Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
There are commercial cross-platform install tools out there and i think that they are really useful because you "compose" your setup once and the setup tool compiles it for the target platforms you want it to work for.
Unfortunately, such tools are expensive for a shareware author like me - they cost thousands of dollars. Are there similar open source projects out there?
Thanks in advance,
David
I'm having the same problem. Looked into IZPack, IZPack with Native Laucher, Lauch4J, ... All of them way too complex to use, at least for my taste. Searching for more info on IZPack, I've run accross that one a minute ago almost by accident: http://www.installjammer.com/
Looks promising, haven't tried it yet, though.
IZPack does very fine, i think. It's comprehensive, cross-platform and has a commercial-friendly license.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
What would be a better option Apache cordova based application or Xamarin. Do we have any market analysis or tool popularity matrix by which one can choose their development path.
There are pros and cons for both approaches, you should make your own choice based on your needs and expectations.
You can find load of articles related to this. From the top results in Google:
Picking between Xamarin and Apache Cordova
Comparing Xamarin and Cordova on Visual Studio 2015
Which one is better: Xamarin or Apache Cordova?
I would suggest you also consider what technology you and the devs involved feel more comfortable with, since the ramp up effort should also be taken into account.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I've been programming in common lisp for a while now, and I like how there's so much handy documentation on the language online; the problem is that I'm often offline and can't access it when I need it most.
Is there a PyDoc equivalent for common lisp (or even just man pages for the language) that I can download and use in the shell?
Cheers in advance.
You can download the CLHS and install it in various ways.
http://www.cliki.net/CLHS
that's an old question…
edit: as referenced on the Cookbook, we can read the HyperSpecs offline with either Dash (MacOS), Zeal (GNU/Linux) or Velocity (Windows).
we could ask or add it on devdocs: https://devdocs.io/
and take the data of the CL Ultra Spec: website, data
and of course browse the built-in documentation with Emacs (C-h, see the menu).
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
is there any tool that can produce me simple application something like access
but without the need for access or open office to be installed
some thing that will save the data in real stand alone executable file with embedded simple db for non programmers.
I believe Filemaker does what you want. It's not free, however you could always download the trial and see if it fits.
If you are familiar with Access, you should look into compiling it into a standalone app using the Access runtime. Here's a thread on it.
Bear in mind that non-programmers will be quite limited in what they'll be able to accomplish, so calling this "rapid application development" is probably way overstating things.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking for interesting online resources on FPGA development - sites, blogs, that sort of thing. What I'm after is examples of fun (and hopefully not too expensive) projects that one can try out and learn from.
have you tried fpga4fun.com or fpga-forum.com?
Also mikrocontroller.net (altough in german) has a linklist.
John Kent's site is a good starting point.
Try opencores.org - it hosts open source projects.
Great site with interesting projects and articles
http://www.fpga4fun.com/
I've compiled a list of FPGA Online Resources. Check link
fpga-blog.tumblr.com/links
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm interested in Collaborative Developing and I was wondering if there are alternative solutions than using UNA (example video) from N-Brain. Free would be even better, but I guess that's not an option which such technology.
PS: The main future I'm looking for is working real-time with multiple persons in the same code.
If you're in Mac world, SubEthaEdit is a good option. Not free, but €29 isn't bad.
After some further searching around I have found Gobby, seems to be much better than MoonEdit.
Don't think there is any better free program that supports developing more than color coding.
I hope to have helped others too by this question.
Thanks to Charlie I have found MoonEdit, I'm still looking for better alternatives though...