column names: mastertransid, type_internal_id_int
Query returns 3 rows. For type_internal_id_int the value can either be SalesOrd, ItemShip or CustInvc
mastertransid is the same for all 3 rows and groups the three together
However if there is a record for type_internal_id_int and it = CustInvc then I need to hide the other two rows.
I've tried grouping my data using <cfoutput group by="type_internal_id_int"> without any luck.
From the image I have included, I don't want customers to see SalesOrd or ItemShip, if a CustInvc value exists.
Related
This question already has answers here:
How do I limit the number of rows returned by an Oracle query after ordering?
(14 answers)
Closed last year.
I'm wanting to find the very last pallet placed in a given batch of locations within a warehouse.
I currently have:
SELECT
max(datreg) AS "_Reg Date",
logguser,
mha,
rack,
horcoor,
vercoor
FROM
L16T3
WHERE
l16lcode = '3'
AND
rack = #('Rack?',rack)
AND
horcoor >= #('Loc From?',horcoor)
AND
horcoor <= #('Loc To?',horcoor)
ORDER BY 1
LIMIT 1
I thought this would return just the last pallet placed in that specific location, but I'm still getting like 4 entries for one location.
I would only want the highlighted result, as that is the most recent pallet placed in 110-001-04:
I'm sure this is super simple but im just starting out :)
You can use a combination of ORDER BY and LIMIT to achieve what you want.
Limit
In a lot of other databases, this is called LIMIT, but I missed that you are using an Oracle database, which has a different dialect of SQL. In Oracle, the most direct equivilent of a limit is:
FETCH FIRST n ROWS ONLY
This means that your query can return at most n rows. So, for example, FETCH FIRST 1 ROWS ONLY means that it can return at most 1 row. The issue is that it takes rows from the start of the table, not the end (and despite the wording implying FETCH LAST n ROWS ONLY would be a thing, it doesn't seem to be) --- you can essentially think of it as cutting off the rows below given limit.
For example, if I have rows in order "A", "B", and "C", FETCH FIRST 1 ROWS ONLY only returns "A". If "C" was really the one I wanted (e.g. the row at the bottom), then I would need to add an ORDER BY clause to first order the results so that the one I want is at the top.
Order By
ORDER BY column dir orders your results by a specific column in a specific direction, e.g. in ascending (ASC) or descending (DESC) order. The syntax actually allows for more complex ordering (e.g. ordering by multiple columns or by a function), but for this simple case this should do what we need.
Putting it together
You want to order so that your desired row is at the top of your table, then you want to limit your results set to contain at most one row.
Adding something like this to the end of your query should work:
ORDER BY "_Reg Date" DESC
FETCH FIRST 1 ROWS ONLY
I'm using Google sheets, and I want to get the data from one sheet to another where I want only the columns with count > 1.
Let's say we have 3 columns A, B, and C. I tried the following (the first sheet name is "Form Responses 1"):
I thought about using a query in the second sheet as: =query('Form Responses 1'!A1:Z, "Select A having count (A) >1 union select B having count (B) >1 union select C having count (C) > 1"). But I got a parse error where it seems that union and having are not supported in google sheets query.
How can I achieve this (whether it's using query or any other Google sheets function that can work)?
More details:
The first sheet contains info about exercises conducted during a lecture and it gets its data from a Google Form (so the responses are fed in this sheet). Here is a screenshot of it:
Please note that the form is divided into sections. When the user selects the course, the attendance, the participation, and adds a comment, then they go to the next section, the next section will be based on the selected course, the newly opened section will have the exercise name and rating questions (the exercise name is a dropdown list with items that are prefilled and specific to the selected course). That's why, you can see that "exercise name" and "rate the exercise" columns are repeated because we have 2 sections in this form.
The second sheet should contain the data of a selected course only (either mobile dev or web dev) which can be achieved easily through a query with a where clause. But, in addition to that, it shouldn't contain the empty columns of "exercise name" and "rate the exercise" as they correspond to another section. So, it should have only one exercise name column and one rating column that correspond to the selected course. Here is a screenshot if we only use a query with where clause without removing the extra name and rating columns:
Here is a screenshot with the desired result:
Thanks.
why not use just:
=QUERY('Form Responses 1'!A1:Z, "select A,B,C,D,E,F,G where F is not null", 1)
Use "OR" condition
Eg:-
QUERY(Data!A:R,"select A, N, P where N>0 or P>0")
where A column has country and N, P columns have population values
I have a Select statement that gets the items based on the greatest date. it works but these are selected value from asp.net controls and one of the controls is a multiselect listbox
as you can see DynamicAtrributeID 937766 is show one time:
I need it to show all the rows that were in 937766 as well as the other rows which could be just one row. Is this possible
SELECT VotingValueDynamicId,
DecisionValueID,
DynamicAttributeID,
VotingValue,
DecisionSurveyID,
VALUEDATEUPDATED,
RECORDSTATUS,
FROM Adjudicate.ONCOLOGY_DynamicDecisionValuesForCaseManager AS a
WHERE (VALUEDATEUPDATED =
(SELECT MAX(VALUEDATEUPDATED) AS Expr1
FROM Adjudicate.ONCOLOGY_DynamicDecisionValuesForCaseManager AS b
WHERE (a.DecisionValueID = DecisionValueID) AND a.DynamicAttributeID = DynamicAttributeID) ) AND (RECORDSTATUS <> 'D')
In the example shown, all the rows with DynamicAtrributeID = 937766 have different values on VALUEDATEUPDATED, so the query is showing one row for that DynamicAtrributeID because that's what you're doing, filtering and getting only the row wich has the max VALUEDATEUPDATED.
