Database not created while adding new bacula client - bacula

While adding new client to bacula (v5.2.6, os Debian Wheezy) and testing configuration with bacula-dir -t -c bacula-dir.conf I'm getting:
bacula-dir: dird.c:954 Could not open Catalog "catalog-test1", database "test1".
bacula-dir: dird.c:959 sqlite.c:182 Database /var/lib/bacula/test1.db does not exist, please create it.
EDIT: Bacula have already two working clients and the problem occurs while adding another one. The same version of bacula director an OS on another server (the same bacula daemons configuration, but the mysql db instead of sqlite3) let me add new clients without creating database for them manually. What should be done to get bacula to automatic catalog creation for new clients?
My Catalog definition for the client:
Catalog {
Name = catalog-test1
dbname = "test1"; dbuser = ""; dbpassword = ""
}
Any advice appreciated.

SQLite DB needs to be created and initialized before first use. It can be done by make commands during manual build or it can be done manually.
In my case (Gentoo Linux) these commands did the trick:
/usr/libexec/bacula/create_bacula_database
/usr/libexec/bacula/make_bacula_tables
See http://www.bacula.org/7.4.x-manuals/en/main/Installing_Configuring_SQLi.html for more details.

Related

Azure Release Pipelines: Azure SQL Database deployment error with not able to get to database server

We are seeing an error when trying to run a .SQL file on our Azure Dev Ops release pipeline:
Here is the error:
System.Management.Automation.RuntimeException: No resource found with serverName [the server], serverType Microsoft.Sql/servers in subscription [subscription id]. Specify the correct serverName/serverType and try again.Check out how to troubleshoot failures at https://aka.ms/sqlazuredeployreadme#troubleshooting-
We do have this set to checked on the networking tab of the sql server database:
I've checked the database server name and everything is correct.
It has something to do with the firewall rules though, but we can't figure out why we can't release our migration scripts to run auto.
Any other ideas of what else we can try?
Thanks.
UPDATE 1:
We have about 5 other instances that are set up the same way that seem to work fine.
Update 2:
Here is the Release step we are doing to push a .sql file to Azure Database which is failing:
Answer:
We removed the tcp: of of the server= part of the connection string and it worked.
Failed:
Server=tcp:server.database.azure.net,1433;Initial Catalog=[enter-db-nm];Persist Security Info=False;User ID=[enter-userid];Password=[enter-pw];MultipleActiveResultSets=False;Encrypt=True;TrustServerCertificate=False;Connection Timeout=30;App={0}
Worked:
Server=server.database.azure.net,1433;Initial Catalog=[enter-db-nm];Persist Security Info=False;User ID=[enter-userid];Password=[enter-pw];MultipleActiveResultSets=False;Encrypt=True;TrustServerCertificate=False;Connection Timeout=30;App={0}
We could leave the tcp: of of the server= and open up all ip addresses and it would work.
Suppose the tcp does something on the back side.
You can use the tcp: fine with logging into the database from SSMS.

Installing RCU for Oracle Data integrator runs on Error

I am trying to installing RCU for Oracle Repository Creation utility however everytime I try to install the development repository it runs on error.
Steps to reproduce the issue.
I run rcu bat file
Create repository/system load and product load
3.Choose oracle as database type/hostname localhost, port 1521 servicename xe, username sys and the password (I am able to login into oracle database with this login information) (I am using oracle 18c express
I am using the prefix dev
I am adding password for schemas, supervisor, and for the repository user.
I am not touching the tablespaces
I start the install and several error messages are dropping. like
Ora-65096 invalid common user or role name
Ora-01917 DEV_STB user does not exists
Ora-00955 The name has already been in use by another object.
My question what could be the problem with the installation of RCU and How can I resolve the issue ?
Funny thing is I am trying to install odi and RCU based on step by step video still something went wrong...
The issue here is you are logging to CDB with the service name XE. You need to log into the PDB (Plugable database).
Just change the service name from XE to XEPDB1 while connecting to the DB through RCU and your issue should be resolved.

Unable to connect to WLADM

I am trying to install and setup MobileFirst. SO i was able to install WAS ND, create a server, Install Mobilefirst Server, Install database, Create database and now i am trying to create a runtime with the configuration tool.
Below is the Database screenshot which proves that the database exist
This is a screenshot of the creating admin configuration and also it show that the port number is ok
This is a screen shot of the database additional extra setting which is checking for the database WLADM70 which i have given, validation happened without problem but its always in the checking for the database state.

