I would like to get all apps which are accessible to me. So I used the API
https://developers.podio.com/doc/applications/get-all-apps-5902728
There is a 'limit' parameter but there is no 'offset' parameter.
The max value of limit is 100.
Is there any other method to get all apps?
Any help will be appreciated.
You can still go through hierarchy Org => Space => App => Item
Get all organisations, which will also give all spaces
https://developers.podio.com/doc/organizations/get-organizations-22344
Get all apps per space
https://developers.podio.com/doc/applications/get-apps-by-space-22478
Small example in Ruby demonstrating how it works
orgs = Podio::Organization.find_all()
orgs.each do |org|
org.spaces.each do |space|
puts "Working in space id:#{space['space_id']} name:'#{space['name']}'"
apps = Podio::Application.find_all_for_space(space['space_id'])
apps.each do |app|
puts "\tApp id:#{app['app_id']} name:'#{app['config']['name']}'"
end
end
end
Related
I am using twilio to provide audio conference functionality in my rails app. When I call my conference number, twilio passes on a couple of values - including 'From' which contains the caller's phone number in international format.
I have a profile for every user in my system and in my controller I am querying the profile to provide a personalised welcome message. Every profile contains between 0 and 3 numbers (primary, secondary and cellphone) and I need to check the caller's ID against those three fields in all profiles.
When I use the console on my dev machine, the following code finds the correct profile:
Profile.find_by('+44000000000')
When I upload to heroku, I use following code instead:
name = Profile.find_by(params['From']) || 'there'
Which causes an error in my app:
2014-04-03T19:20:22.801284+00:00 app[web.1]: PG::DatatypeMismatch: ERROR: argument of WHERE must be type boolean, not type bigint
2014-04-03T19:20:22.801284+00:00 app[web.1]: LINE 1: SELECT "profiles".* FROM "profiles" WHERE (+4400000000) ...
Any suggestion how that could be solved?
Thanks!
Additional information:
I think my problem is that I don't know how to query either the whole profile or three columns at once. Right now the code:
name = Profile.find_by(params['From'])
is not correct (params['From'] contains a phone number) because I am not telling rails to query the columns primary phone number, secondary phone number and cellphone. Neither am I querying the whole profile which would also be an option.
So the question basically is:
How can I change this code:
Profile.find_by(params['From'])
so that it queries either all fields in all profiles or just the three columns with phone numbers which each profile contains?
Is there something like Profile.where(:primary_number).or.where(:secondary_number)or.where(:cellphone) => params['From']
?
I am not familiar with twilio and not sure if this helps but find and find_by_attribute_name accepts array of values as options:
name = Profile.find_by([params['From'], 'there'] )
suppose params['From'] was here , This should generate:
SELECT `profiles`.* FROM `profiles` WHERE `profiles`.`attribute` IN ('here', 'there')
Or:
If you are trying to build dynamic matcher at run time , which is called Meta-programming , you can try this code:
name = eval("Profile.find_by_#{params['From']) || 'there'}(#rest of query params here) ")
Update
First of all, i think you are not using find_by correctly!! the correct syntax is:
Model.find_by(attribute_name: value)
#e.g
Profile.find_by(phone_number: '0123456')
Which will call where and retrive one record, but passing a value will generate a condition that always passes, for example:
Model.find_by('wrong_condition')
#will generate SQL like:
SELECT `models`.* FROM `models` WHERE ('wrong_condition') LIMIT 1
#which will return the first record in the model since there is no valid condition here
Why don't you try:
Profile.where('primary_number = ? OR secondary_number = ? OR cellphone = ?', params['From'], params['From'], params['From'])
You can write your query like:
Profile.where("primary_number = ? or secondary_number = ? or cellphone = ?", params['From'])
Just double check the syntax, but that should do it.
I want to create pagination for a messaging system in which the first page shown contains the oldest messages, with subsequent pages showing newer messages.
For example, if normal pagination for {a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i} with 3 per page is:
{a,b,c}, {d,e,f}, {g,h,i}
Then reverse pagination would be:
{g,h,i}, {d,e,f}, {a,b,c}
I plan to prepend the pages so the result is the same as normal pagination, only starting from the last page.
Is this possible with kaminari?
Kaminary.paginate_array does not produce query with offset and limit. For optimization reason, you shouldn't use this.
Instead you can do this:
#messages = query_for_message.order('created_at DESC').page(params[:page]).per(3)
Where query_for_message stands for any query which you use to retrieve the records for pagination. For example, it can be all the messages of a particular conversation.
Now in the view file, you just need to display #messages in the reverse order. For example:
<%= render :collection => #messages.reverse, :partial => 'message' %>
<%= paginate #messages %>
There's a good example repo on Github called reverse_kaminari on github. It suggests an implementation along these lines (Source).
class CitiesController < ApplicationController
def index
#cities = prepare_cities City.order('created_at DESC')
end
private
def prepare_cities(scope)
#per_page = City.default_per_page
total_count = scope.count
rest_count = total_count > #per_page ? (total_count % #per_page) : 0
#num_pages = total_count > #per_page ? (total_count / #per_page) : 1
if params[:page]
offset = params[:page].sub(/-.*/, '').to_i
current_page = #num_pages - (offset - 1) / #per_page
scope.page(current_page).per(#per_page).padding(rest_count)
else
scope.page(1).per(#per_page + rest_count)
end
end
end
All credits go to Andrew Djoga. He also hosted the app as a working demo.
