(SEO) - What Is The Side Effects Of Copying Main Site Content To Mobile Site? [closed] - seo

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
What do you think about copying our content (text content especially) from our main site (eg: mysite.com) to mobile site (eg: m.mysite.com OR mysite.com/m). What is the SEO side effects of doing this? Does SEO experts recommends this or not?
If you have external articles or reference, hope you guys can share here also. :)
Thank you.

This is Google's official stance on mobile SEO

Google has a separate spider for mobile content. If you copy mainsite to m.yoursite.com, it works best and your domain authority will just get transfered. No dupe content penalty.

Related

SEO for dynamic content site [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 11 years ago.
Improve this question
I am hoping there is a simple solution for this simple question. Let's say I have a site like StackOverflow, where new questions are being created everyday by users. What is the SEO strategy to keep the google crawler informed about this new content? Could it be some kind of "LATEST QUESTIONS" page where the new links would be listed? But then the google crawler would have to parse this periodically to fetch new questions. Is there a best practice / industry standard SEO approach for this problem?
Use a sitemap.xml that links to each article.

Bot resistant website [closed]

Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm building a website with lots of images and want to stop bots from accessing those images. So I'm looking something beyond cookies since bots can handle cookies. My idea is that all authentication should reside purely on the server side. Any ideas?
Someone suggested a website, that makes a user visit a thumbnail page first. Somehow visiting that page triggers a server side variable, which allows the main image to be displayed later. How can that be implemented.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Robots.txt
That will stop some bots from spidering images on your site.
Also look into a .httaccess file
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=.htaccess

What's the best configuration for Robots Meta plugin? [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 11 years ago.
Improve this question
I need to know the best configuration for Robots Meta. That is a wordpress plugin for seo.
index, follow is probably the setting that makes the most sense if you want as many of your pages indexed as possible. Also, you probably want to prevent indexing of administration pages. That said, you will probably have to read the documentation of the plugin in order to choose the settings that suits your web site best.
I found Platinum SEO Pack it's the best plugin for seo for wordpress

For SEO perspective dynamic content good or not [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 12 years ago.
Improve this question
i have 5 dynmic artcile in my home page, (random)
How quick google will read my content ,
First tell me Really Google will cron my content or not becoz am changes my content every page refresh ,
So i have this doubt ,
Google Will crawl random content Or Not ?
Thanks
Google will crawl anything. But if your content is random you'll soon get a Google ban/discount. Regularly changing content is good, random content is not.
Also, your content is only a small portion of your search results these days. Getting relevant links (links from websites with domain authority) has much more influence.

SEO - List of links - Farmlinking? [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 12 years ago.
Improve this question
I'd like to know if listing a set of partner sites/blogs is useful for the pagerank growth.
Does Google see it as an incorrect act? I read somewhere that if people exchange links, google seeks it and marks as a bad technique.
If it doesn't matter, is the content of the linked site relevant?
That's called Link farming and it is a really bad SEO tecnique.
If you link to another page for SEO purposes, keep links relevant and in a way that are interesting to the readers.
An interesting article on Link Farming: The Tell-Tale Signs Of Link Farming