Material A:
http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/83final/ba554_90007/ch04s03.html
Material B:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/5487?page=0,1
Here is a snapshot from material A that told me session resumption will be failed if I called SSL_free, even if save the session via SSL_get1_session().
But a piece code in material B show me SSL_free will result in nothing for session resumption. Because SSL_get1_session will increase the reference counter in session object and allow SSL object to be reused after session freed.
Here is the snapshot from material B:
So, those confused me so much, and which one is truly correct?
Thx!
I think source A is wrong and I think it mistakes SSL_get1_session with SSL_get_session, which actually is SSL_get0_session (does not increment the counter). The OpenSSL documentation is clear in this issue.
The man page fully supports the second statement.
Related
I'm looking if there is a way to call the board (DSXLE5) and request info of the current KeyMapping value?
It is the first time I deal with DSX5 family, I've already identified that the firmware change process is different, as before, to change a DSXLE4 8 port card to be 2in + 6out we used
$mvConnectorConfig -2in6out -sn=XXXXX
and now I see that DSXLE5 needs to point the firmware (*.pin) with the load parameter.
$mvConnectorConfig load -f=xmio5_x2_00i12o.pin -sn=xxxxx
I see from the help that we can use -KeyMapping to change the boards, but how does it work and can we call the board to show which mapping is currently using?
I'm new here, so I'm sorry if it isn't 100% straight question.
Best Regards,
Rafael Girotto
I'm trying to get a BG95 to activate on hologram.
Here are my commands:
AT+QCFG="band",F,180A,180A OK
AT+QCFG="iotopmode",2 OK
AT+QCFG="nwscanseq",020301 OK
AT+QCFG="nwscanmode",0 OK
AT+QCFG="snrscan",0 OK
AT+QICSGP=1,1,"hologram","","",1 OK
AT+QIACT=1 ERROR
At first I thought it was antenna/signal related so I ran AT+CSQ and got this:
+csq: 11,99
This tells me I have a good signal I believe.
Next I tried AT+QNWINFO and get this:
+QNWINFO: "eMTC","311480","LTE BAND 13",5230
In my mind this is saying it's connected to a network.
After trying that I tried to activate again and got this:
AT+QIACT=1
ERROR
The weird thing is it activated just fine about a week ago with pure AT commands. I did try and use an Arduino library with it (WisLTEBG96TCPIP) which may have changed a setting in it. I've done a factory reset but the it still woln't activate.
Another strange thing is the hologram dashboard. Every once and a while it will show the SIM as connected, even though I can't activate.
I have tried with 2 different SIM cards any get the same activation error.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Verizon has cut off all non ODI products. If your hardware has not been Verizon ODI 'certified' it will no longer be allow to be connected to their network, I have 5 new pet rocks thanks to them. The solution is to purchase new modems from vendors that have been through the Verizon ODI program or switch carriers.
I had the same problem before, after a lot of maling with network operator I find out that there isn't a LTE-CAT-M1 (eMTC) network in my area, I tested in another area successfully
Also before setting AT+QCFG commands try AT+CFUN = 0
and after setting AT+QCFG commands try AT+CFUN = 1 .
before sending AT+QIACT, try 'AT+CEREG?' command several times and tell me what is the return of it
Hi I'm trying to add a labor transaction from an action automation script with the object being ASSIGNMENT in Maximo. I am currently trying the code below.
labTransSet = MXServer.getMXServer().getMboSet("LABTRANS",ui);
labTrans = labTransSet.add();
labTrans.setValue("laborcode", userLabor);
labTrans.setValue("wonum", assignWonum);
sds1=SimpleDateFormat("hh.mm aa").format(firstDate);
sds2=SimpleDateFormat("hh.mm aa").format(Date());
labTrans.setValue("STARTTIME", sds1);
labTrans.setValue("FINISHTIME", sds2);
labTransSet.save();
labTransSet.close();
userLabor is the username of the current user
assignWonum is the assignment work order number
firstDate is the scheduled date field from the assignment
The labor record is being added correctly with the right data, but when I go to route my workflow after the script is called from a button, I am given the warning BMXAA8229W WOACTIVITY has been updated by another user and the work order does not route. I am under the impression that this is happening because the assignment object for the script is being queried at the same time I try to add and save a labor record. Does anyone know if my guess is correct or what else the problem is and how I can fix this? Thanks
That error occurs because Maximo already has one version of the record loaded into memory when the record in the database is modified independently. Maximo then tries to work with the in-memory object and sees it doesn't match what is in the database and throws that error. Timing doesn't really have anything to do with it (other than that an edit happened at some point after the record was loaded into memory).
