I customized a new registration page in Blazor Wasm and want to create a new User with new Tenant. I wanted to use ITenantAppService.CreateAsync but it occurred permission problem.
var tenantDto = await _tenantAppService.CreateAsync(new TenantCreateDto()
{
Name = dto.UserName,
AdminEmailAddress = dto.EmailAddress,
AdminPassword = dto.Password,
});
Isn't it possible to create a Tenant by anonymous user?
I think I need to remove this permissions from tenantService or I need to give these permissions to anonymous user.
How can I create new tenant for new user?
I found solution.
Firstly, I tried to remove permissions but I didn't know how to remove easily. Then I tried firstly creating a user without tenant, then give him tenant.create permission but it didn't work.
Finally, I created a class
CustomTenantAppService : TenantManagementAppServiceBase, ITenantAppService
and implemented methods of ITenantAppService, so I could do everything that I want.
Related
I'm currently failing at wrapping my head around claims. I have a ASP.Net Core 3 project with the angular template and users stored in app.
I want to add claims to my users, reading up on I thought it would be easy, just add something along the lines of
await _UserManager.AddClaimAsync(user, new Claim(AccountStatic.ClaimTypes._Claim_Id, user.Id));
When you create the user, and then get it back using the below line once they are logged in again:
User.FindFirst(AccountStatic.ClaimTypes._Claim_Id)?.Value;
This does however not work. I can see the claims being written to AspNetUserClaims table in my database but it's not there in the users claims when they log in. There are a few other claims there, but not the ones I have added.
Do I need to define somewhere which of the users claims get included when they log in?
Edit.
I found a post stating that I need to add claims using a DI AddClaimsPrincipalFactory. So I added this class.
public class UserClaimsPrincipalFactory : UserClaimsPrincipalFactory<ApplicationUser>
{
public UserClaimsPrincipalFactory(UserManager<ApplicationUser> userManager,IOptions<IdentityOptions> optionsAccessor): base(userManager, optionsAccessor)
{}
//https://levelup.gitconnected.com/add-extra-user-claims-in-asp-net-core-web-applications-1f28c98c9ec6
protected override async Task<ClaimsIdentity> GenerateClaimsAsync(ApplicationUser user)
{
var identity = await base.GenerateClaimsAsync(user);
identity.AddClaim(new Claim(AccountStatic.ClaimTypes.Claim_Id, user.Id ?? "[no id]"));
return identity;
}
}
And if I step through the code I can see the claims being added here. But in the Controller my custom claims are not present.
internal string GetUserId()
{
if (User.Identity.IsAuthenticated == false)
return null;
return User.FindFirst(AccountStatic.ClaimTypes.Claim_Id)?.Value;
}
Update. Ok I find this very strange. I have been trying to do what others claim work but for me nothing gets me the users name or id. inspecting the User I get the following. Nothing here contains any reference to the logged in user.
Update 2:
Just noticed that there is actually an Id in there: {http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/05/identity/claims/nameidentifier: ed107a11-6c62-496b-901e-ed9e6497662a} Seems to be the users id from the database. Not sure how to access it yet though.
These return null.
User.FindFirst(JwtRegisteredClaimNames.NameId)?.Value;
User.FindFirst("nameidentifier")?.Value;
User.FindFirst("NameIdentifier")?.Value;
Another update
I'm using a UserClaimsPrincipalFactory and breakingpointing it and looking at the Claims I can see that all of the ones I want are there. But again, these are not available in my API controllers as seen in the first picture.
I finally understood the problem, in large parts thanks to Ruard van Elburgs comments, and the answer he made in the linked question IdentityServer4 Role Based Authorization.
The problem is that the claims are not added to the access token.
There are two tokens, the access token and the identity token.
- Ruard van Elburg
They key to understanding what was going on was finding out that there are two tokens, and that they contain different claims and have different purposes.
You can force claims from one token to also be included in the other if you deem it necessary.
The solution to my problem was to add this in Startup.ConfigureServices
services
.AddIdentityServer(options => {})
.AddApiAuthorization<ApplicationUser, ApplicationDbContext>(options =>
{
foreach (var c in options.ApiResources)
{
// the string name of the token I want to include
c.UserClaims.Add(AccountStatic.ClaimTypes.Claim_Id);
}
});
I still have not figured out how to get the Identity token, but as I'm now including the user Id in the access token my problems are solved for the moment.
I am managing a Keycloak realm with only a single, fully-trusted external IdP added that is intended to be the default authentication mechanism for users.
I do not want to allow user to register, i.e. I want to manually create a local Keycloak user, and that user should then be allowed to link his external IdP account to the pre-existing Keycloak account, having the email address as common identifier. Users with access to the external IdP but without an existing Keycloak account should not be allowed to connect.
I tried the following First Broker Login settings, but whenever a user tries to login, he gets an error message (code: invalid_user_credentials).
Do you have any idea what my mistake might be?
Looks like they integrated this feature in version 4.5.0.
See automatic account link docs.
