I have written quite a few AREL statements, but I'm tying myself in knots over this one. Here is my situation:
class Product < AR::Base
has_many :parents, :class_name => "ProductLink", :foreign_key => :to_product_id
has_many :children, :class_name => "ProductLink", :foreign_key => :from_product_id
# has an attribute called "identifier"
end
class ProductLink < AR::Base
belongs_to :parent, :class_name => "Product", :foreign_key => :from_product_id
belongs_to :child, :class_name => "Product", :foreign_key => :to_product_id
end
I want to retrieve all of the Products that have a child product with an identifier that matches some value.
I have twisted myself into a pretzel with this, seems easy, but I have been looking at it for too long now. I appreciate any help!
Got it!
brand.products.joins(:children => :child).where(:children => { :child => { :searchable_identifier.matches => "2136" } } )
That works great. See the hashed joins? That's what was throwing me off.
Related
I need to model up to 5 or 6 generations horse pedigrees using rails/activerecord. I did my research here on stack and on the web and ultimately utilized this article as the basis of my approach. Here's what I've come up with.
Two models:
Horse has the following attributes id and horse_name
Pedigree has: id, parent_id and horse_id.
And the following associations:
has_many :parent_horse_relationships, :class_name => "Pedigree", :foreign_key => :horse_id, :dependent => :destroy
has_one :sire_horse_relationship, :class_name => "Pedigree", :foreign_key => :horse_id, :conditions => "horse_gender = 'Male'
has_one :dam_horse_relationship, :class_name => "Pedigree", :foreign_key => :horse_id, :conditions => "horse_gender = 'Female'
has_many :parents, :through => :parent_horse_relationships, :source => :parent
has_one :sire, :through => :sire_horse_relationship,:source => :parent
has_one :dam, :through => :dam_horse_relationship,:source => :parent
has_many :horse_parent_relationships, :class_name => "Pedigree", :foreign_key => :parent_id, :dependent => :destroy
has_many :progenies, :through => :horse_parent_relationships, :source => :horse
This approach is close, however it appears my condition to determine the dam or sire is being applied to the Horse and not the parent. Therefore if the particular horse is Male, the horse.sire will work, but the horse.dam will not and vice versa. Once I get basic functionality working I'd like to add additional methods to get the whole pedigree, grandparents, siblings, descendants, etc.
Questions:
How can I apply the gender condition to the parents and not the horse so that both sire and dam work.
Is the approach that I have take viable or is there a more elegant, efficient way of accomplishing this.
Any other suggestions or guidance would be appreciated.
Apologies for the long question and thanks for your help.
I might start with:
has_one :sire, :class_name => "Pedigree", :foreign_key => :horse_id, :conditions => "horse_gender = 'Male'
has_one :dam, :class_name => "Pedigree", :foreign_key => :horse_id, :conditions => "horse_gender = 'Female'
has_many :parent_horse_relationships, :class_name => "Pedigree", :foreign_key => :horse_id, :dependent => :destroy
has_many :parents, :through => :parent_horse_relationships, :source => :parent
has_many :progenies, :through => :horse_parent_relationships, :source => :horse
I ended up spending a great deal of time on this one, but finally came up with a solution that met my requirements. The associations that ultimately worked follow:
has_many :parent_horse_relationships, :class_name => "Pedigree", :foreign_key => :horse_id, :dependent => :destroy
has_many :parents, :through => :parent_horse_relationships, :source => :parent do
def dam_relationship
owner = self.proxy_association.owner
owner = owner.parents.where(:horse_gender => "Female")
where('pedigrees.parent_id = ?', owner)
end
def sire_relationship
owner = self.proxy_association.owner
owner = owner.parents.where(:horse_gender => "Male")
where('pedigrees.parent_id = ?', owner)
end
end
def dam
parents.dam_relationship
end
def sire
parents.sire_relationship
end
Question responses:
I applied the gender condition through use of an association_proxy and a simple wrapper. I created a dam_relationship and corresponding sire_relationship and then wrapped those methods in a couple of dam and sire wrapper methods.
def dam_relationship
owner = self.proxy_association.owner
owner = owner.parents.where(:horse_gender => "Female")
where('pedigrees.parent_id = ?', owner)
end
def dam
parents.dam_relationship
end
This allows me to do:
#horse.parents, #horse.dam, #horse.sire (not displayed)
as well as most of the methods included in the ancestry gem mentioned below. With a little bit of recursion it's fairly straight forward to display the entire pedigree or the number of generations that interest you.
I decided that the approach of having two models (Horse and Pedigree) provide som additional flexibility compared to having the sire_id and dam_id directly in the Horse model. This approach will enable me to more easily create methods like #horse.uncle, #horse.aunt. I believe these would be more difficult with the sire_id and dam_id directly in the Horse model.
