I am studying unit testing for quasar framework now.
But I have not clear about vue-jest and jest-vue.
Please help me what the difference is? thank you.
These packages are from the same author. jest-vue was deprecated in favour of vue-jest.
As the description states,
DEPRECATED
this package has been renamed to vue-jest
Since it's older, jest-vue may not have all features of vue-jest.
Related
in the current Documentation of Optaplanner (7.40.0.Final) it says:
"The easiest way to explain the score during development is to print the return value of explainScore()"
When I create a scoreManager it doesn't have the method explainScore()
How do I get the explanation of the score in the Terminal? Where do I have to call the scoreManager?
I am working with Quarkus and my problem is very similar to the TimeTabling Problem.
Best regards and thank you in advance
Justin
Are you using the version coming with the Quarkus Platform BOM? Because in this case, it's 7.39.0.Final and that could explain your issue.
You can define the version yourself and upgrade to 7.40.0.Final. It might work, Geoffrey would be able to confirm.
He will also be able to tell you if he plans to upgrade Quarkus to 7.40.0.Final for 1.7.
That method was introduce recently. OptaPlanner 7.40.0.Final, the same version as the docs you're reading, definitely has it:
https://github.com/kiegroup/optaplanner/blob/7.40.0.Final/optaplanner-core/src/main/java/org/optaplanner/core/api/score/ScoreManager.java#L81
and first of all thank you for your amazing work.
The README file indicates that it is possible to use Bootstrap instead of Material Design, but I can’t find any documentation of how to implement it.
Does anybody has already done that ? Thank you in advance :)
Unfortunately, we did not find the time to document the ra-core package properly yet, so you'll have to explore the source code for now. I doubt you'll find any example for doing this as the separation into two packages (ra-core and ra-material-ui) is quite recent.
Be aware that building a bootstrap version of react-admin will take a lot of time. You'll have to explore the ra-material-ui package and build a bootstrap version of every components.
I need to upgrade from NHibernate 1.2.x to the latest version. Can someone help me out by either pointing me into the right direction, explain to me what I need to do, or just shoot me for using 1.2 when it's almost 2013.
Please.
Easy Answer: Have you tried just dropping in the latest version? 3.x should be somewhat compatible with what you have.
Hard Answer: Download Fluent NHibernate and get ready for some fun learning. It all depends on why you feel the need to upgrade.
The release notes in the download list know and possible breaking changes. It may be worth looking through. Other than that, I would suggest just dropping the new files in and see what happens.
Wow, this is totally confusing and the dojo 1.8 documentation seems a complete clusterf**k around build layers. Anybody have a clue what's going on there?
In the build script example profiles, the example amd.profile.js has profile.layers["dojo/dojo"] and the tutorial follows this same syntax.
Besides the tutorial, in the 1.8 build documentation there is no mention of this kind of structure, but of profile.dependencies.layers[n].
The documentation also references non-AMD syntax and, just to add another "layer" of confusion, there's also a profile.dependencies.layers[n].dependencies.
Which should I be using? Is this actually documented anywhere with any consistency or clarity?
I have learned that the Dojo 1.8 Reference Guide contains obsolete information regarding build profiles, but that the Dojo 1.8 Build tutorial is current:
http://dojotoolkit.org/documentation/tutorials/1.8/build/
That tutorial recommends this blog post for more information about layers and build optimization: http://www.sitepen.com/blog/2012/06/11/dgrid-and-dojo-nano-build/
I'm getting ready to deploy the first release of our software, version 1.0. Once it's out to our customer, inevitably, some bugs will be found. When I fix those bugs though, I'm not sure what "best practice" is for versioning it. When I release the fixes, would that be an entirely new version (in maven), such as 1.01 (or whatever the increment is, 1.1 for example)? Or would it still be 1.0 with some sort of classifier (maybe a date tag)?
Thanks,
Jeff
Wikipedia has a surprisingly thorough discussion of software versioning. It covers all the major points and discusses most of the approaches I've seen.
(In your specific case I'd go with 1.0.1 which would generally be regarded as "an update to 1.0 with no significant feature additions")
You have to change the number in order for maven clients to recognize a newer version in the repository. The change is up to you. I'm sure there's a best practice document somewhere but my company dictates the numbers we use so I've never looked for one.