Why am i getting a #1222 - The used SELECT statements have a different number of columns
? i am trying to load wall posts from this users friends and his self.
SELECT u.id AS pid, b2.id AS id, b2.message AS message, b2.date AS date FROM
(
(
SELECT b.id AS id, b.pid AS pid, b.message AS message, b.date AS date FROM
wall_posts AS b
JOIN Friends AS f ON f.id = b.pid
WHERE f.buddy_id = '1' AND f.status = 'b'
ORDER BY date DESC
LIMIT 0, 10
)
UNION
(
SELECT * FROM
wall_posts
WHERE pid = '1'
ORDER BY date DESC
LIMIT 0, 10
)
ORDER BY date DESC
LIMIT 0, 10
) AS b2
JOIN Users AS u
ON b2.pid = u.id
WHERE u.banned='0' AND u.email_activated='1'
ORDER BY date DESC
LIMIT 0, 10
The wall_posts table structure looks like id date privacy pid uid message
The Friends table structure looks like Fid id buddy_id invite_up_date status
pid stands for profile id. I am not really sure whats going on.
The first statement in the UNION returns four columns:
SELECT b.id AS id,
b.pid AS pid,
b.message AS message,
b.date AS date
FROM wall_posts AS b
The second one returns six, because the * expands to include all the columns from WALL_POSTS:
SELECT b.id,
b.date,
b.privacy,
b.pid.
b.uid message
FROM wall_posts AS b
The UNION and UNION ALL operators require that:
The same number of columns exist in all the statements that make up the UNION'd query
The data types have to match at each position/column
Use:
FROM ((SELECT b.id AS id,
b.pid AS pid,
b.message AS message,
b.date AS date
FROM wall_posts AS b
JOIN Friends AS f ON f.id = b.pid
WHERE f.buddy_id = '1' AND f.status = 'b'
ORDER BY date DESC
LIMIT 0, 10)
UNION
(SELECT id,
pid,
message,
date
FROM wall_posts
WHERE pid = '1'
ORDER BY date DESC
LIMIT 0, 10))
You're taking the UNION of a 4-column relation (id, pid, message, and date) with a 6-column relation (* = the 6 columns of wall_posts). SQL doesn't let you do that.
(
SELECT b.id AS id, b.pid AS pid, b.message AS message, b.date AS date FROM
wall_posts AS b
JOIN Friends AS f ON f.id = b.pid
WHERE f.buddy_id = '1' AND f.status = 'b'
ORDER BY date DESC
LIMIT 0, 10
)
UNION
(
SELECT id, pid , message , date
FROM
wall_posts
WHERE pid = '1'
ORDER BY date DESC
LIMIT 0, 10
)
You were selecting 4 in the first query and 6 in the second, so match them up.
Beside from the answer given by #omg-ponies; I just want to add that this error also occur in variable assignment. In my case I used an insert; associated with that insert was a trigger. I mistakenly assign different number of fields to different number of variables. Below is my case details.
INSERT INTO tab1 (event, eventTypeID, fromDate, toDate, remarks)
-> SELECT event, eventTypeID,
-> fromDate, toDate, remarks FROM rrp group by trainingCode;
ERROR 1222 (21000): The used SELECT statements have a different number of columns
So you see I got this error by issuing an insert statement instead of union statement. My case difference were
I issued a bulk insert sql
i.e. insert into tab1 (field, ...) as select field, ... from tab2
tab2 had an on insert trigger; this trigger basically decline duplicates
It turns out that I had an error in the trigger. I fetch record based on new input data and assigned them in incorrect number of variables.
DELIMITER ##
DROP TRIGGER trgInsertTrigger ##
CREATE TRIGGER trgInsertTrigger
BEFORE INSERT ON training
FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
SET #recs = 0;
SET #trgID = 0;
SET #trgDescID = 0;
SET #trgDesc = '';
SET #district = '';
SET #msg = '';
SELECT COUNT(*), t.trainingID, td.trgDescID, td.trgDescName, t.trgDistrictID
INTO #recs, #trgID, #trgDescID, #proj, #trgDesc, #district
from training as t
left join trainingDistrict as tdist on t.trainingID = tdist.trainingID
left join trgDesc as td on t.trgDescID = td.trgDescID
WHERE
t.trgDescID = NEW.trgDescID
AND t.venue = NEW.venue
AND t.fromDate = NEW.fromDate
AND t.toDate = NEW.toDate
AND t.gender = NEW.gender
AND t.totalParticipants = NEW.totalParticipants
AND t.districtIDs = NEW.districtIDs;
IF #recs > 0 THEN
SET #msg = CONCAT('Error: Duplicate Training: previous ID ', CAST(#trgID AS CHAR CHARACTER SET utf8) COLLATE utf8_bin);
SIGNAL SQLSTATE '45000' SET MESSAGE_TEXT = #msg;
END IF;
END ##
DELIMITER ;
As you can see i am fetching 5 fields but assigning them in 6 var. (My fault totally I forgot to delete the variable after editing.
