I used a CTE (temp table) to compute data through semesters. With my query, I want to compare if my data (already aggregated) are equal to my sum computed in my CTE. However, when using WHERE data_already_aggregated <> data_computed I got a result where my results in those columns are equal. I tried to use =! as well, and also =. Last option worked, but not the way I want.
Here my code:
WITH trimestriel AS(
SELECT "donnéestrim".annee,
"donnéestrim".trimestre,
"donnéestrim".codescpi,
scpi.scpi,
"donnéestrim"."rd_t",
SUM("donnéestrim".rd_t) OVER (PARTITION BY "donnéestrim".annee, "donnéestrim".codescpi) AS "trim_sum_totalYear_rd_t",
row_number() over (partition BY scpi.codescpi, annee) AS "row_number"
FROM "donnéestrim"
LEFT JOIN scpi ON scpi.codescpi = "donnéestrim".codescpi
ORDER BY "donnéestrim".annee)
SELECT "annuel".codescpi,
scpi.scpi ,
"annuel".annee,
trimestriel."trimestre",
"annuel".revdisavpl AS "annuel_revdisavpl",
"trim_sum_totalYear_rd_t",
"rd_t" AS "trim_rd_t"
FROM "annuel"
LEFT JOIN scpi ON scpi.codescpi = "annuel".codescpi
LEFT JOIN trimestriel ON trimestriel.codescpi = "annuel".codescpi AND trimestriel.annee=annuel.annee
WHERE "annuel".annee = '2018' and scpi.codescpi = '129' and "annuel".revdisavpl != "trim_sum_totalYear_rd_t"
result
As #JNevill suggested, it's a data type problem. A double precision type only display the data with its specific parameters, but can store more information if casted. I cast it to real, and I can saw the gaps between my data.
Related
I'm trying to call a window function inside of a case statement, as such:
SELECT
DISTINCT properties.property_id
COALESCE(MAX(CASE
WHEN units_count.unit_type = 'NORMAL' THEN units_count.unit_count
END) OVER (PARTITION BY properties.property_id),
0)::INT AS normal_units_count
FROM units_count
JOIN properties ON units_count.property_id = properties.property_id
I'm receiving the following error:
SQL compilation error: [IFF(UNITS_COUNT.UNIT_TYPE = 'NORMAL', UNITS_COUNT.UNIT_COUNT, SYSTEM$NULL_TO_FIXED(null))] is not a valid group by expression
I've tried adding a qualify clause to remove the MAX() function:
SELECT
DISTINCT properties.property_id
COALESCE(CASE
WHEN units_count.unit_type = 'NORMAL' THEN units_count.unit_count
END OVER (PARTITION BY properties.property_id),
0)::INT AS normal_units_count
FROM units_count
JOIN properties ON units_count.property_id = properties.property_id
QUALIFY units_count.unit_count = MAX(units_count.unit_count) OVER (PARTITION BY properties.property_id)
The code executes, but the qualify clause results in unwanted filtering for other fields. Can I keep the existing logic (with MAX()) or do I need to include a qualify clause?
The DISTINCT is in effect a grouping operation, but your MAX is a for every row with the OVER clause.
which implies as "basic SQL" this should work:
SELECT
p.property_id,
MAX(IFF(uc.unit_type = 'NORMAL', uc.unit_count, 0)) as v1 max_units_count
FROM units_count AS uc
JOIN properties AS p
ON uc.property_id = p.property_id
GROUP BY 1
but as your "other fields" implies you are selecting other things and without knowing what/how you are doing that is hard to see what you are wanting todo.
also your max(unit_count) does not so much feel like it is a normal_unit_count.
But you example needs to pull in a second+ column of what you are wanting to do to see how they should be co-handled. But I would be inclined with zero information to suggest you use a CTE to find the per property_id the MAX unit_count and then join that result to a second read from your data. Because with zero insights to the other operations and how they could re-use that read, I have experienced it is better to GROUP/JOIN then WINDOW(over partition)/ANYVALUE. But that is another option.