The most popular gem for accomplishing this seems to be ancestry. The author accomplishes this and a lot more simply by adding an ancestry column to the model of interest. Its a very nice solution a definitely worth checking out.
I have some troubles wrapping my head around the following situation..
I am trying to create a tree structure, where I will be able to give custom names to connections between nodes..
So I want to have Node and Relation models. Each
Node
has_many :relations
Each
Relation
has_many :nodes
Node can be either a parent or a child.. So far everything was easy and there are tons of examples that show how to make a self-referential has_many table... The problem is that I want to be able to give names to relations, so that I can do something like:
relation1 = node1.relations.create(:name => "relation_name", :child => node2)
and in result get something like:
relation1.name == "relation_name"
relation1.parent == node1
relation1.child == node2
All the creations are happening within the model, this activity is not really exposed to user, if that matters.
Thanks!
EDIT2:
Here is how it works now:
class Node < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :sentence
has_one :parent_relation, :foreign_key => "child_id", :class_name => "Relation"
has_many :child_relations, :foreign_key => "parent_id", :class_name => "Relation"
has_one :parent, :through => :parent_relation
has_many :children, :through => :child_relations, :source => :child
has_many :relations, :foreign_key => "child_id"
has_many :relations, :foreign_key => "parent_id"
class Relation < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :videos, :as => :videoable, :dependent => :destroy
has_many :phrases, :through => :videos
belongs_to :parent, :class_name => "Node"#, :inverse_of => :parent_relation
belongs_to :child, :class_name => "Node"#, :inverse_of => :child_relation
So what you're talking about is more like a Joins Model than a Self-Reference.
Note: I changed your relation association 'labels' because I was having a hard time with your naming, so you don't have to change your 'labels' that was just for me.
So for your Node class you could do something like this
class Node < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :parent_relation, :foreign_key => "child_id",
:class_name => "Relation"
has_many :child_relations, :foreign_key => "parent_id",
:class_name => "Relation"
has_one :parent, :through => :parent_relation
has_many :children, :through => :child_relations, :source => :child
end
Then for your Relation class you could something like
class Relation < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :parent, :class_name => "Node", :inverse_of => :parent_relation
belongs_to :child, :class_name => "Node", :inverse_of => :child_relations
end
The :inverse_of option should let you build let you build a Node based off the parent and children associations from your Node instances, this is just a caveat from the magic with :through relationships. (Documentation for this is at the bottom of the Joins Model section.)
I don't fully understand your association structure, but I think this should model it correctly. Lemme know if there are any problems though.
Side Note: Since Relation is a constant set in the ActiveRecord module you might consider changing it to something like NodeRelationship. I don't think it will interfere with your program, but it definitively caused some trouble for my thought process.
I have a many to many relationship between documents.
Say I have document1 and document2. I have a many to many table where there are parents and children.
document.rb
has_many :child_relationships, :class_name => "DocumentRelationship", :foreign_key => "child_id", :dependent => :destroy
has_many :parents, :through => :child_relationships, :source => :parent
has_many :parent_relationships, :class_name => "DocumentRelationship", :foreign_key => "parent_id", :dependent => :destroy
has_many :children, :through => :parent_relationships, :source => :child
document_relationship.rb
belongs_to :parent, :class_name => "Document", :foreign_key => "parent_id"
belongs_to :child, :class_name => "Document", :foreign_key => "child_id"
validates_uniqueness_of :child_id, :scope => [:parent_id]
validates_presence_of :parent_id
validates_presence_of :child_id
validate :obeys_chronology
def obeys_chronology
errors.add(:child_id, "must be created after its parent") if child_id.to_i < parent_id.to_i
errors.add(:child_id, "cannot be its own parent") if child_id.to_i == parent_id.to_i
end
If I say document2.children << document1 it appropriately fails validation, but I don't know how to write a test for this.
Is there a better way to do this?
Add it to the collection
document2.children << document1
document2.children.contain?(document1).should == false
Then make sure it's not in there.
