Let's say we have a class Base.
#inerface Base : NSObject
{
}
+(id) instance;
#end
#implementation Base
+(id) instance
{
return [[[self alloc] init] autorelease];
}
-(id) init
{
...
}
#end
And we have a derived class Derived.
#interface Derived : Base
{
}
#end
Which reimplements the init method.
Now we want to create an instance of Derived class using class method +(id) instance.
id foo = [Derived instance];
And now foo is actually a Base class.
How to achieve foo to be a Derived class in this case?
Should I reimplement all the class method for derived classes ? (actually immplementation will be totally the same).
Is there a more elegant way ?
When you create an instance using [Derived instance], that instance will be of class Derived. Try it. The trick is messaging self in the instance method:
+(id) instance
{
return [[[self alloc] init] autorelease];
}
When you send the instance message to Base, self is Base. When you send the same message to Derived, self is Derived and therefore the whole thing works as desirable.
Related
My header class looks like:
#import "Card.h"
#interface PlayingCard : Card
#property (strong, nonatomic) NSString *suit;
#property (nonatomic) NSUInteger rank;
+ (NSArray *) validSuits;
+ (NSUInteger) maxRank;
#end
And my implementation:
#implementation PlayingCard
+ (NSArray *) validSuits
{
return #[#"♥︎", #"♣︎", #"♦︎", #"♠︎"];
}
+ (NSArray *) rankStrings
{
return #[#"?", #"1", #"2", #"3", #"4"];
}
- (void)setSuit:(NSString *)suit
{
if ([[PlayingCard validSuits] containsObject:suit])
{
_suit = suit;
}
}
- (NSString *)suit
{
return _suit ? _suit : #"?"; // if suit !nil return suit, else return ? string.
}
+ (NSUInteger)maxRank
{
return [[self rankStrings] count] - 1;
}
#end
So I understand that any method with a + means it's a Class method.
My question is, why must I use [PlayingCard classMethod] e.g. [PlayingCard validSuits] in the setSuit method whereas I can use [self classMethod] e.g. [self rankStrings] in the maxRank method?
I'm assuming it's something to do with the maxRank method being a class method whereas setSuit isn't. But could it be because setSuit is a setter?
I really don't know, I can't visualise what's going on here. I've only just started my foray into Objective-C and am coming from a Java background.
I have realised I can substitute PlayingCard in for self in the maxRank method without any error messages, however substituting self in for PlayingCard in the setSuit method gives me an error saying
No visible #interface for 'PlayingCard' declares the selector for 'validSuits'
Any explanation as to why this is the case and what's going on would be great. Thanks!
The meaning of self in methods
Every Objective-C method receives an implicit self argument. Instance methods receive the instance, while class methods receive the class object (remember: classes are objects).
If you want to send a class method, the compiler lets you use two types of syntax:
[ClassName classMethod]
[classObjectPtr classMethod]
The first syntax is used in [PlayingCard maxRank]. Here, the target is (explicitly) the PlayingCard class.
A class method already has a class object as a target for sending class methods: the self argument. So they can use [self classMethod] to send other class methods.
Why sending a message to self in class methods?
The advantage of the latter is that the class is not explicitly named. This makes it possible to override class methods in subclasses and call them from base classes.
You basically get the same dynamic method dispatch as with instance methods. This is actually a nice feature of Objective-C not present in Java or C++.
Instance methods would use the dynamic version by accessing their class and sending the message to that:
- (void)setSuit:(NSString *)suit
{
if ([[[self class] validSuits] containsObject:suit])
{
_suit = suit;
}
}
Now an imaginary subclass of PlayingCard could override the class method validSuits and implicitly alter the behavior of setSuit:.
self can be an instance or a class depending on the type of method declared.
- (void)setSuit: is an instance method, thus self is an instance inside this method declaration.
+ (NSUInteger)maxRank is a class method, thus self is a class inside inside this method declaration.
+ (void)classMethod;
- (void)instanceMethod;
- (void)setSuit
{ // self is an instance here
[self classMethod]; // warning, class method sent to instance
[self instanceMethod]; // works, instance method sent to instance
}
+ (NSUInteger)maxRank
{ // self is a class here
[self classMethod]; // works, class method sent to class
[self instanceMethod]; // warning, instance method sent to class
}
You tried to called a "class method" on self inside an instance method where self in an "instance".
In a class method, self refers to the class (it refers to an object that represents the class that obj-c runtime creates for you), so you can use it to call class level method.
In an instance method, self refers to the instance. If you want to call class level method in an instance method, you need to use the class name instead.
