different directory instead of using the default working tree for the repository. This would allow you to custom build a solution with libgit2 that maintained multiple checked out copies.
Without using that option, a libgit2 git_repository object expects there will be just one working directory and looks to the core.worktree config option if it isn't the "natural" working directory for the repository.
The git-new-workdir tricks with symlinks in the .git directory don't work great with libgit2 right now, I'm afraid, and particularly doesn't work well on Windows. I'd love to see this addressed, but it isn't too high on my priority list.
Git doesn't support this natively, but you can use git-new-workdir to do it.
I have a svn branch that I had been working on and decided to start using git-svn to work locally. Now I have two problems. I want to move my work into another svn repository (on the same host) but I'd first like to merge the latest work from trunk. How would I do this with git-svn? Also, how would I continue my work in a separate svn-repo while continually merging work from the original repo? Also, I don't want to checkout the entire history from the original trunk because the project is rather huge. I am new to git and to git-svn, though I've taken a crash course in git branching and I feel confident enough to use advanced commands like rebase and cherry-pick. I mainly need to know how to apply these concepts thru git-svn. Do the svn repos get setup as a git remote somehow? Are there good resources on the net explaining how it works? Any guidance is much appreciated.
Create your Git repo with git svn init -s <url>.
git config --edit, add several svn-remotes for each of your Subversion repos. Later you'll use the -R option to all git-svn commands to select which svn-remote to use.
Tweak svn-remote branch mappings as needed. Keep in mind that the default refs/remotes/* namespace specifies remote branches — not Git remotes. (You'll have just a single git remote named . which I don't recommend pushing/pulling to/from).
You can easily design your remote branches namespace to keep branches from different Subversion repos separated (e.g. refs/remotes/repoA/*, /refs/remotes/repoB/* etc).
git svn fetch. This has options to scan history only partially, e.g. starting from a specific revision. Please read the manpage on instructions how to do this.
You can also ignore specific paths and/or branches here.
Work with Git as usual, trying to keep your commits as linear as possible. Rebase often. Merge commits are fine (git-svn will even set svn:mergeinfo property), but holy cow be careful (and read the manpage for caveats). Understand that Git commits with git-svn-id tags are immutable, and push -f won't save you. For example, it's forbidden to amend or rebase already dcommit'ed changes.
Are there good resources on the net explaining how it works?
By far the best resource is the manpage. The next after it is git-svn source.
I was wondering if I right click on a file in the SVN repo browser, does it get permanently deleted? can it be recovered?
This question/answer from the SVN FAQ might interest you :
How do I completely remove a file from the repository's history?
There are special cases where you
might want to destroy all evidence of
a file or commit. (Perhaps somebody
accidentally committed a confidential
document.) This isn't so easy, because
Subversion is deliberately designed to
never lose information. Revisions are
immutable trees which build upon one
another. Removing a revision from
history would cause a domino effect,
creating chaos in all subsequent
revisions and possibly invalidating
all working copies.
The project has plans, however, to
someday implement an svnadmin obliterate command which would
accomplish the task of permanently
deleting information. (See issue 516.)
In the meantime, your only recourse is
to svnadmin dump your repository, then
pipe the dumpfile through
svndumpfilter (excluding the bad path)
into an svnadmin load command.
If it's that hard, there are little chances it can be done easily from Tortoise SVN...
(And it's not the goal of Source Control...)
You'll find that you can only delete from the Repo Browser when you are viewing the HEAD revision. This is identical to deleting a file from your working copy and then checking in the delete. In both cases, you'll be able to restore from the previous revision.
Deleting a file via the repo-browser context menu basically creates a new global revision where just that file was deleted, so it appears in the log as such - you can always revert to that revision to get the file back, or you can just pull it directly from the repository into your working copy.
No... Deleting a file (even using the repo browser) only affects working copies. It would be a pretty lousy revision control system if you couldn't recover a file from the past. It is actually pretty difficult to modify files in a committed revision, even if you have root access to the server.
Doesn't right-click just bring up some sort of menu? And with SVN is that you can always revert anyways.
I deleted a top level directory from Repo Browser by accident and the only way to get it back was the following:
Export the top level folder from a previous version history
Make a new folder in the repository to replace the one deleted.
Add the exported files back to the new directory (same name as previous)
Update the working copy, it will delete and then re-add the same files.
Its annoying but at least the working and repo will be back in sync. The "Revert Changes from this Revision" didnt work for undoing repo deletes, it only reverts in working directory not the "Undo" the delete to the repository.