Subsonic 3.0 testing - what am I missing here? - testing

EDIT: This issue is already submitted on Github. Changing the "Act" part to this will make the test pass
var result = Adresse.All()
.Where(x => x.AdresseX == txt1 && x.PostBy == txt2)
.FirstOrDefault();
[TestMethod]
public void WTF()
{
//Arrange
string txt1 = "Vingsted Skovvej 1";
string txt2 = "7100 Vejle";
var one = new Adresse { ID = 1, AdresseX = "Vejlevej 55", PostBy = "7300" };
var two = new Adresse {ID = 2, AdresseX = txt1, PostBy = txt2 };
Adresse.Setup(new List<Adresse> { one, two });
//Act
var result = Adresse.SingleOrDefault(x => x.AdresseX == txt1 && x.PostBy == txt2);
//Assert
Assert.AreEqual(2, result.ID);
}
The following test fails me because I get the first object back (the one where ID equals 1)... Can somebody explain to me what I'm doing wrong???

This is logged as an issue on github, it would be worth you adding any info you can to it though.

Related

MVC Entity Framework, Query returns null

Hi guys can you help me understand why i keep getting a null instead of get the value.
Need to receive the saidaservicoid to be able to update. I receive the value from the view but can't update elemento. Stays null.
Thanks in advance for the help.
[Database]
[elementoRepository]
public async Task UpdateElementoSaidaServicosAsync(AddSaidasServicoViewModel model)
{
var saidaServico = await _context.SaidaServicos.FindAsync(model.SaidaServicoId);
var elemento = await _context.Elementos.FindAsync(model.ElementoId);
if (elemento == null)
{
return;
}
var updateElementoSaida = _context.Elementos.Where(e => e.Id == model.ElementoId).FirstOrDefault();
if (updateElementoSaida == null)
{
updateElementoSaida = new Elemento
{
saidaServico = saidaServico,
};
_context.Elementos.Update(updateElementoSaida);
}
else
{
int SaidaServicos = model.SaidaServicoId;
updateElementoSaida.saidaServico = saidaServico;
}
await _context.SaveChangesAsync();
return;
}
Ok. the best way that i found to solve this issue was to get the last ID.
int SaidaServicos = _context.SaidaServicos.Max(item => item.Id);

Moq + xunit + asp.net core: service return null value

I use xUnit as test runner in my asp.net core application.
Here is my test theory:
[Theory(DisplayName = "Search advisors by advisorId"),
ClassData(typeof(SearchAdvisorsByIdTestData))]
public async void SearchAdvisors_ByAdvisorId(int brokerDealerId, FilterParams filter)
{
// Arrange
var _repositoryMock = new Mock<IRepository>();
// Do this section means we bypass the repository layer
_repositoryMock
.Setup(x => x.SearchAdvisors(filter.CID.Value, new AdvisorSearchOptions
{
SearchKey = filter.SeachKey,
AdvisorId = filter.AdvisorId,
BranchId = filter.BranchId,
City = filter.City,
Skip = filter.Skip,
Limit = filter.Limit,
RadiusInMiles = filter.Limit,
Longitude = filter.Longitude,
Latitude = filter.Latitude
}))
.Returns(Task.FromResult<SearchResults<Advisor>>(
new SearchResults<Advisor>()
{
Count = 1,
Limit = 0,
Skip = 0,
ResultItems = new List<SearchResultItem<Advisor>>() {
//some initialize here
}
})
);
_advisorService = new AdvisorService(_repositoryMock.Object, _brokerDealerRepositoryMock, _brokerDealerServiceMock);
// Action
var model = await _advisorService.Search(brokerDealerId, filter);
Assert.True(model.AdvisorResults.Count == 1);
Assert.True(model.AdvisorResults[0].LocationResults.Count > 0);
}
The service like this
public async Task<ViewModelBase> Search(int brokerDealerId, FilterParams filter)
{
var opts = new AdvisorSearchOptions
{
SearchKey = filter.SeachKey,
AdvisorId = filter.AdvisorId,
BranchId = filter.BranchId,
City = filter.City,
Skip = filter.Skip,
Limit = filter.Limit,
RadiusInMiles = filter.Limit,
Longitude = filter.Longitude,
Latitude = filter.Latitude
};
var searchResults = await _repository.SearchAdvisors(filter.CID.Value, opts); // line 64 here
if (searchResults.Count == 0 && Utils.IsZipCode(filter.SeachKey))
{
}
//Some other code here
return model;
}
The issue was after run line 64 in the service. I always get null value of searchResults although I already mocked _repository in the test.
What was my wrong there?
Thank in advance.
Argument matcher for SearchAdvisors() mock does not work because you pass different instances of AdvisorSearchOptions. First instance is created in _repositoryMock.Setup() statement and the second one is created in Search() method itself.
There are several ways to fix this problem:
1.If you don't care about verifying whether instance of AdvisorSearchOptions passed to repository is filled correctly, just use It.IsAny<AdvisorSearchOptions>() matcher in mock setup:
_repositoryMock.Setup(x => x.SearchAdvisors(filter.CID.Value, It.IsAny<AdvisorSearchOptions>()))
.Returns(/*...*/);
2.In previous case the test will not verify that AdvisorSearchOptions is filled correctly. To do this, you could override Object.Equals() method in AdvisorSearchOptions class so that mock call will match for different instances:
public class AdvisorSearchOptions
{
// ...
public override bool Equals(object obj)
{
var cmp = obj as AdvisorSearchOptions;
if (cmp == null)
{
return false;
}
return SearchKey == cmp.SearchKey && AdvisorId == cmp.AdvisorId &&
/* ... compare all other fields here */
}
}
3.Another way to verify object passed to mock is to save the instance via Mock callback and then compare required fields:
AdvisorSearchOptions passedSearchOptions = null;
_repositoryMock
.Setup(x => x.SearchAdvisors(filter.CID.Value, It.IsAny<AdvisorSearchOptions>()))
.Returns(Task.FromResult<SearchResults<Advisor>>(
new SearchResults<Advisor>()
{
Count = 1,
Limit = 0,
Skip = 0,
ResultItems = new List<SearchResultItem<Advisor>>() {
//some initialize here
}
})
)
.Callback<int, AdvisorSearchOptions>((id, opt) => passedSearchOptions = opt);
// Action
// ...
Assert.IsNotNull(passedSearchOptions);
Assert.AreEqual(filter.SearchKey, passedSearchOptions.SearchKey);
Assert.AreEqual(filter.AdvisorId, passedSearchOptions.AdvisorId);
// Check all other fields here
// ...

