Hey,
I have to map the following entities:
class Document
{
public int DocumentId { get; set; }
public DocumentList ContainingList { get; set; }
}
class DocumentList
{
public int DocumentListId { get; set; }
public DateTime LastUpdateTime { get; set; }
public IList<Doucment> Documents { get; set; }
}
With the constraint that only one DocumentList can own a specific document (altough a collection-table exists here).
Mapping has to rely on the following tables (which cannot be changed, for the sake of simplicity):
TB_DOC
------
DOC_ID (int, PK)
DOC_CONTENT (blob)
TB_DOC_LIST
-----------
DOC_LIST_ID (int, PK)
DOC_LIST_UPDATE_TIME (datetime)
TB_LIST_AND_DOCS
----------------
DOC_LIST_ID
DOC_ID
So the mapping i tohught of would be like this:
enter code here
<class name="DocumentList" table="TB_DOC_LIST">
<id name="DocumentListId">
<column name="DOC_LIST_ID"/>
<generator class="assigned" />
</id>
<property name="LastUpdateTime" column="DOC_LIST_UPDATE_TIME ">
<set name="Documents" table="TB_LIST_AND_DOCS">
<key column="DOC_ID"></key>
<one-to-many class="Document" />
</set>
</class>
and:
<class name="Document" table="TB_DOC">
<id name="DocumentId">
<column name="DOC_ID"/>
<generator class="assigned" />
</id>
[ ??? ] - property to reference the "owner" document list
</class>
Now, following the known patterns, i can't figure out how should the back-link from Document to the DocumentList be mapped, since i have a "weired| one-to-many relation here, broken by a third table.
I also don't want a Document object to reference an IList to solve this with back-referencing many-to-many, since each Document has only one such "owner" DocumentList.
Any elegant idea? what am i mispercepting here?
cant test it right now, but a join could be used to get the reference id.
<class name="Document" table="TB_DOC">
<id name="DocumentId">
<column name="DOC_ID"/>
<generator class="assigned" />
</id>
<join table="TB_LIST_AND_DOCS">
<key column="DOC_ID"/>
<many-to-one class="DocumentList">
<column name="DOC_LIST_ID" />
</many-to-one>
</join>
</class>
Related
First of all, I'm sure there must be a simple solution to this but I just can't find it. (Yes, I have googled it)
If I run this Criteria..
IList<Team> teams = session.CreateCriteria<Team>("t")
.CreateCriteria("t.TeamMembers", "m")
.Add(Expression.Eq("m.Enabled", true))
.List<Team>();
..the generated SQL is similar to:
SELECT t.*, m.* FROM Teams t INNER JOIN TeamMembers m ON t.ID = m.TeamID
Since I only need the columns from table Teams. How do I instruct NHibernate stop fetching the unused columns from TeamMembers?
(My real implementation is quite complex which returns lots of data so this is a simplified example for brevity)
EDIT: " Added: .Add(Expression.Eq("m.Enabled", true))" to the Criteria
Here's a test I made with the same setup:
Classes:
public class Team
{
public virtual int ID { get; private set; }
public virtual Iesi.Collections.Generic.ISet<Member> Members { get; set; }
}
public class Member
{
public virtual int ID { get; private set; }
public virtual bool Enabled { get; set; }
public virtual Team Team { get; set; }
}
Mappings:
<class xmlns="urn:nhibernate-mapping-2.2" name="TestApp.Team, ClassLib" table="`Team`">
<id access="backfield" name="ID" type="System.Int32, mscorlib, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089">
<column name="ID" />
<generator class="identity" />
</id>
<set lazy="true" name="Members">
<key>
<column name="TeamID" />
</key>
<one-to-many class="TestApp.Member, ClassLib" />
</set>
</class>
<class xmlns="urn:nhibernate-mapping-2.2" name="TestApp.Member, ClassLib" table="`Member`">
<id access="backfield" name="ID" type="System.Int32, mscorlib, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089">
<column name="ID" />
<generator class="identity" />
</id>
<property name="Enabled" type="System.Boolean, mscorlib, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089">
<column name="Enabled" />
</property>
<many-to-one class="TestApp.Team, ClassLib" name="Team">
<column name="TeamID" />
</many-to-one>
</class>
Generated SQL:
SELECT this_.ID as ID11_1_, m1_.ID as ID10_0_, m1_.Enabled as Enabled10_0_, m1_.TeamID as TeamID10_0_ FROM "Team" this_ inner join "Member" m1_ on this_.ID=m1_.TeamID WHERE m1_.Enabled = #p0;#p0 = True [Type: Boolean (0)]
Note for clarification: I incidentally named the TeamMembers to Members in my test example.
