Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
I'm learning Objective-C and i would like to know where i can found a IDE for Objective-C on Linux?
There are two different IDEs provided with GNUstep, I prefer ProjectManager but there's also ProjectCenter. While neither has been released in a while, the state in VCS is much better than the date of the last release would lead you to believe :-).
Honestly when it comes to doing Objective-C and you have access to a Mac, Xcode is your best bet but here's what I know would be close enough on a Linux box:
Project Center
KDevelop
And not sure if there's a plugin for it, but Eclipse is a fairly good IDE.
What do you want out of an IDE? Emacs has a very good Objective-C mode, and good integration to parse build errors from GCC and also debug with GDB. It would be a good IDE for most tasks, unless you really want a GUI builder.
Have a look at the latest FreeBSD release, which incorporates Clang, a rival of gcc with a BSD licence instead of a GPL licence.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
http://embsysregview.sourceforge.net/
I'd like to avoid using eclipse if I can. Tried googling - nothing came up.
The debuggers of most commercial vendors will provide that functionality, for example Kiel MDK-ARM, IAR EWB, Rowley Associates CrossWorks.
Keil and IAR both provide code-size limited evaluation versions that you can use for non-commercial and evaluation purposes (i.e. you can't sell or distribute a product built using it), Rowley have a 30 day evaluation licence (as does IAR in addition to teh code limited version). For a full licence Rowley is by far the least expensive - largely because they use GCC rather than a proprietary compiler, but the debugger is their own and not based on GDB (and all the better for it!).
If you need free tools, CooCox CoIDE appears to do exactly what you want (and probably more). It is Eclipse based, so may not meet your requirements, but all the integration is already done for you, so it is less of a kit-of-parts than assembling Eclipse with CDT and various other plug-ins. In particular the embedded target debugging is integrated, and that is probably the most difficult part to get information on for Eclipse in my experience.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
we have written a bit of an application framework (game engine really, but that's not important) in C++, and would like to extend functionality by a more RAD friendly scripting environment.
So we are looking for a (or multiple) scripting language that is
open source (free: mono is not free on different platforms)
has an IDE (intelisence, for accessible classes/methods)
has runtime debugging support. (breakpoints, and variable inspection at a minimum)
can integrate with a C++ project
anything out there meet these needs?
Since you've indicated your interest in Lua, I'll expand on that a bit. Using Lua takes care of #1 (open source) and #4 (C++ integration).
The two projects I've been working on may take care of #2 -- ZeroBrane Studio is a lightweight open-source Lua IDE, and #3 -- MobDebug is a Lua debugger, also open-source, also on github, and integrates with ZeroBrane Studio. ZeroBrane Studio runs on Windows, Mac, and Linux..
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Are there any IDE's or editors that support Mercury besides emacs?
Distributed with Mercury is a syntax highlighting file for vim.
This is the only official editor support. See the vim directory in the compiler's source distribution.
People say that prolog-mode for Emacs also supports Mercury, I tried this and discovered that it didn't handle Mercury specific syntax at all, and therefore was no better than using any other emacs mode.
Personally I use vim with syntax highlighting.
Codeblocks could probably be made to work with Mercury. It doesn't directly support syntax highlighting for this language but you can create a custom lexer for it. Getting codeblocks' build system to work with the mmc compiler is just a matter of tweaking the 'advanced options' under Compiler and debugger settings.
We have recently released a simple plugin for eclipse to help editing Mercury files and using along Java projects. Please take a look at it if you have Mercury under Linux and meets your requirements. Any feedback is welcome. :)
You can find it here: http://kai.mercury.mind-era.com
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I need an APL implementation to test some expressions, do your know which is the best interpreter for the language ?
It would be great if it is free and it runs on Linux.
You can test simple expressions with my APL interpreter, it runs on JavaScript in the browser: http://ngn.github.com/apl/web/index.html https://n9n.gitlab.io/apl/web/index.html
Try GNU APL. Version 1.0 was released September 27, 2013.
Also, if you want to try something, why not go to http://tryapl.org ? :)
And, finally, Dyalog Ltd. offers free version of their interpreter (the best you can get, IMHO) - which is free for personal, non-commercial use - which sounds like what you do..
And while TryAPL gives you a protected environment in which certain "potentially harmful" statements are not allowed, there is a new service available which gives you a complete sandboxed Dyalog APL environment that can execute scripted commands at https://tio.run/#apl-dyalog
Try APLX for Linux (Personal Edition) Version 1.1 from MicroAPL.
The best for PC are>
APL2 IBM but free only a trial period.
APLX is very good but some different to APL2.seems to be Eternal Life inside APL.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I am looking for a STABLE FTP library for Compact Framework. I would prefer a library where I don't have to fix or step through any code, but just use as is.
While the free OpenCf.FTP is great, I think it is at this point creating more work for me than my actual coding and I am afraid I don't have time allotted for this.
Any libs you guys have had experience with? Good/bad?
Our Rebex FTP/SSL supports .NET CF since 2006. It shares the codebase with Rebex FTP which is maintained since 2004. I guess it is probable quite stable - for example Microsoft licensed this FTP/SSL component and is using it in Visual Studio 2010 for web deployment. Source code available.
Xceed also has a solid FTP library for .NET CF.
Check out IP*Works from \n Software. Solid and well supported.
What i find the most bizarre about CF is that it lacks FTP functionality. I mean it is a framework for MOBILE apps for God's sake. Perhaps someone from MS could enlighten me on why file transfer functionality is missing from mobile apps framework.
I am sure someone will come with some long and smart sounding explanation. Knock yourself out, it still makes no sense at all.