I have a Transaction's saved search on my Netsuite account and this saved search has some filter condition on Netsuite UI.
Using SuiteScript 2.0, I am loading this search and taking copy of all the filter defined on Netsuite UI (say defaultfilters) and then applying filter for "trandate" as filterExpression then pushing defaultfilters in savedsearch filter collection.
but what happening is that, netsuite only considering "trandate" filter, not those that are defined on Netsuite.
I assume that somehow between two filters "OR" logical operator being applied.
same issue discussed in another query:
SuiteScript 2.0 search.createFilter with formula not working
please guide me for this issue.
Thanks
You can do the following to add searchFilters or FilterExpressions
Load the search
var savedSearch = search.load({ id: SEARCH_ID });
Push custom filters in savedSearch object as below:
// for searchFilter
savedSearch.filters.push(search.createSearchFilters(SEARCH_FILTER_OBJECT);
// for filter expression
var filterExpressions = savedSearch.filterExpressions;
filterExpressions.push('and', [FIELDID, SEARCH_OPERATOR, VALUES]);
savedSearch.filterExpressions = filterExpressions;
As for using formula in filterExpressions, if you use formulanumeric as the fieldName, your operator should be equalto and not is whereas if you use formulatext as fieldName you can use is operator as per NetSuite's Search Operators
Related
I have a subject like "accessTo" = ["123", "123-edit"]
and a resource like "interestedId" = "123"
Now I'm trying to write a condition - where it checks "interestedId" concatenated with "-edit" equals "123-edit" in "AccessTo".
Im trying to write rule like this
anyOfAny_xacml1(function[stringEqual], "accessTo", "interestedId"+"-edit")
It is not allowing to do this.
Any help is appreciated.
In addition to the answer from Keerthi S ...
If you know there should only be one value of interestedId then you can do this to prevent the indeterminate from happening:
stringBagSize(interestedId) == 1 && anyOfAny(function[stringEqual], accessTo, stringOneAndOnly(interestedId) + "-edit")
If more than value is present then evaluation stops prior to reaching the function that expects only one value. This condition would return false if more than one value is present.
On the other hand if interestedId can have multiple values then this would work:
anyOfAny(function[stringEqual], accessTo, map(function[stringConcatenate],interestedId, "-edit"))
The map function will apply the stringConcatenate function to all values in the bag.
Since Axiomatics products are compliant with XACML specification, all attributes by default are assumed to contain multiple values(called as 'bags').
So if you would like to append a string to an attribute use stringOneAndOnly XACML function for the attribute to indicate that the attribute can have only one value.
So assuming you mean accessTo has attribute ID as Attributes.access_subject.subject_id, interestedId has the attribute ID as Attributes.resource.resource_id and anyOfAny_xacml1 is equivalent to anyOfAny XACML function, the resulting condition would look like,
anyOfAny(function[stringEqual], Attributes.access_subject.subject_id, stringOneAndOnly(Attributes.resource.resource_id) + "-edit")
I have a custom field being added on user story (HierarchicalRequirement) level.
The WSAPI documentation shows the following details for the field:
c_CustomFieldName
Required false
Type string
Max Length 32,768
Sortable true
Explicit Fetch false
Query Expression Operators contains, !contains, =, !=
When trying to create a report using Custom List to identify user stories where this field is empty, I add (c_CustomFieldName = "") to the query.
And yet, the result shows rows where this field is not empty.
How can that be?
I tried querying on null, but it didn't work.
thx in advance
What you're doing should work- are you getting errors, or just incorrect data? It almost seems like it's ignoring your query altogether.
I tried to repro both with the custom list app and against wsapi directly and the following all worked as expected:
(c_CustomText = "") //empty
(c_CustomText = null) //empty
(c_CustomText != "") //non-empty
(c_CustomText != null) //non-empty
It's possible you're running into some weird data-specific edge case in your data. It may be worth following up with support.
I am exploring how I can write generic query for any Node given a set of search parameters and came across org.neo4j.ogm.cypher.Filters (in neo4j-ogm-core-2.0.3.jar)
I would have liked to have more options for ComparisionOperator like CONTAINS, IN, STARTSWITH etc.
Right now the operators supported are:
EQUALS("=")
MATCHES("=~")
LIKE("=~", new CaseInsensitiveLikePropertyValueTransformer())
GREATER_THAN(">")
LESS_THAN("<")
Are there is any plan to enhance this to support more operations?
Here is an example of how I am using Filters:
public Collection<User> findUserByFirstNameLike(String firstName) {
Filters filters = new Filters();
Filter firstNameFilter = new Filter("firstName", firstName);
firstNameFilter.setComparisonOperator(ComparisonOperator.LIKE);
filters.add(firstNameFilter);
Collection<User> users = session.loadAll(User.class, filters);
return users;
}
Filters has been updated in neo4j-ogm-core version 2.1.0.