Thus (without testing) this might work:
SELECT
DISTINCT p.property_id
ANYVALUE(COALESCE(MAX(CASE
WHEN uc.unit_type = 'NORMAL' THEN uc.unit_count
END) OVER (PARTITION BY p.property_id),
0)::INT) AS normal_units_count
FROM units_count AS uc
JOIN properties AS p
ON uc.property_id = p.property_id
I have the following query:
SELECT DISTINCT
CAB.CODPARC,
PAR.RAZAOSOCIAL,
BAI.NOMEBAI,
SUM(VLRNOTA) AS AMOUNT
FROM TGFCAB CAB, TGFPAR PAR, TSIBAI BAI
WHERE CAB.CODPARC = PAR.CODPARC
AND PAR.CODBAI = BAI.CODBAI
AND CAB.TIPMOV = 'V'
AND STATUSNOTA = 'L'
AND PAR.CODCID = 5358
GROUP BY
CAB.CODPARC,
PAR.RAZAOSOCIAL,
BAI.NOMEBAI
Which the result is this. Company names and neighborhood hid for obvious reasons
The query at the moment, for those who don't understand Latin languages, is giving me clients, company name, company neighborhood, and the total value of movements.
in the WHERE clause it is only filtering sales movements of companies from an established city.
But if you notice in the Select statement, the column that is retuning the value that aggregates the total amount of value of sales is a SUM().
My goal is to return only the company that have the maximum value of this column, if its a tie, display both of em.
This is where i'm struggling, cause i can't seem to find a simple solution. I tried to use
WHERE AMOUNT = MAX(AMOUNT)
But as expected it didn't work
You tagged the question with the whole bunch of different databases; do you really use all of them?
Because, "PL/SQL" reads as "Oracle". If that's so, here's one option.
with temp as
-- this is your current query
(select columns,
sum(vrlnota) as amount
from ...
where ...
)
-- query that returns what you asked for
select *
from temp t
where t.amount = (select max(a.amount)
from temp a
);
You should be able to achieve the same without the need for a subquery using window over() function,
WITH T AS (
SELECT
CAB.CODPARC,
PAR.RAZAOSOCIAL,
BAI.NOMEBAI,
SUM(VLRNOTA) AS AMOUNT,
MAX(VLRNOTA) over() AS MAMOUNT
FROM TGFCAB CAB
JOIN TGFPAR PAR ON PAR.CODPARC = CAB.CODPARC
JOIN TSIBAI BAI ON BAI.CODBAI = PAR.CODBAI
WHERE CAB.TIPMOV = 'V'
AND STATUSNOTA = 'L'
AND PAR.CODCID = 5358
GROUP BY CAB.CODPARC, PAR.RAZAOSOCIAL, BAI.NOMEBAI
)
SELECT CODPARC, RAZAOSOCIAL, NOMEBAI, AMOUNT
FROM T
WHERE AMOUNT=MAMOUNT
Note it's usually (always) beneficial to join tables using clear explicit join syntax. This should be fine cross-platform between Oracle & SQL Server.
I am fairly new to SQL and having issues figuring out how to solve the simple issue below. I have a dataset I am trying to self-join, I am using (b.calendar_year_number -1) as one of the columns to join. I applied a calculation of -1 with the goal of trying to match values from the previous year. However, it is not working as the resulting column shows (No column name) with a screenshot attached below. How do I change the alias to b.calendar_year_number after the calculation?
Code:
SELECT a.day_within_fiscal_period,
a.calendar_month_name,
a.cost_period_rolling_three_month_start_date,
a.calendar_year_number,
b.day_within_fiscal_period,
b.calendar_month_name,
b.cost_period_rolling_three_month_start_date,
(b.calendar_year_number -1)
FROM [data_mart].[v_dim_date_consumer_complaints] AS a
JOIN [data_mart].[v_dim_date_consumer_complaints] AS b
ON b.day_within_fiscal_period = a.day_within_fiscal_period AND
b.calendar_month_name = a.calendar_month_name AND
b.calendar_year_number = a.calendar_year_number
I am using (b.calendar_year_number -1) as one of the columns to join.
