prestashop - Can't load Order status at line 242 in file classes/PaymentModule.php - prestashop

when I order with an obligation to pay
[PrestaShopException]
Can't load Order status
at line 242 in file classes/PaymentModule.php
237. }
238.
239. $order_status = new OrderState((int) $id_order_state, (int) $this->context->language->id);
240. if (!Validate::isLoadedObject($order_status)) {
241. PrestaShopLogger::addLog('PaymentModule::validateOrder - Order Status cannot be loaded', 3, null, 'Cart', (int) $id_cart, true);
242. throw new PrestaShopException('Can\'t load Order status');
243. }
244.
245. if (!$this->active) {
246. PrestaShopLogger::addLog('PaymentModule::validateOrder - Module is not active', 3, null, 'Cart', (int) $id_cart, true);
247. die(Tools::displayError());
PaymentModuleCore->validateOrder - [line 58 - modules/ps_wirepayment/controllers/front/validation.php] - [9 Arguments]
Ps_WirepaymentValidationModuleFrontController->postProcess - [line 270 - classes/controller/Controller.php]
ControllerCore->run - [line 509 - classes/Dispatcher.php]
DispatcherCore->dispatch - [line 24 - override/classes/Dispatcher.php]
Dispatcher->dispatch - [line 28 - index.php]


insert with phpmyadmin the table
ps_order_state:
INSERT INTO `ps_order_state` (`id_order_state`, `invoice`, `send_email`, `module_name`, `color`, `unremovable`, `hidden`, `logable`, `delivery`, `shipped`, `paid`, `deleted`) VALUES
(1, 0, 1, 'cheque', 'RoyalBlue', 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
(2, 1, 1, '', 'LimeGreen', 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0),
(3, 1, 1, '', 'DarkOrange', 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0),
(4, 1, 1, '', 'BlueViolet', 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0),
(5, 1, 0, '', '#108510', 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0),
(6, 0, 1, '', 'Crimson', 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
(7, 1, 1, '', '#ec2e15', 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
(8, 0, 1, '', '#8f0621', 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
(9, 1, 1, '', 'HotPink', 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0),
(10, 0, 1, 'bankwire', 'RoyalBlue', 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
(11, 0, 0, '', 'RoyalBlue', 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
(12, 1, 1, '', 'LimeGreen', 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0),
(13, 1, 0, '', '#DDEEFF', 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0);


Your ps_wirepayment module is trying to set an order status to an invalid / deleted id_order_state.
If you haven't modified it , bankwire modulee relies on ps_configuration "PS_OS_BANKWIRE" status value,
so make sure the ID value is valid and links to a valid order state in your database.

Related

Issues with OFDM transmitter and reciever in GNUradio

I am having some issues with GNUradio when trying to use OFDM transmitter and reciever. I am vaguely following the example on the WiKi here is my flow chart:
I am struggling to get the correct values for the OFDM modules. I have tried multiple values for the Occupied Carriers and Sync Word.
Current values:
Occupied Carriers: (list(range(-26, -21)) + list(range(-20, -7)) + list(range(-6, 0)) + list(range(1, 7)) + list(range(8, 21)) + list(range(22, 27)),)
Sync Word 1&2: (0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0)
Pilot Carrier: ((-21, -7, 7, 21,),)
This program is not working and it gives the following error:
TypeError: __init__(): incompatible constructor arguments. The following argument types are supported:
1. gnuradio.digital.digital_python.ofdm_carrier_allocator_cvc(fft_len: int, occupied_carriers: List[List[int]], pilot_carriers: List[List[int]], pilot_symbols: List[List[complex]], sync_words: List[List[complex]], len_tag_key: str = 'packet_len', output_is_shifted: bool = True)
Invoked with: 64; kwargs: occupied_carriers=([-26, -25, -24, -23, -22, -20, -19, -18, -17, -16, -15, -14, -13, -12, -11, -10, -9, -8, -6, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26],), pilot_carriers=((-21, -7, 7, 21),), pilot_symbols=(1, 1, 1, -1), sync_words=[(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]], len_tag_key='packet_len'
This is new territory for me so please ask if I can make any clarifications