Rally c# task time spent

I have a C# .net application using the rally 3.0.1 API. When I query task in my system I get 0.0 for time spent when I know they have time against them. Anyone know how to get this? Below is my code:
if (uTasks.Count > 0)
{
Request taskRequest = new Request(resultChild["Tasks"]);
QueryResult TaskQueryResult = restApi.Query(taskRequest);
foreach (var items in TaskQueryResult.Results)
//foreach (var items in uTasks)
{
DataRow dtrow2;
dtrow2 = dt.NewRow();
dtrow2["TaskID"]=items["FormattedID"];
dtrow2["Task Name"] = items["Name"];
if (items["Owner"] != null)
{
var owner = items["Owner"];
String ownerref = owner["_ref"];
var ownerFetch = restApi.GetByReference(ownerref, "Name");
string strTemp = ownerFetch["_refObjectName"];
dtrow2["Owner"] = strTemp.Replace(",", " ");
}
\\else { dtrow2["Owner"] = ""; }
dtrow2["Task-Est"] = items["Estimate"];
dtrow2["Task-ToDo"] = items["ToDo"];
dtrow2["Task-Spent"] = items["TimeSpent"];
dtrow2["ObjectType"] = "T";
dt.Rows.Add(dtrow2);
}
}
It seems like that should work. You may want to make sure you're including the TimeSpent field in your fetch before issuing the request.
taskRequest.Fetch = new List<string>() { "TimeSpent" };

Having error in updating my record in database my method as follows

What I have done wrong in this code ? (I am using MVC4 and EF)
As an example: Please clear this am fresher to use MVC4
EditResponse response = new EditResponse();
try
{
using (WeMatchContext db = new WeMatchContext())
{
B_MEMBER_REGISTER update = new B_MEMBER_REGISTER();
var output = db.B_MEMBER_REGISTER.Where(x => x.MEMBER_ID == model.MEMBER_ID).FirstOrDefault();
if(output != null )
{
update.FIRST_NAME = model.FIRST_NAME;
update.LAST_NAME = model.LAST_NAME;
update.GENDER = model.GENDER;
update.DOB = model.DOB;
int resultcount = db.SaveChanges();
if (resultcount > 0)
{
response.MEMBER_ID = update.MEMBER_ID;
response.ResultCode = 0;
response.Message = "Updated Successfully";
}
You have to attach updated data with the db entity. please try this,
using (WeMatchContext db = new WeMatchContext())
{
var update = db.B_MEMBER_REGISTER.Where(x => x.MEMBER_ID == model.MEMBER_ID).FirstOrDefault();
if(update != null )
{
update.FIRST_NAME = model.FIRST_NAME;
update.LAST_NAME = model.LAST_NAME;
update.GENDER = model.GENDER;
update.DOB = model.DOB;
//below line of code is very important.
db.B_MEMBER_REGISTER.Attach(update);
db.Entry(update).State = EntityState.Modified;
int resultcount = db.SaveChanges();
if (resultcount > 0)
{
response.MEMBER_ID = update.MEMBER_ID;
response.ResultCode = 0;
response.Message = "Updated Successfully";
}
}
}

Why does this controller double the inserts when I try to archive the results of the Bing Search API?

