Good day
I'm trying to perform load testing with LoadRunner 11. Here's an issue:
I've got automatically generated script after actions recording
Need to catch Session ID. I do it with web_reg_save_param() in the next way:
web_reg_save_param("S_ID",
"LB=Set-Cookie: JSESSIONID=",
"RB=; Path=/app/;",
LAST);
web_add_cookie("S_ID; DOMAIN={host}");
I catch ID from the response (Tree View):
D2B6F5B05A1366C395F8E86D8212F324
Compare it with Replay Log and see:
"S_ID = 75C78912AE78D26BDBDE73EBD9ADB510".
Compare 2 IDs above with the next request ID and see 3rd ID (Tree View):
80FE367101229FA34EB6429F4822E595
Why do I have 3 different IDs?
Let me know if I have to provide extra information.
You should Use(Search=All) below Code. Provided your Right and left boundary is correct:
web_reg_save_param("S_ID",
"LB=Set-Cookie: JSESSIONID=",
"RB=; Path=/app/;",
"Search=All",
LAST);
web_add_cookie("{S_ID}; DOMAIN={host}");
For Details refer HP Mannual for web_reg_save_param function.
I do not see what the conflict or controversy is here. Yes, items related to state or session will definitely change from user to user, one recording session to the next. They may even change from one request to the next. You may need to record several times to identify the change and use pattern for when you need to collect and when you need to reuse the collected data from a response in a subsequent request.
Take a listen to this podcast. It should help
http://www.perfbytes.com/dynamic-data-correlation
Related
I´ve got a Job that runs a TaskletStep, then a chunk-based step and then another TaskletStep.
In each of these steps, errors (in the form of Exceptions) can occur.
The chunk-based step looks like this:
stepBuilderFactory
.get("step2")
.chunk<SomeItem, SomeItem>(1)
.reader(flatFileItemReader)
.processor(itemProcessor)
.writer {}
.faultTolerant()
.skipPolicy { _ , _ -> true } // skip all Exceptions and continue
.taskExecutor(taskExecutor)
.throttleLimit(taskExecutor.corePoolSize)
.build()
The whole job definition:
jobBuilderFactory.get("job1")
.validator(validator())
.preventRestart()
.start(taskletStep1)
.next(step2)
.next(taskletStep2)
.build()
I expected that Spring Batch somehow picks up the Exceptions that occur along the way, so I can then create a Report including them after the Job has finished processing. Looking at the different contexts, there´s also fields that should contain failureExceptions. However, it seems there´s no such information (especially for the chunked step).
What would be a good approach if I need information about:
what Exceptions did occur in which Job execution
which Item was the one that triggered it
The JobExecution provides a method to get all failure exceptions that happened during the job. You can use that in a JobExecutionListener#afterJob(JobExecution jobExecution) to generate your report.
In regards to which items caused the issue, this will depend on where the exception happens (during the read, process or write operation). For this requirement, you can use one of the ItemReadListener, ItemProcessListener or ItemWriteListener to keep record of the those items (For example, by adding them to the job execution context to be able to get access to them in the JobExecutionListener#afterJob method for your report).
Hi I'm trying to add a labor transaction from an action automation script with the object being ASSIGNMENT in Maximo. I am currently trying the code below.
labTransSet = MXServer.getMXServer().getMboSet("LABTRANS",ui);
labTrans = labTransSet.add();
labTrans.setValue("laborcode", userLabor);
labTrans.setValue("wonum", assignWonum);
sds1=SimpleDateFormat("hh.mm aa").format(firstDate);
sds2=SimpleDateFormat("hh.mm aa").format(Date());
labTrans.setValue("STARTTIME", sds1);
labTrans.setValue("FINISHTIME", sds2);
labTransSet.save();
labTransSet.close();
userLabor is the username of the current user
assignWonum is the assignment work order number
firstDate is the scheduled date field from the assignment
The labor record is being added correctly with the right data, but when I go to route my workflow after the script is called from a button, I am given the warning BMXAA8229W WOACTIVITY has been updated by another user and the work order does not route. I am under the impression that this is happening because the assignment object for the script is being queried at the same time I try to add and save a labor record. Does anyone know if my guess is correct or what else the problem is and how I can fix this? Thanks
That error occurs because Maximo already has one version of the record loaded into memory when the record in the database is modified independently. Maximo then tries to work with the in-memory object and sees it doesn't match what is in the database and throws that error. Timing doesn't really have anything to do with it (other than that an edit happened at some point after the record was loaded into memory).
What you need to do is make sure you are modifying the exact same task/assignment/labtrans record that has already been loaded into memory. That "MXServer.getMXServer().getMboSet" stuff is guaranteed to use a new object. That is how you start a new transaction in Maximo; how you make sure you are not using anything already loaded into memory. I suspect you want to get your set off of the implicit "mbo" object the script will give to you.
