I am writing an app in WordPress for managing dog adoptions. In one scenario, the user selects a primary breed from a select and a secondary breed from another select. When they choose the breed, an input (read-only) field is filled with the values of the 2 selects.
I wanted to test this and I have written an acceptance test that does just that. The dog breed from the select is chosen and the value is added to the input via jQuery:
Image of Field with Dog Value filled out
The trouble is that when I try to assert that the text exists, I continuously get an error and the test fails. The lines that follow are the ones I have tried:
$I->see('Kelpie X');
$I->seeElement( '#acf-field_mdr_dog_text_breed_name', ['value' => 'Kelpie X']);
$I->seeInField( 'input#acf-field_mdr_dog_text_breed_name', 'Kelpie X');
Why aren't these conditions passing? Does it have to do because jQuery set the value?
Thanks!
I am not sure why the first one did not work, but I noticed that the value in the input text field had a space after the X. Apparently seeInField & seeElement are very strict, so this did the trick:
// Note the space after the X
$I->seeElement( 'input#acf-field_mdr_dog_text_breed_name', ['value' => 'Kelpie X ']);
$I->seeInField( 'input#acf-field_mdr_dog_text_breed_name', 'Kelpie X ');
Related
In sales order, there is a field discount %. Is it possible to ensure the users only input value lower than x and it will not accept any value higher than x.
You can achieve this with creating a function using #api.onchange('discount') decorator on python code to ensure discount value is not higher than x, if higher then set x to discount field and also possible to show warning popup from that function.
But if python code change is not prefered, you can also achieve this with Automated action where you create a new rule on sale.order.line, set trigger On form modification, action Execute python code and add the following code
if record.discount > 10:
record.discount = 10
Where 10 is the value of x. This will ensure discount is always less than x.
Op1: If you want to ensure that behaviour you can add an sql constraint to the database, this will work fine if your X value never change, something like this:
_sql_constraints = [
('discount_less_than_X', 'CHECK(discount < X)', 'The discount value should be less than X'),
]
This constraint will trigger in all cases(create, write, import, SQL insert).
Replace X with the value desired.
Op2: Use decorator api.constrains, get X value from somewherelse and apply the restriccion, something like this:
#api.constrains('discount')
def _check_discount(self):
# Create a key:value parameter in `ir.config_parameter` table before.
disscount_max_value = self.env['ir.config_parameter'].sudo().get_param('disscount_max_value')
for rec in self:
if rec.disscount > int(disscount_max_value):
raise ValidationError('The discount value should be less than {}'.format(disscount_max_value))
I hope this answer can be helful for you.
I'm trying to do an ad hoc search of records that contain duplicate values in the first and second elements of a multivalued UniData field. I was hoping something like this would work but I'm not having any luck.
LIST PERSON WITH EVAL "STATUS[1] = STATUS[2]"
After some testing it looks like I stumbled across a way of reading the field right to left that many characters. Interesting but not useful for what I need.
LIST PERSON NAME EVAL "NAME[3]" COL.HDG 'Last3'
PERSON Name Last3
0001 Smith ith
Any ideas on how to correctly select on specific field elements?
Apparently the EXTRACT function will let me specify an element but I still can't get a selection on it to work properly.
LIST PERSON STATUS EVAL "EXTRACT(STATUS,1,2,0)" COL.HDG 'Status2'
PERSON STATUS Status2
0001 Added Processed
Processed
I would use eval with #RECORD placeholder with the dynamic array notation as such (assuming that STATUS is in Attribute 11.
Edit:
Previous answer was how I would do this in UniVerse
SELECT PERSON WITH EVAL "#RECORD<11,1>" EQ EVAL "#RECORD<11,2>"
Script Wolf's more better way that works in UniVerse and UniData.
SELECT PERSON WITH EVAL "EXTRACT(#RECORD,11,1,0)" EQ EVAL "EXTRACT(#RECORD,11,2,0)"
Good Luck.
Trying to wrap my head around zoho creator, its not as simple as they make it out to be for building apps… I have an inventory database, and i have four fields that I call to fill a field called Inventory Number (Inv_Num1) –
First Name (First_Name)
Last Name (Last_Name)
Year (Year)
Number (Number)
I have a Custom Function script that I call through a Custom Action in the form report. What I am trying to do is upload a CSV file with 900 entries. Of course, not all of those have those values (first/last/number) so I need to bulk edit all of them. However when I do the bulk edit, the Inv_Num1 field is not updated with the new values. I use the custom action to populate the Inv_Num1 field with the values of the other 4 fields.
Heres is my script:
void onetime.UpdateInv()
{
for each Inventory_Record in Management
{
FN = Inventory_Record.First_Name.subString(0,1);
LN = Inventory_Record.Last_Name.subString(0,1);
YR = Inventory_Record.Year.subString(2,4);
NO = Inventory_Record.Number;
outputstr = FN + LN + YR + NO;
Inventory_Record.Inv_Num1 = outputstr;
}
}
I get this error back when I try to run this function
Error.
Error in executing UpdateInv workflow.
Error in executing For Each Record task.
Error in executing Set Variable task. Unable to update template variable FN.
