I need help with condensing my script so that a #div_x is related to a separate element img_x.
My project uses ui-selectable to grab points on a map and return an image set in a separate div via jquery cycle (as in here http://bit.ly/gH7Lm3).
I have bound the 'selectablestop' event to two functions - .hasClass and .append - in order to 1) detect if a point has been selected and 2) append the containing cycle div with a corresponding image (also, incidentally, contained within its own div). As is, it looks something like this:
$("#selectable").selectable().bind("selectablestop", function(event, ui) {
if($('#point_a').hasClass('ui-selected')){
$('#cycle').append('<div id="pic"><img src="image_a.jpg" /></div>');}
if($('#point_b').hasClass('ui-selected')){
$('#cycle').append('<div id="pic"><img src="image_b.jpg" /></div>');}
if($('#point_c').hasClass('ui-selected')){
$('#cycle').append('<div id="pic"><img src="image_c.jpg" /></div>');}
, etc.
My question:
Can I accomplish this with one argument, using a variable x instead of writing out each line matching point_a to img_a, point_b to img_b, etc. That is,
if($('#point_(variable)').hasClass('ui-selected')){
$('#cycle').append('<div id="pic"><img src="image_(matching variable).jpg" /></div>');}
Thanks! I've spent some time looking for a good approach.
Thanks to rdworth via Jquery forum for this solution:
<li id="point_a" data-image="image_a.jpg">...</li>
<li id="point_b" data-image="image_b.jpg">...</li>
$( ".ui-selected" ).each(function() {
$( "#cycle" ).append( "<div id='pic'><img src='" + $( this ).data( "image" ) + "'></div>" );
});
Related
I need to select all the checkboxes from here one-by-one after every 3 second. I tried couple of xpaths with list,none of them have worked
Tried xpaths:
//div/div[#class='filters-list sdCheckbox ']
Using input and type. But none of them worked. Can you please help me out?
Reference website: https://www.snapdeal.com/products/storage-devices?sort=plrty
->Capacity at the left hand corner
By.xpath("//a[#class='filter-name']") this one listed out all the filters of page.
The xPath "//div[#data-name='Capacity_s']/div[#class='filters-list sdCheckbox ']/input" will fetch you the list of all input elements that you need to check.
There is a container DIV that holds all the filters of a certain type, e.g. Brand, Capacity, etc. The one for Brand is shown below.
<div class="filter-inner " data-name="Brand">
Under that container, all the LABEL tags are what you need to click to check the boxes. So, we can craft a CSS selector using the grouping as a filter to reach only the checkboxes we want.
"div[data-name='Brand'] label"
Since this is something I assume you will reuse, I would write this as a function.
public static void CheckFilters(String filterGroup)
{
WebDriverWait wait = new WebDriverWait(driver, 10);
List<WebElement> filters = driver.findElements(By.cssSelector("div[data-name='" + filterGroup + "'] label"));
// System.out.println(filters.size()); // for debugging
for (int i = 0; i < filters.size(); i++)
{
filters.get(i).click();
// wait for the two overlays to disappear
wait.until(ExpectedConditions.invisibilityOfElementLocated(By.cssSelector("div.searcharea-overlay")));
wait.until(ExpectedConditions.presenceOfElementLocated(By.cssSelector("div.filterLoader.hidden")));
// reload the element list after the refresh so you don't get StaleElementExceptions
filters = driver.findElements(By.cssSelector("div[data-name='" + filterGroup + "'] label"));
}
}
and you would call it like
driver.get("https://www.snapdeal.com/products/storage-devices?sort=plrty");
CheckFilters("Brand");
I'm brand new to javascript, dojo and HTML and I've searched everywhere for examples of this and cannot find any.
I have a map with some feature points and a find task to highlight the feature points on the map, and display them in a grid with it's field attributes. This works great when I specify the search field as:
findParams.searchFields = ["LOCATION"];
But if I add:
findParams.searchFields = ["LOCATION", "MODEL_NUM"];
The grid displays results from multiple fields (ie. searching for attributes in LOCATION "A" would also find attributes in MODEL_NUM containing the letter "A"). So I decided to add a drop down menu select to specify which field to search in (one at a time) so the results are more precise.
So I added the following dijit:
<select id="fieldSelect" data-dojo-type="dijit/form/Select" name="fieldSelect">
<option value="" selected="selected">Select a field</option>
<option value="MODEL_NUM">Model Number</option>
<option value="LOCATION">Location</option>
<option value="NUM_DEFICIENCIES">Number of Deficiencies</option>
<option value="INSTALL_DATE">Install Date</option>
</select>
I then modified the search field statement to:
findParams.searchFields = "[" + "\"" + dom.byId("fieldSelect").value +
"\"" + "]";
When I click my search button I get an Uncaught TypeError: a.join is not a function (FindParameters.js:5)
I hope this is enough information. Does anyone have a solution or a recommendation?
