Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I've set up a TLS server in Go using a custom generated certificate/key pair. Is there an easy way for me to test that the content of my HTTP requests to this server is indeed encrypted when it gets sent out over the network? For my own sanity I'd like to compare and contrast the content of the packets when I use TLS vs normal HTTP.
You can use a sniffer, here are two: Charles Proxy, it has a 30 day free trial period and is easy to use. Or WireShark, it is free and you will hate using it.
Related
Closed. This question is not about programming or software development. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 9 days ago.
Improve this question
dear friends!
I using multifunction printer Pantum M6507W.
In my opinion, using WPA protocol is not security in current time when exist WPA2-PSK and WPA3-PSK.
And I need change authorization protocol thereby opening a security hole in my wireless networks.
How resolve this problem?
I hope use WPA2-PSK protocol.
In printer settings I don't find how change authorization protocol
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
What is meant by a local area network configuration, as opposed to a local area network? or any network configuration for that matter.
What does it refer to exactly?
As it's name would imply, a LAN configuration refers to the parameters that defines the network, such as the network mask, security protocol in use, access control, IP (if a TCP/IP network) address delivery method, etc.
Btw this question is quite vague. If you're looking to know more about networks, you should start by some readings, and could possibly try out some online configuration exemple such as this one
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Is mod_sec and the OWASP rule set adequate to protect against DDoS and DoS attacks or would you recommend taking additional steps, e.g. blocking suspicious IP addresses which have been identified by mod_sec using iptables?
Would you recommend activating mod_evasive in addition to mod_sec?
What about ShoreWall and CSFirewall?
Thank you!
mod_sec only provides "rate-limiting", that can offer a degree of DOS protection, when the attack originates from same set of IP addresses. It can deny/drop connections, when let's say there are more than, say 20 requests from the same IP. It would not offer protection from DDoS, where compromised command and control hosts continue slow paced attacks spanning over days.
On your second question: I do not have much insight into mod_evasive.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I would like to know if the public key depends on the used account. In other words, do I really have to use the same account on the server and the client when I add my public key (id_rsa.pub) in authorized_keys on the server?
Thanks.
The accounts don't matter. All that matters is that the client key is in the server account's authorized_keys file.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
For our company I want to setup a file sharing service such as Dropbox but on our own servers for our corporate information.
It must be only available for employes of our company.
Please suggest me software package.
I suggest you try http://owncloud.org/.
That's what we use in my company and it is quite convenient to sync our working files (similar to what dropbox do), and to share files as well.
Have a look at arXshare (http://www.arxshare.com). You can install it on any server with PHP, it is easy to setup, and it does not require any database and is very lightweight. Furthermore, it does end-to-end encryption, so your shared files on the server are useless without your password.