Error evaluating STRING expression :
Even though there is a First Name for example, it still thinks there is none. This only happens on the fields I changed with Bulk Edit. If I do each one by hand, then the custom action works—but of course then the Inv_Num1 is already updated through my edit on success functions and makes the whole thing moot.
this may be one year late, you might have found the solution but just to highlight, the error u were facing was just due to the null value in first name.
you just have put a null check on each field and u r good to go.
you can generate the inv_number on the time of bulk uploading also by adding null check in the same code on and placing the code on Add> On Submt.( just the part inside the loop )
the Better option would be using a formula field, you just have to put this formula in that formula field and you'll get your inventory_number autogenerated , you can rename the formula_field to Inv Number or whaterver u want.
Since you are using substring directly in year Field, I am assuming the
year field as string.else you would have to user Year.tostring().substring(2,4) & instead of if(Year=="","",...) you have to put if(Year==null , null,...);
so here's the formula
if(First_Name=="","",First_Name.subString(0,1))+if(Last_Name =="","",Last_Name.subString(0,1)) + if(Year=="","",Year.subString(2,4)+Number
Let me know ur response if u implement this.
Without knowing the datatype its difficult to fix, but making the assumption that your Inventory_Record.number is a numeric data item you are adding a string to a number:
The "+" is used for string Concatenation - Joiner but it also adds two numbers together so think "a" + "b" = "ab" for strings but for numbers 1 + 2 = 3.
All good, but when you do "a" + 2 the system doesn't know whether to add or concatenate so gives an error.
I am using twilio to provide audio conference functionality in my rails app. When I call my conference number, twilio passes on a couple of values - including 'From' which contains the caller's phone number in international format.
I have a profile for every user in my system and in my controller I am querying the profile to provide a personalised welcome message. Every profile contains between 0 and 3 numbers (primary, secondary and cellphone) and I need to check the caller's ID against those three fields in all profiles.
When I use the console on my dev machine, the following code finds the correct profile:
Profile.find_by('+44000000000')
When I upload to heroku, I use following code instead:
name = Profile.find_by(params['From']) || 'there'
Which causes an error in my app:
2014-04-03T19:20:22.801284+00:00 app[web.1]: PG::DatatypeMismatch: ERROR: argument of WHERE must be type boolean, not type bigint
2014-04-03T19:20:22.801284+00:00 app[web.1]: LINE 1: SELECT "profiles".* FROM "profiles" WHERE (+4400000000) ...
Any suggestion how that could be solved?
Thanks!
Additional information:
I think my problem is that I don't know how to query either the whole profile or three columns at once. Right now the code:
name = Profile.find_by(params['From'])
is not correct (params['From'] contains a phone number) because I am not telling rails to query the columns primary phone number, secondary phone number and cellphone. Neither am I querying the whole profile which would also be an option.
So the question basically is:
How can I change this code:
Profile.find_by(params['From'])
so that it queries either all fields in all profiles or just the three columns with phone numbers which each profile contains?
Is there something like Profile.where(:primary_number).or.where(:secondary_number)or.where(:cellphone) => params['From']
?
I am not familiar with twilio and not sure if this helps but find and find_by_attribute_name accepts array of values as options:
name = Profile.find_by([params['From'], 'there'] )
suppose params['From'] was here , This should generate:
SELECT `profiles`.* FROM `profiles` WHERE `profiles`.`attribute` IN ('here', 'there')
Or:
If you are trying to build dynamic matcher at run time , which is called Meta-programming , you can try this code:
name = eval("Profile.find_by_#{params['From']) || 'there'}(#rest of query params here) ")
Update
First of all, i think you are not using find_by correctly!! the correct syntax is:
Model.find_by(attribute_name: value)
#e.g
Profile.find_by(phone_number: '0123456')
Which will call where and retrive one record, but passing a value will generate a condition that always passes, for example:
Model.find_by('wrong_condition')
#will generate SQL like:
SELECT `models`.* FROM `models` WHERE ('wrong_condition') LIMIT 1
#which will return the first record in the model since there is no valid condition here
Why don't you try:
Profile.where('primary_number = ? OR secondary_number = ? OR cellphone = ?', params['From'], params['From'], params['From'])
You can write your query like:
Profile.where("primary_number = ? or secondary_number = ? or cellphone = ?", params['From'])
Just double check the syntax, but that should do it.
I'm trying to clean this data: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/820037/local_council_election_data_w_occupation.gz
It's all the candidates for a local councils' election in Finland. In the column "Ammatti" there is the occupation of a candidate as reported by him/her.
I want to find all the students, but the problem is, that they can be "opiskelija" (student) or "yliopisto-opiskelija" (university student) and things like that.
I clicked the column title "Ammatti" and Filtered it with "opiskelija", then I created a "text facet" from the menu in column title.
That gives me the following facet:
agrol. opiskelija AMK 1
agrologiopiskelija 9
agronomiopiskelija 1
...and so on.
I'd want to change the value of "Ammatti" (occupation) to "opiskelija" (student) in everyone of these occasions.
To make thngs a bit more complicated the facet has also some occupations (mature students and administrative staff) I don't want to change to "opiskelija":
aikuisopiskelija 10
opiskelijakunnan hallituksen varapuheenjohtaja 1
opiskelijapalvelun päällikkö 1
opiskelijapalvelupäällikkö 1
I did this by hand clicking through the whole list in the facet and changing the occupations one by one.
I suppose there is a better way to do this, but could someone please tell me how I should've done it?
Using the 'include' option in the facet, select all the rows that you want to transform from the column "Ammatti". Then in for this column invoke the Transform function and replace "value" by "opiskelija"
This will replace all the value you have selected by "opiskelija".
Hope this help (and it doesn't come too late).