What you need to do is make sure you are modifying the exact same task/assignment/labtrans record that has already been loaded into memory. That "MXServer.getMXServer().getMboSet" stuff is guaranteed to use a new object. That is how you start a new transaction in Maximo; how you make sure you are not using anything already loaded into memory. I suspect you want to get your set off of the implicit "mbo" object the script will give to you.
Good day
I'm trying to perform load testing with LoadRunner 11. Here's an issue:
I've got automatically generated script after actions recording
Need to catch Session ID. I do it with web_reg_save_param() in the next way:
web_reg_save_param("S_ID",
"LB=Set-Cookie: JSESSIONID=",
"RB=; Path=/app/;",
LAST);
web_add_cookie("S_ID; DOMAIN={host}");
I catch ID from the response (Tree View):
D2B6F5B05A1366C395F8E86D8212F324
Compare it with Replay Log and see:
"S_ID = 75C78912AE78D26BDBDE73EBD9ADB510".
Compare 2 IDs above with the next request ID and see 3rd ID (Tree View):
80FE367101229FA34EB6429F4822E595
Why do I have 3 different IDs?
Let me know if I have to provide extra information.
You should Use(Search=All) below Code. Provided your Right and left boundary is correct:
web_reg_save_param("S_ID",
"LB=Set-Cookie: JSESSIONID=",
"RB=; Path=/app/;",
"Search=All",
LAST);
web_add_cookie("{S_ID}; DOMAIN={host}");
For Details refer HP Mannual for web_reg_save_param function.
I do not see what the conflict or controversy is here. Yes, items related to state or session will definitely change from user to user, one recording session to the next. They may even change from one request to the next. You may need to record several times to identify the change and use pattern for when you need to collect and when you need to reuse the collected data from a response in a subsequent request.
Take a listen to this podcast. It should help
http://www.perfbytes.com/dynamic-data-correlation
here i have got one issue.can some one please help me to resolve this.
i was trying to extract some data to DS 0FI_AP_6...
then in InfoPackage Monitor I can see like..
-->Requests (messages): Everything OK
-->Extraction (messages): Everything OK
-->Transfer (IDocs and TRFC): Missing messages or warnings
-->Info IDoc 2 : sent, not arrived ; IDoc ready for dispatch (ALE service)
Data Package 1 : 23752 Records arrived in BW
Data Package 2 : 15216 Records arrived in BW
Request IDoc : Application document posted
Info IDoc 1 : Application document posted
Info IDoc 3 : Application document posted
Info IDoc 4 : Application document posted
-->Processing (data packet): Everything OK
Data Package 1 ( 38672 Records ) : Everything OK
in Status Menu I am having message like...
Missing data packages for PSA Table
Diagnosis
Data packets are missing from PSA Table . BI processing does not
return any errors. The data transport from the source system to BI was
probably incorrect.
Procedure
Check the tRFC overview in the source system.
You access this log using the wizard or following the menu path
"Environment -> Transact. RFC -> Source System".
Error handling:
If the tRFC is incorrect, resolve the errors listed there.
Check that the source system is connected properly to BI. In
particular, check the remote user authorizations in BI.
Please suggest me how to resolve this issue...
thanks in advance for your help and quick reply is much appreciated.
But what the worst thing is I deleted the infopackage in PSA by mistake.
In the normal case, if I repeat the process again, the delta load would be OK, but now the delta load remains error.
so gurus,
1. how can I restart my delta loading correctly?
2. I want to modify the timestamp in the delta table, but how to do it ?
Go to T-Code RSA7 in the source system. This will tell you the date/timestamp that the delta is set to. If the date was changed to a range that no longer works then you will need to re-initialize the datasource in the BW system side. However, the Delta date may still be fine becauase it may have never been changed when you tried to first do your load because of the connection issues.
You can create a new infopackage and set the update to Initialize Datasource with Data Transfer. This will essentially run a full load from the datasource and then reset the delta pointer date/timestamp to when you ran it. This way you will capture all the data that you needed and anything that was already in the PSA should be overwritten.
Also note that you should delete or set the request status to red on the previous request that may contain bad data in the PSA.
From the original error it seems like you are having an RFC connection issue between the datasource and BW. Contact your BASIS support and have them check the connection to make sure it is good. To ensure that your datasource is extracting properly you can run t-code RSA3 on it in the source system. This will ensure that the extraction of data is working properly.