In the following screenshot we see the results of selecting
Edit|Find|Show Usages
while highlighting a class SparkAbstractBenchmark: Notice we do not get any useful information because the log files overwhelm the source files
So is there a way to exclude *.log from the search ?
You might consider upgrading to the IntelliJ latest version, since in the newer versions the results are organized in sections that you can collapse/expand, I guess it could be usefull for this case, look:
If this is not enough (which is the case) you have the option to configure your own Scopes, just go to the Find Usages Settings and click the elipses in the Scope section, then click the + symbol to add a new (local) scope, name it and you should see this window:
Then in the Pattern: field you have to specify the pattern following the scope syntax which should be something like this:!file:*.log
After applying you should have this new Scope option available in the settings scopes list which you can use to filter the search.
Related
I'm a tester and my manager has add new team project to the TFS and add my user and a developer user for this team project, when I've tried to add any type of work items the list of "Assigned To" shows all the users correctly, except for the "bug work item" only, I can't assigned to any user and shows that it is not in the list of supported values.
how can I solve this problem?
First, make sure the work item that you're manipulating currently in a state that has a valid transition to New. Otherwise, you will not be able to save the changes.
If you have customized the bug work item type. According to sounds like a rule in the bug workflow or field.
If you run the [witadmin exportwitd] command and export the bug work item type, look for the Assigned To Field and look at the rules on the field. Also take a look at the section and look at the rules for the transitions.
Also take a look at this similar question on TFS2015 Bug/Task unable to assign it to someone else than the user that creates it, try the suggestion mentioned in the link:
needed to give the relevant global top-level permissions for everyone
to view stuff
Just run the below in order to grant the needed rights :
tfssecurity /a+ Server FrameworkGlobalSecurity GenericRead
> "[DefaultCollection]\Project Collection Valid Users" ALLOW
> /collection:http://tfsserver:8080/tfs/DefaultCollection
I'm looking to create a central repository for all of our published API documentation using DocFx. I have documentation auto-generated via my build (using TFS) and published through my release (using Octopus) just fine for multiple individual sites. However, I'm wanting to pull it altogether in one location. The thinking is that through a parent site you could filter content in any of the individual sites without having to drill down into them. Do you have a recommendation on how to do this?
Also, within this same documentation repository I want to provide the capability to search by all of the meta data (project-level documentation) across the hundreds of projects in our portfolio. This will give our BA, DEV and QA teams easier access to what all our systems do. I like the "filtering" capability built into DocFx, but I'm wanting full-text search across all of the meta data. Do you have a recommendation for this functionality as well?
To change the location of the docfx output, edit the docfx.json file and specify the dest value. By default it is "dest": "_site". For more formatting guidance, reference: https://dotnet.github.io/docfx/tutorial/docfx.exe_user_manual.html.
Regarding full-text search, that is possible by simply ensuring the ExtractSearchIndex post-processor is invoked (in order to generate an index.json file of keywords) and that the global _enableSearch value is set to true in the docfx.json file. A snippet from that file would look like:
"postProcessors": [ "ExtractSearchIndex" ],
"globalMetadata": {
"_enableSearch": "true"
}
For your first question:
I think what you expect is like the .NET API Browser. The source code behind this page is not open to public, so you need create this page by yourself, through collecting xrefmap.yml from multiple sites, and extract the needed data into this page.
For your second question:
DocFX uses Luna to scan all the output files and generate an index file called index.json for later search use. In your case, you should want to limit the search scope only in the metadata you defined. This is also not supported by DocFX by default. You can also use Luna in your central place to search these meta. You can create your specific index.json for each project first, and the cental place to collect them for the search page.
I'm the only front-end dev on our team and I would like to be notified whenever one of the other devs pushes a review that touches some "front-end" files (e.g., *.html or *.css). Is this possible?
We're using Gerrit v2.9.4.
You can find any changes containing html files with following search (according to docs):
path:^.*\.html$
In my setup (Gerrit 2.12.2), I had to use (with trailing $, I've an error):
path:^.*\.html
Please note that you combine searches with boolean operators like AND and OR. Example:
path:^.*\.html OR path:^.*\.css
If you want to get notification, you can save this filter in your settings (Settings > Watched Projects). See this documentation for more details.
We've been using Trac for a while now for our developers only. However we are now opening it up for our (internal) clients. We have a project listing page (based on the default one that comes with Trac). What we'd like to do, is display more information about the project than what is currently available.
I have searched google and here, to see if I can find how to get more information. There seems to be a variable called $project which has .name, .description and .href as attributes.
Is there somewhere, a list of the attributes available? Or perhaps a different solution altogether that will allow us to display more information on the project list page. Such as the number of open tickets etc.
As far as I known, you can use $project.env as well. It is an object, which provides a number of attributes:
$project.env.base_url
$project.env.base_url_for_redirect
$project.env.secure_cookies
$project.env.project_name
$project.env.project_description
$project.env.project_url
$project.env.project_admin
$project.env.project_admin_trac_url
$project.env.project_footer
$project.env.project_icon
$project.env.log_type
$project.env.log_file
$project.env.log_level
$project.env.log_format
More detail is available at env.py
On the project page customization page there is not much variables, indeed. Looking at the source code there is also trac.version, trac.time, but that's all. There is also project.env that may hold more information. I do not have a multiproject setup at hand, so you might be interested to see for yourself what variables are available with TracDeveloper plugin. It dumps variables if enabled and you add debug=true in the URL.
I'm investigating the use of Eclipse as a platform and I am trying to figure out how a plugin provides configuration. For example, say I have a plugin to display a user defined message. Further, I want that user defined message to be configured by the user. What is the standard way for the user to edit this message in the platform? Is there any documentation for this?
As you mentions in the comments, the article Preferences in the Eclipse Workbench UI described the way developers define preference pages for their plug-ins.
By use of the preference store in conjunction with the preferences dialog and provided field editors a plug-in developer can quickly put together a user interface for managing preferences.
The color preference page is an example of a simple page that uses a single JFace field editor to manage its values
That way, you can define several type of custom values configured by the user:
text field
set of predefined values (dropdown list)
array of values
Example:
Found it: http://www.eclipse.org/articles/Article-Preferences/preferences.htm Wow, Stackoverflow helps a lot! You only need to post and it magically comes up in Google
Sorry to VonC but I had already found it before he posted the answer :-/