I build my runner and it works fine. However, when it initializes, it first clones the project to /home/user/builds/xxxx... I never, ever, ever want GitLab to use /home. Never. Not for anything. I was told that it is impossible to change it to a different location. I find it hard to believe.
See in the image below, it gives me a warning about templates not found in some made up directory, then clones the entire project under the user's home directory. I don't give it that command - so it must be a default. Is there a way to choose ANY other mount point? The project is several hundred gigabytes and the /home directory is 50k. I cannot control that. So to a different mount point it must go.
I can provide the yml etc, but this is about core behavior of the runner itself - not anything I created. I'm hoping it is a simple variable I can send when initializing the runner.
Thank you in advance.
Related
Every time I tried to config a remote interpreter, Pycharm asked me to set a sync folder. In my routine, I usually have the Cannot find declaration to go to error which can not be solved by invalidating caches. So I have to config the interpreter again. And these caused the redundant folders in my remote machine. And another situation is that I want to create other projects with the same interpreter. Where I have to config the folder mapping for each project to make the interpreter valid.
I do not understand this way. In my opinion, the sync folders should correspond to my local project. And the interpreter should be independent of the projects.
Every time I tried to config a remote interpreter, Pycharm asked me to set a sync folder.
To be able to execute a script on the remote machine, it is necessary to make sure it exists on it. This is by design, but if you already have a project folder deployed, you can change the suggested paths to needed ones during the interpreter configuration.
See step 7. https://www.jetbrains.com/help/pycharm/configuring-remote-interpreters-via-ssh.html#ssh
And another situation is that I want to create other projects with the same interpreter. Where I have to config the folder mapping for each project to make the interpreter valid.
Unfortunately, this setup does not work, please vote for
https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/PY-40680/Allow-reusing-a-single-remote-interpreter-in-multiple-project
to increase its priority.
So here's a question. I'm new to Sylius, and am working on some simple CSS updates. I have a local copy of Sylius running with the built-in webserver: server:run. I also have a development server on Digital Ocean, which runs an (almost) identical copy of Sylius, aside from the configs of course.
Something strange is happening with my CSS update, however. I made a change to .navbar-brand within web/assets/compiled/backend_backend_4.css.
This change showed up immediately on my local. On the development server, however, when pulling down the change (git), and verifying that it now exists in that file, the change doesn't seem to propegate. It's effects aren't shown, inspecting the stylesheet doesn't show them, and furthermore viewing the css file sourcecode directly in the browser does not show the change. But on the filesystem it's definitely there.
I've tried clearing the cache, to no avail.
I also checked the assetic value in both config_dev.yml files, and verified they are both set to use_controller: true
Even still, I tried dumping assetic, to no avail.
So I'm wondering what's going on. Additionally, I realize that I probably shouldn't edit CSS files within a folder called 'compiled'. I'm sure there's a way to do that using a compiler, but I'm not yet familiar with the process and am just making minor changes and learning about caching so far.
Yes you are right you shouldn't be editing the compiled files.
You should edit the source files, then run gulp
or on my system i have to explicitly run npm run gulp
I've documented the solution that worked for me here. It didn't involve Gulp at all, but instead uses Assetic:
Assets need to be installed as hard copies first (I'm not quite sure
what this does exactly, but it seems like an important step because
it copies a lot of assets to places. Documentation was unhelpful but
it was suggested on Stack Overflow somewhere.):
app/console assets:install web
Assets should be edited in web/bundles/[bundle-here]/css or js. This
is frequently within syliusweb if it has to do with page styles /
layouts.
Hint: These assets are referred to in files such as
src/Sylius/Bundle/Resources/views/Backend/layout.html.twig (see the
opening:
(% stylesheets
tag, or search universally for this tag).
Within this tag, you'll see that stylesheets have an output to the compiled folder, but also list the
bundles where they pull their original css from. You should edit one of the source css files, if you'd like your changes to end up in the destination css.
After editing assets, dump assetic:
php app/console assetic:dump
Note - it is also possible to set an assetic watcher on these assets
(google to find out how, think it's a -w flag somewhere), but this is
said to only work in development mode, as it should.
After dumping assetic, the assets from the source bundles compile into their assets/compiled versions, usually combining multiple stylesheets. You should now see your asset refresh!
I have a c++ command line application that I have already compiled into an executable and have added it into my Xcode project. I have also added the "Copy Files" section to the Build Phases tab of the project properties and added my executable with the "Executables" destination. When I build my application I see it in the test.app/Contents/MacOS folder when I View package contents on the test.app that is built.
I also have App Sandbox enabled on the Capabilities tab of the project (so that I can distribute my application through the mac app store.
How can I expose this command line executable that is bundled with my application to the user so that they can run it from the command line (terminal)? I have not been able to find anything on search engines or on StackOverflow about how to get this file (or a symlink to this file) into the users PATH. I tried using an NSTask to create a symlink, but that only works if I disable the App Sandbox (which makes sense). Has anyone done this before? How did you get it to work? Or can these executables only be executed by code within your application?
I don't see a good way to do this. First, a clarification: the PATH is a list of directories that contain executables, not a list of executables; there's no way to add a single executable to the PATH. Instead, what you'd need to do is either put your executable into one of the directories in the user's PATH, or add the directory your executable is in into the PATH.