Failed to connect to database server. How do I connect to a database that is not on my localhost using powershell and integrated security?

Background to my question
At any moment I am expecting the security people in black suits and black sun glasses to come and take me away because of all my sql server login attempts...
I used and adapted iris classon's example to connect to a database via Powershell. The adapted code uses Integrated Security=True"
$dataSource = my_enterprise_db_server
$database = my_db
$connectionString = "Server=$dataSource;Database=$database;Integrated Security=True;"
$connection = New-Object System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection
$connection.ConnectionString = $connectionString
$table = new-object “System.Data.DataTable”
$query = "..."
$connection.Open()
$command = $connection.CreateCommand()
$command.CommandText = $query
...
Hot diggity dog that worked. Thank's Iris.
I read the snapin verses the Import-Module sqlps way of executing a sql command. I also read all the links that Michael Sorens provided in his answer. I can mount a sqlserver connect with mount mydb SQLSERVER SQLSERVER:\SQL, use ls or dir, walk the path down the objects, etc. I also revised the main part of what Iris provided to
$table = Invoke-Sqlcmd –Server $dataSource –Database $database -Query $query
This version of Invoke-Sqlcmd allows me to connect to an "enterprise" database. The problem with all the references provided are that they expect you to work with a localhost sqlexpress database. The moment I try to use
Set-Location SQLSERVER:\SQL\my_enterprise_db_server\my_db
or similar constructs, I receive a message that ends with
...WARNING: Could not obtain SQL Server Service information. An attempt to connect to WMI on 'my_enterprise_db_server' failed with the following error: Access is denied. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070005 (E_ACCESSDENIED))
I also saw mention of the SQLCMDSERVER and SQLCMDDBNAME environment variables. I set these to
$env:SQLCMDDBNAME = "my_db"
$env:SQLCMDSERVER = "my_enterprise_db_server"
set-location sqlserver:\sql
ls
produces
MachineName
-----------
localhost
Question
How do I correctly use set-location or New-PSDrive-Name for a database that does not reside on my local computer?
I found the answer by a serendipitous route. I right clicked on a database object in sql server management studio. There was an option to start powershell. Even though this looks like the order sqlps option, SSMS gave me the right way to set the location.
Option 1. If the server does not have instances, then add DEFAULT after the server_name in the slashy path.
Set-Location SQLSERVER:\SQL\server_name\DEFAULT\Databases\database_name\Tables\dbo.table_name
Option 2. If you have a server with an instance, then set the instance name after the server_name in the slashy path.
Set-Location SQLSERVER:\SQL\server_name\instance_name\Databases\database_name\Tables\dbo.table_name
I am a mere mortal as far as database security goes. Many of the features of SSMS are turned off to me because of my security settings verses how the dba security settings are configured. I receive errors in in SSMS all the time. Well that is no different with Powershell using the Set-Location. I did not realize that the two error messages where related because of the security policy configuration verses pilot error. If I set a location to a table, then I only have two warnings of access denied. If I set the location to the database level, then Powershell blows chunks for a bit but I have my slashy path setting. I do not see the errors if I used the Invoke-SqlCmd. I see now that the way the security errors were presented in Powershell are why I thought there was a problem with how I was attempting to connect to the database. Now I can do this:
mount rb SELSERVER SQLSERVER:\SQL\server_name\DEFAULT\Databases\database_name\Tables
# Look at a list of tables.
ls
# Go to a traditional file system
cd F:\
# Go to the Linux Style mounted file system
cd rb:\
# Go to a table like a directory
cd dbo.my_table_name
# Look at the column names
ls
# Use relative navigation
cd ..\dbo.my_other_table_name
ls
# Compare column names with another table using relative navigation after I have just
# listed the current directory/table that I am in.
ls ..\dbo.my_table_name
That just rocks! Now all I need to do is come up with an array of server names and databases to create mount points for all the databases that I can connect to. An array like that is just begging for an iteration to create all the mount points.