You are using MySQL Union.
UNION is used to combine the result from multiple SELECT statements into a single result set.
The column names from the first SELECT statement are used as the column names for the results returned. Selected columns listed in corresponding positions of each SELECT statement should have the same data type. (For example, the first column selected by the first statement should have the same type as the first column selected by the other statements.)
Reference: MySQL Union
Your first select statement has 4 columns and second statement has 6 as you said wall_post has 6 column.
You should have same number of column and also in same order in both statement.
otherwise it shows error or wrong data.
Related
Morning,
I'm running the following SELECT statement on a DB2 server (IBM Power System) and it returns the latest record from tableB based on a Timestamp (all good).
SELECT * FROM library1/tableA
JOIN library1/tableB on tableB.PRDCOD = tableA.NPROD
WHERE tableB.PRDCOD = '5520' and tableA.SPRTXT01 <> '0/9'
ORDER BY tableB.timstp DESC FETCH NEXT 1 ROWS ONLY
I now need to change this statement to update tableA and set field SPRTXT01 = '0/9', but only if tableB.SRVRSP= 'SUCCESSFUL' i.e. the latest record from tableB has a response of 'SUCCESSFUL'.
But I don't know how to format this statement correctly. Can anyone assist please?
I've tried the below, but this updated ALL rows in the table
UPDATE library1/tableA
SET tableA.SPRTXT01 = '0/9'
Where exists (
Select '1'
FROM library1/tableA
JOIN library1/tableB on
tableB.PRDCOD = tableA.NPROD
WHERE tableB.PRDCOD = '5520' and tableB.SRVRSP = 'SUCCESSFUL'
and tableA.SPRTXT01 <> '0/1'
ORDER BY tableB.timstp DESC FETCH NEXT 1 ROWS ONLY)
and I don't think it's applying the selection correctly i.e. rather than selecting the latest record from table B and then applying the RVSRP = 'SUCCESSFUL' check, it is only selecting the latest record for table B where SRVSRP = 'SUCCESSFUL'.
Thanks
Try this:
CREATE TABLE tableA (NPROD VARCHAR (10), SPRTXT01 VARCHAR (3));
CREATE TABLE tableB (PRDCOD VARCHAR (10), SRVRSP VARCHAR (20), timstp TIMESTAMP);
INSERT INTO tableA (NPROD, SPRTXT01)
VALUES ('5520', ''), ('XXXX', '');
INSERT INTO tableB (PRDCOD, SRVRSP, timstp)
VALUES
('5520', 'SUCCESSFUL', CURRENT TIMESTAMP)
, ('5520', 'UNSUCCESSFUL', CURRENT TIMESTAMP + 1 SECOND)
-- Comment out the next row to make it NOT update the SPRTXT01 column
, ('5520', 'SUCCESSFUL', CURRENT TIMESTAMP + 2 SECOND)
;
UPDATE tableA
SET tableA.SPRTXT01 = '0/9'
Where tableA.NPROD = '5520' AND tableA.SPRTXT01 <> '0/9'
AND exists
(
SELECT 1
FROM tableB
JOIN (SELECT PRDCOD, MAX (timstp) AS timstp FROM tableB GROUP BY PRDCOD) G
ON (G.PRDCOD, G.timstp) = (tableB.PRDCOD, tableB.timstp)
WHERE tableB.PRDCOD = tableA.NPROD
AND tableB.SRVRSP = 'SUCCESSFUL'
);
SELECT * FROM tableA;
NPROD
SPRTXT01
5520
0/9
XXXX
fiddle
I have two tables, headers and lines. I need to grab the batch_submission_date from the header table, but sometimes a query for batch_id will return a null for batch_submission_date, but will also return a parent_batch_id, and if we query THAT parent_batch_id as a batch_id, it will then return the correct batch_submission_date.
e.g.
SELECT t1.batch_id,
t1.parent_batch_id,
t2.batch_submission_date
FROM db.headers t1, db.lines t2
WHERE t1.batch_id = '12345';
output = 12345, 99999, null
Then we use that parent batch_id as a batch_id :
SELECT t1.batch_id,
t1.parent_batch_id,
t2.batch_submission_date
FROM db.headers t1, db.lines t2
WHERE t1.batch_id = '99999';
and we get output = 99999,99999,'2018-01-01'
So I'm trying to write a query that will do this for me - anytime a batch_id's batch_submission_date is null, we find that batch_id's parent batch_id and query that instead.
This was my idea - but I just get back null both for bp_batch_submission_date and for new_submission_date.
