I have a question that bothers me for a long time, here some code as below,
if (flag) {
// some code here
}
else | // cursor here
when I press shift + command + enter (on Mac) to complete automatically, it restyled my code as
if (flag) {
// some code here
} else {
|
}
and I just wanna it complete but never effect on my own style, i.e.
if (flag) {
// some code here
}
else {
|
}
is there any settings about this manner for IntelliJ IDEA? thanks in advance:)
It's likely a setting in your code style that had forced this. By default, IntelliJ does not force the else statement to go to a separate line.
Navigate to Settings > Editor > Code Style > Java, select the Wrapping and Braces tab, and tick the "'else' on new line" checkbox. This will then force all of your else statements to be on their own separate line as you wish.
Related
I have a problem with ModalBottomSheet and it's on my work computer so I can't record it to you right now. So basically, after I give focus to one of my TextFields, my keyboard comes up and pushes all the content upwards so I can see the TextField that I'm writing to. When I'm hiding my keyboard I can see that my ModalBottomSheet hides too, but I never set it to come up.
So if you are familiar with this bug, please let me know your solutions.
My coworker, so he inserted a boolean that checks if keyboard is up or not and if it is, dont put ap modal bottom sheet.
You can use this method until this problem is fixed with an additional update.
You can use LaunchedEffect for this. Here is an example for you.
The important thing here is to disable the ModalBottomSheetDialog when the keyboard is opened and re-enable it half a second after the keyboard is closed.
You can trigger the required function by assigning a value to this variable when the keyboard is turned on, and then changing and checking this value when the keyboard is closed.
/*Change this value to "keyboard_on" when the keyboard is turned on and "keyboard_off" when the keyboard is closed again. You can give different names for different usage areas. That's why we're using a string, not a Boolean.*/
var taskCodeValue = remember { mutableStateOf("keyboard_off") }
var sheetOpener by remember { mutableStateOf(true) }
if (taskCodeValue.value == "keyboard_off"){
LaunchedEffect(taskCodeValue.value == "keyboard_off"){
delay(500)
sheetOpener = true
}
}else {
sheetOpener = false
}
/*
By adding the Scaffold, which includes ModalBottomSheet and other compose
elements, into a box, we enable them to work independently of each other.
*/
Box(modifier = Modifier.fillMaxSize()) {
Scaffold(
content = {}
)
if (sheetOpener){
ModalBottomSheetLayout(
sheetState = sheetState,
sheetContent = {}
) {}
}
}
Without going into the politics of the company, I need to change the behaviour of the IntelliJ Java formatter thus....
someMethod(() -> {
// do stuff
}
Needs to format to:
someMethod(() ->
{
// do stuff
}
I got it moving { to new line for regular methods :( but struggling to find the option to do same for lambdas.
File | Settings | Editor | Code Style | Java > 'Wrapping and Braces' tab > 'Braces placement' section > 'In lambda declaration' option > set to 'Next line' instead of default 'End of line'.
I have an old app where I have 5 tabs. Each tab have list of ads & there is details. Also each tab have respective add ad. Design for all 5 tabs is same except some changes, so I decided to use 1 screen only for all 5 tabs.
Now what I am doing is while add ad, I am checking which tab I am and based on tab bar index, I am showing hiding fields. Same is applicable for details screen also. Sample code is as shown below.
if (self.tabBarController.selectedIndex==0) {
field1.hidden = NO;
} else if (self.tabBarController.selectedIndex==1) {
field1.hidden = NO;
} else if (self.tabBarController.selectedIndex==2) {
field1.hidden = NO;
} else if (self.tabBarController.selectedIndex==3) {
field1.hidden = NO;
} else if (self.tabBarController.selectedIndex==4) {
field1.hidden = YES;
}
Now I have around 15 fields for each form so I write this code for all fields.
What I noticed that client change the tab bar position continuously so I was looking for efficient way of doing it.
Right now what I do is at all places manually change index positions by doing Search-Replace, however I dont like this.
I was looking for a way where instead of selectedIndex, I was looking for someconstant value that I will assign to tab item of tab bar, so my code will change as below
if (self.tabBarController.selectedIndex==adType_News) {
field1.hidden = NO;
} else if (self.tabBarController.selectedIndex==adType_Occasions) {
.
.
And so on...
This way, I only need to change in the storyboard and code level will not have any changes.
Is there way where I can achieve this?
Main Issue
As client ask to change tab bar completely, I need to make changes of selectedIndex changes at all places which I don't like and feel more in-efficient way. So I was looking for a way where I will make change in storyboard only and coding level there won't be any change.
The main issue for me is changing selectedIndex in all files which make more error.
I think I understand the question to mean that the code is full of number literals, referring to the selected index of the tabbar, and the business requirements about the ordering of items are shifting. Fix by changing the literals to something symbolic that can be controlled centrally:
// in a new file, indexes.h
#define INDEXA (0)
#define INDEXB (1)
#define INDEXC (2)
// wherever existing code refers to the tab selection
#import "indexes.h"
// in the code, for example if selectedIndex == 2, change to
if (self.tabBarController.selectedIndex==INDEXC) {
// ...