One way to solve this problem would be this one:
Reverse pagination with kaminari?
It does not look very clean nor optimal, but it works :)
Yes, but the method I have come up with isn't exactly pretty. Effectively, you have to set your own order:
Message.page(1).per(3).order("created_at DESC").reverse!
The problem with this approach is twofold:
First the reverse! call resolves the scope to an array and does the query, nerfing some of the awesome aspects of kaminari using AR scopes.
Second, as with any reverse pagination your offset is going to move, meaning that between two repeat calls, you could have exactly 3 new messages send and you would get the exact same data back. This problem is inherent with reverse pagination.
An alternative approach would be to interrogate the "last" page number and increment your page number down towards 1.
I am working on a new project and whole day thinking & looking for the best way, how to save users' location to database.
I need to save their city, country. Here is a bit problem, because for example for Europeans this means city=Berlin, country=Germany.
But for US users it's like city=Los Angeles, country=California (state=USA).
So this is the problem with which I ma facing whole today.
My goal in this app is to find all users in the city according to their location. And also find the people, which are in their area of let's say 15 km/miles.
I plan to implement the app in RoR, PostgreSQL, the app will run probably on Heroku.
What is the best way to solve this "problem"? Could you give me please some advices, tips, whatever?
Thank you
You can use the geokit and geokit-rails gems to achieve that. See here for documentation: https://github.com/imajes/geokit-rails
Basically, it works like this: you save address data of your users and that address is looked up and mapped to a point in space (lat/lng) using a geocoding service (e.g. Google Maps or Yahoo Placefinder). These points can then be used to calculate distances etc.
An example:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
# has the following db fields:
# - city
# - state
# - country
# - latitude
# - longitude
acts_as_mappable :default_units => :miles,
:default_formula => :sphere,
:lat_column_name => :latitude,
:lng_column_name => :longitude,
:auto_geocode => {:field => :full_address}
def full_address
[city, state, country].reject(&:blank).join(', ')
end
end
Then you can do the following:
# find all users in a city (this has nothing to do with geokit but is just a normal db lookup)
User.where(:city => 'New York')
# find all users that are within X miles of a place
User.find_within(300, 'Denver')
and much more, just see the documentation...
This example shows you how to use the geokit gem. This gem does no longer seem to be under active development. So maybe it would be worthwile to check out geocoder: https://github.com/alexreisner/geocoder
I Am trying to build play with API code from Amazon -- I am a noob at this --
I have created a product search using the simple lookup code, and have gone though and set the search field form a form submission works fine, how ever I don't want to set a category Like I am currently below to say DVD, BABY MUSIC, I wish to set to ALL is this possible?
include("amazon_api_class.php");
$obj = new AmazonProductAPI(); -- I have edited this and added ALL as a category in here
try
{
$result = $obj->searchProducts($query,
AmazonProductAPI::BABY, -- I can change this to DVD or MUSIC and it works but if i set to ALL i get errors?
"TITLE"); - tryed changing this to KEYWORD doesnt work!
}
catch(Exception $e)
Any Help Would Be nice.
Thanks
Carl
OK --- updated -- ANd I belive I have to use KEYWORD when USING ALL so I have added this in
case "KEYWORD" : $parameters = array("Operation" => "ItemSearch",
"Title" => $search,
"SearchIndex" => $category,
"ResponseGroup" => "Small",
"MerchantId" => "All",
"Condition"=>"New",
'Keywords' => $searchTerm);
Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/ADMINwhere2shoponline/www/include/amazon.php on line 23
still get this error?
carl
Carl,
You should be able to use ALL as the search parameter, but you need to make sure that the number of ItemPage you are requesting is not more than 5 or it will return an error. All other categories allow up to 10, but ALL is limited to 5.
Check that and see if you yet your problem resolved.
this is my test (with shoulda helpers):
context "searching from header" do
setup do
Factory(:city, :name => 'Testing It')
ThinkingSphinx::Test.index 'city_core', 'city_delta'
ThinkingSphinx::Test.start
get :index,
:query => 'Testing It'
end
should respond_with(:success)
should assign_to(:results)
should "have one city on the result" do
assert_equal( assigns(:results).count, 1 )
assert_kind_of( assigns(:results).first, City )
end
ThinkingSphinx::Test.stop
end
Everything works fine except the test always say the count of the results is 0, not 1.
I have debugged this code and when the request reaches the controller, the Sphinx indexes are completely empty, even with the explicit call of index for it.
Am I doing something wrong here?
Any help appreciated.
I found out the problem... even tho the insertion in the database is right before the ThinkingSphinx.index, with transactional fixtures, after the setup block the records get deleted.
The solution was adding to the test the following line:
self.use_transactional_fixtures = false
Hope this helps anyone with the same problem.