UPDATED FOR UPDATE QUESTION
It's probably best to make the Members collection lazy in the configuration
<set name="Members" lazy="true">
and then only set otherwise when required like
.SetFetchMode("TeamMembers", FetchMode.Eager)
I've an issue using one-to-one mapping. I've searched internet and found many solutions but none was satisfying. Most of the examples carry overhead of storing parent instance in child class.
I want to use only parent Id in child class having foreign key constraint relationship but dont want to keep any parent instance in child.
When I try to load the records from database it throws exception "No row with the given identifier exists [AssemblyName.]". But, the record exists in Table "B" properly.
Any solutions for this issue?
The class structure:
class A {
public virtual string Id {get;set;}
public virtual B B {get;set;} // properties...... }
class B { public virtual string Id {get;set;} // properties......
public virtual string ParentId { get;set;} // class A Id }
The database structure:
CREATE TABLE [A](
[Id] [nvarchar](45) PRIMARY KEY
) ON [PRIMARY]
CREATE TABLE [B](
[Id] [nvarchar](45) PRIMARY KEY,
[ParentId] [nvarchar](45) NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
The mapping:
<hibernate-mapping xmlns="urn:nhibernate-mapping-2.2">
<class name="A,AssemblyName" table="A" lazy="true">
<id name="Id" column="Id" type="string">
<generator class="assigned"/>
</id>
<one-to-one name="_B" cascade="all" fetch="join" foreign-key="None" constrained="true" class="B"/>
</class>
</hibernate-mapping>
<hibernate-mapping xmlns="urn:nhibernate-mapping-2.2">
<class name="B,AssemblyName" table="B" lazy="true">
<id name="Id" column="Id" type="string"> <generator class="assigned"/> </id>
<property name="_Name" column="Name"/> </class>
</hibernate-mapping>
One-to-one associations are always bidirectional in NHibernate. Mapping of class B is incomplete:
<class name="B,AssemblyName" table="B" lazy="true">
<id name="Id" column="Id" type="string">
<generator class="assigned"/>
</id>
<many-to-one name="A" unique="true" column="A" />
<property name="_Name" column="Name"/>
</class>
This is foreign key association. For more information see this detailed Ayende's blog post or NHibernate documentation.
Read this. A "real" one-to-one needs the same primary key in both tables (and no ParentId column).
I am customizing N2CMS's database structure, and met with an issue. The two classes are listed below.
public class Customer : ContentItem
{
public IList<License> Licenses { get; set; }
}
public class License : ContentItem
{
public Customer Customer { get; set; }
}
The nhibernate mapping are as follows.
<class name="N2.ContentItem,N2" table="n2item">
<cache usage="read-write" />
<id name="ID" column="ID" type="Int32" unsaved-value="0" access="property">
<generator class="native" />
</id>
<discriminator column="Type" type="String" />
</class>
<subclass name="My.Customer,My" extends="N2.ContentItem,N2" discriminator-value="Customer">
<join table="Customer">
<key column="ItemID" />
<bag name="Licenses" generic="true" inverse="true">
<key column="CustomerID" />
<one-to-many class="My.License,My"/>
</bag>
</join>
</subclass>
<subclass name="My.License,My" extends="N2.ContentItem,N2" discriminator-value="License">
<join table="License" fetch="select">
<key column="ItemID" />
<many-to-one name="Customer" column="CustomerID" class="My.Customer,My" not-null="false" />
</join>
</subclass>
Then, when get an instance of Customer, the customer.Licenses is always empty, but actually there are licenses in the database for the customer. When I check the nhibernate log file, I find that the SQL query is like:
SELECT licenses0_.CustomerID as CustomerID1_,
licenses0_.ID as ID1_,
licenses0_.ID as ID2_0_,
licenses0_1_.CustomerID as CustomerID7_0_,
FROM n2item licenses0_
inner join License licenses0_1_
on licenses0_.ID = licenses0_1_.ItemID
WHERE licenses0_.CustomerID = 12 /* #p0 */
It seems that nhibernate believes that the CustomerID is in the 'n2item' table. I don't know why, but to make it work, I think the SQL should be something like this.