Basically you need to create a new flow and add 2 alternative executions:
Create User If Unique
Automatically Link Brokered Account
According to the doc: https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/server_admin/index.html#detect-existing-user-first-login-flow, you must create a new flow like this:
et voilà :)
As per this discussion:
https://keycloak.discourse.group/t/link-idp-to-existing-user/1094/5
It’s a bug in keycloak and they seem to be a reluctant to fix it for
whatever reason. I have very few users so I solved it by manually
querying the idp for the information keycloak uses and then copying it
into the relevant fields in the UI. So there is no sign up process for
my users I just make them myself. Obviously that’s a poor solution
though, what we really need is someone to take over that PR and
persuade the maintainers to merge it.
This is the PR: https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/6282
As it is described in this GitHub issue response the solution is to use a JavaScript authenticator that handles this.
In order to do so, you need to do the folowing:
Enable [custom authenticators using JavaScript in your server[(https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/server_installation/#profiles) by https://stackoverflow.com/a/63274532/550222creating a file profile.properties in your configuration directory that contains the following:
feature.scripts=enabled
Create the custom authenticator. You have to create a JAR file (essentially a ZIP file) with the following structure:
META-INF/keycloak-scripts.json
auth-user-must-exist.js
The content of the files are in this Gist, but I am including them here as well:
META-INF/keycloak-scripts.json:
{
"authenticators": [
{
"name": "User must exists",
"fileName": "auth-user-must-exists.js",
"description": "User must exists"
}
]
}
auth-user-must-exist.js:
AuthenticationFlowError = Java.type("org.keycloak.authentication.AuthenticationFlowError")
ServicesLogger = Java.type("org.keycloak.services.ServicesLogger")
AbstractIdpAuthenticator = Java.type("org.keycloak.authentication.authenticators.broker.AbstractIdpAuthenticator")
IdpCreateUserIfUniqueAuthenticator = Java.type("org.keycloak.authentication.authenticators.broker.IdpCreateUserIfUniqueAuthenticator")
var IdpUserMustExists = Java.extend(IdpCreateUserIfUniqueAuthenticator)
function authenticate(context) {
var auth = new IdpUserMustExists() {
authenticateImpl: function(context, serializedCtx, brokerContext) {
var parent = Java.super(auth)
var session = context.getSession()
var realm = context.getRealm()
var authSession = context.getAuthenticationSession()
if (authSession.getAuthNote(AbstractIdpAuthenticator.EXISTING_USER_INFO) != null) {
context.attempted()
return
}
var username = parent.getUsername(context, serializedCtx, brokerContext)
if (username == null) {
ServicesLogger.LOGGER.resetFlow(realm.isRegistrationEmailAsUsername() ? "Email" : "Username")
authSession.setAuthNote(AbstractIdpAuthenticator.ENFORCE_UPDATE_PROFILE, "true")
context.resetFlow()
return
}
var duplication = parent.checkExistingUser(context, username, serializedCtx, brokerContext)
if (duplication == null) {
LOG.info("user not found " + username)
context.failure(AuthenticationFlowError.INVALID_USER)
return
} else {
authSession.setAuthNote(AbstractIdpAuthenticator.EXISTING_USER_INFO, duplication.serialize())
context.attempted()
}
}
}
auth.authenticate(context)
}
Then, you can define as follows:
User Must Exist -> ALTERNATIVE
Automatically Set Existing User -> ALTERNATIVE
Honestly i am surprised by the keycloak auto creating behavior. I tried to add new Authentication flow as descibed here https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/server_admin/index.html#automatically-link-existing-first-login-flow
My flow :
1 - Create User If Unique [ALTERNATIVE]
2 - Automatically Link Brokered Account [ALTERNATIVE]
My use case : Authenticating users from Github ( Github as IDP )
Result : when a github user logon with an existing "username" keycloak links the github account to my local user ( based on his username ). I expected using his email instead of username.
I am working on a .Net Core API, and inside my Controller, I have the following code:
if (User.Identity.IsAuthenticated)
{
var username = HttpContext.User.FindFirstValue(ClaimTypes.NameIdentifier);
var user = await _userManager.FindByNameAsync(username);
artistCardDtoCollection = _artistsService.GetAllArtists(user.Id, User.IsInRole("Admin"));
}
The code above is because I wish to pass the User.Id (if logged in) and a IsAdmin flag to my GetAllArtists method.
The code above is failing on User.IsInRole("Admin"). I get a false when I know 100% that the user in question is an Admin. I've double checked the database via SQL Management Studio.
This makes me think one can't use User.IsInRole() when working with JWT. If that is the case, then what is the correct way? Thanks
Probably it could be the caching issue with User.IsInRole(), if we check documentation we will find:
IsInRole first checks the IsRoleListCached property to determine
whether a cached list of role names for the current user is available.
If the IsRoleListCached property is true, the cached list is checked
for the specified role. If the IsInRole method finds the specified
role in the cached list, it returns true. If IsInRole does not find
the specified role, it calls the GetRolesForUser method of the default
Provider instance to determine whether the user name is associated
with a role from the data source for the configured ApplicationName
value.
