Is it possible to find the count of items in a Typescript record?
For example something like
const testRecord: Record<string, string> = {
'one': 'value1',
'two': 'value2'
};
var length = testRecord.length;
// looking for length to be 2 but is undefined as there is no length property
For reference: https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/utility-types.html#recordkt
I've just found this answer here for the length of a javascript object which seems to work just fine:
Length of a JavaScript object
My implementation to answer the example above was:
const testRecord: Record<string, string> = {
'one': 'value1',
'two': 'value2'
};
var length: Object.keys(testRecord).length;
// length equals 2
However please let me know if there is a better, more specific "Record" way to do this?
Maybe it's not what you wanted, but there is a Map type that has size property.
You can use it like this:
let m = new Map<string, any>();
m.set('a', 1)
let one = m.get('a');
console.log('a value is: ' + one + '; size of the map is: ' + m.size);
Map doesn't work exactly as Object does, so take a look at differences in behaviour first: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Map#objects_vs._maps
Related
I'm trying to save just a number from a string I get from a paragraph but when I try to asign an alias to it and then check the value it returns undefined. I've tried a few solutions I found but none of those seem to work for me. These are two ways I tried (I tried another one similar to the second one but using split, had same result). The console.log inside of the 'then' doesn't show in the console, and when I try the alias after the code is when I get undefined.
cy.get('p')
.eq(1)
.should('have.text', '/[0-9]+/g')
.as('solNumber')
cy.get('p')
.eq(1)
.invoke('text')
.then((text)=>{
var fullText = text;
var pattern = /[0-9]+/g;
var number = fullText.match(pattern);
console.log(number);
})
.as('solNumber')
Please convert with + operator and return the numeric value if you want numeric type to be stored.
cy.get('p').eq(1)
.invoke('text')
.then(fullText => {
const number = fullText.match(/[0-9]+/);
return +number // text to numeric
})
.as('solNumber')
cy.get('#solNumber')
.should('eq', 42) // numeric type
});
Running your 2nd code on this,
<p>21</p>
<p>42</p>
gives the correct outcome
cy.get('p')
.eq(1)
.invoke('text')
.then((text)=>{
var fullText = text;
var pattern = /[0-9]+/g;
var number = fullText.match(pattern);
console.log(number); // logs 42
})
.as('solNumber')
cy.get('#solNumber')
.should('eq', '42') // passes
So, you need to inspect the DOM, it looks like it's not what you expect.
The first attempt you were passing a jquery element to the .should() and although some chainers change the subject yours did not so it saved the jquery element as solNumber.
The second attempt invokes the .text() which was passed to the .then() it logs the number correctly. However, you did not return anything at the end of the .then() block, therefore, solNumber should hold the entire paragraph.
This should help you out to extract the specific number and save it as an alias.
cy.get('p')
.invoke('text')
.invoke('trim')
.then(paragraph => {
const matcher = /some/
expect(paragraph).to.match(matcher) // check number is there
const indexOfText = paragraph.match(matcher) // get index of match text
return paragraph.substring(indexOfText.index, indexOfText.index + indexOfText[0].length) // return substring
})
.as('savedText')
cy.get('#savedText')
.then(cy.log) // will print out the number you seek
for (i in 0 until result.size){ result[i].config= addConfig(taskNames!![i],processKeys!![i]) }
Here result is a list of class which has datamember config and tasNames and processKeys are list of string.
Is there a way in kotlin to map result.config with respective taskNames and processKeys without using traditional loop and mentioning length of result.I am new to kotlin.
class Process {
var processKey: String? = null
var task: List<Task>? = null}
class Task {
var taskName: String? = null
var processVariables: List<ProcessVariable>? = null}
class ProcessVariable {
var name: String? = null
var label: String? = null
var applicableValue: List<String>? = null}
Result is already present with datamember config pf type ProcessVariable
If I understand your problem correctly, you need to combine 3 lists.
So iterating over the lists may be easier to understand than some clever way of list transformations.
You can get rid of the traditional for loop, so you don't need to calculate the size of the loop:
result.forEachIndexed {
i, resultData -> resultData.config = addConfig(taskNames[i], processKeys[i])
}
If you want to combine two lists, you can use the zip method:
val configList = taskNames.zip(processKeys) {tsk, prc -> addConfig(tsk, prc)}
In your example, the result-object was already existing. Maybe it is easier to create new result-objects:
val results = configList.map {
Result(config = it)
}
I need to check if the certain value exists in both arrays and if exists remove this element from the second array. I know that it exists.
taking the 1st element from array doubleTue, taking the index where is this value in amTue and pmTue then remove those by using splice command.