On OS X, the default PATH is /usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin. The first 4 directories shouldn't be modified from the system default, so only /usr/local/bin is a possibility. But creating it (it doesn't exist by default) would require admin (actually root) rights, which isn't allowed by App Store policies. So that's out.
That leaves modifying the user's PATH. The "right" way to do that system-wide is by placing a file in /etc/paths.d, which requires admin (/root) rights, so that's out too. Technically modifying the /etc/paths file would work, but that has the same permissions problem plus it's the wrong way to do customization.
The next possibility is to modify (/create) the user's shell initialization script(s). This'll work, but doing it at all right is going to be messy, because there are several shells the user might use, each with several different possible initialization scripts that the user might or might not have created...
Let's take a very simple case: a user who only ever uses bash, and who doesn't already have any initialization scripts. When a "login" instance of bash starts, it looks for ~/.bash_profile, ~/.bash_login, and ~/.profile (in that order), and runs the first one it finds. But your app doesn't know which shell he uses, so you'd better create ~/.profile so zsh and ksh will use it as well. So, your app creates ~/.profile, and puts this in it:
PATH="$PATH:/Applications/MyApp.app/Contents/Helpers"
Great, right? Yup, great, until the user runs something else that wants to set their PATH, it creates ~/.bash_profile, and this overrides your setup. After that, your executable will be in the PATH of zsh and ksh, but not bash. Whee.
And then one day the user decides to use tcsh instead, and it (and csh) have a completely different but equally messy pile of possible init files...
I'm having an issue with linked Resources in Flash Builder. I work in a team environment where we use Linked Resources extensively. We just started developing ANEs and noticed that while linkedResources are used in the libraryPathEntry, in the buildTargets like anePathEntry and airCertificatePath, the absolute path is stored. I tried editing the .actionScriptProperties files directly, modifying the buildtarget absolute paths to linked resource equivalents using the libraryPathEntry as a guide but FlashBuilder complained when loading the project.
Is there a way to get the buildTargets to respect linkedResources and not save the absolute path? I'm trying to avoid the draconian way where all developers must have the exact same directory structure.
Thanks!
Randy
My team had this exact problem and all attempts to fix it with relative paths or workspace macros (i.e. ${PROJECT_LOC}) failed. It seems as if the team in charge of Flash Builder neglected to support relative paths in these particular dialogs, despite them being supported elsewhere.
Here is what we have done to fix this problem. I am assuming you are on a Mac/Linux or the like. If not, the concept here can still be applied.
Most of our projects already have a "set up" bash script that contributors run when they get code. Inside of that script, we simply set up a couple of symbolic links from the user specific absolute path, to a new absolute path with a "common" user. The script first creates the directory if it does not exist, and then creates the symlinks.
sudo mkdir -p /Users/common/<project>/
sudo ln -f -h -s ~/path/to/certificate/dir /Users/common/<project>/certificates
Obviously you can use whatever you like and whatever makes sense for the common path.
Now, in your .actionScriptProperties file you can change the location pointed to by the provisingFile and airCertificatePath to this new common absolute path.
<buildTarget ... provisioningFile="/Users/common/<project>/certificates/provisionfile.mobileprovision" ... >
<airSettings airCertificatePath="/Users/common/<project>/certificates/cert.p12" ... >
We actually take this a step further (and I suspect you will need to also) and create common symlink paths for the ANE files themselves. This ends up changing the anePathEntry to the common path as well.
<anePathEntry path="/Users/common/<project>/anes/some.ane"/>
You will need to make sure that you either hand edit the .actionScriptProperties file directly, or type in the fully qualified symlink path into the dialogs directly. Any attempt at using the Finder dialog launched by Flash Builder to navigate to the files in the common location resulted in the symlinks being auto-resolved to their actual locations.
The script requires sudo, which as I'm sure you know, will require that the users of it know their root password. Maybe some more bash savvy folks can suggest a way around sudo if this is not an option for you.
This will work for android stuff as well I believe. I don't know if that matters to you or not.
Hope this helps!
It looks like this issue was called out in the Flash Builder 4.6 known issues:
http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-builder/kb/flash-builder-4-6-known.html
https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FB-32955
The bug is apparently fixed but I haven't been able to check the new Flash Builder 4.7 beta yet:
http://blogs.adobe.com/flex/2012/08/flash-builder-4-7-beta-is-here.html
We are trying to setup stylecop for a team development environment. So far what we have done is:
Checked the files into source control
Create an environment variable on every machine that points to that location (each dev has source checked out to a different location, this solves that)
Add the tag to the project as follows:
This works great, but VS complains that the file is unsafe, and I know to fix that we have to mark is safe in the registry. We wanted to create a .reg file to import this setting and make it easier for everyone. Can we use that environment variable in the path? I have tried the snippet below, but that doesn't seem to work. Is the syntax for an environment variable different?
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\VisualStudio\9.0\MSBuild\SafeImports]
"StyleCop.4.3"="%StyleCopLocation%\\Microsoft.StyleCop.Targets"
Why you need to host that Targets file in a global place? Everyone can install a copy of StyleCop.
If you in fact plan to share StyleCop settings, please configure the projects to use a project locally setting file (*.SourceAnalysis). You can check in this file along with your projects, and then everyone is in sync.