I want to construct an SQL along this but try not to use sqlu.
select el.oid, el.name, el.res_cat from el
left join bk on (el.cat = bk.cat and bk.oid=100)
where not exists (select 1 from dates bd where
el.oid=bd.lots_oid and bd.bk_oid = bk.oid) and el.e_oid=bk.e_oid
Are there Slick functions for SQL exists or not exists? Thanks
Update 1
I realized my mistakes when I revisited my Slick code again. I want to apologize for the false alarm I set. This is not an answer and hopefully someone can help me to rectify my mistakes. For the time being, I am using Slick's plain SQL to continue my work.
The Slick query I constructed didn't work. It was close to the SQL I wanted. What I did was,
val elQuery = elTable.joinLeft(bkTable)
.on((el, bk) => el.cat === bk.cat && bk.oid === 100)
val query = for {
a <- elQuery if bdTable.filterNot(bd => a._2.map(_.oid === bd.bkOid).isDefined && a._1.oid === bd.elOid).exists
} yield a
finalQuery.result.statements.foreach(x => Logger.debug(s"xx => $x"))
I notice filterNot does not generate a SQL not exists. This is the other portion that lost me.
I don't have enough reputation to make comment yet. But I assume that you want to get all rows that doesn't exit in dates table. I would rewrite your query like below:
SELECT
el.oid, el.name, el.res_cat.cat
FROM
el
LEFT JOIN bk ON bk.cat = el.cat
AND bk.e_oid = el.e_oid
AND bk.oid = 100
LEFT JOIN dates bd ON bd.lots_oid = el.oid
AND bd.bk_oid = bk.oid
WHERE
bd.lots_oid IS NULL
Explanation:
Instead of taking NOT EXISTS, you can achieve the same thing by LEFT JOIN dates and specify on WHERE condition that the primary key (PK) for dates IS NULL. I don't know the PK for dates table, so I just add the column I know. You should adjust it to the PK of dates table.
LEFT JOINing and WHERE PK IS NULL ensures you that the row doesn't exist on the left joined table.
Related
When you use the Ibis API to query impala, for some reason Ibis API forces it to become a subquery (when you join 4-5 tables it suddenly becomes super slow). It simply won't join normally, due to column name overlap problem on joins. I want a way to quickly rename the columns perhaps, isn't that's how SQL usually works?
i0 = impCon.table('shop_inventory')
s0 = impCon.table('shop_expenditure')
s0 = s0.relabel({'element_date': 'spend_element_date', 'element_shop_item': 'spend_shop_item'})
jn = i0.inner_join(s0, [i0['element_date'] == s0['spend_element_date'], i0['element_shop_item'] == s0['spend_shop_item']])
jn.materialize()
jn.execute(limit=900)
Then you have IBIS generating SQL that is SUBQUERYING it without me suggesting it:
SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT `element_date`, `element_shop_item`, `element_address`, `element_expiration`,
`element_category`, `element_description`
FROM dbp.`shop_inventory`
) t0
INNER JOIN (
SELECT `element_shop_item` AS `spend_shop_item`, `element_comm` AS `spend_comm`,
`element_date` AS `spend_date`, `element_amount`,
`element_spend_type`, `element_shop_item_desc`
FROM dbp.`shop_spend`
) t1
ON (`element_shop_item` = t1.`spend_shop_item`) AND
(`element_category` = t1.`spend_category`) AND
(`element_subcategory` = t1.`spend_subcategory`) AND
(`element_comm` = t1.`spend_comm`) AND
(`element_date` = t1.`spend_date`)
LIMIT 900
Why is this so difficult?
It should be ideally as simple as:
jn = i0.inner_join(s0, [s0['element_date'].as('spend_date') == i0['element_date']]
to generate a single: SELECT s0.element_date as spend_date, i0.element_date INNER JOIN s0 dbp.shop_spend ON s0.spend_date == i0.element_date
right?
Are we not ever allowed to have same column names on tables that are being joined? I am pretty sure in raw SQL you can just use "X AS Y" without having to need subquery.
I spent the last few hours struggling with this same issue. A better solution I found is to do the following. Join keeping the variable names the same. Then, before you materialize, only select a subset of the variables such that there isn't any overlap.
So in your code it would look something like this:
jn = i0.inner_join(s0, [i0['element_date'] == s0['element_date'], i0['element_shop_item'] == s0['element_shop_item']])
expr = jn[i0, s0['variable_of_interest_1'],s0['variable_of_interest_2']]
expr.materialize()
See here for more resources
https://docs.ibis-project.org/sql.html
This is my query .After i comment the part OR (NITransactionStatus = 'SUCCESS') ,there is no slowness.
