I am finding the doc for CFStreamCreatePairWithSocketToCFHost confusing:
Specifically, its not clear to me how the function can set the readStream pointer to null on error.
as far as I understand, the pointer is passed by value - so the function can only change the objected pointed to by the pointer.
Right now I can't figure out how to detect connection errors.
Relevant doc snippet:
Creates readable and writable streams connected to a given CFHost object.
void CFStreamCreatePairWithSocketToCFHost (
CFAllocatorRef alloc,
CFHostRef host,
SInt32 port,
CFReadStreamRef *readStream,
CFWriteStreamRef *writeStream
);
readStream
Upon return, contains a CFReadStream object connected to the host host on port port, or NULL if there is a failure during creation. If you pass NULL, the function will not create a readable stream. Ownership follows the Create Rule.
This is my connecting code, it goes all the way to NSLog(#"Connected") even when the server is down.
NSLog(#"Attempting to (re)connect to %#:%d", m_host, m_port);
while(TRUE)
{
CFHostRef host = CFHostCreateWithName(kCFAllocatorDefault, (CFStringRef)m_host);
if (!host)
{
NSLog(#"Error resolving host %#", m_host);
[NSThread sleepForTimeInterval:5.0];
continue;
}
CFStreamCreatePairWithSocketToCFHost(kCFAllocatorDefault, host , m_port, &m_in, &m_out);
CFRelease(host);
if (!m_in)
{
NSLog(#"Error");
}
CFStreamClientContext context = {0, self,nil,nil,nil};
if (CFReadStreamSetClient(m_in, kCFStreamEventHasBytesAvailable | kCFStreamEventErrorOccurred | kCFStreamEventEndEncountered, networkReadEvent, &context))
{
CFReadStreamScheduleWithRunLoop(m_in, CFRunLoopGetCurrent(),kCFRunLoopCommonModes);
}
if (CFWriteStreamSetClient(m_out, kCFStreamEventErrorOccurred | kCFStreamEventEndEncountered, networkWriteEvent, &context))
{
CFWriteStreamScheduleWithRunLoop(m_out, CFRunLoopGetCurrent(),kCFRunLoopCommonModes);
}
BOOL success = CFReadStreamOpen(m_in);
CFErrorRef error = CFReadStreamCopyError(m_in);
if (!success || (error && CFErrorGetCode(error) != 0))
{
NSLog(#"Connect error %s : %d", CFErrorGetDomain(error), CFErrorGetCode(error));
[NSThread sleepForTimeInterval:5.0];
}
else
{
NSLog(#"Connected");
break;
}
}
From the "CFNetwork Programming Guide":
Opening a stream can be a lengthy process, so the CFReadStreamOpen and CFWriteStreamOpen functions avoid blocking by returning TRUE to
indicate that the process of opening the stream has begun. To check
the status of the open, call the functions CFReadStreamGetStatus and
CFWriteStreamGetStatus, which returnkCFStreamStatusOpening if the open
is still in progress, kCFStreamStatusOpen if the open is complete,
orkCFStreamStatusErrorOccurred if the open has completed but failed.
In most cases, it doesn’t matter whether the open is complete because
the CFStream functions that read and write will block until the stream
is open.
Also check out the kCFStreamEventOpenCompleted,
(http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/CoreFoundation/Reference/CFStreamConstants/Reference/reference.html)
: a stream event that reports the successful completion of the opening
process. So to conclude, after calling CFReadStreamOpen (or Write),
which will probably succeed, register to listen to the "OpenCompleted"
event to identify a "real" success.
Surely after you call CFStreamCreatePairWithSocketToCFHost() just test readstream to see if it's NULL?
As you're passing in the memory location of the readstream pointer, the function can easily set that to whatever value it chooses (either a reference to a created object, or alternatively NULL).
Edit
I've tried your code, and I agree, it's very confusing. It appears that the CFReadStreamRef is readily created and opened, even for a nonsense host (I literally used "nonsense"). I don't believe this function will return NULL pointers for an unreachable host.
I suppose this makes sense, in as far as until one tries to open the stream, whether it will work or not is unknown.
So, the readStream param is a pointer to the CFReadStreamRef and, as such, can definitely be set to NULL by the function. &foo means "address of foo" and if you have the address you can set the value.
