I made a small backup application that simply creates an archive out specified files and folders. Now I need an online service to backup that online. Which service can i use that can be integrated into my app ?
Options I considered:
dropbox is ideal, but they have all but abandoned the desktop.
skydrive has no api.
I couldn't find any free reliable backup service that uses ftp .
anything else ? it should provide 1-2 gb of free space and be reasonably reliable.
Thanks
My app is in C#, but can be ported to any other language as well..
In your case, Amaxon's S3 seems more fitting but that's not free.
Depending on your target audience, you can create a local archive and have that picked up by your regular backup solution. You might try Wuala,or SpiderOak. Expand Wuala by adding your own space. Spideroak is free up to 2GB (more if you invite friends), and also provides a good alternative to Dropbox (if you want to see how to migrate from dropbox to spideroak see my blogpost about that).
Try box.net, now known as box.com or simply Box
reference: http://developers.box.com/docs
Related
I have installed dropbox python client for linux and I noticed the sync bandwidth is quite limited:
$ dropbox status
Syncing (252,088 files remaining, 18 days left)
Downloading 252,088 files (35.1 KB/sec, 18 days left)
Is there a way to make it faster?
Note: Yes I have a 100Mbit/s internet connexion...
Firstly, check if there is a 75% cap enabled, as mentioned here
If there isn't then it's probably your Internet, try switching to a different network source (from wireless to wired) or use a different Internet connection. I had the same issue before and it was solved by changing to a different Internet connection, yes I have 100Mbit/s too but it didn't help.
Alternatively
If you already have another synced up dropbox, just copy the files over to the new install of Dropbox, if you're just trying to get the initial sync done.
Also take a look at LAN Sync, a feature in Dropbox
This honestly isn't a SO question because is isn't really a programming question, a forum like Superuser.com might be better suited perhaps.
edit: saw that you already have a superuser account, my bad. :)
We have multiple clients using our service.
Each client may create multiple projects.
Each client may upload multiple files to any of his projects.
Each file may have custom meta data associated.
Each client may "share" any of the projects to another client.
Each client may comment any of his or shared projects/files.
My question is about file storing in a cloud. What will best solution? I thought about Amazon S3 but maybe there are better alternatives?
You can explore Box.com solution. They are an advanced file management solution in the cloud and support fine-grained permission management as you explained above. Dropbox for Teams is also another option - The permission model is not as extensive as Box, but the sync client is very stable here. In one of my recent projects, I used box.com mainly due to their fine-grained permission controls
You can also build this on S3 (Dropbox and I guess Box too is behind the scenes built on S3). To achieve all the functionality as you mentioned, it is quite some programming work !
I'm going to deploy a web application with multiple Pyramid application servers and nginx as a load balancer.
This application will have a feature for uploading files which should be available for downloading afterwards.
Total size of uploaded files may be very big so I'd like to deploy a separate file webserver to serve these static files. (this is one reason why I don't like rsync solution proposed here).
What is the best solution to handle file upload and syncronization in this case? I was thinking about NFS or something like that, but I'm not sure it is a good way to solve the problem. I suppose there must be some best-practices here or even a tool or library for these purposes.
UPDATE:
I don't want use cloud services like Dropbox, it would be nicer to find some syncronization solution inside the network segment.
UPDATE2:
I finished with setting up NFS, for now it works perfectly.
not really a python or pyramid related question. But, you should investigate distributed file systems and CDN's both of which are for this kind of thing. gridfs is easy enough to get going with. But there are plenty of other options. Both Amazon and Google have similar services.
I am developing an application which needs to fetch some data from an XML file for the automatic update process and for some other functions. This approach requires the files to be located in a direct link, so it can be hard-programmed to use that specific URL.
I heard that you can use a lot of free-to-use file-sharing services such as Google Drive, Box and Dropbox. Can you tell me if it's true or not? And are there any other services beside those I mentioned?
I don't need a web hosting that supports PHP and other frameworks, I just want to store files and make my application access it when required.
Yes, both Dropbox and Google Drive provide web hosting of your public folders, but there is a 10GB bandwidth limit with Dropbox.
You can use any free web hosting like 110mb or 5gbfree too.
You can try github, bitbucket or mega.co.nz
I know you use the C based networking API to do FTP communication but I'd prefer to use something a little higher level. I've seen a few Objective-C based wrappers but I'm not sure what to use. I don't need that complex of FTP interaction. Its just the typical create/delete dirs, upload/download files... What do you recommend?
Edit:
Here is one that looks promising but I can't get it to compile for the iPhone SDK
The ConnectionKit
This may help, but you may reconsider design for reasons stated by bbum:
http://code.google.com/p/s7ftprequest/
The reason why you can't find much in the way of useful FTP client software is because FTP isn't used much any more and is generally actively discouraged from use.
Without great care, it is quite easy to create big old security holes when using FTP (when I ran a consulting company, the 3 times we had infected machines were all because of FTP server security holes or exploits -- one time, the damned HP copier's FTP server was the attack vector!).
FTP is also inefficient unless carefully configured.
I would encourage you to use an HTTP based protocol. WebDAV allows you to do basically anything FTP can do, but does so over an HTTP channel. Thus, it'll work through proxies and the like. Heck -- HTTP has become so ubiquitous that pretty much everything works with HTTP.
And, of course, there are plenty of good HTTP client APIs built for Objective-C.
Obviously, if FTP is a requirement for your project, this answer won't help you much....
After not finding anything that works well I decided I'd go ahead and follow Apple's tutorial on how to do FTP. It sure is a PITA but at least it does work. I'm defiantly going to support WebDAV in the first revision my app, and eventually perhaps some other transfer methods later on. I think I'm going to consider releasing this open source after I get FTP & WebDAV working good, since there is no reason why you should have to do this much low level work to do such a basic and ambiguous task as FTP these days.
I've implemented FTP file download and upload, directory create and directory list download through the regular FTP possibilities in the iPhone SDK. Note: you'd be passing the login name and password as part of every FTP request unsecured. Apparently no apparent connection to the FTP server is maintained at the app level, like with a real FTP client app, that I haven't been able to find for iPhone yet. If you're interested in the source code please let me know through e-mail.
GoldRaccoon isn't mentioned and can be found on GitHub. I use that library and it works very well (besides it didn't support FTP rename)