In other words, you can't get more than one row for a DynamicAtrributeID if you're filtering by his max(VALUEDATEUPDATED).
As #necoflecap1 said , the issue is your filter condition, For VALUEDATEUPDATED , you are filtering max(VALUEDATEUPDATED) which any way going to give 1 value per DynamicAttributeID and DecisionValueID combination,since your filter in subquery is
WHERE (a.DecisionValueID = DecisionValueID) AND (a.DynamicAttributeID =
DynamicAttributeID)
I can see two possibilities here , either add one more filter for VotingValue column
WHERE (a.DecisionValueID = DecisionValueID) AND (a.DynamicAttributeID =
DynamicAttributeID) and (a.VotingValue=b.VotingValue)
or Do a
group By VotingValue
inside filter subquery for max(VALUEDATEUPDATED) so that aggregation will perform for every VotingValue (which is the column I can see coming with a different value for DynamicAtrributeID 937766)
Summary:
I have a list of work items that I am attempting to assign to a list of workers. Each working is allowed to only have a max of 100 work items assigned to them. Each work item specifies the user that should work it (associated as an owner).
For example:
Jim works a total of 5 accounts each with multiple work items. In total jim has 50 items to work already assigned to him. I am allowed to assign only 50 more.
My plight/goal:
I am using a temp table and a select statement to get the # of items each owner has currently assigned to them and I calculate the available slots for new items and store the values in new column. I need to be able to select from the items table where the owner matches my list of owners and their available items(in the temp table), only retrieving the number of rows for each user equal to the number of available slots per user - query would return only 50 rows for jim even though there may be 200 matching the criteria while sam may get 0 rows because he has no available slots while there are 30 items for him to work in the items table.
I realize I may be approaching this problem wrong. I want to avoid using a cursor.
Edit: Adding some example code
SELECT
nUserID_Owner
, CASE
WHEN COUNT(c.nWorkID) >= 100 THEN 0
ELSE 100 - COUNT(c.nWorkID)
END
,COUNT(c.nWorkID)
FROM tblAccounts cic
LEFT JOIN tblWorkItems c
ON c.sAccountNumber = cic.sAccountNumber
AND c.nUserID_WorkAssignedTo = cic.nUserID_Owner
AND c.nTeamID_WorkAssignedTo = cic.nTeamID_Owner
WHERE cic.nUserID_Collector IS NOT NULL
AND nUserID_CurrentOwner = 5288
AND c.bCompleted = 0
GROUP BY nUserID_Owner
This provides output vaulues of 5288, 50, 50 (in Jim's scenario)
It took longer than I wanted it to but I found a solution.
I did use a sub-query as suggested above to produce the work items with a unique row count by user.
I used PARTITION BY to produce a unique row count for each worker and included in my HAVING clause that the row number must be < the count of available slots. I'd post the code but it's beyond the char limit and I'd also have a lot of things to change to anon the system properly.
Originally I was approaching the problem incorrectly focusing on limiting the results rather than thinking about creating the necessary data to relate the result sets.
I have a Column(Fields) that contain multiple values for each entity (One to Many).
Example: A record can can reference multiple values in this column.
What I want to do is get only records where highest(MAX) value in this column is equals zero.
The first thing I did was convert the values in the column to Integer, this way I can get the Max Value.
Here is my Code:
How do I get the Max code? If a record has more than one code. I want only record with the Max or highest code of 00000.
I am getting an error with the Having clause since I cannot use Aggregate in the Where Clause.
SELECT CUSTOMER.USER_ID, MAX(CInt(CUSTOMER.REC_CODE)) AS ACTIVE_REC_CODE,
CUSTOMER.CUS_TYPE
FROM CUSTOMER
WHERE ((CUSTOMER.REC_CODE) IS NOT NULL )
GROUP BY
CUSTOMER.USER_ID, CUSTOMER.REC_CODE, CUSTOMER.CUS_TYPE
HAVING MAX(CInt([CUSTOMER.REC_CODE])= 00000 )
You are close, but you need to remove CUSTOMER.REC_CODE from your WHERE, since you want the max value of that column. This should work:
SELECT CUSTOMER.USER_ID, MAX(CInt(CUSTOMER.REC_CODE)) AS ACTIVE_REC_CODE, CUSTOMER.CUS_TYPE
FROM CUSTOMER
WHERE CUSTOMER.REC_CODE IS NOT NULL
GROUP BY CUSTOMER.USER_ID, CUSTOMER.CUS_TYPE
HAVING MAX(CInt([CUSTOMER.REC_CODE])) = 0