I know of Rational Rose and we have got Rational Rose 6.
But I am looking for some other tools which are more usable, which do not complain that they are not running in Windows 98/2000 (when installed and run in WinXP) and has got better features as compared to Rational Rose 6.
Check out Enterprise Architect. It's not expensive and does a lot of things well.
This lists Visual Basic (as distinct from VB.Net) as supported.
Enterprise Architect does reverse engineering and code generation for VB6
I did check out Enterprise Architect on SpareX's web site but could not find any reference stating that it handles reverse engineering or code generation for VB6.
Related
Someone asked me today if it was possible to port a visual basic application to Linux or similar platform, I assumed it was .NET so I suggested to use Mono, but noticed that on their vb support page they only talk about vb 8 (.NET)
Does mono support non-.NET vb? In fact I'm not sure what he is using, I think vb6, I'm not sure of the versioning at all though.
No, VB6 is an entirely different beast from VB.NET. Mono is basically there to run (via JITting, interpreting or AOT-compiling) IL - the Intermediate Language that VB.NET and C# compile down to. (Of course it also provides the libraries and compilers.)
Running VB6 requires an entirely different execution environment, basically.
No, but you could take a look at gambas
Gambas is a free development
environment based on a Basic
interpreter with object extensions, a
bit like Visual Basic™
What is the best route or place to get started with arcobjects if one is not a developer and not aiming to become one?
I've been using gis professionally for a long time, almost two decades, arcinfo/arcgis for most of that; I'm pretty good. I'm learning software development, and even have a modestly successful small python application used in a public project; I'm not good! I don't want to become a full fledged software developer but I keep running into things I just can't do without programming (example). In the arcgis world this puts me pretty squarely in the python camp, which is fine by me since I like python, however python does not have straightforward access to arcobjects.
Soooo, I need to get started, but where? Arcgis help says to get started with the ESRI Developer Network but $1500/yr is definitely not in my budget, and sounds like using a sledge hammer to swat mosquito. And which language .NET, Visual Basic, or Visual C++?
Thanks for your thoughts.
Assuming you have desktop, I'd just install the SDK from the desktop installation DVD's and download the free VS2010 60 day eval (which can be extended).
VS Express is supported, but I've never used it.
For language, I'd stay away from C++. There's more sample code available for C# than VB.NET. Except for the yield keyword, VB.NET and C# are equal.
Working on a company using the .Net Framework 2 (vb6 and vb.net 2005) and a very rudimentary sourceforge setup, I'm kindof at a loss when I was tasked to "...find a suitable Open Source Unit Testing & Bug Tracking system..." for the team. Those were my superior's exact words.
I know about the Team Foundation Server's capabilities, but the company doesn't want to adopt it and instead go for an open source solution. Any ideas on the best system which are compatible with the code used by the dev. team?
We too are using the .NET Framework 2 (VB.NET 2005) and have begun unit testing with the NUnit unit-testing framework (since our client is unwilling to pay for TFS, etc.)
You can find out more information here:
http://www.nunit.org/
Hope that helps,
Jeff
I'm already new in C++CLI , although I have been working on VB and C++ for a long time , but I need to start a projects on CLI using it's visual screens and easy codes (just in windows) , But I can't find any good Resource or book to start windows programming (I mean codes that you can give it to buttons or texts without using c++ classes) ,
Can I find any of them ?
thank you
I can suggest you 3 books ( I used them ):
Foundations of C++/CLI The Visual C++ Language for.NET 3.5
Pro Visual C++/CLI and the .NET 3.5 Platform
C++/CLI in Action
They are in order of difficulty.
The first and the 2nd are introductory and advance respectively.
The 3rd is great for advanced topics, like interop, mixed-mode coding etc..
Not sure what you have done in your work with C++ without classes, it is C with classes :). If you want to write Windows Program in C, Programming Windows, 5th Edition written by Charles Petzold could be a good start. Then you can decide which managed GUI to learn. Winform is mature with no future planned beyond .Net 4.0, while WPF is growing and is the main focus of Microsoft.
I heard from a friend that Microsoft rewrote all the Windows Workflow Foundation (WF) again and changed everything was in .Net 3.5.
Is that true?
And what about what we learned about WF in 3.0 and 3.5?
According to this article:
http://visualstudiomagazine.com/articles/2009/01/01/windows-workflow-changes-direction.aspx
Windows Workflow Foundation 4.0 is a "bottom-up rewrite with entirely new thinking...WF 3.0/3.5 will remain part of the framework and will run side by side with WF 4.0. This lets you manage the transition at a time that fits your organization's broader goals."
...which is code for, "We know we just screwed up your programming model, but we have a long term strategy, so we hope you will forgive us."
The article goes on to say that
The gains are enormous: custom
activities take center stage, and
authoring them is much simpler;
workflows are entirely declarative;
and there are three workflow flow
styles that you can combine
seamlessly. It's possible that you
could see a 10-fold improvement in the
time required to create and debug
workflows, in addition to 10- to
100-fold runtime performance
improvements.
The change is not without its detractors. In this article at DotNetKicks, the author states that "Microsoft is seriously damaging the Dot Net developer community and adoption in the industry with these half baked product releases and abrupt about-faces after shipping."
Which is why I generally wait for the 2.0 or 3.0 version of Microsoft technologies, although I made an exception for ASP.NET MVC.
We found the workflow product to be difficult to wrap your head around when it came time to pass data in and out. Scott Allen had a series of articles that did a good job describing the process, but still this was not at an easy task.
That's what the word on the street is. And on the internet. 3.0 and 3.5 will be deprecated, but still available.
Is this change not in Visual Studio 2010 beta 1? Download it, find out, and tell Microsoft what you think of it.