SELECT licenses0_.ID as ID1_,
licenses0_.ID as ID2_0_,
licenses0_1_.CustomerID as CustomerID7_0_,
FROM n2item licenses0_
inner join License licenses0_1_
on licenses0_.ID = licenses0_1_.ItemID
WHERE licenses0_1_.CustomerID = 12 /* #p0 */
Could any one point out what's wrong with my mappings? And how can I get the correct licenses of one customer? Thanks in advance.
I'm not sure whether the SQL is incorrect, because the parent class mapping uses a discriminator so I'd expect all properties to be stored in the same table as the base class (n2item). However I'm not familiar with the "join table" syntax, I generally use joined-subclass so I might be misunderstanding.
Assuming the subclass mapping is correct, could the problem with the licenses be something to do with no Cascade setting being set for that collection?
Using NHibernate I want to filter a collection in a class to contain ONLY a subset of possible objects. Below I am including a sample table data to help explain. I can find no way to do this using NHibernate.
Table:DataObject
DataObjectId(PK) / Name / CurrentVersion
11 "data.txt" 2
12 "info.txt" 3
Table:DataObjectVersion
Id / Comment / VersionNumber / DataObjectId(FK)
31 "Genesis" 1 11 <= Ignore this object
32 "Changed data" 2 11 <= Get this object
34 "Genesis" 1 12 <= Ignore this object
35 "Changed info" 2 12 <= Ignore this object
36 "Added info" 3 12 <= Get this object
I want to join on a non-foreign key DataObject.CurrentVersion = DataObjectVersion.VersionNumber for each DataObject in one command.
Here are the classes and mapping files:
public class DataObject
{
public virtual int DataObjectId { get; set; }
public virtual string Name { get; set; }
public virtual int CurrentVersionNumber { get; set; }
public virtual IList<DataObjectVersion> Versions { get; set; }
}
<class name="DataObject" table="DataObject" lazy="false">
<id name="DataObjectId" column="DataObjectId" type="int">
<generator class="assigned" />
</id>
<property name="Name" column="Name" type="String(512)" />
<property name="CurrentVersionNumber" column="CurrentVersionNumber" type="int" />
<bag name="Versions" cascade="all-delete-orphan" inverse="true" lazy="false" >
<key column="DataObjectId" />
<one-to-many class="DataObjectVersion" />
</bag>
</class>
public class DataObjectVersion
{
public virtual int DataObjectVersionId { get; set; }
public virtual string Comment { get; set; }
public virtual int VersionNumber { get; set; }
public virtual int DataObjectId { get; set; }
}
<class name="DataObjectVersion" table="DataObjectVersion" lazy="false">
<id name="Id" column="DataObjectVersionId" type="int">
<generator class="assigned" />
</id>
<property name="Comment" column="Comment" type="String(512)" />
<property name="VersionNumber" column="VersionNumber" type="int" />
<property name="DataObjectId" column="DataObjectId" type="int" />
</class>
if you want to filter the collection on demand, using a filter is a valid choice.
You would need to declare the filter on both the Version class and in the bag element and apply the filter from the NHibernateSession.EnableFilter method
if you always want to fetch a single Version in the bag then implement a 'where' in the mapping of the bag:
<bag name="Versions" cascade="all-delete-orphan" inverse="true" lazy="false" where="CurrentVersionNumber = Versions.VersionNumber" >
<key column="DataObjectId" />
<one-to-many class="DataObjectVersion" />
</bag>
note that in the 'where' you write proper SQL not HQL and as such the proper SQL i write above probably has to be changed to reflect your schema
Additionally if a single object is to be fetched setting up a bag and the according IList may be an overkill.
