I am using MS Access 2007.
A: DCount("[Name]","[Main]","[Name] = 'Mark'")/
DCount("[Entry]","[Main]","[Entry] = 1")
Okay, so I am basically counting the number of people with the name Mark and I am dividing it by the number of Entry's that = 1 in my database. That's easy enough, but I am trying to apply a third condition, where
[Location]![City] = 'Chicago'
, but Access isn't letting me do this (It can't find the table, even though it's in the table I specified above.
DCount("[Name]","[Main]","[Name] = 'Mark' AND [Location]![City] = 'Chicago'")/
DCount("[Entry]","[Main]","[Entry] = 1")
I have also tried filtering the city with a Where clause in the Design view, but the condition is being applied after the calculation above, so the calculation is the same regardless of the city. I just need it to perform the above calculation for the city of Chicago.
Is something like this possible with DCount?
Also, I would die a happy man if you could tell me how to Group By the city While performing the calculations for each one separately, but I would also be very thankful if someone could just show me how to do it the first way too.
Thanks
What is [Location]![City]? My answer is based on the presumption it refers to a field named City in a table named Location.
If that is correct, I think your problem is because you're attempting to specify a condition based on a field which is not part of the domain ([Main]) you told DCount to use.
From Microsoft's Documentation, the domain is "A string expression identifying the set of records that constitutes the domain. It can be a table name or a query name for a query that does not require a parameter."
So if you want your DCount criteria to refer to fields in two tables, consolidate the tables in the form of a query into a single "domain". Maybe your query could be something like this, "qryMainWithCity":
SELECT m.[Name], m.Entry, m.City_ID, l.City
FROM
Main AS m
INNER JOIN Location AS l
ON m.City_ID = l.City_ID;
If that query works for your situation, you should be able to get what you want with a DCount expression like this:
DCount("*","qryMainWithCity","[Name] = 'Mark' AND City = 'Chicago'")
I was just posting the same answer as #HansUp's came up. I have an alternative way to do it, and that's to use an instant recordset lookup:
Dim varReturnValue as Variant
varReturnValue = CurrentDB.OpenRecordset("SELECT Main.[Name] FROM Main INNER JOIN Location ON Main.City_ID = Location.City_ID WHERE Main.[Name] = 'Mark' AND Location.City = 'Chicago';")(0)
That returns the first field in the recordset returned (the index is zero-based). That way you don't have to save a query.
Related
I have a list of 2500 obj numbers stored in Excel for which I need to run the below SQL:
SELECT
a.objno,
a.table_comment,
b.queue_comment
FROM
aq$_queue_tables a
JOIN
AQ$_QUEUES b ON a.objno = b.table_objno
WHERE
a.objno = 19551;
Is there any way I can write a loop on above SQL with objno feeding from a list or from a different table? I also want to store/produce all the results from each loop run as a single output.
I considered the option to upload the numbers into a new table and add a where condition:
a.objno=(SELECT newtab.objectno FROM newtab);
However, the logic I'll be writing in the query would exclude certain objectno results. Let's say that the associated objectno has certain queue_comment as of certain date associated with that objectno. I do not want to pull that record. This condition would match with some objectno and wouldn't match with others. Having that condition and running the query against all the objectno is returning 0 results. I couldn't share the original logic as it would reveal certain business rules and it'll be a violation of some policy.
So, I need to run the query on each objectno separately and combine the results.
I'm totally new to SQL and got this task assigned. I'm aware of the regular loop, for in SQL, but I don't think I can apply them in this situation.
Any guidance or reference links to helpful topics is much appreciated as well.
Thanks in advance for the help.
One option is to upload the object numbers from Excel sheet to a table in the database and run the query as following. Assuming newtab is the table where the objectno are uploaded.
SELECT
a.objno,
a.table_comment,
b.queue_comment
FROM
aq$_queue_tables a JOIN AQ$_QUEUES b on a.objno = b.table_objno
WHERE
a.objno IN (SELECT newtab.objectno FROM newtab);
I have used a subquery here, join to the aq$ can work as well.