Nope, you're not. Look at your join statement and you'll see the third condition is:
b.calendar_year_number = a.calendar_year_number
So just change that to include the calculation. As far as the 'no column name' issue, you can use colname = somelogic syntax or somelogic as colname. Below, I used the former syntax.
select a.day_within_fiscal_period,
a.calendar_month_name,
a.cost_period_rolling_three_month_start_date,
a.calendar_year_number,
b.day_within_fiscal_period,
b.calendar_month_name,
b.cost_period_rolling_three_month_start_date,
bCalYearNum = b.calendar_year_number
from [data_mart].[v_dim_date_consumer_complaints] a
left join [data_mart].[v_dim_date_consumer_complaints] b
on b.day_within_fiscal_period = a.day_within_fiscal_period
and b.calendar_month_name = a.calendar_month_name
and b.calendar_year_number - 1 = a.calendar_year_number;
You could use the analytical function LAG/LEAD to get your required result, no self-join necessary:
select a.day_within_fiscal_period,
a.calendar_month_name,
a.cost_period_rolling_three_month_start_date,
a.calendar_year_number,
old_cost_period_rolling_three_month_start_date =
LAG(cost_period_rolling_three_month_start_date) OVER
(PARTITION BY calendar_month_name, day_within_fiscal_period
ORDER BY calendar_year_number),
old_CalYearNum = LAG(calendar_year_number) OVER
(PARTITION BY calendar_month_name, day_within_fiscal_period
ORDER BY calendar_year_number)
from [data_mart].[v_dim_date_consumer_complaints] a
Currently I am having an issue bringing back the correct data for this particular query below. I am attempting to bring back data that excludes select criteria from the subselect statement after MINUS keyword.
SELECT
DISTINCT ORDER.OWNER, ORDER_H.PO_ID
FROM ORDER ORDER
WHERE ORDER.TYPE != 'X'
AND ORDER.STATUS='10'
AND ORDER.CLOSE_DATE IS NULL MINUS
(
SELECT
DISTINCT ORDER.OWNER, ORDER.PO_ID
FROM ORDER ORDER
INNER JOIN COST COST ON COST.PO_ID = ORDER.PO_ID
AND COST.CODE IN
(
'LGSF',
'DFCDC',
'BOF',
'TFR',
'RFR',
'TFLHC',
'BF',
'CBF',
'CHAP',
'DYPH' ,
'OFFP',
'PTWT',
'DTEN',
'OTHR',
'DMSG',
'STOR',
'TOF',
'ANTCV',
'ANTIP',
'CVD',
'TRAN'
)
WHERE ORDER.TYPE != 'OTR'
AND ORDER.STATUS = '10'
AND (COST.E_AMT > 0 AND COST.A_AMT IS NULL)
)
FOR READ ONLY WITH UR
The data coming back includes the data within the subquery instead of excluding this data from the resultset. I cannot figure out why this is the case. Does anyone have any idea why after MINUS it doesn't exclude this data and is bringing back data where COST.E_AMT is actually greater than 0 and COST.A_AMT is actually populated for each CODE listed in the subquery? Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
I hve to display several cell values into one cell. So I am using this query:
select LISTAGG(fc.DESCRIPTION, ';'||chr(10))WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY fc.SWITCH_NAME) AS DESCRIP from "ORS".SWITCH_OPERATIONS fc
group by fc.SWITCH_NAME
It is working fine. But when I am merging this with my main(complete) query then I am getting the error as: Error code 1427, SQL state 21000: ORA-01427: single-row subquery returns more than one row
Here is my complete query:
SELECT
TRACK_EVENT.LOCATION,
TRACK_EVENT.ELEMENT_NAME,
(select COUNT(*) from ORS.TRACK_EVENT b where (b.ELEMENT_NAME = sw.SWITCH_NAME)AND (b.ELEMENT_TYPE = 'SWITCH')AND (b.EVENT_TYPE = 'I')AND (b.ELEMENT_STATE = 'NORMAL' OR b.ELEMENT_STATE = 'REVERSE'))as COUNTER,
