I'm currently using Apache+Phusion quite successfully but am interested in trying out Nginx+Phusion. Although there are lots of places where I can get info on how to set up the latter none of them explain what I have to do to ensure that it is Nginx that is serving things up rather than Apache.
Ideally I would like to keep the Apache stuff available whilst trialling but I'm guessing that at a minimum I will have to stop Apache and run Nginx - or can both be running simultaneously on the same machine? If the answer to this is yes then which server will handle URL requests and how will I know?
Related
I am trying to grab json data from monit and display it on a status page for management to see the current status of a handful of processes. This info would be displayed in Confluence running on the same machine but since Confluence (apache) and monit are running on different ports it is considered to be cross domain.
I know I can write a server side process to serve this data but that seems to be overkill and would actually take longer that it took to set monit up in the first place :)
The simplest solution is to configure monit's headers (Access-Control-Allow-Origin) to allow the other server. Does anyone know how to do this? I suspect there is a way since M/Monit would run into the same issue. I have tried some blind attempts on the "httpd... allow" lines but it complains about the syntax with x.x.x.x:port or using keyword "port" in that location.
ok... going to answer my own question (sort of).
First, I think I may have asked the question wrong. I don't deal with a lot of cross domain issues. Sorry about that.
But here is what I did to get to the monit info from the other servers: pretty simple using proxies in apache where the main server is:
ProxyPass /monit http://localhost:2812
ProxyPassReverse /monit http://mainserver/monit
ProxyPass /monit2 http://server2:2812
ProxyPassReverse /monit2 http://mainserver/monit2
I did this for each of the servers and tested that I can get to either the monit web interface or to the _status?format=json sub pages. I can now call them using ajax on our main web page.
This also has the benefit that I can lock down the monit access control to just the main server but have the info show on a more visible page. :)
I don't think you would need a proxy to just display monit's api or http info. It depends on how you have your network and dns configured. If you'd like to use only localhost, then that might be necessary. But, monit does have a facility to use global host ip access using allow directives in it's own config rc file
I am setting up a very simple HTTP server for the first time, am considering my options, and would appreciate any feedback on the best way to proceed. My goal is pretty simple: I'm not serving any files, I only need to respond to a very specific HTTP POST request that will contain geolocation data, run some Python code, and return the results as JSON. I do need to be able to respond to multiple simultaneous requests. I would like to use HTTPS.
In looking on stackoverflow it seems I can potentially go with BaseHTTPServer and ThreadingMixIn, or Apache and mod_wsgi. I already have Apache installed, but have never configured it. Are there compelling reasons to go the more complicated Apache route (more complicated to me, because I will need to do research on configuring Apache and getting mod_wsgi going but already have a test instance of BaseHTTPServer up and running), or is it equally safe, secure (very important), and performance-oriented to use BaseHTTPServer for something so simple?
BaseHTTPServer is not a production grade server.
If you don't understand how to set up Apache, but want to get something with mod_wsgi running quickly and easily, then you probably want to look at mod_wsgi express.
This gives you a way of installing mod_wsgi using Python 'pip' and also provides you a way of starting up Apache/mod_wsgi with a auto generated Apache and mod_wsgiconfiguration such that you don't even need to know how to configure Apache.
The next version of mod_wsgi express to be released (version 4.3.0, likely released this week), can even set up a HTTPS site for you, with you just needing to have obtained a valid certificate or generated a self signed certificate.
I would suggest if interested you use the mod_wsgi mailing list to ask for more details about using mod_wsgi express for running a HTTPS site.
http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/WhereToGetHelp?tm=6#Asking_Your_Questions
You can start playing around though with it for a normal HTTP site by following instructions at:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/mod_wsgi
When using XAMPP (1.7.5 Beta) under Windows 7 (Ultimate, version 6.1, build 7600), it takes several seconds before pages actually show up. During these seconds, the browser shows "Waiting for site.localhost.com..." and Apache (httpd.exe, version 2.2.17) has 99% CPU load.
I have already tried to speed things up in several ways:
Uncommented "Win32DisableAcceptEx" in xampp\apache\conf\extra\httpd-mpm.conf
Uncommented "EnableMMAP Off" and "EnableSendfile Off" in xampp\apache\conf\httpd.conf
Disabled all firewall and antivirus software (Windows Defender/Windows Firewall, Norton AntiVirus).
In the hosts file, commented out "::1 localhost" and uncommented "127.0.0.1 localhost".
Executed (via cmd): netsh; interface; portproxy; add v6tov4 listenport=80 connectport=80.
Even disabled IPv6 completely, by following these instructions.
The only place where "HostnameLookups" is set, is in xampp\apache\conf\httpd-default.conf, to: Off.
Tried PHP in CGI mode by commenting out (in httpd-xampp.conf): LoadFile "C:/xampp/php/php5ts.dll" and LoadModule php5_module modules/php5apache2_2.dll.
None of these possible solutions had any noticeable effect on the speed. Does Apache have difficulty trying to find the destination host ('gethostbyname')? What else could I try to speed things up?
