I'm looking if there is a way to call the board (DSXLE5) and request info of the current KeyMapping value?
It is the first time I deal with DSX5 family, I've already identified that the firmware change process is different, as before, to change a DSXLE4 8 port card to be 2in + 6out we used
$mvConnectorConfig -2in6out -sn=XXXXX
and now I see that DSXLE5 needs to point the firmware (*.pin) with the load parameter.
$mvConnectorConfig load -f=xmio5_x2_00i12o.pin -sn=xxxxx
I see from the help that we can use -KeyMapping to change the boards, but how does it work and can we call the board to show which mapping is currently using?
I'm new here, so I'm sorry if it isn't 100% straight question.
Best Regards,
Rafael Girotto
Related
I am using two msp430f5529 with booster pack(trf7970a),I'm making one module to work in special direct mode(as per sloa214,SDM is used to transmit data) and another one module to work in Direct Mode1(DM1) to receive transmitted data from module one. But I'm not able to receive any data.
Below is my tx code.
Mifare_SDM_config();
Mifare_SDM_Enter();
Mifare_SDM_Transmit((unsigned int*)tx_buff,10,1); //here 1 is parity bit
Mifare_SDM_Exit();
and my receiver code.
//Entering DM1 Mifare_DM1_Enter();
Mifare_DM1_Recieve(rx_buff,rx_len,1);//here 1 is parity bit
Mifare_DM1_Exit();
am I missing anything?
I'm trying to get a BG95 to activate on hologram.
Here are my commands:
AT+QCFG="band",F,180A,180A OK
AT+QCFG="iotopmode",2 OK
AT+QCFG="nwscanseq",020301 OK
AT+QCFG="nwscanmode",0 OK
AT+QCFG="snrscan",0 OK
AT+QICSGP=1,1,"hologram","","",1 OK
AT+QIACT=1 ERROR
At first I thought it was antenna/signal related so I ran AT+CSQ and got this:
+csq: 11,99
This tells me I have a good signal I believe.
Next I tried AT+QNWINFO and get this:
+QNWINFO: "eMTC","311480","LTE BAND 13",5230
In my mind this is saying it's connected to a network.
After trying that I tried to activate again and got this:
AT+QIACT=1
ERROR
The weird thing is it activated just fine about a week ago with pure AT commands. I did try and use an Arduino library with it (WisLTEBG96TCPIP) which may have changed a setting in it. I've done a factory reset but the it still woln't activate.
Another strange thing is the hologram dashboard. Every once and a while it will show the SIM as connected, even though I can't activate.
I have tried with 2 different SIM cards any get the same activation error.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Verizon has cut off all non ODI products. If your hardware has not been Verizon ODI 'certified' it will no longer be allow to be connected to their network, I have 5 new pet rocks thanks to them. The solution is to purchase new modems from vendors that have been through the Verizon ODI program or switch carriers.
I had the same problem before, after a lot of maling with network operator I find out that there isn't a LTE-CAT-M1 (eMTC) network in my area, I tested in another area successfully
Also before setting AT+QCFG commands try AT+CFUN = 0
and after setting AT+QCFG commands try AT+CFUN = 1 .
before sending AT+QIACT, try 'AT+CEREG?' command several times and tell me what is the return of it
Hi I'm trying to add a labor transaction from an action automation script with the object being ASSIGNMENT in Maximo. I am currently trying the code below.
labTransSet = MXServer.getMXServer().getMboSet("LABTRANS",ui);
labTrans = labTransSet.add();
labTrans.setValue("laborcode", userLabor);
labTrans.setValue("wonum", assignWonum);
sds1=SimpleDateFormat("hh.mm aa").format(firstDate);
sds2=SimpleDateFormat("hh.mm aa").format(Date());
labTrans.setValue("STARTTIME", sds1);
labTrans.setValue("FINISHTIME", sds2);
labTransSet.save();
labTransSet.close();
userLabor is the username of the current user
assignWonum is the assignment work order number
firstDate is the scheduled date field from the assignment
The labor record is being added correctly with the right data, but when I go to route my workflow after the script is called from a button, I am given the warning BMXAA8229W WOACTIVITY has been updated by another user and the work order does not route. I am under the impression that this is happening because the assignment object for the script is being queried at the same time I try to add and save a labor record. Does anyone know if my guess is correct or what else the problem is and how I can fix this? Thanks
That error occurs because Maximo already has one version of the record loaded into memory when the record in the database is modified independently. Maximo then tries to work with the in-memory object and sees it doesn't match what is in the database and throws that error. Timing doesn't really have anything to do with it (other than that an edit happened at some point after the record was loaded into memory).
What you need to do is make sure you are modifying the exact same task/assignment/labtrans record that has already been loaded into memory. That "MXServer.getMXServer().getMboSet" stuff is guaranteed to use a new object. That is how you start a new transaction in Maximo; how you make sure you are not using anything already loaded into memory. I suspect you want to get your set off of the implicit "mbo" object the script will give to you.
I want to define a Ring Group that, when called, rings one extension and one external number (mobile phone). What is the best way to achieve that?
Right now only the extension is called. So just entering an external number in the Destination field does not work, the logs say
[NOTICE] switch_cpp.cpp:1376 [ring groups][call forward all] user_exists id <mobileno> <domainname>
and later
[DEBUG] switch_ivr_originate.c:3865 Originate Resulted in Error Cause: 27 [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER]
It will check all calls using the dialplan to see if the destination is a local number for an external number it should say user_exists false every time.
This [DESTINATION_OUT_OF_ORDER] indicates that it may not have found a matching outbound route that matches the number of digits of the external phone number. Or it may mean that your carrier rejected the call maybe didn't like the caller ID that was sent. Easiest thing to try is attempt it with an outbound rout to different carrier.
In case you weren't aware FusionPBX 4.4 was release on 5 April 2018. Instructions to upgrade are post on docs.fusionpbx.com. Search term upgrade (version upgrade).
Material A:
http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/83final/ba554_90007/ch04s03.html
Material B:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/5487?page=0,1
Here is a snapshot from material A that told me session resumption will be failed if I called SSL_free, even if save the session via SSL_get1_session().
But a piece code in material B show me SSL_free will result in nothing for session resumption. Because SSL_get1_session will increase the reference counter in session object and allow SSL object to be reused after session freed.
Here is the snapshot from material B:
So, those confused me so much, and which one is truly correct?
Thx!
I think source A is wrong and I think it mistakes SSL_get1_session with SSL_get_session, which actually is SSL_get0_session (does not increment the counter). The OpenSSL documentation is clear in this issue.
The man page fully supports the second statement.