But now my code is having problem on getting the first value.
tried as in level array: var val = doubleTue[i]
and 2 level array: var val - doubleTue[i][0]
tried toString(), read()
for (var n=0; n<doubleTue.length; n++)
{
var val = doubleTue[i][0];
var val1 = amTue.indexOf(val);
if (val1!=-1) {amTue.splice(val1, 1);};
var val2=pmTue.indexOf(val);
if (val2!=-1) {pmTue.splice(val2, 1); };
}
}
the issue is found. i have used wrong variable for looping. hehe. copy past issue
thnks all
jsonStoreInit = function(pSuccess, pFailure){
collections={};
collections['objects'] = {};
var options = {};
options.localKeyGen = false;
options.clear = false;
options.username = app.username;
options.password = app.password;
options.additionalSearchFields = {key: 'string'};
WL.JSONStore.init(collections, options)
.then(pSuccess)
.fail(pFailure);
};
putObject = function(pObject) {
var keyValue = pObject.getKey();
var object = {myObject : pObject.getKey()};
var options = {};
//options.additionalSearchFields = {key : keyValue};
WL.JSONStore.get("objects")
.add(object, options);
};
I'm on WL 6.0 FP 1
In the code sample above jsonStoreInit is what I use to init my store including the options.additionalSearchFields.
When I come to add the objects in the putObject funciton it works fine with the additionalSearchFields commented out, but when I uncomment it to add the additional fields I get an error
[wl.jsonstore] {"src":"store","err":21,"msg":"INVALID_ADD_INDEX_KEY","col":"objects","usr":"xxxx","doc":{},"res":{}}
When I look this error message up all I get is
21 INVALID_ADD_INDEX_KEY
Problem with additional search fields.
Which I had kinda figured ... can anyone provide any help on this ...
I don't need to you fix my code but if you could point me to a working example that would be excellent.
Many thanks, ownimage
The person that asked the question solved it, but I'm leaving this answer in case someone is wondering how to pass data that uses additionalSearchFields.
Example:
var data = {hello: 'world'};
WL.JSONStore.get('collection').add(data, {additionalSearchFields: {key: 'value'}})
The example assumes the collection was created with a search field for hello as string and an additional search field for key as string. It also assumes there's a collection initialized called collection.
I want to convert my class to a Map so I'm using Serialization package. From the example it looks simple:
var address = new Address();
address.street = 'N 34th';
address.city = 'Seattle';
var serialization = new Serialization()
..addRuleFor(Address);
Map output = serialization.write(address);
I expect to see an output like {'street' : 'N 34th', 'city' : 'Seattle'} but instead it just output something I-don't-know-what-that-is
{"roots":[{"__Ref":true,"rule":3,"object":0}],"data":[[],[],[],[["Seattle","N 34th"]]],"rules":"{\"roots\":[{\"__Ref\":true,\"rule\":1,\"object\":0}],\"data\":[[],[[{\"__Ref\":true,\"rule\":4,\"object\":0},{\"__Ref\":true,\"rule\":3,\"object\":0},{\"__Ref\":true,\"rule\":5,\"object\":0},{\"__Ref\":true,\"rule\":6,\"object\":0}]],[[],[],[\"city\",\"street\"]],[[]],[[]],[[]],[[{\"__Ref\":true,\"rule\":2,\"object\":0},{\"__Ref\":true,\"rule\":2,\"object\":1},\"\",{\"__Ref\":true,\"rule\":2,\"object\":2},{\"__Ref\":true,\"rule\":7,\"object\":0}]],[\"Address\"]],\"rules\":null}"}
Serialization is not supposed to create human-readable output. Maybe JSON output is more what you look for:
import dart:convert;
{
var address = new Address();
..address.street = 'N 34th';
..address.city = 'Seattle';
var encoded = JSON.encode(address, mirrorJson);
}
Map mirrorJson(o) {
Map map = new Map();
InstanceMirror im = reflect(o);
ClassMirror cm = im.type;
var decls = cm.declarations.values.where((dm) => dm is VariableMirror);
decls.forEach((dm) {
var key = MirrorSystem.getName(dm.simpleName);
var val = im.getField(dm.simpleName).reflectee;
map[key] = val;
});
return map;
}
The new Address() creates a full prototype object which is what you are seeing. That being said, they could have done something to avoid part of those, but if you want to restore the object just the way it is, that's necessary.
To see the full content of an object you use the for() instruction in this way:
for(obj in idx) alert(obj[idx]);
You'll see that you get loads of data this way. Without the new Address() it would probably not be that bad.
Serialization won't help you here...
You might give a try to JsonObject library, and maybe go through this in depth explanation how to do what you are trying to do using mirrors.