My reading of the documentation for CFStreamCreatePairWithSocketToCFHost is that they will be set to NULL on failure, but that failure is not about connection failure, but other kinds of failure (memory, etc). So not likely you'll get an error there.
Looks to me like the issue is that CFReadStreamOpen can return immediately with true when it can open the stream in the background and so this code is not really opening the stream or testing that it's been opened, merely queuing it for opening). From the documentation for CFReadStreamOpen:
" If the stream can open in the background without blocking, this function always returns true."
So I think you will need to follow the rest of the instructions for CFReadStreamOpen and schedule the stream on a run loop, or perhaps poll (though obviously polling in a tight loop isn't likely to work).
In the documentation for CFReadStreamOpen we see:
Opening a stream causes it to reserve all the system resources it requires. If the stream can open in the background without blocking, this function always returns true.
I suspect that the stream is opening in the background, and thus you are saying "Connected" before it actually opens. You've already scheduled the stream with a runloop, so if you let the run loop run, you'll probably get a callback with the event type set to kCFStreamEventErrorOccurred, and from there you can process the error appropriately.
Related
I'm currently working on creating tests for specific use cases one of which is Init WF200 -> connect to AP -> send TCP data -> Deinit WF200. The application is very energy critical so I have to ensure that the WF200 is enabled as short as possible.
The hardware I use is a EFM32GG11 MCU together with a WF200 WIFI transceiver, both from SiliconLabs. I'm using an RTOS and the lwip stack with the netconn API for TCP communication.
The problem is that I can't find a way to know if the TCP transaction was completed, which I need to know before putting the WF200 into shutdown. Currently the task is faster then the actual transmission which leads to data loss and incomplete TCP communication.
Currently I have a working work around which is adding a delay. But that doesn't seem like an elegant solution to me, especially because the delay is dependent on the amount of data being sent.
I have already tried checking the tcp pcb state but with no success. Is there some way I can block the thread until the transaction is completed?
Thanks in advance!
static void tcp_thread(void *p_arg) {
struct netconn *conn;
err_t err;
LWIP_UNUSED_ARG(p_arg);
// needed, otherwise netconn_connect fails
KAL_Dly(1);
conn = netconn_new(NETCONN_TCP);
if (conn != NULL) {
struct ip4_addr broker_ip;
IP_ADDR4(&broker_ip, SERVER_IP_0, SERVER_IP_1, SERVER_IP_2, SERVER_IP_3);
err = netconn_connect(conn, &broker_ip, 65432);
if (err == ERR_OK) {
// NOCOPY only safe when data is static and const
err = netconn_write(conn, test_data, strlen(test_data), NETCONN_NOCOPY);
printf("Data sent\n");
netconn_close(conn);
netconn_delete(conn);
} else {
printf("No TCP connection\n");
}
} else {
printf("No netconn\n");
}
KAL_Dly(200);
sl_wfx_deinit();
OSTaskDel(0, &err);
}
netconn will execute a call back, you can add while(1){osDelay(2);} to your code and wait for that callback to finish. Maybe post a flag in the callback you can check for. For example you can use that data RX callback (or error callback, etc), inspect for an ack, then write to a var you can check in your code's while loop.
I'm writing code that sends an UDP packet using CoreFoundation. Here is the code
CFSocketRef socket = CFSocketCreate(kCFAllocatorDefault, PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_UDP, 0u, NULL, NULL);
// ... (handle error if socket is NULL)
struct sockaddr_in sockaddr;
// ... (set fields of sockaddr)
NSData *addressData = [NSData dataWithBytes: &sockaddr length: sockaddr.sin_len];
if (CFSocketSendData(self.socket, (__bridge CFDataRef) addressData, (__bridge CFDataRef) data, 0) != kCFSocketSuccess) {
// ... (handle error)
}
However, I am not sure, how to complete this flow, i.e. I have the following questions:
Should I close / release the socket somehow if I am not going to send more data? If so, is CFSocketInvalidate the appropriate function?
The documentation to CFSocketSendData says: "If this function returns kCFSocketSuccess, then by the time it returns, the data has been queued in the socket buffer for delivery." Can I invalidate the socket right after calling CFSocketSendData or should I wait until the data are send?