I'm trying to archive my search results for a term by
Using the Bing API in an async controller
Inserting them into database using Entity Framework
using the Bing API and insert them into a database using entity framework. For whatever reason it is returning 50 results, but then it enters 100 results into the database.
My Controller Code:
public class DHWebServicesController : AsyncController
{
//
// GET: /WebService/
private DHContext context = new DHContext();
[HttpPost]
public void RunReportSetAsync(int id)
{
int iTotalCount = 1;
AsyncManager.OutstandingOperations.Increment(iTotalCount);
if (!context.DHSearchResults.Any(xx => xx.CityMarketComboRunID == id))
{
string strBingSearchUri = #ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["BingSearchURI"];
string strBingAccountKey = #ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["BingAccountKey"];
string strBingUserAccountKey = #ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["BingUserAccountKey"];
CityMarketComboRun cityMarketComboRun = context.CityMarketComboRuns.Include(xx => xx.CityMarketCombo).Include(xx => xx.CityMarketCombo.City).First(xx => xx.CityMarketComboRunID == id);
var bingContainer = new Bing.BingSearchContainer(new Uri(strBingSearchUri));
bingContainer.Credentials = new NetworkCredential(strBingUserAccountKey, strBingAccountKey);
// now we can build the query
Keyword keyword = context.Keywords.First();
var bingWebQuery = bingContainer.Web(keyword.Name, "en-US", "Moderate", cityMarketComboRun.CityMarketCombo.City.Latitude, cityMarketComboRun.CityMarketCombo.City.Longitude, null, null, null);
var bingWebResults = bingWebQuery.Execute();
context.Configuration.AutoDetectChangesEnabled = false;
int i = 1;
DHSearchResult dhSearchResult = new DHSearchResult();
List<DHSearchResult> lst = new List<DHSearchResult>();
var webResults = bingWebResults.ToList();
foreach (var result in webResults)
{
dhSearchResult = new DHSearchResult();
dhSearchResult.BingID = result.ID;
dhSearchResult.CityMarketComboRunID = id;
dhSearchResult.Description = result.Description;
dhSearchResult.DisplayUrl = result.DisplayUrl;
dhSearchResult.KeywordID = keyword.KeywordID;
dhSearchResult.Created = DateTime.Now;
dhSearchResult.Modified = DateTime.Now;
dhSearchResult.Title = result.Title;
dhSearchResult.Url = result.Url;
dhSearchResult.Ordinal = i;
lst.Add(dhSearchResult);
i++;
}
foreach (DHSearchResult c in lst)
{
context.DHSearchResults.Add(c);
context.SaveChanges();
}
AsyncManager.Parameters["message"] = "The total number of results was "+lst.Count+". And there are " + context.DHSearchResults.Count().ToString();
}
else
{
AsyncManager.Parameters["message"] = "You have already run this report";
}
AsyncManager.OutstandingOperations.Decrement(iTotalCount);
}
public string RunReportSetCompleted(string message)
{
string str = message;
return str;
}
}
Here is how I am calling it from my asp.net mvc 4 page.
#Ajax.ActionLink("Run Report", "GatherKeywordsFromBing", "DHWebServices",
new { id=item.CityMarketComboRunID},
new AjaxOptions { OnSuccess = "ShowNotifier();", UpdateTargetId = "TopNotifierMessage", HttpMethod = "POST", InsertionMode = InsertionMode.Replace, LoadingElementId = strCityMarketComboProgressID, LoadingElementDuration = 1000 },
new { #class = "ViewLink" })
<span class="ProgressIndicator" id="#strCityMarketComboProgressID"><img src="#Url.Content("~/Content/img/SmallBall.gif")" alt="loading" /></span>
For whatever reason all of
Try saving only once:
foreach (DHSearchResult c in lst)
{
context.DHSearchResults.Add(c);
}
context.SaveChanges();
Also there's nothing asynchronous in your code, so there's no point of using asynchronous controller. Not only that it won't improve anything but it might make things worse.