So, got 2 models:
class Match < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :rounds
has_many :participations
has_many :players, :through => :participations
belongs_to :clan_1, :class_name => "Clan", :foreign_key => "clan_1_id"
belongs_to :clan_2, :class_name => "Clan", :foreign_key => "clan_2_id"
belongs_to :winner, :class_name => "Clan", :foreign_key => "winner_id"
belongs_to :league
belongs_to :tournament
validates :clan_1_id, :presence => true
validates :clan_2_id, :presence => true
scope :by_league, lambda { |league| where("league_id == ?",league.id) }
scope :by_tournament, lambda { |tournament| where("tournament_id == ?",tournament.id) }
scope :played, where("played is not NULL")
scope :not_played, where("played is NULL")
end
class Clan < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :players
has_many :rounds_won, :class_name => "Round", :foreign_key => "winner_id"
has_many :rounds_blue, :class_name => "Round", :foreign_key => "clan_blue_id"
has_many :rounds_purple, :class_name => "Round", :foreign_key => "clan_purple_id"
has_many :matches_won, :class_name => "Match", :foreign_key => "winner_id"
has_and_belongs_to_many :leagues
has_and_belongs_to_many :tournaments
def matches
Match.where("clan_1_id = ? OR clan_2_id = ?",self.id, self.id)
end
def matches_lost
matches.where("winner_id != ?", self.id)
end
def matches_drawn
matches.played.where("winner_id is NULL")
end
end
and I want to fetch all clans, which taken part in match.
You're over thinking it. Rails makes it very easy for you to do this.
class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :post
end
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :comments
end
#post.comments
If you have a column in your comment table with "modelName"_id (eg post_id) rails with automatically hook up the foreign key.
All you have to do is call #model1.model2 assuming #model1 is an instance of the model1 object.
If you want to hook up the query yourself you could use the where() method.
#comments = Comment.where(:post_id => some_id)
If you alter your associations a little bit you can utilize includes() in scopes:
class Match < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :clan_1, :class_name => "Clan"
belongs_to :clan_2, :class_name => "Clan"
end
class Clan < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :one_matches, :class_name => 'Match', :foreign_key => :clan_1_id
has_many :two_matches, :class_name => 'Match', :foreign_key => :clan_2_id
end
Then you can add this scope:
class Clan < ActiveRecord::Base
scope :participated_in_match, includes(:one_matches, :two_matches).where("matches.id IS NOT NULL")
end
This isn't tested so please let me know if you get unexpected results.
Quite simply:
model_two_object = Model_2.first # For clarity only, change to suit your needs
model_two_object.models_1
I'm building a small twitter style microblogging service where users can follow other users and get a feed of their messages
I have the following models:
class Follow < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :follower, :class_name => "User"
belongs_to :followee, :class_name => "User"
end
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :follows, :foreign_key => 'follower_id',
:class_name => 'Follow'
has_many :followers, :through => :follows
has_many :followed, :foreign_key => 'followee_id',
:class_name => 'Follow'
has_many :followees, :through => :followed
has_many :messages
end
class Message < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
end
To get a feed for the current user, I want to perform the following SQL query:
SELECT * FROM follows JOIN users JOIN messages WHERE follows.follower_id = current_user.id AND follows.followee_id = users.id AND users.id = messages.user_id;
What is the correct ActiveRecord way of doing this?
Not sure what you're looking for, but here is my suggestion:
I assume that you have other purposes for that Follow class, otherwise I don't see the purpose of it.
The "correct way" (i.e. my completely subjective way) to do it would actually be something like this:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :followers, :foreign_key => 'followed_id',
:class_name => 'User', :association_foreign_key => 'follower_id',
:include => [:messages]
has_and_belongs_to_many :follows, :foreign_key => 'follower_id',
:class_name => 'User', :association_foreign_key => 'followed_id'
has_many :messages
end
class Message < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
end
Then create the following table:
create_table :users_users, :id => false do |t|
t.integer :followed_id
t.integer :follower_id
end
And you're set:
followed = User.find :first
follower = User.find :last
followed.followers << follower
followed.followers.first.messages
followed.followers.first.followers.first.messages # etc...
But from what I make it, you want to show all the messages from all the followers at the same time.
This should be possible to achieve by adding
has_and_belongs_to_many :followed_messages, :foreign_key => 'follower_id',
:class_name => 'Message', :association_foreign_key => 'followed_id'
to the User class, but I don't know how correct that way would be. Or it might be possible to achieve with association extensions but there I can't really give any examples.
Update:
By changing the :class_name, it will associate it with the Message.id, didn't think about that so it will not be correct in this way.
So the only "nice" option is to go through the User class like in the first example.
The only other options I can see is either the association extensions (which I can't give you an example for) or perhaps using a finder statement.
has_many :followed_messages, :class_name => 'Message',
:finder_sql => 'select * from messages where user_id in(select followed_id from users_users where follower_id = #{id})'
You probably have to customize that sql statement to get everything to work, but at least you should get the picture :)
Keijro's arrangement would work better, though if you need the Follow table, then you can execute the SQL query you specified as follows:
Follow.all(:joins => { :messages, :users }, :conditions => { "follows.follower_id" => current_user.id, "follows.followee_id" => "users.id", "users.id" => "messages.user_id"} )