So I have a site that is now receiving 30k unique hits a day, and at this moment during the day of peak hours I am getting a lot of 'error establishing database connection' (it's a WP install if you haven't guessed).
Here is a quote from my host:
The error that you included in your
support request seems to indicate that
something is wrong with the code and
the SQL query is not formatted
properly. You would need to dig into
that. We do not offer support for
third-party applications or custom
code.
Is there some "easy way" of pinpointing bad formatted/programmed code via Firebug or some FF extension? I am trying to find any other possibility than going through line by line and making this a five year plan.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
If this only happens during peak hours it's probably got nothing to do with the SQL query. Probably the system is not responding fast enough.
Related
Apologies first of all if there is an answer to this elsewhere on the site. I've checked some of the proposed solutions and can't find anything appropriate.
So I've got this SSRS report that works fine when deployed but won't run locally during testing. The main query itself works when run in the query editor, as do all the sub queries that provide data for parameter drop lists but when I try to preview it, I get the error.
Bear in mind it used to work, up until the end of last year, which was when it was last updated.
I've tried removing all the tables and matrices on a copy (replacing with one very simple table), the parameters went too and I still get the error. I've also downloaded the server version, renamed it and redeployed it, works online, but not locally. As the error message is brutally vague, I've run out of ideas of things to try. Apart from switching over to PowerBI, can anyone think of anything else I could do to understand where the error is from?
Possibly relevant - the main query has some recursion in a subquery, but only a couple of levels. Could this be related? As I've said before, it used to work...
PS I'm using VS 16.7.2 from server V13.0.4466.4
PPS I also added the query to a brand new report and it errored so I think it must be something related to the SQL itself?
Hello expert I am working in banking software vendor company and we are working in PostgreSQL database due to load of work in office time(pick hour) I want to execute some function in specified time(off hour) with trigger. So please if you have any idea please help me.
A trigger should always be something fast. You don't want to hold transactions open for a couple of hours, that would be a really bad idea.
The correct solution for such a problem would be a queue. There are some existing implementations like PGQ, but I don't know if the'll meet your requirements.
I need to log the last time the user signed in using my node.js server. I am looking into three options. The persistence requirement is not super high, meaning that the margin of error of this record being recorded is open.
Use SQL DB and whenever the user logs in it modifies their profile account.
Record it in a server text file. So whenever the user logs on, this file will be opened and updated. The opening, recording and closing of the file will all be done asynchronously.
I'm thinking that the second option is the better on because I'm using SQL for many other operations so I prefer to not interrupting my DB as much as possible.
One concern I have for the second option is the performance hit on the server that will be caused by the frequently read and write to a local text file.
I'm curious what other people who have gone through this path thought about my thought process. Any opinions or tips are highly welcomed. Thank you.
Normally you should use a SQL database, it is a much more better way than the plain text.
The main problem with a text file is that when you log in, you can simply append a line (but what about a couple of user loggin in at the same moment ? You have not any warranty that all the access are logged), but when you want to extact the last login for a user, you should read (and then load) all the file from the start (or the end), which can cause a really worst problem than the access to the DB.
Naturally you can work out all the problems with a text file, but then you have written a lot of code to avoid a simple update query.
I don't think that, with the information you give, you should be worried about the performance of a database access in this case.
I'm trying to amend our content management system so it'll handle SQL database failures more gracefully. It's a bunch of ASMX pages, and a Helpers.vb file in which I've written a SQL connection tester function.
Each of the ASMX pages call the same function.
I need to create a variable I can check that's persistent and performant, otherwise I'm going to have fall back on something disasterously slow like reading a text file every time I set up a sql connection string.
I've tried using application caching, but either it doesn't work in the context of my helpers.vb file, or I've made a mess of the syntax. One problem that's already stymied some of the approaches I've found via google - I can't use 'Import System.Web.Caching' - IntelliSense doesn't show the 'Caching' part.
Has anyone got any example code that might get me up and running? Or an alternative approach?
#Mike,
Many thanks, now I'm using HttpRuntime.Cache correctly... it works!
Thanks everyone for taking the time to post :)
I need your help, I have a problem with server.transfer code in vb.net, it runs so slow..
My Question:
Why does it run slowly (take 5 minutes to move between web pages (.aspx))?
What should i check for this trouble?
Is it because operating system? Im use windows 7, before i used windows XP there is no problem like this...
is server.transfer related to database connection (not sure)? I use mysql (XAMPP packages).
Or may be because other configuration that i miss out in windows seven.
FYI: i try in several web browser same result(loading 5 minutes)..
Thank every one that answer my question, thank you very much!
One thing I've found on this is that it can have to do with the status code the transferred page returns. If it returns a 500 error, it can make your server transfer run upwards of five minutes.
One way to test this, if you can, is to run the transferred page in isolation and generate any of the information being transferred on the other side to see if any errors are generated.
It took me a day to figure this out. Hopefully it helps someone else.