All 3 options you want to see (CONTAINS, IN, STARTS WITH) are available in this version along with:
LESS_THAN("<")
LESS_THAN_EQUAL("<=")
IS_NULL("IS NULL")
ENDING_WITH("ENDS WITH")
EXISTS("EXISTS")
IS_TRUE("=")
I am trying to get the ID under "General" from a feature item in rally. This is my query:
body = { "find" => {"_ProjectHierarchy" => projectID, "_TypeHierarchy" => "PortfolioItem/Feature"
},
"fields" => ["FormattedID","Name","State","Release","_ItemHierarchy","_TypeHierarchy","Tags"],
"hydrate" => ["_ItemHierarchy","_TypeHierarchy","Tags"],
"fetch"=>true
}
I am not able to get any value for FormattedID, I tried using "_UnformattedID" but it pulls up an entirely different value than the FormattedID. Any help would be appreciated.
LBAPI does not have FormattedID field. You are correct using _UnformattedID. It is the FormattedID without the prefix. For example, this query:
https://rally1.rallydev.com/analytics/v2.0/service/rally/workspace/1111/artifact/snapshot/query.js?find={"_ProjectHierarchy":2222,"_TypeHierarchy":"PortfolioItem/Feature","State":"Developing",_ValidFrom: {$gte: "2013-06-01TZ",$lt: "2013-09-01TZ"}},sort:{_ValidFrom:-1}}&fields=["_UnformattedID","Name","State"]&hydrate=["State"]&compress=true&pagesize:200
shows _UnformattedID that correspond to FormattedID as this screenshot shows:
I noticed your are using fields and fetch . Per LBAPI's documentation, it uses fields rather than fetch. If you want to get all fields, use fields=true
As far as the missing custom fields, make sure that the custom field value was set within the dates of the query.
Compare these almost identical queries: the first query does not return a custom field, the second query does.
Query #1:
https://rally1.rallydev.com/analytics/v2.0/service/rally/workspace/1111/artifact/snapshot/query.js?find={"_ProjectHierarchy":2222,"_TypeHierarchy":"PortfolioItem/Feature","State":"Developing",_ValidFrom: {$gte: "2013-06-01TZ",$lt: "2013-09-01TZ"}}}&fields=["_UnformattedID","Name","State","c_PiCustomField"]&hydrate=["State","c_PiCustomField"]
Query #2:
https://rally1.rallydev.com/analytics/v2.0/service/rally/workspace/11111/artifact/snapshot/query.js?find={"_ProjectHierarchy":2222,"_TypeHierarchy":"PortfolioItem/Feature","State":"Developing",__At: "current"}&fields=["_UnformattedID","Name","State","c_PiCustomField"]&hydrate=["State","c_PiCustomField"]
The first query uses time period: _ValidFrom: {$gte: "2013-06-01TZ",$lt: "2013-09-01TZ"}
The second query uses __At: "current"
Let's say I just create a new custom field on PortfolioItem. It is not possible to create a custom field on PorfolioItem/Feature, so the field is created on PI, but both queries still use "_TypeHierarchy":"PortfolioItem/Feature".
After I created this custom field, called PiCustomField, I set a value of that field for a specific Feature, F4.
The first query does not have a single snapshot that includes that field because that field did not exist in the time period we lookback. We can't change the past.
The second query returns this field for F4. It does not return it for other Features because all other Features do not have this field set.
Here is the screenshot:
I'm currently trying to create an Endeca query using the Java API for a URLENEQuery. The current query is:
collection()/record[CONTACT_ID = "xxxxx" and SALES_OFFICE = "yyyy"]
I need it to be:
collection()/record[(CONTACT_ID = "xxxxx" or CONTACT_ID = "zzzzz") and
SALES_OFFICE = "yyyy"]
Currently this is being done with an ERecSearchList with CONTACT_ID and the string I'm trying to match in an ERecSearch object, but I'm having difficulty figuring out how to get the UrlENEQuery to generate the or in the correct fashion as I have above. Does anyone know how I can do this?
One of us is confused on multiple levels:
Let me try to explain why I am confused:
If Contact_ID and Sales_Office are different dimensions, where Contact_ID is a multi-or dimension, then you don't need to use EQL (the xpath like language) to do anything. Just select the appropriate dimension values and your navigation state will reflect the query you are trying to build with XPATH. IE CONTACT_IDs "ORed together" with SALES_OFFICE "ANDed".
If you do have to use EQL, then the only way to modify it (provided that you have to modify it from the returned results) is via string manipulation.
ERecSearchList gives you ability to use "Search Within" functionality which functions completely different from the EQL filtering, though you can achieve similar results by using tricks like searching only specified field (which would be separate from the generic search interface") I am still not sure what's the connection between ERecSearchList and the EQL expression above?
Having expressed my confusion, I think what you need to do is to use String manipulation to dynamically build the EQL expression and add it to the Query.
A code example of what you are doing would be extremely helpful as well.