UPDATE
After a suggestion to pass an array and not a string to the findParams.searchFields, I made the following changes:
findParams.searchFields = [];
findParmas.searchFields.push(dom.byId("fieldSelect").value);
This still gave me attribute results from multiple fields. After running a couple small tests:
var selectedField = document.getElementById('fieldSelect').value;
var index = selectedField.options[selectedField.selectedIndex].value;
And:
var selectedField = dom.byId('fieldSelect').value;
I'm finding that in the Chrome developer tools debugger, when I created a breakpoint at that line and executed the statement, both examples had the value of selectedField as 'undefined'.
Is this an issue of not getting the value from the drop down select dijit?
If no value is passed to findParams.searchFields, the API assumes all fields are valid, which is why I'm getting attribute results from multiple fields.
Thanks.
Use dijit.byId instead of dom.byId.
The following works for me:
var value = dijit.byId("fieldSelect").value;
if ("" != value) {
findParams.searchFields = [value];
} else {
findParams.searchFields = ["MODEL_NUM", "LOCATION", "NUM_DEFICIENCIES", "INSTALL_DATE"];
}
I found the problem.
Ultimately it was the registry.byId that led me to the answer, I had to rearrange some code after I realized the searchFields was in the wrong function and not in the function that is called when I click the search button.
But when accessing the dijit, the only thing that worked was registry.byId to access the dijit node and pass the value of the selected value into my searchFields.
Thanks.
I have two Hyper Links on to a DOJO DIv
var create = dojo.create("div",{
id:"create_links",
className:"iconRow1",
innerHTML:"<a class='popupLink' href='javascript:openCreateDialog()'>Create </a> <span>|</span><a href='javascript:openUploadDialog()'>Batch </a>"
},dojo.query(".ui-jqgrid-titlebar")[0]);
On click of the Batch Hyperlink , i have a function
function openUploadDialog()
{
// Here i want to disable the Create Hyper Link tried this way
dojo.byId('create_links')[1].disabled=true; // Not working
}
See whether i can answer your question.
HTML Part:
<div id="create_links">
g
h
</div>
JS Part:
dojo.addOnLoad(function() {
var a = dojo.query("#create_links a")[1];
dojo.connect(a,'click',function(e){
console.log(e.preventDefault())
})
})
#Kiran, you are treating the return of dojo.byId('create_links') like an array when that statement will return to you a node on the dom.
Also, hyperlinks don't support a disabled attribute to prevent them from being actionable. You could probably create a click handler that returns false to accomplish this type of functionality, or like #rajkamal mentioned, calling e.preventDefault(). #rajkamal also provides a good solution to selection the link properly.
and thanks in advance for your help!
Here's my situation: I have a set of divs whose IDs have an incrementing number applied to the end of the name using PHP. Each of these divs are added dynamically with PHP (They are a series of FAQ questions with a hidden div container with the answers, that slide down when the question is clicked.) [Live Example][1]
There is no limit to the number of questions that appear on the page, because this is being used for a Wordpress theme and my client wants to add new questions as they go along.
Here's an example of the structure for each FAQ question using the PHP:
<?php var $faqnum = 0; $faqnum++; ?>
<div id="faqwrap<?php $faqnum; ?>">
<h4>What data is shared?</h4>
<div id="faqbox<?php $faqnum; ?>" class="slidebox">
<p>Data sharing is defined by the type of service:</p>
<ul class="list">
<li>Third-party access to data (Enhanced Services only is strictly controlled and determined by the SDA)</li>
<li>All members must participate in points of contact and conjunction assessment but can choose whether to participate in other services</li>
<li>Participation in a service requires the member to provide associated data<br />
</ul>
</div>
</div>
Now this is what I have currently in jQuery, and it works, but only if I add a new one every time my client wants to add a new question.
$(document).ready(function() {
$('.slidebox*').hide();
// toggles the slidebox on clicking the noted link
$("#faqwrap1 a:not(div.slidebox a)").click(function() {
$("#faqbox1.slidebox").slideToggle('normal');
$('div.slidebox:not(#faqbox1)').slideUp('normal');
return false;
});
});
I thought of maybe doing something with a declared variable, like this:
for (var x = 0; x < 100; x++;) {
$('#[id^=faqwrap]'+ x 'a:not(div.slidebox a)')...