Reading the comments and all I think you need to enhance your Excel with 2 additional columns and load to a new table.
IN can be used in the following way too:
SELECT
a.objno,
a.table_comment,
b.queue_comment
FROM
aq$_queue_tables a
JOIN
AQ$_QUEUES b ON a.objno = b.table_objno
WHERE
(a.objno,a.table_comment,b.queue_comment) IN (19551,'something','something');
so with the new table will be:
WHERE
(a.objno,a.table_comment,b.queue_comment) IN
(select n.objno, n.table_comment, n.queue_comment from new_table n)
Here is a picture explaining what I have and what I'm looking for.
Tables and data describing the question.
This originally seemed like a very simple update query but it has proven I really don't understand how the query works. Can someone please explain the SQL I would need to move all the data from tblImport.Addtl_Initiator to the respective blanks under tblEntries.Initiator, and the data from tblImport.Addtl_Date_Initiated to the respective blanks under tblEntries.Date_Initiated? Essentially just moving the data to the left one column, but in a different table.
Additional information: There is a unique ID field on each of the tables not shown in the picture.
Try it with Nz.
UPDATE tblentries
INNER JOIN tblimport
ON tblentries.eid = tblimport.eid
AND tblentries.initiator = tblimport.initiator
AND tblentries.date_initiated = tblimport.date_initiated
SET tblentries.initiator = nz(tblimport.initiator, tblimport.addtl_initiator),
tblentries.date_initiated = nz(tblimport.date_initiated, import.addtl_date_initiated)
This link might also be helpful: coalesce alternative in Access SQL
Use IsNull to get the non-blank values:
SELECT
IsNull(Initiator, Addtl_Inititator) AS Initiator,
IsNull(Date_Initiated, Addtl_Date_Initiated) AS Date_Initiated,
FROM
tblImport
For the record I am a newbie when it comes to SQL. I am practicing and getting familiar with the syntax, and how it is all structured. I am using this website as a crash course in SQL. If you follow the link and take a look at question #5 the directions state to pull up data related only to three countries that of France, Germany, and Italy.
My dilemma is that I do not understand how multiple strings should be structured.
Here is my code:
SELECT name, population
FROM world
WHERE name = 'france';
The code above will produce a table with both selected columns, and the row that contains France's data, but I still need two other rows with data. However, when I try to edit it to achieve the results I need it won't work:
SELECT name, population
FROM world
WHERE name = 'germany' 'france' 'italy';
The code above only produces columns and the rows disappear. I need my table to include the name and population of all three countries. I have searched for a simple answer on how to properly add multiple strings and haven't found anything conclusive.
Despite my issue being relatively simple, I still seek help from all y'all, so please help!
Thank you!
Try to use IN operator, that allows you to make multiple values in WHERE clause.
Your code should look like this:
SELECT name, population
FROM world
WHERE name IN ('france','Germany','Italy');
You can put many criteria in a WHERE clause. Use AND and OR to combine them (and parentheses when needed such as in where a = 1 and (b = 2 or c = 3)). So your query can be written as
SELECT name, population
FROM world
WHERE name = 'germany' OR name = 'france' OR name = 'italy';
As has been shown, however, when looking for several values of one attribute you can replace all the ORs with an IN clause:
WHERE name IN ('germany', 'france', 'italy')
which is more readable and hence preferable.
Hello Stackoverflow community!
I am currently confronted with writing somthing, that automatically cleans up a database after certain requirements. Here is what I have to do:
If a cell in one table contains a certain substr (lets say "Mrs."), in another table a Togglebox is supposed to be checked (Yes if "Mrs." is contained and No if not)
I already worked out something that sets The Toggleboxes to -1 in that column, but I have to include a check, if it even has to be changed and in which row. For that I wanted to bring up an If-construction and a variable that would contain the ID of the first table's row to determine, which of the Rows in the second table have to be changed.