In your case you can try to use GetRolesAsync like below:
var user = await _userManager.FindByNameAsync(username);
var roles = await _userManager.GetRolesAsync(user);
artistCardDtoCollection = _artistsService.GetAllArtists(user.Id, roles.Contains("Admin"));
We use Apache Shiro to authenticate and authorize users using our active directory.
Authenticating the user and mapping groups works just fine using the following config:
adRealm = org.apache.shiro.realm.activedirectory.ActiveDirectoryRealm
adRealm.searchBase = "OU=MYORGANIZATION,DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=COM"
adRealm.groupRolesMap = "CN=SOMEREADGROUP":"read","CN=SOMEMODIFYGROUP":"modify","CN=SOMEADMINGROUP":"admin"
adRealm.url = ldaps://my.ad.url:636
adRealm.systemUsername= systemuser
adRealm.systemPassword= secret
adRealm.principalSuffix= #myorganization.mydomain.com
I can authenticate in Shiro using the following lines:
String user = "someuser";
String password = "somepassword";
Subject currentUser = SecurityUtils.getSubject ();
if (!currentUser.isAuthenticated ()){
UsernamePasswordToken token = new UsernamePasswordToken (user,
password);
token.setRememberMe (true);
currentUser.login (token);
}
We now want to get more user information from our ActiveDirectory. How can I do that using Apache Shiro? I was not able to find anything about it in the documentation.
In the source code of ActiveDirectoryRealm I found this line:
NamingEnumeration answer = ldapContext.search(searchBase, searchFilter, searchArguments, searchCtls);
So the first part of the answer is clear: use the ldapContext to search something in it. But how can I retrieve the LdapContext?
It depends on what you are trying to do. Are you just trying to reuse the context to run a query for something other then authentication or authorization? Or are you trying to change the behavior of the query in the AD realm?
If the latter, you would need to extend the ActiveDirectoryRealm and override the queryForAuthorizationInfo() method.
Are you implementing something that is custom for your environment?
(updated)
A couple things:
The realm has access to the LdapContext in the two touch points: queryForAuthenticationInfo() and queryForAuthorizationInfo(), so if you extend the AD realm or AbstractLdapRealm you should already have it. You could change the query to return other info and add the extra info to your Principal. Then you have access to that info directly from your Subject object.
Your realms, are not required to be singletons.
If you want to do some other sort of user management (email all users with a given role, create a user, etc). Then you could create a LdapContextFactory in your shiro.ini, and use the same instance for multiple objects.
[main]
...
ldapContextFactory = org.apache.shiro.realm.ldap.JndiLdapContextFactory
ldapContextFactory.systemUsername = foobar
ldapContextFactory.systemPassword = barfoo
adRealm = org.apache.shiro.realm.activedirectory.ActiveDirectoryRealm
adRealm.ldapContextFactory = $ldapContextFactory
...
myObject = com.biz.myco.MyObject
myObject.ldapContextFactory = $ldapContextFactory
This would work well if myObject is interacting with other Shiro components, (responding to events, etc), but less so if you need access to it from another framework. You could work around this by some sort of static initialization that builds creates the ldapContextFactory, but in my opinion, this is where the sweet spot of using the shiro.ini ends, and where using Guice or Spring shines.
Wishing You a Happy New year I start with my first problem of the year
here's what I do in login method of user controller:
Yii::import('ext.eoauth.*');
$ui = new EOAuthUserIdentity(
array(
//Set the "scope" to the service you want to use
'scope'=>'https://www.googleapis.com/auth/userinfo.email https://www.googleapis.com/auth/userinfo.profile',
'provider'=>array(
'request'=>'https://www.google.com/accounts/OAuthGetRequestToken',
'authorize'=>'https://www.google.com/accounts/OAuthAuthorizeToken',
'access'=>'https://www.google.com/accounts/OAuthGetAccessToken',
)
)
);
if ($ui->authenticate()) {
$user=Yii::app()->user;
$user->login($ui);
$this->redirect(array('loggedin'));
}
else
throw new CHttpException(401, $ui->error);
its logged and in place of name it display the token key.. i need to get email at least to store it to db... Please help me out.. thanks in advance
In the UserIdentity class, You need to write a line i.e
$this->setState('name', 'value');
This is used to set the `Yii::app()->user->name
so if you set it as
$this->setState('name', $record->email);
$this->errorCode=self::ERROR_NONE;
in your UserIdentity class then Yii::app()->user->name will return you the email or whatever you want
I tried lot to get user detail by using above code.. Unfortunately I failed.. Then I started with eauth integration..I downloaded the demo example in the url and added extension to my extension folder inside protected and configured the main.php.. I got integration of more than 10 login integration.. I commented the services extension inside component tag in main.php to get Google and Yahoo login integration.. It works... Which made me to access the user name also.. Thanks for support..
demo of eauth
For integration find the link below
Integration link for eauth