}
I hope this is clear enough for you! Again, I thank you in advance. :)
The best way to handle this is to not use the IDs, but use classes for the outer element. So your PHP would be altered like this:
<?php var $faqnum = 0; $faqnum++; ?>
<div id="faqwrap<?php $faqnum; ?>" class="question">
<h4>What data is shared?</h4>
<div id="faqbox<?php $faqnum; ?>" class="slidebox">
<p>Data sharing is defined by the type of service:</p>
<ul class="list">
<li>Third-party access to data (Enhanced Services only is strictly controlled and determined by the SDA)</li>
<li>All members must participate in points of contact and conjunction assessment but can choose whether to participate in other services</li>
<li>Participation in a service requires the member to provide associated data<br />
</ul>
</div>
</div>
Your JQuery would be rewritten with the selector for the class "question".
$(document).ready(function() {
$('.slidebox*').hide();
// toggles the slidebox on clicking the noted link
$(".question a:not(div.slidebox a)").click(function() {
/* close everything first */
$('div.slidebox').slideUp('normal');
/* selects and opens the the slidebox inside the div */
$(".slidebox", this).slideToggle('normal');
return false;
});
});
This will get you the effect you are looking for. The key differences in the JQuery is the way you get the slidebox inside the question that got clicked. I'm using the scoped selection $(".slidebox", this) to get just the slidebox inside the clicked ".question" element.
The subtle visual difference is that the slideUp() happens before the slideToggle(). This will essentially close any open queries before it opens the desired one. If you keep your animations fast, this will be more than fine. The advantage of this approach is that you don't have to worry about the count of questions on a page, and the selectors are most likely more optimized than the for loop.
Edit
I adjusted the PHP code to use a class for "slidetoggle" instead of an id. It's technically an HTML error to have multiple IDs that are the same. It can throw off some assistive technologies for people with dissabilities. I'm assuming that section of code was repeated several times on the page.
Without changing your current markup, this would work:
// toggles the slidebox on clicking the noted link
$("div[id=^faqwrap]").each(function () {
var $faqwrap= $(this);
$faqwrap.find("h4 > a").click(function () {
var $currentSlidebox = $faqwrap.children(".slidebox");
$currentSlidebox.slideToggle('normal');
$('div.slidebox').not($currentSlidebox).slideUp('normal');
return false;
});
});
Maybe you can find a few suggestions in the above code that help you.
Like #Berin, I'd also recommend giving a separate CSS class to the outer DIV and using that as a selector, instead of $("div[id=^faqwrap]").
Is there any way to disable all input fields in an div container with dojo?
Something like:
dijit.byId('main').disable -> Input
That's how I do it:
dojo.query("input, button, textarea, select", container).attr("disabled", true);
This one-liner disables all form elements in the given container.
Sure there is. Open up this form test page for example, launch FireBug and execute in the console:
var container = dojo.query('div')[13];
console.log(container);
dojo.query('input', container).forEach(
function(inputElem){
console.log(inputElem);
inputElem.disabled = 'disabled';
}
)
Notes:
On that test page form elements are actually dijit form widgets, but in this sample I'm treating them as if they were normal input tags
The second dojo.query selects all input elements within the container element. If the container had some unique id, you could simplify the sample by having only one dojo.query: dojo.query('#containerId input').forEach( ...
forEach loops through all found input elements and applies the given function on them.
Update: There's also a shortcut for setting an attribute value using NodeList's attr function instead of forEach. attr takes first the attribute name and then the value or an object with name/value pairs:
var container = dojo.query('div')[13];
dojo.query('input', container).attr('disabled', 'disabled');
Something else to keep in mind is the difference between A Dijit and a regular DomNode. If you want all Dijit's within a DomNode, you can convert them from Nodes -> Dijit refs with query no problem:
// find all widget-dom-nodes in a div, convert them to dijit reference:
var widgets = dojo.query("[widgetId]", someDiv).map(dijit.byNode);
// now iterate over that array making each disabled in dijit-land:
dojo.forEach(widgets, function(w){ w.attr("disabled", "disabled"); }
It really just depends on if your inputs are regular Dom input tags or have been converted into the rich Dijit templates (which all do have a regular input within them, just controlled by the widget reference instead)
I would do it like this:
var widgets;
require(["dijit/registry", "dojo/dom"], function(registry, dom){
widgets = registry.findWidgets(dom.byId(domId));
});
require(["dojo/_base/array"], function(array){
array.forEach(widgets, function(widget, index) {
widget.set("disabled", true);
});
});
Method findWidgets is essential to get all widgets underneath a specific DOM.