SELECT
t1.parent_id as parent_id,
t1.BATCH_ID as bp_batch_id,
t2.BATCH_LINE_NUMBER as bp_batch_li,
t1.BATCH_SUBMISSION_DATE as bp_batch_submission_date,
CASE
WHEN t1.BATCH_SUBMISSION_DATE is null
THEN
(SELECT a.BATCH_SUBMISSION_DATE
FROM
db.headers a,
db.lines b
WHERE
a.SD_BATCH_HEADERS_SKEY = b.SD_BATCH_HEADERS_SKEY
and a.parent_batch_id = bp_batch_id
and b.batch_line_number = bp_batch_li
) END as new_submission_date
FROM
db.headers t1,
db.lines t2
WHERE
t1.SD_BATCH_HEADERS_SKEY = t2.SD_BATCH_HEADERS_SKEY
and (t1.BATCH_ID = '12345' or t1.PARENT_BATCH_ID = '12345')
and t2.BATCH_LINE_NUMBER = '1'
GROUP BY
t2.BATCH_CLAIM_LINE_STATUS_DESC,
t1.PARENT_BATCH_ID,
t1.BATCH_ID,
t2.BATCH_LINE_NUMBER,
t1.BATCH_SUBMISSION_DATE;
is what I'm trying to do possible? using the bp_batch_id and bp_batch_li variables
Use CTE (common table expression) to avoid redundant code, then use coalesce() to find parent date in case of null. In your first queries you didn't attach joining condition between two tables, I assumed it's based on sd_batch_headers_skey like in last query.
dbfiddle demo
with t as (
select h.batch_id, h.parent_batch_id, l.batch_submission_date bs_date
from headers h
join lines l on l.sd_batch_headers_skey = h.sd_batch_headers_skey
and l.batch_line_number = '1' )
select batch_id, parent_batch_id,
coalesce(bs_date, (select bs_date from t x where x.batch_id = t.parent_batch_id)) bs_date
from t
where batch_id = 12345;
You could use simpler syntax with connect by and level <= 2 but if in your data there are really rows containing same ids (99999, 99999) then we get cycle error.
I have the following query
SELECT ProgramDate, [CountVal]= COUNT(ProgramDate)
FROM ProgramsTbl
WHERE (Type = 'Type1' AND ProgramDate = '10/18/11' )
GROUP BY ProgramDate
What happens is that if there is no record that matches the Type and ProgramDate, I do not get any records returned.
What I like to have outputted in the above is something like the following if there is no values returned. Notice how for the CountVal we have 0 even if there are no records returned that fit the match condition:
ProgramDate CountVal
10/18/11 0
This is a little more complicated than you would like however, it is very possible. You will first have to create a temporary table of dates. For example, the query below creates a range of dates from 2011-10-11 to 2011-10-20
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE date_stamps AS
SELECT (date '2011-10-10' + new_number) AS date_stamp
FROM generate_series(1, 10) AS new_number;
Using this temporary table, you can select from it and left join your table ProgramsTbl. For example
SELECT date_stamp,COUNT(ProgramDate)
FROM date_stamps
LEFT JOIN ProgramsTbl ON ProgramsTbl.ProgramDate = date_stamps.date_stamp
WHERE Type = 'Type1'
GROUP BY ProgramDate;
Select ProgramDate, [CountVal]= SUM(occur)
from
(
SELECT ProgramDate, 1 occur
FROM ProgramsTbl
WHERE (Type = 'Type1' AND ProgramDate = '10/18/11' )
UNION
SELECT '10/18/11', 0
)
GROUP BY ProgramDate
Because each SELECT statement is really building a table of records you can use a SELECT query to build a table with both the program count and a default count of zero. This would require two SELECT queries (one to get the actual count, one to get the default count) and using a UNION to combine the two SELECT results into a single table.
From there you can SELECT from the UNIONed table to sum the CountVals (if the programDate occurs in the ProgramTable the CountVal will be
CountVal of the first query if it exists(>0) + CountVal of the second query (=0)).
This way even if there are no records for the desired programDate in ProgramTable you will get a record back indicating a count of 0.
This would look like:
SELECT ProgramDate, SUM(CountVal)
FROM
(SELECT ProgramDate, COUNT(*) AS CountVal
FROM ProgramsTbl
WHERE (Type = 'Type1' AND ProgramDate = '10/18/11' )
UNION
SELECT '10/18/11' AS ProgramDate, 0 AS CountVal) T1
Here's a solution that works on SQL Server; not sure about other db platforms:
DECLARE #Type VARCHAR(5) = 'Type1'
, #ProgramDate DATE = '10/18/2011'
SELECT pt.ProgramDate
, COUNT(pt2.ProgramDate)
FROM ( SELECT #ProgramDate AS ProgramDate
, #Type AS Type
) pt
LEFT JOIN ProgramsTbl pt2 ON pt.Type = pt2.Type
AND pt.ProgramDate = pt2.ProgramDate
GROUP BY pt.ProgramDate
Grunge but simple and efficient
SELECT '10/18/11' as 'Program Date', count(*) as 'count'
FROM ProgramsTbl
WHERE Type = 'Type1' AND ProgramDate = '10/18/11'
Try something along these lines. This will establish a row with a date of 10/18/11 that will definitely return. Then you left join to your actual data to get your desired count (which can now return 0 if there are no corresponding rows).