Using SQL LocalDB in a Windows Service

I have a very small test application in which I'm trying to install a Windows Service and create a LocalDB database during the install process, then connect to that LocalDB database when the Windows Service runs.
I am running into huge problems connecting to a LocalDB instance from my Windows Service.
My installation process is exactly like this:
Execute an installer .msi file which runs the msiexec process as the NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM account.
Run a custom action to execute SqlLocalDB.exe with the following commands:
sqllocaldb.exe create MYINSTANCE
sqllocaldb.exe share MYINSTANCE MYINSTANCESHARE
sqllocaldb.exe start MYINSTANCE
Run a custom C# action using ADO.NET (System.Data.SqlConnection) to perform the following actions:
Connect to the following connection string, Data Source=(localdb)\MYINSTANCE; Integrated Security=true
CREATE DATABASE TestDB
USE TestDB
CREATE TABLE ...
Start the Windows Service before the installer finishes.
The Windows Service is installed to the LocalSystem account and so also runs as the NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM user account.
The service attempts to connect using the same connection string used above.
I am consistently getting the following error when trying to open the connection to the above connection string from within the Windows Service:
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException (0x80131904): A network-related or
instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to
SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify
that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to
allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 50
- Local Database Runtime error occurred. The specified LocalDB instance does not exist.
This is frustrating because both the msi installer custom action and the Windows Service are running under the same Windows user account (I checked, they're both NT AUTHORITY\System). So why the first works and the second does not is beyond me.
I have tried changing the connection strings used in the custom action and the Windows Service to use the share name (localdb)\.\MYINSTANCESHARE and I get the exact same error from the Windows Service.
I have tried changing the user account that the Windows Service logs on as to my Windows user account, which does work as long as I first run a command to add it to the SQL server logins for that instance.
I've also tried running a console application and connecting to the share name connection string and that works as well.
I've also tried connecting to the share name from SQL Server Management Studio and that works as well.
However none of these methods really solve my problem. I need a Windows Service because it starts up as soon as the computer starts up (even if no user logs on) and starts up no matter which user account is logged in.
How does a Windows Service connect to a LocalDB private instance?
I am using SQL Server 2014 Express LocalDB.
Picking up from the comments on the question, here are some areas to look at. Some of these have already been answered in those comments, but I am documenting here for others in case the info might be helpful.
Check here for a great source of info on SQL Server Express LocalDB:
SQL Server 2014 Express LocalDB
SqlClient Support for LocalDB
SqlLocalDB Utlity
Introducing LocalDB, an improved SQL Express (also look at the Q&A section at the end of the main post, just before the comments, as someone asked if LocalDB can be launched from a service, and the answer is:
LocalDB can be launched from a service, as long as the profile is loaded for the service account.
What version of .Net is being used? Here it is 4.5.1 (good) but earlier versions could not handle the preferred connection string (i.e. #"(localdb)\InstanceName"). The following quote is taken from the link noted above:
If your application uses a version of .NET before 4.0.2 you must connect directly to the named pipe of the LocalDB.
And according to the MSDN page for SqlConnection.ConnectionString:
Beginning in .NET Framework 4.5, you can also connect to a LocalDB database as follows:
server=(localdb)\\myInstance
Paths:
Instances: C:\Users{Windows Login}\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server Local DB\Instances
Databases:
Created via SSMS or direct connection: C:\Users{Windows Login}\Documents or C:\Users{Windows Login}
Created via Visual Studio: C:\Users{Windows Login}\AppData\Local\Microsoft\VisualStudio\SSDT
Initial Problem
Symptoms:
Database files (.mdf and .ldf) created in the expected location:
C:\Windows\System32\config\systemprofile
Instance files created in an unexpected location:
C:\Users\{current user}\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server Local DB\Instances
Cause (note taken from "SqlLocalDB Utility" MSDN page that is linked above; emphasis mine):
Operations other than start can only be performed on an instance belonging to currently logged in user.
Things to try:
Connection string that specifies the database (though maybe a long-shot if the error is regarding not being able to connect to the instance):
"Server=(LocalDB)\MYINSTANCE; Integrated Security=true ;AttachDbFileName=C:\Windows\System32\config\systemprofile\TestDB.mdf"
"Server=(LocalDB)\.\MYINSTANCESHARE; Integrated Security=true ;AttachDbFileName=C:\Windows\System32\config\systemprofile\TestDB.mdf"
Is the service running? Run the following from a Command Prompt:
TASKLIST /FI "IMAGENAME eq sqlservr.exe"
It should probably be listed under "Console" for the "Session Name" column