If there is a need to wait, how can I find out that the data are already sent? Can I find out if there were any errors? (Of course, I have no guarantee that receiver gets the data with UDP. However, can I detect some errors which occur on my side during sending?)
Thanks.
Should I close / release the socket somehow if I am not going to send more data? If so, is CFSocketInvalidate the appropriate function?
Yes. Call CFSocketInvalidate followed by CFRelease.
Can I invalidate the socket right after calling CFSocketSendData or should I wait until the data are send?
In the source code, CFSocketSendData calls sendto with the SO_SNDTIMEO option set.
There's no need to wait. If CFSocketSendData returns kCFSocketSuccess, you're done.
Note that this situation can be more complicated for a TCP connection.
However, can I detect some errors which occur on my side during sending?
You can. Using errno. The possible errors for sendto are listed here.
I am reading data from a NSFileHandle (from a NSPipe) using a readabilityHandler block:
fileHandle.readabilityHandler = ^( NSFileHandle *handle ) {
[self processData: [handle availableData]];
}
This works fine, I get all the data I expect fed to my processData method. The problem is that I need to know when the last chunk of data was read. availableData should return an empty NSData instance if it reached end-of-file, but the problem is that the reachability handler is not called again on EOF.
I can’t find anything about how to get some kind of notification or callback on EOF. So what am I missing? Is Apple really providing an asynchronous reading API without an EOF callback?
By the way, I cannot use the runloop based readInBackgroundAndNotify method since I don’t have a runloop available. If I cannot get this to work with the NSFileHandle API I probably will directly use a dispatch source to do the IO.
I personally compare current file offset with current file position and stop reading.
extension FileHandle {
func stopReadingIfPassedEOF() {
let pos = offsetInFile
let len = seekToEndOfFile()
if pos < len {
// Resume reading.
seek(toFileOffset: pos)
}
else {
// Stop.
// File offset pointer stays at the EOF.
readabilityHandler = nil
}
}
}
I couldn't understand why it's been designed in this way for a long time, but now I think this could be intentional.
In my opinion, Apple basically defines FileHandle as an infinite stream, therefore, EOF is not well defined unless you close the file. FileHandle seem to be more like a "channel".
It's also unclear what happens if another process appends/delete some data to/from the file while you're reading from it. What would be the EOF in this case? As far as I find, there's no mention about this case in Apple documentation. As far as I know, there's no true exclusive file I/O lock in macOS like other Unix-like systems.
In my opinion, availableData can return empty data at any time if I/O is not fast enough, and readabilityHandler just don't care about EOF.
I believe the accepted answer is actually incorrect. The readabilityHandler is indeed called when EOF is reached. That is signaled by having availableData be of 0 size.
Here’s a simple playground that attests to this.
import Foundation
import PlaygroundSupport
let pipe = Pipe()
pipe.fileHandleForReading.readabilityHandler = { fh in
let d = fh.availableData
print("Data length: \(d.count)")
if (d.count == 0) {
fh.readabilityHandler = nil
}
}
pipe.fileHandleForWriting.write("Hello".data(using: .utf8)!)
pipe.fileHandleForWriting.closeFile()
PlaygroundPage.current.needsIndefiniteExecution = true
I'm afraid you're out of luck doing this with NSFileHandle if you can't use readInBackgroundAndNotify.
Two solutions I see:
Create a runloop and then use readInBackgroundAndNotify.
Roll your own implementation using dispatch_io_*
Before you decide its a tl:dr (too long, didnt read) post try to read at least some, since Its a question broken down in a lot of small pieces. Some of which you can probably answer and help me.
Please try to help me as much as you can. These types of problems are very common on the internet and I think you will help me and much more people after me.
I am currently researching HTTP services and the protocol itself so that I can discover if it is useful to me.
I have some basic questions as well as some code that needs to be discussed.
First I would like to know how does the communication start? I have discovered that the client sends a message in which it requests a resource (is this correct?). Then what happens? I (as a server) have to reply with what?
Do I need to append a carriage return and a line feed after every response? Somewhere it says there even need to be two (\r\n\r\n).
How can an asynchronous writing be established? (I hope this question is understandable) My primary goal is to achieve a connection between a client and a server and then a continuous data stream from server to the client. Does the client need to reply for every message it gets?
