Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm building a website with lots of images and want to stop bots from accessing those images. So I'm looking something beyond cookies since bots can handle cookies. My idea is that all authentication should reside purely on the server side. Any ideas?
Someone suggested a website, that makes a user visit a thumbnail page first. Somehow visiting that page triggers a server side variable, which allows the main image to be displayed later. How can that be implemented.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Robots.txt
That will stop some bots from spidering images on your site.
Also look into a .httaccess file
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=.htaccess
Related
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
The image describes itself the objetive:
If someone doesn't understand, I want to create a register box which registers the g+ email into a database with the respective user's data.
It's called OAuth. Usually we use an external provider (such as Google, Facebook, Github, etc.) to identify the user, so you don't have to. The user don't have to give you his password, because you use access tokens to request the user's data from the provider's server:
You can read more and find implementations here.
On the image, you probably see the Google's OAuth2 service.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I made a mistake when I helped a friend to set up her website. I forgot to upload robots.txt before I sent some text code onto the server to test the server. When she google her url in google, she can see the source code as a first result.
I now uploaded a robots.txt onto the server, but the old source code is still there although I have changed the code totally.
Can I fix this problem now?
Thanks
The next time Google (or any other search engine) crawls your website, it'll see the robots.txt file and reindex (or remove) the site accordingly. If you absolutely must remove the site now, go to http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=164734.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
What do you think about copying our content (text content especially) from our main site (eg: mysite.com) to mobile site (eg: m.mysite.com OR mysite.com/m). What is the SEO side effects of doing this? Does SEO experts recommends this or not?
If you have external articles or reference, hope you guys can share here also. :)
Thank you.
This is Google's official stance on mobile SEO
Google has a separate spider for mobile content. If you copy mainsite to m.yoursite.com, it works best and your domain authority will just get transfered. No dupe content penalty.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I was looking at the Soundlcoud Widget docs
http://developers.soundcloud.com/docs/widget#
I noticed there is a parameter for 'download'. I tried it on the HTML5 sharing widget it didn't turn on the download link. Is there a way to show the Download link?
Example
http://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F46911134&auto_play=false&show_artwork=true&color=ff7700&download=true&sharing=false
Thanks
This is actually the intended behaviour. A lot of the time, the widget is displayed in a relatively small frame, and showing all the buttons creates too much visual clutter. A redesign (to use icons, for example) is coming, but I can't give you a date on when that will be ready. In the meantime, the documentation will be updated.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 12 years ago.
Improve this question
i have 5 dynmic artcile in my home page, (random)
How quick google will read my content ,
First tell me Really Google will cron my content or not becoz am changes my content every page refresh ,
So i have this doubt ,
Google Will crawl random content Or Not ?
Thanks
Google will crawl anything. But if your content is random you'll soon get a Google ban/discount. Regularly changing content is good, random content is not.
Also, your content is only a small portion of your search results these days. Getting relevant links (links from websites with domain authority) has much more influence.