Run the following from a Command Prompt:
sqllocaldb.exe info MYINSTANCE
And verify that the value for "Owner" is correct. Is the value for "Shared name" what it should be? If not, the documentation states:
Only an administrator on the computer can create a shared instance of LocalDB
As part of the setup, add the NT AUTHORITY\System account as a Login to the system, which is required if this account is not showing as the "Owner" of the instance:
CREATE LOGIN [NT AUTHORITY\System] FROM WINDOWS;
ALTER SERVER ROLE [sysadmin] ADD MEMBER [NT AUTHORITY\System];
Check the following file for clues / details:
C:\Users{Windows Login}\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server Local DB\Instances\MYINSTANCE\error.log
In the end you might need to create an actual account to create and own the Instance and Database, as well as run your service. LocalDB really is meant to be user-mode, and is there any downside to having your service have its own login? And you probably wouldn't need to share the instance at that point.
And in fact, as noted by Microsoft on the SQL Server YYYY Express LocalDB MSDN page:
An instance of LocalDB owned by the built-in accounts such as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM can have manageability issues due to windows file system redirection; Instead use a normal windows account as the owner.
UPDATE (2015-08-21)
Based on feedback from the O.P. that using a regular User account can be problematic in certain environments, AND keeping in mind the original issue of the LocalDB instance being created in the %LOCALAPPDATA% folder for the user running the installer (and not the %LOCALAPPDATA% folder for NT AUTHORITY\System ), I found a solution that seems to keep with the intent of easy installation (no user to create) and should not require needing extra code to load the SYSTEM profile.
Try using one of the two built-in accounts that is not the LocalSystem account (which does not maintain its own registry info. Use either:
NT AUTHORITY\LocalService
NT AUTHORITY\NetworkService
Both have their profile folders in: C:\Windows\ServiceProfiles
While I have not been able to test via an installer, I did test a service logging on as NT AUTHORITY\NetworkService by setting my SQL Server Express 2014 instance to log on as this account, and restarted the SQL Server service. I then ran the following:
EXEC xp_cmdshell 'sqllocaldb c MyTestInstance -s';
and it created the instance in: C:\Windows\ServiceProfiles\NetworkService\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server Local DB\Instances
I then ran the following:
EXEC xp_cmdshell N'SQLCMD -S (localdb)\MyTestInstance -E -Q "CREATE DATABASE [MyTestDB];"';
and it had created the database in: C:\Windows\ServiceProfiles\NetworkService
I was able to solve similar issue in our WiX installer recently. We have a Windows service, running under SYSTEM account, and an installer, where LocalDB-based storage is one of the options for database configuration. For some time (a couple of years actually) product upgrades and service worked quite fine, with no issues related to LocalDB. We are using default v11.0 instance, which is created in SYSTEM profile in C:\Windows\System32\config tree, and a database specified via AttachDbFileName, created in ALLUSERSPROFILE tree. DB provider is configured to use Windows authentication. We also have a custom action in installer, scheduled as deferred/non-impersonate, which runs DB schema updates.
All this worked fine until recently. After another bunch of DB updates, our new release started to fail after having upgraded over the former - service was unable to start, reporting infamous "A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server" (error 50) fault.
When investigating this issue, it became apparent that the problem is in a way WiX runs custom actions. Although non-impersonated CA-s run under SYSTEM account, the registry profile and environment remain that of current user (I suspect WiX loads these voluntary when attaching to user's session). This leads to incorrect path being expanded from the LOCALAPPDATA variable - the service receives SYSTEM profile one, but the schema update CA works with the user's one.
So here are two possible solutions. The first one is simple, but too intrusive to user's system - with cmd.exe started via psexec, recreate broken instance under the SYSTEM account. This was not an option for us as the user may have other databases created in v11.0 instance, which is public. The second option assumed lots of refactoring, but wouldn't hurt anything. Here is what to do to run DB schema updates properly with LocalDB in WiX CA:
Configure your CA as deferred/non-impersonate (should run under SYSTEM account);
Fix environment to point to SYSTEM profile paths:
var systemRoot = Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("SystemRoot");
Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable("USERPROFILE", String.Format(#"{0}\System32\config\systemprofile", systemRoot));
Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable("APPDATA", String.Format(#"{0}\System32\config\systemprofile\AppData\Roaming", systemRoot));
Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable("LOCALAPPDATA", String.Format(#"{0}\System32\config\systemprofile\AppData\Local", systemRoot));
Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable("HOMEPATH", String.Empty);
Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable("USERNAME", Environment.UserName);
Load SYSTEM account profile. I used LogonUser/LoadUserProfile native API methods, as following:
