SEO - List of links - Farmlinking? [closed] - seo

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 12 years ago.
Improve this question
I'd like to know if listing a set of partner sites/blogs is useful for the pagerank growth.
Does Google see it as an incorrect act? I read somewhere that if people exchange links, google seeks it and marks as a bad technique.
If it doesn't matter, is the content of the linked site relevant?

That's called Link farming and it is a really bad SEO tecnique.
If you link to another page for SEO purposes, keep links relevant and in a way that are interesting to the readers.
An interesting article on Link Farming: The Tell-Tale Signs Of Link Farming

Related

Categorization in Google [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
How can I allow such categorization in Google for a website?
This is an example of Sitelinks in Google search results. According to Google:
We only show sitelinks for results when we think they'll be useful to the user. If the structure of your site doesn't allow our algorithms to find good sitelinks, or we don't think that the sitelinks for your site are relevant for the user's query, we won't show them.
You cannot allow that.
After a while if your website is visited frequently the most important pages will be listed there and you will be able to manage it using the Google Webmaster tool.

SEO solution for microblogs? [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
we all have heard about benefits of microblogs but what if we have a microblog and want to boost it's SEO?
the biggest problem in microblogs is keywords are not related to each other and each topic has a small amount of related keywords.
for example if we have a microblog that has short tips about all fields in computer sience, and a blog that publish articles in this field too.
the outlined blog has a better chance to be appeared in SERP, instead the underlined microblog has no chance because of it's limited keywords.
am i right and what is the SEO solution for these microblogs?
In theory, blog with more keywords can rank better than microblog with few keywords because there is more content on blog.
For many seo addicts, content is king! No matter support of website, the most important is having always more content (and thus keywords).
In my opinion, blog is more powerful in seo than microblog.

what is the secret of appearing titles on google search result very fast? [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 11 years ago.
Improve this question
I need to know how stackoverflow's questiones appear on google search result very fast I know what are points google consider to rank some title but I think the architecture of design is important because they appear very fast after some minutes I ask a question and I have been seen it in google result just in a minute. what is the secret ?
Is there any relation between asp.net-mvc web application with that or not asp.net application could be fast in google result.
This Pro Webmasters questions covers this. It basically boils down to having lots of fresh content and quality links.

SEO for dynamic content site [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 11 years ago.
Improve this question
I am hoping there is a simple solution for this simple question. Let's say I have a site like StackOverflow, where new questions are being created everyday by users. What is the SEO strategy to keep the google crawler informed about this new content? Could it be some kind of "LATEST QUESTIONS" page where the new links would be listed? But then the google crawler would have to parse this periodically to fetch new questions. Is there a best practice / industry standard SEO approach for this problem?
Use a sitemap.xml that links to each article.

SEO really important? Are there any studies? [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm studying at a university, and it's really important to be able to support arguments with facts. Are there any studies about SEO? I've read that people don't bother to go to the next page on google, they do a new search instead. But are there really any studies in the subject?
But are there really any studies in the subject?
For example, the pie chart on this page says that 40% of clicks are on the top (number 1) search result, that 90% are on the first page, and that 0.01% are on neither pages 1 and 2.