Java analogy of obj-c class methods is the static method. Java's this keyword is similar to self, except it can't be used to refer to a class.
setSuit is an instance method, and validSuits is a class method. However, both maxRank and rankStrings are class methods. Class methods are basically the same as static methods in C++
How does one detect the calling class from within a static method such that if the class is subclassed the subclass is detected? (See comment inside MakeInstance)
#interface Widget : NSObject
+ (id) MakeInstance;
#end
#implementation Widget
+ (id) MakeInstance{
Class klass = //How do I get this?
id instance = [[klass alloc] init];
return instance;
}
#end
#interface UberWidget : Widget
//stuff
#end
#implementation UberWidget
//Stuff that does not involve re-defining MakeInstance
#end
//Somewhere in the program
UberWidget* my_widget = [UberWidget MakeInstance];
I believe the appropriate solution for what you are trying to accomplish is this:
+ (id) MakeInstance{
id instance = [[self alloc] init];
return instance;
}
And as Cyrille points out, it should probably return [instance autorelease] if you want to follow convention (and aren't using ARC).
UIAdam's solution is perfectly fine for your case. Although if you want to detect, more specifically, from which class is you method called, use [self class] on objects, or simply self for classes.
What's the best way to implement a method that returns an autoreleased object? Does the following code work correctly?
#implementation MyClass
-(void) myclassWithSomeParameter:(SomeType) parameter
{
return [[MyClass allocWithSomeParameter:parameter] autorelease];
}
The return type must be MyClass *, you need to alloc the new instance, and it should be a class method rather than an instance method (otherwise you need an existing instance of MyClass).
+ (MyClass *)myClassWithSomeParameter:(SomeType)parameter {
return [[[MyClass alloc] initWithSomeParameter:parameter] autorelease];
}
Then create instances like so:
MyClass *instance = [MyClass myClassWithSomeParameter:parameter];
I am trying to implement a class, that subclasses NSObject directly, that can only have one instance available throughout the entire time the application using it is running.
Currently I have this approach:
// MyClass.h
#interface MyClass : NSObject
+(MyClass *) instance;
#end
And the implementation:
// MyClass.m
// static instance of MyClass
static MyClass *s_instance;
#implementation MyClass
-(id) init
{
[self dealloc];
[NSException raise:#"No instances allowed of type MyClass" format:#"Cannot create instance of MyClass. Use the static instance method instead."];
return nil;
}
-(id) initInstance
{
return [super init];
}
+(MyClass *) instance {
if (s_instance == nil)
{
s_instance = [[DefaultLiteralComparator alloc] initInstance];
}
return s_instance;
}
#end
Is this the proper way to accomplish such a task?
Thanks
You need to do a little more than that. This describes how an objective-c singleton should be implemented: Objective-C Singleton
In your scenario, there is still a way to create a second instance of your class:
MyClass *secondInstance = [[MyClass alloc] initInstance]; //we have another instance!
What you want is to override your class's +(id)alloc method:
+(id)alloc{
#synchronized(self){
NSAssert(s_instance == nil, #"Attempted to allocate a second instance of singleton(MyClass)");
s_instance = [super alloc];
return s_instance;
}
return nil;
}
I have class X, an abstract class, and classes A and B that inherit from it. Classes A and B each have their own 'return_something' function. I have another method elsewhere that calls 'return_something' on a series of objects, all of type X. 'return_something' returns something different depending on whether it is an A or a B, so I can just call id *result = [x return_something).
I can design this all fine, but when I come to implementing it I don't know what to put in class X, the parent. It needs to have a 'return_something' function in order for it to be callable, but the function itself is defined in the child classes. I can declare it in the parent and both children, but I don't have anything to return from the X implementation - the returned object is dependent on the child's re-definition.
This would be fine for a non-returning method, but how am I meant to use inheritance and polymorphism with a function?
The simplest thing to do is throw an exception from the "base" function. That way you'll know if it gets called by mistake.
Other languages which provide explicit "abstractness" don't require method bodies for abstract methods.
Use an objective-C protocol instead of an abstract base class:
#protocol ProtocolX
-(int)return_something;
#end
#interface ClassA : NSObject <ProtocolX> {
}
-init;
-(int)return_something;
#end
#interface ClassB : NSObject <ProtocolX> {
}
-init;
-(int)return_something;
#end
#implementation ClassA : NSObject <ProtocolX>
-(int)return_something { return 1; }
-init { retur [super init]; }
#end
#implementation ClassB : NSObject <ProtocolX>
-(int)return_something { return 3; }
-init { retur [super init]; }
#end
References of type id<ProtocolX> can then be passed around and used:
id<ProtocolX> ref = [[ClassA alloc] init];
int myIntForA = [ref return_something];
[ref release];
ref = [[ClassB alloc] init];
int myIntForB = [ref return_something];
[ref release];