[DllImport("advapi32.dll", CharSet = CharSet.Unicode, SetLastError = true)]
[return: MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.Bool)]
private static extern bool LogonUser(
string lpszUserName,
string lpszDomain,
string lpszPassword,
int dwLogonType,
int dwLogonProvider,
ref IntPtr phToken);
[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)]
struct PROFILEINFO
{
public int dwSize;
public int dwFlags;
[MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.LPWStr)]
public String lpUserName;
[MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.LPWStr)]
public String lpProfilePath;
[MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.LPWStr)]
public String lpDefaultPath;
[MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.LPWStr)]
public String lpServerName;
[MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.LPWStr)]
public String lpPolicyPath;
public IntPtr hProfile;
}
[DllImport("userenv.dll", SetLastError = true, CharSet = CharSet.Unicode)]
[return: MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.Bool)]
static extern bool LoadUserProfile(IntPtr hToken, ref PROFILEINFO lpProfileInfo);
var hToken = IntPtr.Zero;
var hProfile = IntPtr.Zero;
bool result = LogonUser("SYSTEM", "NT AUTHORITY", String.Empty, 3 /* LOGON32_LOGON_SERVICE */, 0 /* LOGON32_PROVIDER_DEFAULT */, ref token);
if (result)
{
var profileInfo = new PROFILEINFO();
profileInfo.dwSize = Marshal.SizeOf(profileInfo);
profileInfo.lpUserName = #"NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM";
if (LoadUserProfile(token, ref profileInfo))
hProfile = profileInfo.hProfile;
}
Wrap this in an IDisposable class, and use with a using statement to build a context.
The most important - refactor your code to perform necessary DB updates in a child process. This could be a simple exe-wrapper over your installer DLL, or stand-alone utility, if your already have one.
P.S. All these difficulties could be avoided, if only Microsoft let uses choose where to create LocalDB instances, via command line option. Like Postgres' initdb/pg_ctl utilities have, for example.
I suggest using a different user account, and not using the System account, by doing the following:-
create a new account on the machine, and set that to be the account
under which the Windows Service runs. It's not good practice to use
the system account just to run an application, anyway, as the
permissions are excessive.
ensure that the permissions on the LocalDB files are set to allow the said user account to access the database (and thus continue to
use Integrated Security)
make sure it works by trying to connect to the DB (once installed) under the same user account by running sqlcmd or Management Studio
under the context of the said user, then connecting with Integrated
Security to ensure it works.
Some other things to try/consider:
have you checked the Windows Event log for any events that might be useful for diagnostic purposes?
Make sure that if you have any other versions of SQL Server (especially prior to 2012) that for the command-line tools, the %PATH% isn't set to find an older tools version first. Older tools don't support LocalDB.
It is possible also (as an alternative) to set up LocalDB to be shared with other users. This involves sharing the instance, and then granting access to other users. See the "Sharing Issues" section in this article: Troubleshoot SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB.
There's also another SO article that may contain some more useful information there in the links within (change the language in the URL from Polish to English by changing pl-pl to en-us). His work-around is using SQL Server accounts, which might not be OK in your case.
This might also be useful, as it relates to security permissions being denied, and possible resolutions: https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/30383/cannot-start-sqllocaldb-instance-with-my-windows-account
Trevor, the problem you have is with the MSI custom actions. You must configure them with "Impersonate=false" otherwise the custom actions will be executed under the current user context.
BTW what tool are you using to create the installer?
Depending on the tool you use, could you please provide screenshots or code snippets of your custom actions configuration?
The accepted answer from this post will give you some additional information about the different custom action execution alternatives:
Run ExeCommand in customAction as Administrator mode in Wix Installer
You will find additional information about impersonation here:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rflaming/archive/2006/09/23/768248.aspx
I wouldn't create the database under the system's localdb instance. I'd create it under the current user installing the product. This will make life much easier if you need to delete or manage the database. They can do this through sql management studio. Otherwise, you'll have to use psexc or something else to launch a process under the SYSTEM account to manage it.
Once the db is created, then use the share option you mentioned. The SYSTEM account can then access the database through the share name.
sqllocaldb share MSSqlLocalDb LOCAL_DB
When sharing, I've noticed you'll have to restart the the local db instance to actually access the db through the share name:
sqllocaldb stop MSSQLLocalDB
sqllocaldb start MSSQLLocalDB
Also, You may need to add the SYSTEM account as a db reader and writer to the database ...
EXEC sp_addrolemember db_datareader, 'NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM'