The FaultContract from my WCF service doesn't have a datacontract members; thus when the service is consumed in BizTalk, the generated schema doesn't show up any members. How do I handle in BizTalk?
While consuming this WCF service from a .NET client, the implementation provides the exception along with Class library ( of data objects) and I catch the fault of that exception type.
I am not sure if this is possible. But to get it to work biztalk must have access to the dll with your data objects. You could try referencing the dll from your biztalk project.
If you are consuming the service from an orchestration you could try the following steps:
Add an XSD representation of your
FaultContract to the project and use
this as message type on your fault
operation.
Add an exception handler block to
the orchestration using this fault
operation as message type
On your two-way WCF SendPort go to
the Messages tab and then on
'Inbound BizTalk Message Body'
change the radio button to Path.
On 'Body path expression' add
something like this:
/* [namespace-uri()='http://myservice.namespace/'] | /* [local-name()='Fault'] /* [local-name()='Detail']/*
These two xpaths separated by a '|' will make the adapter depending on what it receives publish either the correct service reply or the content of the details node which is where the WCF FaultContract is placed. This will allow the disassembler to work when trying to identify the message.
A side effect of this is that you will have a problem catching SOAP-faults in the orchestration but this is solved by creating a schema representation of a SOAP-fault (http://schemas.datacontract.org/2004/07/System.ServiceModel#ExceptionDetail) and use that as a second fault operation.
I have found issue. Our web service return fault XML in lower case. So correct XPath is
/*[local-name()='Fault']/*[local-name()='detail']/*
Related
I was wondering if it was possible to configure a WCF service client to use a custom type instead of FaultException when throwing faults. The custom type would inherit from FaultException, but also have some additional details about the error.
The reason I want to use a custom FaultException is so I can store a GUID from the SOAP Header which is otherwise lost.
I know I could manually catch and rethrow any faults my service client returns, but that's flimsy. I have no way of guaranteeing future developers will do the same.
I've thought about subclassing the generated service client class and putting the error handling in there, but that generates a lot of work whenever the target service changes.
So, is it possible to configure a WCF service client to throw a custom FaultException type for Faults?
You can create your own IErrorHandler implementation:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.servicemodel.dispatcher.ierrorhandler.aspx
Override ProvideFault and then do conversion from regular exceptions (including plain FaultException) to your own custom based FaultException<T>, where T is your own type that you can define to include custom properties.
After that, you have to register your implementation of IErrorHandler as service behavior, either in code or in web/app config.
I am implementing an IErrorHandler for a set of WCF services. I configure the WCF services to use this error handler via the configuration file, using a custom behavior.
All methods in all services return a value that is derived from a common base class.
What I want to do is to include information about the error in the return value if the error handler gets called.
Any ideas on how to do this elegantly would be much appreciated.
You just need to create the message manually which complies with your return SOAP data. You can implement your own body writer and use it for the Message.Create function. Here is a good example of how to accomplish what you basically need Simple custom error handler for webHttpBinding in WCF
However if I were you I would choose fault approach when you just return void or some data if everything succeeds and fault message if it fails. Of course if there are no strict requirements to return operation status in the response object or if you are not refactoring an existing system.
Hope it helps.
In the context of a WCF project, I need to handle in the same way xml and non-xml messages (eg. Standard SOAP, WS-Attachments, etc..). The normal flow of WCF creates a Message object which can handle an Xml message, this is done by the encoder, so if one wants to handle different messages, it's needed to implement different kind of message-handling...
My needs is to create a message derivation class, which represent the concept of "received message" but not "handled" in the form of special data handling, but , about real data-handling, deferred in a secondary step.
so in the catch-all service I will get a Message messageObject as parameter, so the signature of the service will be Message Accept(Message messageObject)
Any idea?
thanks in advance
There is only single base Message type in WCF. This is a core type which is used by WCF infrastructure. The type is abstract so generally you can create your custom implementation but in such case you will probably have to replace some WCF channels to correctly use your new type.
If you need to transport message in custom format you are probably not looking for replacing Message type but either replacing encoder, serializer or both.
I'm building a WCF SOAP application. The WSDL file has numerous operations of which many have the same argument type. The WSDL file defines all soapAction attributes as "''". When I try to start such a service WCF throw an exception saying that soapActions have to be unique.
After some googling I'm even more puzzled than before. I used SOAPUI to create a mock service with two operations which take the same input type and without the soapActions defined it always chooses the same operation. When the actions are defined it works fine.
My questions are:
Can you make a WCF SOAP service without unique soapActions (actually leaving the soapActions "''" as defined in the original WSDL)?
How can a service choose the right operation without the soapAction defined?
Edited:
I'm not in control of the WSDL. I'm using the WSCF.Blue tool to create a service stub from the WSDL file. I might be able to modify the WSDL, but I want to see if there is some possibility to leave it as it is.
It is not very clear from your question but I suggest you are building service based on some defined WSDL, aren't you? WCF by default uses SOAP action because it is required part of WS-I Basic Profile 1.1 offered by WCF services with BasicHttpBinding. WSDLs with empty SOAP actions are used when the action is defined by root body element.
WCF samples provides example of custom DispatchOperationSelector which is able to route messages to operations by their root body element. This is probably what you need to add to your service so that clients based on provided WSDL can call it.
I'm looking to use the MsmqIntegrationBinding to integrate with a legacy queue which has a serialized object as the message body. Has anyone come up with a way to obtain the "metadata" of the message body and create a service side class to use within the service?
For example, if I put in a serialized Product object from System A and my service needs to consume it, how do I provide MsmqMessage the type if I do not have the Product class on my side? I was thinking of reading off a message in a separate program, deserializing, and then emitting via the code dom. Ideas?
I wholeheartedly recommend against attempting to emit the deserialized type at runtime in the message destination. Either work with the XML at the destination to obtain the data you desire, or build data contracts that both the source and destination can adhere to.
Hmm... in WCF, you can define service methods which take (and optionally return) an untyped Message type. This seems to fit your bill quite nicely.
Other than with strongly typed messages, you'll have to do all the putting together of the message on the client and the taking apart on the server by means of reading the raw XML - but that seems to be what you're looking for, right?
Find more information and samples here:
WCF - Handling Generic Messages
How to pass a generic object through WCF
Untyped messages on WCF
Untyped messages have some restrictions, e.g. you can only read them once on the server, but you should be able to manage your scenario with this, I think.
Marc