I have a telegram bot that for any received message runs a program in the server and sends its result back. But there is a problem! If a user sends too many messages to my bot(spamming), it will make server so busy!
Is there any way to block the people whom send more than 5 messages in a second and don't receive their messages anymore? (using telegram api!!)
Firstly I have to say that Telegram Bot API does not have such a capability itself, Therefore you will need to implement it on your own and all you need to do is:
Count the number of the messages that a user sends within a second which won't be so easy without having a database. But if you have a database with a table called Black_List and save all the messages with their sent-time in another table, you'll be able to count the number of messages sent via one specific ChatID in a pre-defined time period(In your case; 1 second) and check if the count is bigger than 5 or not, if the answer was YES you can insert that ChatID to the Black_List table.
Every time the bot receives a message it must run a database query to see that the sender's chatID exists in the Black_List table or not. If it exists it should continue its own job and ignore the message(Or even it can send an alert to the user saying: "You're blocked." which I think can be time consuming).
Note that as I know the current telegram bot API doesn't have the feature to stop receiving messages but as I mentioned above you can ignore the messages from spammers.
In order to save time, You should avoid making a database connection
every time the bot receives an update(message), instead you can load
the ChatIDs that exist in the Black_List to a DataSet and update the
DataSet right after the insertion of a new spammer ChatID to the
Black_List table. This way the number of the queries will reduce
noticeably.
I have achieved it by this mean:
# Using the ttlcache to set a time-limited dict. you can adjust the ttl.
ttl_cache = cachetools.TTLCache(maxsize=128, ttl=60)
def check_user_msg_frequency(message):
print(ttl_cache)
msg_cnt = ttl_cache[message.from_user.id]
if msg_cnt > 3:
now = datetime.now()
until = now + timedelta(seconds=60*10)
bot.restrict_chat_member(message.chat.id, message.from_user.id, until_date=until)
def set_user_msg_frequency(message):
if not ttl_cache.get(message.from_user.id):
ttl_cache[message.from_user.id] = 1
else:
ttl_cache[message.from_user.id] += 1
With these to functions above, you can record how many messages sent by any user in the period. If a user's messages sent more than expected, he would be restricted.
Then, every handler you called should call these two functions:
#bot.message_handler(commands=['start', 'help'])
def handle_start_help(message):
set_user_msg_frequency(message)
check_user_msg_frequency(message)
I'm using pyTelegramBotAPI this module to handle.
I know I'm late to the party, but here is another simple solution that doesn't use a Db:
Create a ConversationState class to attach to each telegram Id when they start to chat with the bot
Then add a LastMessage DateTime variable to the ConversationState class
Now every time you receive a message check if enought time has passed from the LasteMessage DateTime, if not enought time has passed answer with a warning message.
You can also implement a timer that deletes the conversation state class if you are worried about performance.
Material A:
http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/83final/ba554_90007/ch04s03.html
Material B:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/5487?page=0,1
Here is a snapshot from material A that told me session resumption will be failed if I called SSL_free, even if save the session via SSL_get1_session().
But a piece code in material B show me SSL_free will result in nothing for session resumption. Because SSL_get1_session will increase the reference counter in session object and allow SSL object to be reused after session freed.
Here is the snapshot from material B:
So, those confused me so much, and which one is truly correct?
Thx!
I think source A is wrong and I think it mistakes SSL_get1_session with SSL_get_session, which actually is SSL_get0_session (does not increment the counter). The OpenSSL documentation is clear in this issue.
The man page fully supports the second statement.
I am facing the following problem:
I have multiple HTTP Requests in my testplan.
I want every request to be repeated 4 times if they fail.
I realized that with a BeanShell Assertion, and its already working fine.
My problem is, that I don't want requests to be executed if a previous Request failed 5 times,
BUT I also dont want the thread to end.
I just want the current thread iteration to end,
so that the next iteration of the thread can start again with the 1st request (if the thread is meant to be repeated).
How do I realize that within the BeanShell Assertion?
Here is just a short extract of my code where i want the solution to have
badResponseCounter is being increased for every failed try of the request, this seems to work so far. Afterwards, the variable gets resetted.
if (badResponseCounter = 5) {
badResponseCounter = 0;
// Stop current iteration
}
I already checked the API, methods like setStopTest() or setStopThread() are given, but nothing for quitting the current iteration. I also need the preference "continue" in the thread group, as otherwise the entire test will stop after 1 single request failed.
Any ideas of how to do this?
In my opinion the easiest way is using following combination:
If Controller to check ${JMeterThread.last_sample_ok} and badResponseCounter variables
Test Action Sampler as a child of If Controller configured to "Go to next loop iteration"
Try this.
ctx.setRestartNextLoop(true);
if the thread number is 2, i tried to skip. I get the below result as i expected (it does not call b-2). It does not kill the thread either.