So the thought is like this:
If 1st_Table contains "Mrs." Then
CurrentDb.Execute "UPDATE 2nd_Table SET gender = -1 WHERE foo = 1st_Table.ID_Var"
1st_Table.ID_Var would contain the ID of the row of the first table
Now the more or less obvious question: How do I accomplish that?
This is bascally the first time working with VBA/Access AND SQL so I have no closer thoughts on how to do that.
Thanks in advance
Greetings
geisterfurz007
P.S. The variable names will be changed in the final version; they are just to visualize. Just saw that they were colored by SO.
Try this (SQL update query):
UPDATE 2nd_Table INNER JOIN 1st_Table ON 2nd_Table.ID = 1st_Table.ID
SET 2nd_Table.gender = -1
WHERE 1st_Table.PersonName LIKE '*Mrs.*'
ID -> reference between both tables
PersonName -> column in 1st table containing Mrs.
I am using SQL server 2005, querying with Web Developer 2010, and the min function appears to be returning more than one value (for each ID returned, see below). Ideally I would like it to just return the one for each ID.
SELECT Production.WorksOrderOperations.WorksOrderNumber,
MIN(Production.WorksOrderOperations.OperationNumber) AS Expr1,
Production.Resources.ResourceCode,
Production.Resources.ResourceDescription,
Production.WorksOrderExcel_ExcelExport_View.PartNumber,
Production.WorksOrderOperations.PlannedQuantity,
Production.WorksOrderOperations.PlannedSetTime,
Production.WorksOrderOperations.PlannedRunTime
FROM Production.WorksOrderOperations
INNER JOIN Production.Resources
ON Production.WorksOrderOperations.ResourceID = Production.Resources.ResourceID
INNER JOIN Production.WorksOrderExcel_ExcelExport_View
ON Production.WorksOrderOperations.WorksOrderNumber = Production.WorksOrderExcel_ExcelExport_View.WorksOrderNumber
WHERE Production.WorksOrderOperations.WorksOrderNumber IN
( SELECT WorksOrderNumber
FROM Production.WorksOrderExcel_ExcelExport_View AS WorksOrderExcel_ExcelExport_View_1
WHERE (WorksOrderSuffixStatus = 'Proposed'))
AND Production.Resources.ResourceCode IN ('1303', '1604')
GROUP BY Production.WorksOrderOperations.WorksOrderNumber,
Production.Resources.ResourceCode,
Production.Resources.ResourceDescription,
Production.WorksOrderExcel_ExcelExport_View.PartNumber,
Production.WorksOrderOperations.PlannedQuantity,
Production.WorksOrderOperations.PlannedSetTime,
Production.WorksOrderOperations.PlannedRunTime
If you can get your head around it, I am selecting certain columns from multiple tables where the WorksOrderNumber is also contained within a subquery, and numerous other conditions.
Result set looks a little like this, have blurred out irrelevant data.
http://i.stack.imgur.com/5UFIp.png (Wouldn't let me embed image).
The highlighted rows are NOT supposed to be there, I cannot explicitly filter them out, as this result set will be updated daily and it is likely to happen with a different record.
I have tried casting and converting the OperationNumber to numerous other data types, varchar type returns '100' instead of the '30'. Also tried searching search engines, no one seems to have the same problem.
I did not structure the tables (they're horribly normalised), and it is not possible to restructure them.
Any ideas appreciated, many thanks.
The MIN function returns the minimum within the group.
If you want the minimum for each ID you need to get group on just ID.
I assume that by "ID" you are referring to Production.WorksOrderOperations.WorksOrderNumber.
You can add this as a "table" in your SQL:
(SELECT Production.WorksOrderOperations.WorksOrderNumber,
MIN(Production.WorksOrderOperations.OperationNumber)
FROM Production.WorksOrderOperations
GROUP BY Production.WorksOrderOperations.WorksOrderNumber)