How can i modify this query such that there is no slow and also i need to include both the conditions thats inside 'WHERE' clause?
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM IN_CTD D
INNER JOIN IN_CTC C
ON C.InwardCustFileId = D.InwardCustFileId
WHERE (D.CurrentStatusId = 30) OR (NITransactionStatus = 'SUCCESS')
Trying to make it brief :
While i excute this query,it takes too much time to complete its execution . After i comment the 'OR' checking,there is no slowness.The 'IN_CTD' table mentioned in the query contains 2830539 records and the table 'IN_CTC' have 1965 records.How can i modify this query including the 'OR' checking such that it won't take much time to execute ?
Maybe you can try sub query. If NITransactionStatus column is on IN_CTD table, try this:
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM IN_CTC C
INNER JOIN (SELECT InwardCustFileId FROM IN_CTD WHERE (CurrentStatusId = 30) OR (NITransactionStatus = 'SUCCESS')) AS D
ON C.InwardCustFileId = D.InwardCustFileId
If NITransactionStatus column is on IN_CTC table, try this:
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM IN_CTC C
INNER JOIN (SELECT InwardCustFileId FROM IN_CTD WHERE CurrentStatusId = 30) AS D
ON C.InwardCustFileId = D.InwardCustFileId
WHERE (NITransactionStatus = 'SUCCESS')
Hope it can help.
This SQL is beyond my expertise. I think it should be fairly easy for someone with experience. Here is what I have so far..
SQL is as follows:
UPDATE (Tbl_Stg_Project_Schedule_Dates
INNER JOIN Tbl_Child_ITN ON Tbl_Stg_Project_Schedule_Dates.ms_itn = Tbl_Child_ITN.ITN)
INNER JOIN Tbl_Schedule ON Tbl_Child_ITN.Id = Tbl_Schedule.ID SET Tbl_Schedule.a_construction_start = [Tbl_Stg_Project_Schedule_Dates].[ms_start_date]
WHERE (((Tbl_Stg_Project_Schedule_Dates.ms_tempt_id) In (16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23)));
I want to add one last condition to this being that I only want the minimum of [Tbl_Stg_Project_Schedule_Dates].[ms_start_date] to update the table. I've tried the obvious of wrapping the field in Min, and also tried creating a separate aggregate select statement first (to get the min value with other criteria) that I then tried to create the update query from in new query but no luck.
I believe this is valid Access/Jet SQL. The idea here is to use a subquery to look up the earliest date among all the rows in your subset. I'm not sure if ms_itn was the right column to correlate on but hopefully you get the idea:
UPDATE (Tbl_Stg_Project_Schedule_Dates
INNER JOIN Tbl_Child_ITN ON Tbl_Stg_Project_Schedule_Dates.ms_itn = Tbl_Child_ITN.ITN)
INNER JOIN Tbl_Schedule ON Tbl_Child_ITN.Id = Tbl_Schedule.ID
SET Tbl_Schedule.a_construction_start = [Tbl_Stg_Project_Schedule_Dates].[ms_start_date]
WHERE (((Tbl_Stg_Project_Schedule_Dates.ms_tempt_id) In (16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23)))
and [Tbl_Stg_Project_Schedule_Dates].[ms_start_date] = (
select min(sd.[ms_start_date])
from [Tbl_Stg_Project_Schedule_Dates] as sd
where sd.ms_itn = [Tbl_Stg_Project_Schedule_Dates].ms_itn
)
I have an Entity Framework model with the following classes (I have simplified the classes for simpler viewing):
PuzzleItem
-PuzzleId (int, primary key)
-Title
PuzzleProgress
-ProgressId (int, primary key)
-PuzzleId (FK)
-UserId (FK)
In PuzzleItem I have a number of levels. The PuzzleProgress keeps track of which level the user is at by inserting a record of that level when the user completes a previous level. For a start a new user will have one entry in PuzzleProgress with PuzzleId = 1.
In my code, I am using the following statement to perform a left outer join, so that I will get a list of all puzzles, and indicating to me which puzzle has not been solved. I made reference to this post from StackOverflow.
Here is my code:
var result = from pzs in e.PuzzleItems
join prg in e.PuzzleProgresses on pzs equals prg.PuzzleItem
into pzs_prg_tbl
from pzs_prg in pzs_prg_tbl.DefaultIfEmpty()
where pzs_prg.UserId == userId
select new SimplePuzzleItem()
{
PuzzleId = pzs_prg.PuzzleId,
PuzzleName = pzs_prg.PuzzleItem.Title,
IsUnlocked = (pzs_prg == null?false:true)
};
After running the code, only the first level of this new user is returned (while the PuzzleItem table has 3 records).
