I have an app with a self-hosted WCF service.
My WCF service gets published under the URI "net.tcp://localhost:8004/DocumentService". When I run the service on a remote machine and try to discover the service with the new .NET 4 class DiscoveryClient, the found services all have the URI "net.tcp://localhost:8004/DocumentService" too without any information about the actual machine where the service is hosted.
Obviously this is useless if I want to access the service on the remote machine. But I can't find any reference to the actual remote machine (IP address or server name) in the arguments passed to FindProgressChanged.
Is there a way to get the information about the remote machine or do I have to publish my service with the machine name of the remote machine? Or is DiscoveryClient just broken?
I hope this make sense.
I spent a lot of time investigating this problem. Building base addresses in the code was not acceptable for me, as it implies hardcoding transport scheme and port (the latter, of course, can be stored in a separate config section, but then why not just to use the existing section?). I wanted to have an ability to just configure the base address in config as usual. And it turns out that a base address like <add baseAddress="net.tcp://*:8731/"/> will perfectly work. I think the same is true for programmatic configuration.
Related
The laptops of our company have a WCF sync/client installed which communicates with the Server.
The data transfer works as long as they do not connect with the VPN.
When they connect with the VPN, I can make the WCF client Sync again if I add the "proxyaddress" paramater to the .config file.
Question : how can I make it work in both scenario's? Is there a way the WCF client makes a "smart selection" of multiple endpoints?
This issue more relates to network, route, instead of WCF.
When we connect to VPN, an extra virtual network interface is created on the local machine. At the same time, the local routing table is changed, which caused the issue that the internal network address could not be accessed. We can solve this by setting up a proxy address. A more general way is to set a static route on the local machine.
Route add –p 172.17.10.0 mask 255.255.255.0 172.17.16.1
The first address is a destination network address. the last address is a local gateway, which can be routed by a local network interface. This will lead to the data packages sent to the destination network to be addressed from the specified network interface.
Here is a related link.
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E53394_01/html/E54745/gmyag.html
Feel free to let me know if there is anything I can help with.
When I run my WCF in normal mode it works, but when I run through the Azure Computer Emulator on my local PC, the port numbers are different. For instance, the WCF page opens up in under the address: http://localhost:81/ServiceName1.svc, but the WSDL address says
You can also access the service description as a single file:
http://pc-name1:82/ServiceName1.svc?singleWsdl
When I try to connect using WCF test client, it is not working when I try to fetch the address http://localhost:81/ServiceName1.svc or the address http://pc-name1:82/ServiceName1.svc
Do you know what might be happening? Has anyone noticed this when using the Azure emulator?
Have you gone through the Hosting WCF within Windows Azure exercise? This behaviour is explained. You need an update to the WCF - KB981002- WCF: Hotfix rollup update, which will add a special behavior for your WCF services:
7.About the System.ServiceModel configuration above:
For this example we are exposing a metadata exchange (MEX) endpoint in addition to the service main endpoint. This will expose
the service metadata and thus allow service references to be added to
this service in Visual Studio.
The useRequestHeadersForMetadataAddress behavior is a special behavior that is defined in KB981002- WCF: Hotfix rollup update. It
allows WCF to serve correct metadata behind load balancers. Windows
Azure web roles are load balanced between one or more physical
servers.
I've got a working WCF service and a working Delphi client. On a normal PC, they work nicely. On a VM that's "Bridged" they work nicely if I log onto the domain (but not if I logon locally to the VM as administrator). If the VM is NATed, the connection attempt times out.
I would love to hear people's thoughts on what could be making such a difference to whether the client can successfully connect to the WCF service. Bear in mind I'm connecting with basicHttpBinding with no security.
The service is setup to use System Account (interact with desktop is NOT checked), and it starts automatically. The service URI doesn't change, the port is open, and can be telnet'd to in all scenarios.
Any ideas or pointers?
Within the VM, open Internet Explorer and verify that you can view the WSDL of the WCF service. If you can't, then your issue is connectivity and has nothing to do with your Delphi code.
Group Policies and Enterprise Security solutions that swap certificates or require certificates to be registered (we're using a UTM called CyberRoam) make a difference.
Also when Virtual Machines join a domain, their ComputerNames are added to a list maintained by the Domain Controller. When the same Virtual Machine is "moved" or "copied", its ComputerName should be changed to avoid DNS resolution issues.
I'm not claiming this as the definitive answer, however it does explain the issues I noticed in this instance.
This is probably a basic networking issue, but I am new to this stuff and just do not know the answer.
I have written a wcf service and client. I can use one of the http bindings and get the service to work correctly when I put my machine's network IP address as the endpoint address and run the client and server from the same machine. Now, I want to be able to connect to this service from a different machine over the internet. Clearly it does not work when I use my network IP address in this scenario, but simply putting in my router's broadband IP address does not seem to be doing the trick, either. Am I just missing a firewall port that I need to open up, or am I trying to do something that should not be possible?