To do this for more than 1 date, you'd want to build a Date table that holds a list of all dates you want to query (so substitute the "select '10/18/11'" with "select Date from DateTbl").
SELECT ProgDt.ProgDate, [CountVal]= COUNT(ProgramsTbl.ProgramDate)
FROM (SELECT '10/18/11' as 'ProgDate') ProgDt
LEFT JOIN ProgramsTbl
ON ProgDt.ProgDate = ProgramsTbl.ProgramDate
WHERE (Type = 'Type1')
GROUP BY ProgDt.ProgDate
To create a date table that you can use for querying, do this (assumes SQL Server 2005+):
create table Dates (MyDate datetime)
go
insert into Dates
select top 100000 row_number() over (order by s1.name)
from master..spt_values s1, master..spt_values s2
go
I have a product table with 15 fields like ItemID (primary),Name ,UPC,Price,Cost, etc.
Now I need to print labels the user can say
from Item "ABC" I need 15 labels
from item 'XYZ" I need 10 labels
I need a SQL statement which I will send the ItemID and the label Qty for Each record and it should give me back for each label a record for example 15 records for item "ABC" and 10 records for Item "XYZ" and so on
SELECT <fields>
FROM Mytable
Where Item = 'ABC'
GO 10
Will select those fields from that table 10 times in a row in 10 result sets.
Really though it sounds like you need to do what you are trying to do not in SQL, but in your calling application.
I agree this should be done on the client but if you insist, following duplicates each record 100 times and selects the amount you need from it.
;WITH ATable AS (
SELECT Item = 'ABC'
UNION ALL SELECT Item = 'XYZ'
)
, Temp (Item, Amount) AS (
SELECT 'ABC', 15
UNION ALL SELECT 'XYZ', 10
)
, q AS (
SELECT ID = 1
, Item
FROM ATable
UNION ALL
SELECT ID = q.ID +1
, q.Item
FROM q
WHERE ID < 100
)
SELECT q.*
FROM q
INNER JOIN Temp t ON t.Item = q.Item
AND t.Amount >= q.ID
You create the dynamic table aliased as r below. Works for amounts up to 2047.
select t.*
from
(select label='ABC', required=15 union all
select label='XYZ', required=10) r
inner join tbl t
on t.ItemID = r.label
inner join master..spt_values v
on v.type=Number and v.number between 1 and r.required
order by t.ItemID
SELECT u.id AS pid ,
b2.id AS id ,
b2.message AS MESSAGE,
b2.uid AS uid,
b2.date AS DATE
FROM (
(SELECT b.id AS id ,
b.pid AS pid ,
b.message AS MESSAGE,
b.uid AS uid,
b.date AS DATE
FROM wall_posts AS b
JOIN Friends AS f
ON f.id = b.pid
WHERE f.buddy_id = '1'
AND f.status = 'b'
ORDER BY DATE DESC
LIMIT 0, 10
)
UNION
(SELECT id ,
pid ,
MESSAGE,
uid,
DATE
FROM wall_posts
WHERE pid = '1'
ORDER BY DATE DESC
LIMIT 0, 10
)
) AS b2
JOIN Users AS u
ON b2.pid = u.id
WHERE u.banned ='0'
AND u.email_activated='1'
ORDER BY DATE DESC
LIMIT 0, 10
Is the code. Not sure how I would get the post count with this. I know normally i would do select count(*) as num I tried
So what i did i took
SELECT u.id AS pid ,
b2.id AS id ,
b2.message AS MESSAGE,
b2.uid AS uid,
b2.date AS DATE
FROM
and changed it to
SELECT COUNT(u.id AS pid ,
b2.id AS id ,
b2.message AS MESSAGE,
b2.uid AS uid,
b2.date AS DATE) as num
FROM
and did something similar for all the the select statements, well that didn't work, kept getting errors like #1064 - You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'AS pid , b2.id AS id , b2.message AS MESSAGE, b' at line 1. So how would i go about getting the count? I need the count for my pagination php class.
The COUNT function doesn't allow the multiple columns you have. It can be COUNT(*) or COUNT(column_name), where there is a single column name. The COUNT(*) format counts total number of rows, where the COUNT(column_name) returns count of the non-null values for the the specified column.
So, the next step is to alter your COUNT in the SELECT. Then, you can go from there if other issues exist.
mysql_num_rows in php seems to pull it off without modifying the sql.