Since Titanium doesn't allow you to manually change the hintText colour of a textfield, I have to set hintText manually. Because of this, I have to dynamically change the passwordMask setting on one of fields I'm using.
However, I'm getting weird behaviour and I can't tell if I'm doing something wrong, or if it's a bug in Titanium.
So, here's my markup:
<TextField id="password" onFocus="passwordFocusEvent" onReturn="passwordReturnEvent" onBlur="passwordBlurEvent" value="password"></TextField>
And some of my controller code:
function passwordFocusEvent(e) {
slideViewUp();
if (e.value === 'password') {
e.source.setPasswordMask(true);
e.source.value = '';
}
}
function passwordBlurEvent(e) {
if (!e.value) {
e.source.setPasswordMask(false);
e.source.value = 'password';
}
}
function passwordReturnEvent(e) {
slideViewDown();
passwordBlurEvent(e);
}
What happens is bizarre. When I focus on the password field, it remains plain text. I enter some text, then click off to another field, stays as plain text.
I click back to the password field, it's STILL plain text.
Now here's the weirdness. Up to this point, I would just assume it's not working. However, when I click off this second time, the passwordMask is set.
Major WTF.
I even tried targeting the field directly using $.password.passwordMask = true; but same thing.
Unfortunately, you cant do this. According to the docs on Ti.UI.TextField in the fine print;
Note: on iOS, passwordMask must be specified when this text field is created.
Its not all bad news though, there are a couple ways you can approach this, one option is to make the password mask yourself, by listening to the change event:
var theStoredPassword = '';
$.password.addEventListener('change', function(e) {
var newpass = e.source.value;
if(newpass.length < theStoredPassword.length) {
// Character deleted from end
theStoredPassword = theStoredPassword.substring(0, theStoredPassword.length-1);
} else {
// Character added to end
theStoredPassword += newpass.substring(newpass.length-1);
}
// Mask the text with unicode ● BLACK CIRCLE, 25CF
$.password.value = new Array(newpass.length + 1).join('●');
});
Another option, would be to have two text fields and swap them out whenever the user focuses the password field, the top one would have the custom hinttext, the bottom one would be passwordMasked. In fact thats probably way easier than what I just coded up. :-)
I am working on creation of automated test for some Web Application. This application is very complex. In fact it is text editor for specific content. As a part of functionality it has some pop-up frames. You may open this pop-up? make some changes and save them - closing current frame. May problem is in that fact, that close button situated inside frame will be eliminating. And this force Chrome WebDriver to hung. My first try was like this:
driver.findElement(By.xpath("//input[#id='insert']")).click();
driver.switchTo().defaultContent();
But it hungs on first line after executinh click command as this command close frame.
Then I change to this(I have JQuery on the page):
driver.executeScript("$(\"input#insert\").click()");
driver.switchTo().defaultContent();
But this leads to same result.
Then I use this solution:
driver.executeScript("setTimeout(function(){$(\"input#insert\").click()}, 10)");
driver.switchTo().defaultContent();
And it hungs on second line. Only this solution works:
driver.executeScript("setTimeout(function(){$(\"input#insert\").click()}, 100)");
driver.switchTo().defaultContent();
but only if you don't take into account, that it is unstable - some timing issue may occur.
So may question is there more cleaner and more stable way for switch out from closed frame?
P.S.: executeScript - self defined function to decrease amount of code. It simply executer some js on page.
Update:
I realized I was wrong. This problem is not for all iframes. It's occur when tinyMCE popup used. Situation is exactly like in this topic. So it's doubtful I will find answer here, but who knows. Solution described above will help, but only for very short amount of time, meaning that after several seconds pass chromedriver will hangs on next command.
This is how i would do it in Ruby, hopefully you can change it for java
$driver.find_element(:xpath, "//input[#id='insert']").click
$wait.until {$driver.window_handles.size < 2} #this will "explicitly wait" for the window to close
handles = $driver.window_handles #get available window handles
$driver.switch_to.window(handles[0]) #navigate to default in this case the First window handle
hope this helps
Problem was in this line of tinyMCEPopup code:
DOM.setAttrib(id + '_ifr', 'src', 'javascript:""'); // Prevent leak
Executing this script on page fix hang problem(but possibly creates leaks :) ):
(function() {
var domVar;
if (window.tinymce && window.tinymce.DOM) {
domVar = window.tinymce.DOM
}
else if (window.tinyMCE && window.tinyMCE.DOM) {
domVar = window.tinyMCE.DOM
}
else {
return;
}
var tempVar = domVar.setAttrib;console.log(123)
domVar.setAttrib = function(id, attr, val) {
if (attr == 'src' && typeof(val)== 'string' &&(val + "").trim().match(/javascript\s*:\s*("\s*"|'\s*')/)) {
console.log("Cool");
return;
}
else {
tempVar.apply(this, arguments);
}
}
}());
Bug and solution also described here
Note. Code above should be added to parent frame, not into popup frame.