We have planned to start an e commerce project using Stripes + Hibernate.
Please let me know if it is good to have admin & user part in same project or two separate ones.
If it is a single project , how do i separate admin side code & user code.
for eg: if i have admin actions in com.ecommerce.adminactions pacakge and user actions in com.ecommerce.useractions package should i use dynamicmappingfilter to direct admin request to com.ecommerce.adminactions and user request to com.ecommerce.useractions ?
-http://myecommerce.com/admin/* - > should always go to com.ecommerce.adminactions
-http://myecommerce.com/ -> should go to com.ecommerce.useractions
or
Should i use #urlbinding(/admin/st.action) in each class (Hard code).
The requirement is they need multistore concept.
Please let me know your thoughts on this.Your thoughts & suggestions will be helpful
Thanks
The Stripes framework does not really influence decisions on how you should organize you're project, or how you should organize your IDE project structure, or even Java package structure or URL structure.
One or more project
Unless you have many developers, keep it all in a single project.
Package structure
A package structure should organize you're Java classes so that you put classes that are logically related (as defined by your architecture!) is in the same package. For example: com.ecommerce.action.admin and com.ecommerce.action.. See also: Properly package your Java classes
URL structure
Typically you want you're URL structure to reflect the logical structure of your website (not the same as your technical structure). To accomplish this, you should not rely on the default URL's but use #UrlBinding. With the annotation you do not hard code links, as all generated links will automatically use the UrlBinding pattern.
Multi store concept
For a multi store concept, you will need to build logic in your application for distinguishing between the different shops. For example by adding a shop id to your URL parameters. Or more sophisticated by detecting the (sub)domain name used and map that to a shop id (You can implement this by using an interceptor).
Related
I am trying to create some dynamic forms using Piranha CMS. As far as I managed to learn it is not supported right now, so I'm looking for work arounds or alternatives.
What I want to do now is use the editor from the manager for other users. To be more precise: this is how the editor looks like inside my manager when I want to edit a page
I have a text input and a select, both are Fields and there are many more fields to be used.
I want the sys admin to create a page with a list of inputs like this, which right now are usable only by the admin. BUT make this list of inputs available for edit to other users as well. Is it possible?
I'm not sure how to extract this editor or behavior or even if it is possible. The problem is we really need the admin to be able to configure different form inputs for users as it is the main core of our functionality.
Any help/advice is highly appreciated, thank you!
The components in the management UI is not designed to be reused in the front-end application in any way. The edit models in the manager contains a lot of extra meta data since the UI is completely generic. If you want to build an edit UI in your front end application, and you're using MVC or Razor Pages, the simplest way is to.
Get the generic model instead of your strongly typed model, for example api.Pages.GetById(...) instead of api.Pages.GetById<T>(...).
Loop the available fields in your selected region (a region is an ExpandObject which can be casted to an IDictionary<string, object>).
Use the built in support in Razor by calling #Html.EditorFor(...) for the fields.
Using this approach you can easily create your own EditorTemplates for the different types of fields you use that will match the rendering in your client application.
Best regards
Håkan
Currently I'm working on a webapp that has a structure roughly like this:
model
user
robot
service
user
robot
web
controller
user
robot
I'm noticing a lot of redundancy in this structure. Is there any way that I could create a project structure that is less redundant?
The main idea behind folders in a project is to encourage separation of concerns. Each folder should group code into separate functionalities.
Your folder structure seems fine, but I would suggest changing the name of the files so that you know exactly what you're dealing with.
Perhaps more like:
model
user
robot
service
userService
robotService
web
userController
robotController
This way you know immediately that:
model files show structure of entities but no functions or logic
services deal with business logic only
controllers deal with API interfaces
I'm working on a project that is basically a file upload "wizard" that basically does the following:
Entry form to select document library and enter some basic info.
Enter additional library-specific information.
Tie in some calendar events.
My goals are:
- Create this as a sandbox solution using Visual Studio
- Avoid hacks and reinventing existing functionality as much as possible.