I've tried playing around with the code but the one I pasted above is the nearest I can get to, can anybody point me in the correct direction? Thanks!
It's a bit hard to say exactly without seeing more of the code, but where pzs_prg.UserId == userId is probably negating the left outer join.
What I mean is, if you're intending PuzzleItems LEFT JOIN PuzzleProgress then you want all PuzzleItems even when there is no PuzzleProgress. But the where pzs_prg.UserId == userId means PuzzleProgress cannot be null, because it must have a UserId (of value userId). So, you effectively have an inner join.
Personally, I don't like the "correct" way of doing joins (left or inner) in linq, so this is how I would correct the linq statement:
var result = from pz in db.PuzzleItems
from pg in db.PuzzleProgresses
.Where(pg => pg.PuzzleId == pz.PuzzleId)
.Where(pg => pg.UserId == userId)
.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new
{
PuzzleId = pz.PuzzleId,
PuzzleName = pz.Title,
IsUnlocked = (pg != null)
};
This reads a lot more like SQL joins, which I learned a long time ago so it fits my thinking.
If you want to re-factor the join type syntax, look at this 'LINQ Joining in c# with multiple conditions'
I think the where clause is filtering out the records. You need to include the where clause in your left join. Like so:
var result = from pzs in e.PuzzleItems
join prg in e.PuzzleProgresses on new { pzs.PuzzleId, UserId = userId } equals new { prg.PuzzleId, prg.UserId }
into pzs_prg_tbl
from pzs_prg in pzs_prg_tbl.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new SimplePuzzleItem()
{
PuzzleId = pzs_prg.PuzzleId,
PuzzleName = pzs_prg.PuzzleItem.Title,
IsUnlocked = (pzs_prg == null?false:true)
};
My LINQ isnt the best, neither is my SQL but im trying to do something like this in LINQ (its kind of in pseudo-code)
select * from CarePlan c
-- only newest Referral based on r.Date (if more than one exists)
left outer join Referral r on r.CarePlanId = c.CarePlanId
where c.PatientId = 'E4A1DA8B-F74D-4417-8AC7-B466E3B3FFD0'
The data looks like this:
A Patient can have a bunch of careplans
each careplan can have 0 to n referrals (I want the newest referral per careplan - if any exist)
Would like to return a list of careplans for each patient (whether or not they have a referral or not, if it has more than one referral - grab the newest one)
Thanks for any help guys
In LINQ you use the DefaultIfEmpty to achieve a left outer join - examples at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb397895.aspx
Assuming that the referrals are not a (potentially empty) collection on the care plans so you're joining two collections together ...
Your query it would be something like:
Get the latest referral per Care Plan:
var latestReferrals = from r in referrals
group r by r.CarePlanId into lr
select new { CarePlanId = lr.Key, LatestReferral = lr.OrderByDescending(lrd => lrd.Date).First()};
Find the combined details:
var q = from c in CarePlan
where c.PatientId = 'E4A1DA8B-F74D-4417-8AC7-B466E3B3FFD0'
join lr in latestReferrals on c.CarePlanId equals lr.CarePlanId into gj
from subReferral in gj.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new { CarePlanId = c.CarePlanId, LatestReferral = (subReferral == null) ? null : subReferral.LatestReferral };
Depending on whether you want many referral properties or just a few you may or may not want the whole Referral object in the second part or just extract the relevant properties.
You may be able to combine these into a single query but for readability it may be easier to keep them separate. If there is a combined solution you should also compare performance of the two approaches.
EDIT: see comment for joining patients/other tables from care plans
If Patient is joined from Referral (as per comment) then its more complex because you're doing several left outer joins. So switching to the slightly more concise syntax:
var combined = from c in carePlans
where c.PatientId = 'E4A1DA8B-F74D-4417-8AC7-B466E3B3FFD0'
from lr in latestReferral.Where(r => r.CarePlanId == c.CarePlanId).DefaultIfEmpty()
from p in patients.Where(patient => patient.PatientId == ((lr != null) ? lr.LatestReferral.PatientId : -1)).DefaultIfEmpty()
select new { c.CarePlanId, PatientName = (p == null) ? "no patient" : p.PatientName, LatestReferral = (lr == null) ? null : lr.LatestReferral };