I hope I made my questions clear, since I'm not an expert in these things (yet, I am very interested in it).
And for the programming part of my problem.
I have managed to put together a simple program in Qt in C++ (server side) and a simple client in Objective C (iOS). The client connects and I can read the request header. It is like this:
Data available, incoming: "GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:9990
Connection: close
User-Agent: CFStream%20test/1.0 CFNetwork/609 Darwin/12.2.0
Should I reply to this header manually? And if so, what?
The client side code looks like this (i know its not pseudo but i think its pretty self-explanatory):
- (void)setupStream
{
NSURL *url = [NSURL URLWithString:#"http://localhost:9990"];
CFHTTPMessageRef message = CFHTTPMessageCreateRequest(NULL, (CFStringRef)#"GET", (CFURLRef)url, kCFHTTPVersion1_1);
stream = CFReadStreamCreateForHTTPRequest(NULL, message);
CFRelease(message);
if (!CFReadStreamSetProperty(stream, kCFStreamPropertyHTTPShouldAutoredirect, kCFBooleanTrue))
{
NSLog(#"Some error.");
}
CFDictionaryRef proxySettings = CFNetworkCopySystemProxySettings();
CFReadStreamSetProperty(stream, kCFStreamPropertyHTTPProxy, proxySettings);
CFRelease(proxySettings);
if (!CFReadStreamOpen(stream))
{
CFRelease(stream);
NSLog(#"Error opening stream.");
}
CFStreamClientContext context = {0, self, NULL, NULL, NULL};
CFReadStreamSetClient(stream, kCFStreamEventHasBytesAvailable | kCFStreamEventErrorOccurred, readStreamCallback, &context);
CFReadStreamScheduleWithRunLoop(stream, CFRunLoopGetCurrent(), kCFRunLoopCommonModes);
NSLog(#"Done");
}
This is the setup stream method. The stream variable is a class variable of type CFReadStreamRef.
The callback looks like this:
static void readStreamCallback(CFReadStreamRef aStream, CFStreamEventType event, void *client)
{
ViewController *controller = (ViewController*)client;
[controller handleEvent:event forStream:aStream];
}
And the handle event like this:
- (void)handleEvent:(CFStreamEventType)event forStream:(CFReadStreamRef)aStream
{
if (aStream != stream)
{
return;
}
NSLog(#"Handle event callback");
switch (event)
{
case kCFStreamEventHasBytesAvailable:
NSLog(#"Work log");
UInt8 bytes[11];
CFIndex length;
length = CFReadStreamRead(stream, bytes, 11); //I know 11 bytes is hard coded, its in testing stage now. Feel free to suggest me how to do it better.
if (length == -1)
{
NSLog(#"Error, data length = -1");
return;
}
NSLog(#"Len: %li, data: %s", length, bytes);
break;
default:
NSLog(#"Other event");
break;
}
}
And thats practically all the client code that is worth mentioning. The Qt Server part (I will only post the important parts) is done like this: (this is a subclassed QTcpServer class). First the startServer(); is called:
bool Server::startServer()
{
if (!this->listen(QHostAddress::Any, 9990))
return false;
return true;
}
When there is a connection incoming the incomingConnection is fired off with the socket descriptor as a parameter:
void Server::incomingConnection(int handle)
{
qDebug("New client connected");
ServerClient *client = new ServerClient(handle, this); //The constructor takes in the socket descriptor needed to set up the socket and the parent (this)
client->setVectorLocation(clients.count()); //This is a int from a Qvector in which i append the clients, its not important for understanding right now.
connect(client, SIGNAL(clientDisconnected(int)), this, SLOT(clientDisconnected(int)), Qt::QueuedConnection); //When the client socket emits a disconnected signal the ServerClient class emits a client disconnected signal which the server uses to delete that client from the vector (thats why I use "setVectorLocation(int)") - not important right now
clients.push_back(client); //And then I append the client to the QVector - not important right now
}
The ClientServer class constructor just creates a new socket and connects the required methods:
ServerClient::ServerClient(int handle, QObject *parent) :
QObject(parent)
{
socket = new QTcpSocket(this); //Socket is a class variable
connect(socket, SIGNAL(disconnected()), this, SLOT(disconnected()));
connect(socket, SIGNAL(readyRead()), this, SLOT(readyRead()));
socket->setSocketDescriptor(handle);
}
Ready read just writes me the data incoming (it wont be much user later i think):
void ServerClient::readyRead()
{
qDebug() << "Data available, incoming: " << socket->readAll();
}
And finally the write data:
void ServerClient::writeData(QByteArray *data)
{
data->append("\r\n\r\n"); //I have read this must be appended to all outgoing data from a HTTP server
socket->write(*data);
socket->flush();
qDebug() << "Written data to client: " << *data;
}
This code however does not always work. Sometimes when I write message like "Message" the client recieves all the data and some things that shouldnt be there (the new line and a wierd symbol - can NSLog cause this?). Sometimes when I send "Hellow" the client only gets "Hel" and some other funky stuff.
What are the problems? What should I pay more attention about? Anything that will help me will be MUCH appreciated. And please dont paste in some links that contain a book with a few hundred pages, Im sure this can be solved just by explaining things to me.
THANKS A LOT!
Jan.
You asked many questions ... and that's a perfectly legitimate thing to do :)
I confess - it was too long, I didn't read :(
BUT ...
1) Yes, the HTTP protocol does expect na "CRLF" ("\r\n"). Many servers and many clients are "forgiving", but strictly speaking - yes, you need them.
REFERENCE: RFC 2616
2) Wanting to understand HTTP "internals" is also perfectly legitimate - I applaud you.
One good way is to read the RFC(s).
Another is to use a "telnet" client: http://blog.tonycode.com/tech-stuff/http-notes/making-http-requests-via-telnet
Yet another is to study requests and responses in FF Firebug
3) Socket programming is another issue - which explains why sometimes you might read "hello world", and other times you might just get "hel".
Strong recommendation: Beej's Guide to Network Programming
4) Finally, no way would I actually write a server in Qt with C++ (except maybe as a toy "science experiment", or for some really off-the-wall requirement)
I would definitely write server code in C# (for Windows servers), Java (for everything else) or a scripting language I felt comfortable with (Perl, Ruby/RoR, Python and Lua all come to mind).
IMHO .. and hope that helps!
Your questions pretty much amount to "how does HTTP work", and the full answer lies in the specification.
I would like to use NSConnection/NSDistributedObject for interprocess communication. I would like the client to be able to handle the case where the server is only occasionally reachable.
How can I determine if sending a message to the NSConnection will fail or has failed? Currently if my server (the process that has vended the remote object) dies, the client will crash if it sends a selector to the remote object.
Ideally I'd like to have a wrapper for the remote object that can lazily instantiate (or reinstantiate) the connection, and return a default value in the case where the connection could not be instantiated, or the connection has failed. I don't really know the correct way to do this using objective c.
Here's some pseudocode representing this logic:
if myConnection is null:
instantiate myConnection
if MyConnection is null:
return defaultValue
try
return [myConnection someMethod]
catch
myConnection = null
return defaultValue
Unfortunately the only way to detect a connection failure is to use an exception handler, as there is no reliable way to "ask" a remote object if the connection is still valid. Thankfully, this is simple:
//get the distributed object
id <YourDOProtocol> remoteObject = (id <YourDOProtocol>)[NSConnection rootProxyForConnectionWithRegisteredName:#"YourRegisteredName" host:yourHost];
//call a method on the distributed object
#try
{
NSString* response = [remoteObject responseMethod];
//do something with response
}
#catch(NSException* e)
{
//the receiver is invalid, which occurs if the connection cannot be made
//handle error here
}
If your server is quiting gracefully then, I'm of the understanding, that it'll post an NSConnectionDidDieNotification as it's connection closes so you could register your client like this:
[[NSNotificationCenter defaultCenter] addObserver:self selector:#selector(connectionDidDie:) name:NSConnectionDidDieNotification object:remoteObject];
Perhaps your connectionDidDie:method could set a Boolean var that you can check prior to attempting sending the message.
Your DO could post a notification to say that it's started (although I think there are also system messages for that but I've only just started learning about DO's) and you could similarly register to be notified of it's startup.
I guess Rob's answer is a definite 'catch-all' and you wouldn't need to worry about the notification centre having not got through to the server in time.
I've been using the 'did die' notification it in my first DO app and I hope it helps you.
Todd.