(select COUNT(*) from ORS.SWITCH_OPERATIONS fc where TRACK_EVENT.ELEMENT_NAME = fc.SWITCH_NAME and fc.NO_CORRESPONDENCE = 1 )as FAIL_COUNT,
(select MAX(cw.COMMAND_TIME) from ORS.SWITCH_OPERATIONS cw where ((TRACK_EVENT.ELEMENT_NAME = cw.SWITCH_NAME) and (cw.NO_CORRESPONDENCE = 1)) group by cw.SWITCH_NAME ) as FAILURE_DATE,
(select LISTAGG(fc.DESCRIPTION, ';'||chr(10))WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY fc.SWITCH_NAME) AS DESCRIP from "ORS".SWITCH_OPERATIONS fc
group by fc.SWITCH_NAME)
FROM
ORS.SWITCH_OPERATIONS sw,
ORS.TRACK_EVENT TRACK_EVENT
WHERE
sw.SEQUENCE_ID = TRACK_EVENT.SEQUENCE_ID
Not only are subqueries in the SELECT list required to return exactly one row (or any time they're used for a singular comparison, like <, =, etc), but their use in that context tends to make the database execute them RBAR - Row-by-agonizing-row. That is, they're slower and consume more resources than they should.
Generally, unless the result set outside the subquery contains only a few rows, you want to construct subqueries as part of a table-reference. Ie, something like:
SELECT m.n, m.z, aliasForSomeTable.a, aliasForSomeTabe.bSum
FROM mainTable m
JOIN (SELECT a, SUM(b) AS bSum
FROM someTable
GROUP BY a) aliasForSomeTable
ON aliasForSomeTable.a = m.a
This benefits you in other ways to - it's easier to get multiple columns out of the same table-reference, for example.
Assuming that LISTAGG(...) can be included with other aggregate functions, you can change your query to look like this:
SELECT Track_Event.location, Track_Event.element_name,
Counted_Events.counter,
Failure.fail_count, Failure.failure_date, Failure.descrip
FROM ORS.Track_Event
JOIN ORS.Switch_Operations
ON Switch_Operations.sequence_id = Track_Event.sequence_id
LEFT JOIN (SELECT element_name, COUNT(*) AS counter
FROM ORS.Track_Event
WHERE element_type = 'SWITCH'
AND event_type = 'I'
AND element_state IN ('NORMAL', 'REVERSE')
GROUP BY element_name) Counted_Events
ON Counted_Events.element_name = Switch_Operations.swicth_name
LEFT JOIN (SELECT switch_name,
COUNT(CASE WHEN no_correspondence = 1 THEN '1' END) AS fail_count,
MAX(CASE WHEN no_correspondence = 1 THEN command_time END) AS failure_date,
LISTAGG(description, ';' || CHAR(10)) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY command_time) AS descrip
FROM ORS.Switch_Operations
GROUP BY switch_name) Failure
ON Failure.switch_name = Track_Event.element_name
This query was written to (attempt to) preserve the semantics of your original query. I'm not completely sure that's what you actually need but without sample starting data and desired results, I have no way to tell how else to improve this. For instance, I'm a little suspicious of the need of Switch_Operations in the outer query, and the fact that LISTAGG(...) is run over row where no_correspondence <> 1. I did change the ordering of LISTAGG(...), because the original column would not have done anything (because the order way the same as the grouping), so would not have been a stable sort.
Single-row subquery returns more than one row.
This error message is self descriptive.
Returned field can't have multiple values and your subquery returns more than one row.
In your complete query you specify fields to be returned. The last field expects single value from the subquery but gets multiple rows instead.
I have no clue about the data you're working with but either you have to ensure that subquery returns only one row or you have to redesign the wrapping query (possibly using joins when appropriate).