If you want users from the internet to be able to connect to your service, you'll have to consider a few points:
binding: the lowest common denominator is the basicHttpBinding which is SOAP 1.1 with basically no additional features available - just like ASMX webservices. Just about anyone can connect to that. For more advanced clients, you might also want to expose a wsHttpBinding endpoint on your service
security: how (if at all) do you want to secure access to your web service? Do you have username/password credentials that callers must supply? Check out the WCF Security Guidance for a whole slew of information bits on the various security scenarios
authenticating your service: typically, you should strive to make your service authenticate itself to the rest of the world - this requires a server certificate and enables secured communication (messages signed + encrypted) on the wire
make sure your service endpoint(s) is reachable from the internet, through all firewalls and proxies and everything :-)
Hope that helps a bit!
You need to set up port forwarding on your router. Perhaps someone on ServerFault or SuperUser would be able to help you. Or even a google search now that you know what it's called. The instructions will be different depending on the router. The port you need to forward will be the port you've picked in the WCF config file.
I host WCF services through IIS, but it took me ages to work out how. At the moment I put the files on the webserver and enable websharing on the root folder. Then you can assign them to an appropriate Application Pool in IIS, and add a service reference to any client projects using the URL of the wsdl.
I'm not sure if this is the best way to do it but its the only way I've worked out so far.
Here's the simple solution.
I am assuming that you have made a working WCF application and hosted over the IIS.
The next thing to do is to browse the application from the IIS. It will give you url in the address bar something like:
http://localhost/myservice/service.svc
Next go to www.whatismyip.com. this will give you your system's WAN IP (say, 45.34.56.200).
Replace the URL you got in step 2 with: http://45.34.56.200/myservice/service.svc
Now you can use this URL any where in this world to consume your service.
I found a good Article and it is working fine for me, on the following the Main steps:
1-First you should create WCF Service.
2-add application on IIS and give alias for your virtual directory and set path from your local drive.
3-Make sure your default app pool set to .NET CLR V4.0.
4-test your WCF service is running successfully on localhost.
5-To access the same via LAN (Local Area Network) you must disable Firewall for you Private network.
6- try to use ngrok.com, you will get Temp URL to use via internet to access your LocalHost anywhere.
Then Everything will be fine.
For More Information Check the following Link:
https://www.codeproject.com/Tips/813650/Host-WCF-on-LocalHost-and-access-via-Internet
We use BigIP to load balance between our two IIS servers. We recently deployed a WCF service hosted on by IIS 6 onto these two Windows Server 2003R2 servers.
Each server is configured with two host headers: one for the load balancer address, and then a second host header that points only to that server. That way we can reference a specific server in the load balanced group for debugging.
So when we run We immediately got the error:
This collection already contains an address with scheme http. There can be at most one address per scheme in this collection.
Parameter name: item
I did some research and we can implement a filter to tell it to ignore the one of the hosts, but then we cannot access the server from that address.
<serviceHostingEnvironment>
<baseAddressPrefixFilters>
<add prefix="http://domain.com:80"/>
</baseAddressPrefixFilters>
</serviceHostingEnvironment>
What is the best solution in this scenario which would allow us to hit a WCF service via http://domain.com/service.svc and http://server1.domain.com/service.svc?
If we should create our own ServiceFactory as some sites suggest, does anyone have any sample code on this?
Any help is much appreciated.
EDIT: We will need to be able to access the WCF service from either of the two addresses, if at all possible.
Thank you.
On your bigIP Create 2 new virtual servers
http://server1.domain.com/
http://server2.domain.com/
create a pool for each VS with only the specific server in it - so there will be no actual load balancing and access it that way. If you are short on external IP'S you can still use the same IP as your production domain name and just use an irule to direct traffic to the appropriate pool
Hope this helps
The URL it uses is based on the bindings in IIS. Does the website have more than one binding? If it does, or is the WCF service used by multiple sites? If it is, then you are SOL AFAIK. We ran into this issue. Basically, there can be only one IIS binding for HTTP, otherwise it bombs.
Also, here's info on implementing a ServiceHostFactory. That WILL work if it's possible that your WCF service only be accessible through 1 address (unfortunately for us, this was not possible).
When you need to test a specific machine, you could "bypass" the load balancing and ensure the correct host-header is sent to keeep WCF happy by editing the "hosts" file on the machine you're testing from so, for example:
10.0.0.11 through 10.0.0.16 are the six hosts that are in the cluster "cluster.mycompany.local", with a load balanced IP address of 10.0.0.10. When testing you could add a line to the machines hosts file that says "10.0.0.13 cluster.mycompany.local" to be able to hit the third machine in the cluster directly.