Applying a formula property and a DataObjectVersion object in the class may be more appropriate
in the class DataObject replace the IList with
public virtual DataObjectVersion Version { get; set; }
and in the mapping replace the 'bag' with something in the lines of
<property name="Version" type="DataObjectVersion" update="false" insert="false" formula="(select v.DataObjectVersionId, v.Comments, v.VersionNumber, v.DataObjectId from DataObjectVersion v where v.VersionNumber = CurrentVersionNumber)" />
again only proper SQL is allowed
i've used computed properties with native datatypes (datetime, string etc) and fetching an Entity may (or may not) need something more or different
Last but not least, you could apply a filter on the collection after you have fetched the primary object DataObject by creating a filter on the collection
IList<DataObjectVersion> fVersion =
NHibernateSession.CreateFilter(do.Versions, "where VersionNumber = :ver")
.SetParameter("ver", do.CurrentVersionNumber)
.List<DataObjectVersion>();
where the do.Versions collection is not initialized, only the results fetched in the separate fVersion collection and this is a second SELECT after already having made the round-trip to the db for the DataObject fetch.
Presumably your VersionNumber increments as the user changes the data and you're trying to get the latest one. If you consider the VersionNumber as an "Age" field instead (i.e. where 0 is the latest / youngest version, 1 is the next oldest and so on) then your problems becomes how to get all the entities with an Age of 0. This can be done using a filter: http://nhibernate.info/doc/nh/en/index.html#objectstate-filters
I have a class with following description:
public class Customer {
public ISet<Client> Contacts { get; protected set;}
}
I want to map Contacts property onto following table:
CREATE TABLE user_contacts (
user1 uuid NOT NULL,
user2 uuid NOT NULL
)
I want it to map bidirectionally, i.e. when Customer1 added to Customer2's Contacts, Customer1's Contacts collection should contain Customer2 (maybe only after entity reload). How could I do that?
Update Sure I can map left-to-right and right-to-left sets and then combine then at runtime, but it'll... hmm... untasty... Is there other solution? Any way, thank you very match, FryHard!
Take a look at this link on what hibernate calls unidirectional many-to-many associations. In Castle ActiveRecord I make use of HasAndBelongsToMany links, but I am not sure how exactly it is mapped in nhibernate.
Though taking a look at your question a little deeper, it looks like you will be linking bidirectionally from customer to user_contacts, which could break the many-many link. I will play with an example and see what I can come up with.
An Export of the hbm files from ActiveRecord shows this
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?>
<hibernate-mapping auto-import="true" default-lazy="false" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="urn:nhibernate-mapping-2.2">
<class name="NHibernateMapping.Customer, NHibernateMapping" table="Customer" schema="dbo">
<id name="Id" access="property" column="Id" type="Int32" unsaved-value="0">
<generator class="identity">
</generator>
</id>
<property name="LastName" access="property" type="String">
<column name="LastName" not-null="true"/>
</property>
<bag name="ChildContacts" access="property" table="user_contacts" lazy="false">
<key column="user1" />
<many-to-many class="NHibernateMapping.Customer, NHibernateMapping" column="user2"/>
</bag>
<bag name="ParentContacts" access="property" table="user_contacts" lazy="false" inverse="true">
<key column="user2" />
<many-to-many class="NHibernateMapping.Customer, NHibernateMapping" column="user1"/>
</bag>
</class>
</hibernate-mapping>
ActiveRecord example:
[ActiveRecord("Customer", Schema = "dbo")]
public class Customer
{
[PrimaryKey(PrimaryKeyType.Identity, "Id", ColumnType = "Int32")]
public virtual int Id { get; set; }
[Property("LastName", ColumnType = "String", NotNull = true)]
public virtual string LastName { get; set; }
[HasAndBelongsToMany(typeof(Customer), Table = "user_contacts", ColumnKey = "user1", ColumnRef = "user2")]
public IList<Customer> ChildContacts { get; set; }
[HasAndBelongsToMany(typeof(Customer), Table = "user_contacts", ColumnKey = "user2", ColumnRef = "user1", Inverse = true)]
public IList<Customer> ParentContacts { get; set; }
}
Hope it helps!