KeyError: "None of [Index([...] are in the [columns]

I've got numpy array with shape of (3, 50):
data = np.array([[0, 3, 0, 2, 0, 0, 1, 2, 2, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 2, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0,
1, 1, 2, 0, 0, 2],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 1, 6, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0,
3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 5, 2, 2, 2, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 3, 2, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0],
[1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]])
and the following column names:
new_cols = [f'description_word_{i+1}_count' for i in range(50)]
I'm trying to add new columns in already existing dataframe in such way:
df[new_cols] = data
but get the error:
KeyError: "None of [Index(['description_word_1_count',
'description_word_2_count',\n 'description_word_3_count',
'description_word_4_count',\n 'description_word_5_count',
'description_word_6_count',\n 'description_word_7_count',
'description_word_8_count',\n 'description_word_9_count',
'description_word_10_count',\n 'description_word_11_count',
'description_word_12_count',\n 'description_word_13_count',
'description_word_14_count',\n 'description_word_15_count',
'description_word_16_count',\n 'description_word_17_count',
'description_word_18_count',\n 'description_word_19_count',
'description_word_20_count',\n 'description_word_21_count',
'description_word_22_count',\n 'description_word_23_count',
'description_word_24_count',\n 'description_word_25_count',
'description_word_26_count',\n 'description_word_27_count',
'description_word_28_count',\n 'description_word_29_count',
'description_word_30_count',\n 'description_word_31_count',
'description_word_32_count',\n 'description_word_33_count',
'description_word_34_count',\n 'description_word_35_count',
'description_word_36_count',\n 'description_word_37_count',
'description_word_38_count',\n 'description_word_39_count',
'description_word_40_count',\n 'description_word_41_count',
'description_word_42_count',\n 'description_word_43_count',
'description_word_44_count',\n 'description_word_45_count',
'description_word_46_count',\n 'description_word_47_count',
'description_word_48_count',\n 'description_word_49_count',
'description_word_50_count'],\n dtype='object')] are in the
[columns]"
Also I don't know where it finds a '\n' symbols in my column names.
At the same time creating a new dataframe with the data is OK:
new_df = pd.DataFrame(data=data, columns=new_cols)
Does anyone know what is causing the error?

Suppose you have a df like this:
df = pd.DataFrame({'person': [1,1,1], 'event': ['A','B','C']})
You can add new columns like this:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
data = np.array([[0, 3, 0, 2, 0, 0, 1, 2, 2, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 2, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0,
1, 1, 2, 0, 0, 2],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 1, 6, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0,
3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 5, 2, 2, 2, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 3, 2, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0],
[1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]])
new_cols = [f'description_word_{i+1}_count' for i in range(50)]
df[new_cols] = pd.DataFrame(data, index=df.index)
I think the problem is that you are using a syntax to create series, when you actually need to create several series. In other words, a dataframe.

How to print a specific information from value_count()?

import pandas as pd
data = {'qtd': [0, 1, 4, 0, 1, 3, 1, 3, 0, 0,
3, 1, 3, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 3,
0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1,
0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 3, 0, 3, 0, 0,
2, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2,
0, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0,
2, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 1,
1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1,
0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1,
1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
}
df = pd.DataFrame (data, columns = ['qtd'])
Counting
df['qtd'].value_counts()
0 43
1 34
2 10
3 7
4 1
Name: qtd, dtype: int64
What I want is to print a phrase: "The total with zero occurrencies is 43"
Tried with .head(1) but shows more than I want.

Does this solve your problem? The [0] indicates the index you wish to print, in this case the very first occurrence in your column of a data frame.
print('The total with zero occurences is:', df['qtd'].value_counts()[0])
The output of the code above will be:
The total with zero occurences is: 43

I am not sure if you want this but may be helpful:
import inflect
e = inflect.engine()
(df['qtd'].map(e.number_to_words).radd("The total with ").add(" occurances is ")
.value_counts().astype(str).reset_index().agg(':'.join,1))
0 The total with zero occurances is :43
1 The total with one occurances is :34
2 The total with two occurances is :10
3 The total with three occurances is :7
4 The total with four occurances is :1
dtype: object

