I have table with the folowing columns:
row_id, customer_id, worker_id, vehicle_id, task_id, subcontractor_id.
I need to get the folowing data:
row_id, customer_name, worker_name, vehicle_name, task_serial, subcontractor_name
I can do this using simple inner joins for each table (Customers, Workers etc.) But each table is really huge (a lot of rows and each row has many fields), and I know that *_id (customer_id, worker_id, ..) is the primary key of its table.
Is there a way I can get this data and avoid many inner joins?
(maybe something with the foreign key, primary key or something like this..)
thanks
I think you will have to use joins - and it is not bad at all.
If the *_id columns are indexed (and primary keys are ususally indexed) it doesn't matter that the join tables are huge as the query processor will use the index to find the correct rows in the join tables - and not do a full table scan. The "many columns" should also be no problem for your query processor...
So I think the query will look something like this:
SELECT a.row_id, customer_name, worker_name, vehicle_name, task_serial, subcontractor_name
FROM my_table as a
INNER JOIN CUSOMER as b ON a.customer_id = b.customer_id
INNER JOIN WORKER as c ON a.worker_id = c.worker_id
...
Of course you can use Left koins as well.
Related
I am trying to join two tables together using UNION (although im not sure that is the best option) there are technically two related columns however they don't have the same name so i'm assuming that isn't an option here is my query:
SELECT title, type, release_date FROM pictures
UNION
SELECT name, residence, NULL as Col3 FROM actor
ORDER BY release_date ASC;
It is only printing out the pictures columns from this? Thank you for any help in advance.
To relate two tables you could use some foreign key or a third table in the case of beign a many-to-many relation, you should use one of the join options, for example:
Imagine that exists a table that relate actor and pictures, called actor_pictures.
Image that we will relate the tables by id (it could be another one, and it doesn't have to have the same name).
You could do this:
SELECT * FROM actor_pictures ap
JOIN actor a ON ap.actor_id = a.id
JOIN pictures p ON ap.pictures_id = p.id
ORDER BY p.release_date ASC
Read this: https://www.w3schools.com/sql/sql_join.asp
I have two tables of world countries Independence Day and I wanted to combine them into one table with a distinct id, but they are using different Primary keys, any suggestions will be appreciated.
Summary of request: How to combine two tables with different Primary Keys but the other fields in common and removing duplicate fields ideally Hash Match and removing duplicates
Expected Results this will include all the unique countries in both tables, please one table may have more countries and we want to make sure we take all the distinct countries from each table. Ideally, the solution will be likely to be of like Hash Match operator in SQL which implements several different logical operations that all use an in-memory hash table for finding matching data. Many thanks in advance
The image of two tables which needs combining.
You seem to want full join:
select a.*, b.* -- select the columns you want
from a full join
b
on a.country = b.country;
If you want to assign a new unique id use row_number():
select row_number() over (order by coalesce(a.country, b.country)) as new_id,
a.*, b.* -- select the columns you want
from a full join
b
on a.country = b.country;
I had a select query, which I designed in the SQL view of the query design tool. With some of my results I found duplicates of the same records. As in there were not multiples in the table, only the query (Same Primary Key). Here is the original query.
SELECT t1.*
FROM Inventory AS t1 INNER JOIN Inventory AS t2 ON
t1.Part_ID = t2.Part_ID WHERE (t1.Inventory_ID<>t2.Inventory_ID);
I aimed to query Inventory for records with the same Part_ID (FK) but different Inventory_ID(PK). There is a composite key between part_ID (FK) and location_ID (FK), if that makes any difference.
I have since changed this query to:
SELECT DISTINCT t1.*
FROM Inventory AS t1 INNER JOIN Inventory AS t2 ON t1.Part_ID = t2.Part_ID
WHERE (t1.Inventory_ID<>t2.Inventory_ID);
This removes the duplicate records, however, I don't believe that my original query should produce replicate data results. I am worried that this suggests that there is something wrong with my tables?
My table looks like the following:
Thanks
The thing is that you might have multiple occurences of part_ID on the INNER JOIN side of your select. So if a part with the same part_ID and a different inventory_ID exists in 2 other locations, you will get duplicates.
To check that, you could do a test on a few duplicates, or rewrite your original query with a GROUP BY instruction on the INNER JOIN side of the query.