Read over Magento's Optimization White Paper, although it mentions enterprise the same methodologies will and should be applied. Magento is by no means simplistic and can be very resource intensive. Like some others mentioned I normally run within a Virtual Machine on a LAMP stack and have all my optimization's (both at server application levels and on a Magento level) preset on a base install of Magento. Running an Opcode cache like eAccelerator or APC can help improve load times. Keeping Magento's caching layers enabled can help as well but can cripple development if you forget its enabled during development, however there are lots of tools available that can clear this for you from a single command line or a tool like Alan Storms eCommerce Bug.
EDIT
Optimization Whitepaper link:
https://info2.magento.com/Optimizing_Magento_for_Peak_Performance.html
Also, with PHP7 now including OpCache, enabling it with default settings with date/time checks along with AOE_ClassPathCache can help disk I/O Performance.
If you are using an IDE with Class lookups, keeping a local copy of the code base you are working on can greatly speed up indexing in such IDEs like PHPStorm/NetBeans/etc. Atwix has a good article on Docker with Magento:
https://www.atwix.com/magento/docker-development-environment/
Some good tools for local Magento 1.x development:
https://github.com/magespecialist/mage-chrome-toolbar
https://github.com/EcomDev/EcomDev_LayoutCompiler.git
https://github.com/SchumacherFM/Magento-OpCache.git
https://github.com/netz98/n98-magerun
Use a connection profiler like Chrome's to see whether this is actually a lookup issue, or whether you are waiting for the site to return content. Since you tagged this question Magento, which is known for slowness before you optimize it, I'm guessing the latter.
Apache runs some very major sites on the internets, and they don't have several second delays, so the answer to your question about Apache is most likely no. Furthermore, DNS lookup happens between your browser and a DNS server, not the target host. Once the request is sent to the target host, you wait for a rendered response from it.
Take a look at the several questions about optimizing Magento sites on SO and you should get some ideas on how to speed your site up.
I am building a cgi application, and now I would like it to be like an application that stands and parses each connection, with this, I can have all session variables saved in memory instead of saving them to file(or anyother place) and loading them again on a new connection
I am using lamp within a linux vmware but I can't seem to find how to install the module for it to work and what to change in the httpd.conf. I tried to compile the module, but I couldn't because my apache isn't a regular instalation, its a lamp already built one, and it seems that the mod needs the apache directory to be compiled. I saw some coding examples out there, so I guess is not that hard once its runing ok with Apache
Can you help me with this please?
Thanks,
Joe
Using FastCGI just means that you spawn a number of processes which will handle requests they get from the actual webserver instead of the webserver spawning a new process whenever a request arrives.
Use something like memcached if you want to keep stuff like sessions in memory.
I am using the comet long-polling technique with apache, php, jquery.
I've got a basic comet update running and it works great. I'm now attempting to build a more complex comet script, and I want a better way to debug.
My comet scripts use $.ajax() with a long timeout, and the server side just sleeps until it either runs up to the timeout or has an event to send to the client. The comet requests go to a different subdomain than the main ajax requests.
For normal pages I edit and test on a linux laptop. I've got apache, mysql, and php with a test database and mirror image of the site. I can edit, save, and see the changes with no upload step. For the comet stuff I've been having to upload to a server to test. This requires me to set up a few fake servers, but mostly it requires me to upload changed files for each test. I've got a mostly automatic upload script, but it's still too slow.
The problem testing locally is the long timeout. The browser won't open another connection to the same server while the comet request is still open. I don't have a subdomain locally so I have all the requests going to the same server so they basically block each other.
I've tried a number of things to make this work and none really do it. I tried first to change my browser setting for number of simultaneous connections. This didn't work in firefox on linux, and I didn't find anything about changing this limit on other browsers.
I tried setting my hosts file to give me two names that map to my ip address. Then I tried configuring VirtualHost conf directives in apache, but that didn't work. I think because apache is looking for an actual dns server to tell it the hostname, not just my /etc/hosts file. Maybe I can run a local dns server to fool apache into thinking my box has two names, but that just seems like a real long way around this problem.
So, does anyone have an idea of how to make this work on one ip address/host?
I'm new to the comet thing, so maybe I've just got the wrong idea about something. Maybe this isn't even possible. Either way, it's time to just ask if this is already a solved problem.
It really should be possible to use /etc/hosts to fool Apache. It certainly does work on Ubuntu Hardy with Apache 2.2.
Try to give different hostname to you local address. Simply add a line like this to /etc/hosts:
127.0.0.1 a.example.com b.example.com c.example.com d.example.com
(Note: use a tab after IP)
Validate this with a ping
ping a.example.com
In you apache configuration, you may use a wildcard alias together with a named virtual host:
<VirtualHost *:80>
ServerName example.com
ServerAlias *.example.com
## snip ##
<VirtualHost>
Instead of using example.com, you might want to use something that's under your control. I use local subdomain of our company's domain (i.e. something.local.molindo.at).
Now you can use different subdomains for your test, each with its own limitation on concurrent connections.
You may need to restart your browser to get this working.
I have made something similar and my hosting gives my max queries limit reached which actually should not happen. But I have read that if my php code is in infinite loop.. ie the sleep mode the hosting detects it and makes db connection user as to be using more queries than allowed. That is alot to presume but I have found a solution to that with same speculations.