I've added a User Defined Variables element
Then created a variable ${Parameter} with value "123456" and passed it in a GET request.
Created a second variable ${Response} with value "Invalid code 123456"
I've added a Response Assertion element
Added the ${Response} variable to the Response Assertion
When I send the request like this, everything is fine. But if I add the second variable in the value field, then an Assertion error is returned.
What I'm trying to do is to add a variable to the value field of an already existing variable:
e.g. Set the Value of the ${Response} variable as "Invalid code ${Parameter}"
How can I achieve this in jmeter?
Why are you unnecessarily making the things complex!
You can directly use the value you want to assert in the Response Assertion.
Keep as follows:
Invalid code ${Parameter}
Here, ${Parameter} value be evaluated first and checked against the response.
Just incase, if you want to use JMeter variable as value to another JMeter variable, use as follows, using ${__evalVar()}:
Invalid code ${__evalVar(Parameter)}
Note: observed that if you define both the variables in the same UDV, Parameter value is empty. So, add two UDVs and define Parameter in the first UDV and Response in the second UDV with above value.
Related
I am trying to assign the value of this stucture path to a fieldsymbol, but this path does not work because it has a table in it's path.
But with in the debugger this value of this path is shown correctly.
Is there a way to dynamically assign a component of a table line to a fieldsymbol, by passing one path?
If not then I will just read the table line and then use the path to get the wanted value.
ls_struct (Struct)
- SUPPLYCHAINTRADETRANSACTION (Struct)
- INCL_SUPP_CHAIN_ITEM (Table)
- ASSOCIATEDDOCUMENTLINEDOCUMENT (Element)
i_component_path = |IG_DDIC-SUPPLYCHAINTRADETRANSACTION-INCL_SUPP_CHAIN_ITEM[1]-ASSOCIATEDDOCUMENTLINEDOCUMENT|.
ASSIGN (i_component_path) TO FIELD-SYMBOL(<lg_value>).
IF <lg_value> IS NOT ASSIGNED.
return.
ENDIF.
<lg_value> won't be assigned
Solution by Sandra Rossi
The debugger has its own syntax and own logic, it doesn't apply the ASSIGN algorithm at all. With ABAP source code, you have to use ASSIGN twice, the first one to reach the internal table, then you select the first line, and the second one to reach the component of the line.
The debugger works completely differently, the debugger code works only in debug mode, you can't call the code from the debugger (i.e. if you call it, the kernel code used by the debugger will fail). No, there's no "abappath". There are the XSL transformation objects (xpath), but it's slow for what you ask.
Thank you very much
This seems to be a rather unexpected limitation of the ASSIGN statement. Probably worth a ticket to SAP's ABAP language group to clarify whether it's even a bug.
While this works:
ASSIGN data-some_table[ 1 ]-some_field TO FIELD-SYMBOL(<lv_source>).
the same expressed as a string doesn't:
ASSIGN (`data-some_table[ 1 ]-some_field`) TO FIELD-SYMBOL(<lv_source>).
Alternative 1 for (name) of the ABAP keyword documentation for the ASSIGN statement says that "[t]he name in name is structured in the same way as if specified directly".
However, this declaration is immediately followed by "the content of name must be the name of a data object which may contain offsets and lengths, structure component selectors, and component selectors for assigning structured data objects and attributes in classes or objects", a list that does not include the table expressions we would need here.
Can I find a process instance by a process instance variable value via the Camunda REST API as described in this request:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/camunda-bpm-dev/gJfXkbkY8fc
(the question above is from 2014, maybe there is a standard way now?)
Looks like this is supported now:
GET /process-instance
variables: Only include process instances that have variables with certain values. Variable filtering expressions are comma-separated and are structured as follows:
A valid parameter value has the form key_operator_value. key is the variable name, operator is the comparison operator to be used and value the variable value.
There is also a POST endpoint which allows to express the filtering more cleanly:
POST /process-instance
variables: A JSON array to only include process instances that have variables with certain values.
The array consists of objects with the three properties name, operator and value. name (String) is the variable name, operator (String) is the comparison operator to be used and value the variable value.
I erroneously deleted the ‘footer.liquid’ file in the Providence theme.
I am unable unable to create a new footer.liquid file in sections as I am getting the error below:
“New schema is incompatible with the current setting value. Invalid type value for block '1523601164583'. Type must be defined in schema. New schema is incompatible with the current setting value. Invalid type value for block '1523858388687'. Type must be defined in schema.New schema is incompatible with the current setting value. Invalid type value for block '1523592394611'. Type must be defined in schema.New schema is incompatible with the current setting value. Invalid type value for block '1523858779593'. Type must be defined in schema”
Any ideas?
I know its been a while but in case anyone ends up on this thread looking for the same thing or the poster of the question did not find a fix (probably not the case) up to this point, I will attempt to answer with how I got around this.
First of all lets examine why this happens, from my understanding, each time we add or modify certain values inside a section schema, the settings_data.json located in the config folder, will have settings generated inside of it upon usage of that section.
So when we go back into the section and change for example the type of a block, it will no longer match the existing settings inside of the settings_data.json and as such you will get an error back.
So how do if fix it? We simply go into the Shopify Store Adimin and remove the blocks that make use of the type we've changed, after we do this we can easily define any new type we want, add the blocks back and we will no longer receive an error.
Suppose I have before hook at the beginning of describe block, where GET API is called to return array of some objects if data is present in database, otherwise it returns empty array.
First it block under describe is ok, it will check response status and should pass if status is equal to 200. (no matter if response array is empty or array of objects)
But second it block should check the structure of single object in array. So, if array is not empty, everything is ok, but if there is no data and API returns empty array, it will fail. How can I invoke it conditionally, only if response.array is not empty?
Is there a way I can get a attribute set in ServletContext in EL so that it ends up as a JavaScript variable?
I am setting it as
context.setAttribute("testing.port", "9000");
I tried retrieving it like
alert("port" +'${testing.port}');
I am just getting a blank.
The problem is the period (.) in the key name. EL interprets the period as a call to an accessor method named getPort1 on whatever object testing references. Fetch the value from the appropriate implicit object:
${applicationScope['testing.port']}
or just use a different key:
${testingPort}
1Yes, this is a simplification of what really happens. It may also look for a predicate getter named isPort, or try Map#get("port").