Some SP features I have run across that might be useful:
- Content organizer feature.
- Association forms.
- Declarative workflows.
Possible approaches I've considered:
A content organizer library that kicks off a workflow on submission. Not sure what the user experience for this would be like. Really hoping to keep to a single link -> Next -> Next -> Done kind of approach.
A declarative workflow with custom actions containing all the complexity.
An association form in front of the built-in document upload form for each library with a follow-on association form for calendar events.
Is this feasible and if so which approach is simplest?
I think I've come to my own conclusions on this. I've decided to go with a Drop Off library as part of the Content Organizer built-in feature (#1 above). This appears to be the simplest approach so far since I can do the majority through configuration in the Entity.xml files of the features. Many of the other methods I tried seems like they would require functionality not available in a Sandbox solution.
In order to achieve this, I defined site columns and added them to custom Document Type, then added this Document Type to all libraries. Using the Drop Off library, I can define rules to move the file based on one of the fields in the custom Document Type. I'm hoping to do any follow-up steps as a workflow that kicks off on the Drop Off library when a file is uploaded or as an Associated Form.
The client I'm working for has a CMS written in Yii. Currently a part of their business is customizing the CMS to meet the specific needs of each customer. About 90% of the code is reused, essentially by copying and pasting from one directory to another. While I've been working on this project, I've had to merge changes in to the shared codebase several times.
All, or most, of these sites are hosted on the same server, and it would seem that it would make more sense to have a single login, that changed what features we showed based on the login. In some case that means overriding whole or partial views (eg, the _form.php might change from customer to customer) including the controller and model. Most of the time, it means adding a new controller for a bit of functionality written just for that client.
I've read about having both a front and backend site here: http://www.yiiframework.com/wiki/63/organize-directories-for-applications-with-front-end-and-back-end-using-webapplicationend-behavior but that doesn't seem to be the right fit (I don't want everyone coming to a different start php file, for instance)
Ideally, I'd have users log in, and get assigned a site id, which will filter data in the shared MVC objects, and will add in the ones specifically for them, or override the ones where necessary
Intuitively it seems like something like this would make sense:
Shared controllers go here:
/protected/controllers
Overrides and additions for client1 go here:
/protected/controllers/client1
or:
/protected/client1/controllers
But I'm not sure how to get Yii to do this in the most efficient and easy to manage way. Is this something that's going to work with Yii, or am I breaking it in ways unintended? If it will work, what's the best way to accomplish it so that it's clear to me six months from now, or some random developer who replaces me?
Do you know RBAM ?
With Role Based access you can profile your application in more-or-less granular way
I need to create a workflow that would break permission inheritance in a sharepoint subsite.
I am building a sharepoint 2010 site that is highly modular and can expand based on clients needs. The project requirement is that the client must be able to expand the website and add subsites from templates with as little interaction as possible. To this end I have created a list and attached a workflow to this list that creates a new website based on the information supplied in the list fields. The workflow I am using is a solution I found online http://www.ilovesharepoint.com/2011/02/create-site-action-sharepoint-designer.html
After the website is created I need to create security groups (another workflow I found online helps with this).
The problem is that the subsite must inherit security groups from the parent site and then I need to add new ones. In order to do this I need to break inheritance from the parent site and than I can create new groups. Currently my client has to do this manually - very bad thing. So I need create a workflow that would do just that.
The problem is that I am completely clueless as to how to go about doing this.
Ideally, I would like to create some sort of workflow action that would take a site url as input and then break permission. From what I've been able to find I need to use BreakRoleInheritance function to do that. but how do I create a workflow that takes input and how do i convert the string input into an actual site?
Like I said, I don't know anything about coding for sharepoint so please be as specific as possible.
Thank you very much.
P.S. maybe I am mistaken and i don't need to break inheritance to create additional security groups that would work only for a given subsite. If so, please tell me how to do this without breaking inheritance.