How to create a matrix consists of submatrix

I want to create a matrix consists of some submatrix, or elements are defined by some conditions about indices.
e.g.
X = np.array(
[[0, 0, 1, 1, 1],
[0, 0, 1, 1, 1],
[1, 1, 0, 0, 1],
[1, 1, 0, 0, 1],
[1, 1, 1, 1, 0]]
)
where i-row and j-col meets conditions below
0 if 2k ≤ i < 2(k+1) and 2k ≤ j < 2(k+1)
1 otherwise
In the above condition, k is 0, 1, 2... and 2 is also a parameter to change and
So, what I finally need is
0 if nk ≤ i < n(k+1) nk ≤ j < n(k+1)
1 otherwise
I think np.ix_ is good for this demand, but it requires a loop structure (I hate loops).
Is there some nice way to generate this?

One way would be utilizing the outer method of the not_equal operator like so:
N = 17; k = 5
np.not_equal.outer(*2*(np.arange(N)//k,)).view('u1')
# array([[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1],
# [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1],
# [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1],
# [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1],
# [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1],
# [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1],
# [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1],
# [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1],
# [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1],
# [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1],
# [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1],
# [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1],
# [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1],
# [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1],
# [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1],
# [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0],
# [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0]], dtype=uint8)

Vectorize this for loop in numpy

I am trying to compute matrix z (defined below) in python with numpy.
Here's my current solution (using 1 for loop)
z = np.zeros((n, k))
for i in range(n):
v = pi * (1 / math.factorial(x[i])) * np.exp(-1 * lamb) * (lamb ** x[i])
numerator = np.sum(v)
c = v / numerator
z[i, :] = c
return z
Is it possible to completely vectorize this computation? I need to do this computation for thousands of iterations, and matrix operations in numpy is much faster than huge for loops.

Here is a vectorized version of E. It replaces the for-loop and scalar arithmetic with NumPy broadcasting and array-based arithmetic:
def alt_E(x):
x = x[:, None]
z = pi * (np.exp(-lamb) * (lamb**x)) / special.factorial(x)
denom = z.sum(axis=1)[:, None]
z /= denom
return z
I ran em.py to get a sense for the typical size of x, lamb, pi, n and k. On data of this size,
alt_E is about 120x faster than E:
In [32]: %timeit E(x)
100 loops, best of 3: 11.5 ms per loop
In [33]: %timeit alt_E(x)
10000 loops, best of 3: 94.7 µs per loop
In [34]: 11500/94.7
Out[34]: 121.43611404435057
This is the setup I used for the benchmark:
import math
import numpy as np
import scipy.special as special
def alt_E(x):
x = x[:, None]
z = pi * (np.exp(-lamb) * (lamb**x)) / special.factorial(x)
denom = z.sum(axis=1)[:, None]
z /= denom
return z
def E(x):
z = np.zeros((n, k))
for i in range(n):
v = pi * (1 / math.factorial(x[i])) * \
np.exp(-1 * lamb) * (lamb ** x[i])
numerator = np.sum(v)
c = v / numerator
z[i, :] = c
return z
n = 576
k = 2
x = np.array([0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5])
lamb = np.array([ 0.84835141, 1.04025989])
pi = np.array([ 0.5806958, 0.4193042])
assert np.allclose(alt_E(x), E(x))
By the way, E could also be calculated using scipy.stats.poisson:
import scipy.stats as stats
pois = stats.poisson(mu=lamb)
def alt_E2(x):
z = pi * pois.pmf(x[:,None])
denom = z.sum(axis=1)[:, None]
z /= denom
return z
but this does not turn out to be faster, at least for arrays of this length:
In [33]: %timeit alt_E(x)
10000 loops, best of 3: 94.7 µs per loop
In [102]: %timeit alt_E2(x)
1000 loops, best of 3: 278 µs per loop
For larger x, alt_E2 is faster:
In [104]: x = np.random.random(10000)
In [106]: %timeit alt_E(x)
100 loops, best of 3: 2.18 ms per loop
In [105]: %timeit alt_E2(x)
1000 loops, best of 3: 643 µs per loop