I am new in rhodes world.
I want my rhodes app to talk directly with web server
i.e I dont want to use Rhosync.
How can I achieve this?
Also I have seen about Rho AsyncHttp, is it the same I do need to do?
You may use Rhodes without Rhosync. They provide the AsyncHttp classes and methods to enable pulling data and images from other web servers.
You may also utilize the Rhodes ORM (Rhom) even if you are not using RhoSync. This can greatly increase your efficiency when dealing with data objects from your backend systems, using RhoSync or otherwise.
refer following link to know more about AsyncHttp and how to use it.
How to use Rhodes without Rhosync or RhoConnect?
Here you will find how to start work on it and where to call those call.
How to use Rhodes without Rhosync or RhoConnect?
Let me know if you need further any help on this. Here I'm using this in my project.
Related
I have a question and was hoping that you could maybe help me out. I currently built an API to communicate between Catia (CAD-Application) and my browser so I can create parts/products read and write parameters etc.
One of my problems is that the only way I know to do this is via ActiveX which I really don't wanna do as it forces everyone to use IE11. Since CatiaV5 is a pretty old Software there won't be any elegant way to use it via some sort of Restful api or similar.
Since I've been working with JavaScript for a while now, did apps for phones but have no idea about browser extensions my question was this. Is it possible to write a Chrome Extension that actually uses com dlls and enables me to set up a connection to a piece of software (in this case Catia) and work with it.
NPAPI plug-ins could be the solution for my problem as it looks from the information I found but it's also supposed to also being phased out.
Do you think it's still worth looking into deeper and studying on writing such an NPAPI app or is there maybe a more elegant way you can think of?
Would be happy for some ideas and suggestions. Thanks in advance and
Greetings Chris
In modern browsers the only way to do this would be using native messaging:
Chrome
Firefox
Edge
FireBreath2 has an abstraction for building c++ plugins which supports native messaging, though the docs are still a little sparse.
Zetakey browser support NPAPI.
We provide HTML5 browser embedded system for industrial and enterprise application.
Www.zetakey.com
Best regards,
Jack Wong
I have a tweak with hooks to an app (tweak1)
The tweak is supposed to use a framework to execute some code.
Unfortunately within iOS7 I'm unable to do that.
However when the same code is executed in a separate tweak (tweak2) with hooks to springBoard, it runs just fine.
My question is possible for me to send a dictionary from the first tweak (tweak1) to tweak2 so it gets executed.
I think I need to use CPDistributedNotificationCenter. But not sure.
If that's the case, a helping suggestions or example would be greatly appreciated.
many thanks
CPDistributedNotificationCenter should work or you could just use NSDistributedNotificationCenter. It inherits from NSNotificationCenter, which we all know how to use.
Another solution I can suggest is CFMessagePort, which I'm using in my apps. I need to support iOS 4, which doesn't support NSDistributedNotificationCenter, so I ended up using CFMessagePort. It differs from notification model in that you can't send messages to everyone. You can only send messages between two known ports. But in your case it probably doesn't matter.
There is also the XPC API but I've never used it and can't say much about it. It's an IPC API so it should work. Many iOS components use it.
I am currently getting my head around aspdotnetstorefront.
My initial thought is to build usercontrols or something else instead of xmlpackages for extending the functionality of aspdotnetstorefront. Is there a reason why I have to use the xmlpackages instead of something else?
There are a few reasons I would choose to use the XMLPackages. First, it is what the products use for layout, so it is easier to replace existing packages. ASPDNSF has built a bunch of functions for the XMLPackages to give you access to their core functionality. You can use the XMLPackages in topics and the templates, so no need to roll your own code. Finally, if you have simple html and javascript to return, it is nice to just use XSLT to do it. Yes, the learning curve is a bit steep, but depending on what you are doing, it makes life easier.
HTH
Wade
We are trying to make an app maker with dijit. Do you know what to do more or less to have the dojox.mobile.* branch running parallel to my dijit app ?
I know there is a seperate dojox.mobile.parser,... I guess, I need to fork it quite deep ?
I thought first about an iFrame but we need drag'n drop from the designer and the simulator.
Any help is welcome,
g
dojox.mobile offers a very light-weight parser which can be used in place of the standard dojo.parser. I think it skips stuff like attachpoints and probably wouldn't work too well with Dijit, so if you use both types of widgets on your page, stick with dojo.parser. The parsers share some globals and are unable to co-exist, so do NOT load both.
I'm using VB.net. I need to create an application that sits in between the browser and the actual internet. Basically, I'm creating an online game that will edit some webpages that are incoming so that they contain parts of the game (it's a kind of scavenger hunt). How would I create this?
Does anybody have any ideas for this? I've found nothing online. If you do know something about this, I prefer code examples and not just subjects. I tend to need big pushes in a direction to learn something new.
Thanks if you can!
Your best bet is to start with FiddlerCore, which is a .NET Class Library which provides exactly what you're looking for. http://fiddler.wikidot.com/fiddlercore