In MS Access, I am trying to implement a many-to-many table that will store 2-way relationships, similar to Association between two entries in SQL table. This table stores info such as "Person A and Person B are coworkers" "C and D are friends", etc. The table is like this:
ConstitRelationships
LeftId (number, primary key, foreign key to Constituents.ConstitId)
RightId (number, primary key, foreign key to Constituents.ConstitId)
Description (text)
Note that the primary key is a composite of the two Id fields.
Also the table has constraints:
[LeftId]<>[RightId] AND [LeftId]<[RightId]
The table is working ok in my Access project, except that I cannot figure out how to make an updateable query that I want to use as a datasheet subform so users can easily add/delete records and change the descriptions. I currently have a non-updatable query:
SELECT Constituents.ConstituentId, Constituents.FirstName,
Constituents.MiddleName, Constituents.LastName,
ConstitRelationships.Description, ConstitRelationships.LeftId,
ConstitRelationships.RightId
FROM ConstitRelationships INNER JOIN Constituents ON
(Constituents.ConstituentId =
ConstitRelationships.RightId) OR (Constituents.ConstituentId =
ConstitRelationships.LeftId);
If I ignore the possibility that the constituentId I want is in the leftId column, I can do this, which is updatable. So the OR condition in the inner join above is what's messing it up.
SELECT Constituents.ConstituentId, Constituents.FirstName,
Constituents.MiddleName, Constituents.LastName,
ConstitRelationships.Description, ConstitRelationships.LeftId,
ConstitRelationships.RightId
FROM ConstitRelationships INNER JOIN Constituents ON
(Constituents.ConstituentId =
ConstitRelationships.RightId) ;
I also tried this wacky iif thing to collapse the two LeftId and RightId fields into FriendId, but it was not updateable either.
SELECT Constituents.ConstituentId, Constituents.FirstName,
Constituents.MiddleName,
Constituents.LastName, subQ.Description
FROM Constituents
INNER JOIN (
SELECT Description, Iif([Forms]![Constituents Form]![ConstituentId] <>
ConstitRelationships.LeftId, ConstitRelationships.LeftId,
ConstitRelationships.RightId) AS FriendId
FROM ConstitRelationships
WHERE ([Forms]![Constituents Form]![ConstituentId] =
ConstitRelationships.RightId)
OR ([Forms]![Constituents Form]![ConstituentId] =
ConstitRelationships.LeftId)
) subQ
ON (subQ.FriendId = Constituents.ConstituentId)
;
How can I make an updatable query on ConstitRelationships, including a JOIN with the Constituent.FirstName MiddleName LastName fields?
I am afraid that is not possible. Because you use joins in your query over three tables it is not updatable. There is no way around this.
Here some detailed information about the topic: http://www.fmsinc.com/Microsoftaccess/query/non-updateable/index.html
As mentioned in the linked article one possible solution and in my opinion best solution for you would be the temporary table. It is a load of work compared to the easy "bind-form-to-a-query"-approach but it works best.
The alternative would be to alter your datascheme in that way that you do not need joins. But then denormalized data and duplicates would go rampage which makes the temporary table a favorable choice.
I am having trouble with writing a SQL query in Access with foreign keys. There are two tables, 'Customers'(ID, Name, Surname) and 'Orders'(ID, Customer, Date, Volume). ID fields are primary, and Orders.Customer is a foreign key linked to Customers.ID, so a customer can have many orders or none.
My goal is to do a search on customers based on many criteria, one of which being if customers have at least an order which volume is superior to a certain quantity. I tried joins with SELECT DISTINCT but it still gives me duplicate results, plus I had to create an empty order for every customer without orders if the query didn't use the above condition.
Does anyone have an idea about that? Maybe some special instruction on foreign keys or 2 separate queries?
Based on the information you give, i only can give you hints on what I think you're doing/understanding wrong :
SELECT DISTINCT does select you a unique record, not a unique value, so if your statement selects all fields (*), distinct won't help you much there.
My guess is you had to create an empty order for each customer because you used INNER JOIN, try LEFT OUTER JOIN instead
For example :
SELECT DISTINCT Customers.*
FROM Customers
LEFT OUTER JOIN Orders
ON (Orders.Customer = Customers.id)
WHERE Volume > put_your_value