TABLE // FIELD
Customer // Company
Stock // Description
Manufact // Manu_Name
Items // Quantity, total_price
I am using Oracle 11g Application Express. I need to display a list of each stock ordered for EACH CUSTOMER. I need to display the Manufacturer, quantity ordered, and total price paid.
When I run this query within my SQL*PLUS command prompt, it endlessly displays results from the tables mentioned until I force-quit (ctrl+c) the application. This is incredibly frustrating - I've tried joining tables, using the EXISTS clause, I just don't know what the hell to do. Any insight would be wonderful - not looking for someone to simply solve this for me, more-so just guide me.
SELECT c.company, s.description, m.manu_name, i.quantity, i.total_price
FROM db1.customer c JOIN db1.orders o USING (customer_num), db1.stock s, db1.manufact m, db1.items i
WHERE o.order_num = i.order_num;
This causes a never-ending display of what seems like the same results, over, and over, and over.
Essentially, I need to display the required information for EACH ORDER of stock. However, I don't need the order_num in my output display of columns, so I thought I needed to use the order_num (in db1.orders o & db1.items i) to essentially tell Oracle, "For each order_num (an order can't exist without an order_num), display (results)...
I am incredibly lost - I've tried outer joins, I've tried using an EXIST operator, I am just stumped and I feel like it's something easy that I'm overlooking.
EDIT: So, it seems I finally found it, after an enormous amount of pondering.
This is how I did it, in case anyone else runs into this issue:
SELECT c.company, s.description, m.manu_name, i.quantity, i.total_price
FROM db1.customer c JOIN db1.orders o USING (customer_num)
JOIN db1.items i USING (order_num)
JOIN db1.stock USING (stock_num)
JOIN db1.manufact m ON m.manu_code = s.manu_code
ORDER BY c.company, s.description;
If you JOIN db1.manufact m USING (manu_code), you get an ambiguously defined column error from Oracle - this is because I already joined the other tables and that column was in one of them (It was the db1.stock table). You can still join them, but you have to use JOIN ON instead.
This displayed the results I needed. Thanks anyways, and cheers if this helped anybody out!
You've only provided two joins (one USING and one in the WHERE) between 5 tables - in this case, you will get the cartesian product of all other rows in all other tables, hence the large number of rows.
(Edit, by implication you need to join all tables together, whether by USING or JOIN)
In order to use the USING join sugar, the same column must be present on the immediate lhs and rhs tables. For multiple joins, into a hierarchy, you may need to nest the USINGs like so:
SELECT c.company, s.description, m.manu_name, i.quantity, i.total_price
FROM customer c
JOIN orders o
JOIN stock s
JOIN items i
JOIN manufact m USING(manid)
USING(itemid)
USING (stockid)
USING (customer_num);
There where join isn't needed since we already have the USING join
I've assumed some columns and relationships between your table in this fiddle here:
You can also drop the USING and use explicit JOIN syntax, which will allow you to avoid the nesting (this is also more portable across the ANSI world):
SELECT c.company, s.description, m.manu_name, i.quantity, i.total_price
FROM customer c
INNER JOIN orders o on c.customer_num = o.customer_num
INNER JOIN stock s on o.stockid = s.stockid
INNER JOIN items i on i.itemid = s.itemid
INNER JOIN manufact m on m.manid = i.manid;
Edit
As OP has demonstrated, no requirement to nest the USING joins, provided that the join ordering is sensible, and provided that the FK JOIN column isn't duplicated across multiple tables.
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!4/91ef6/9
Related
We're currently starting SQL in school ... so I'm very beginner.
Now we got a task that says:
Write a SQL-query which gives the same output like the following query. Use cross joins.
SELECT PRODUCT_NAME, QUANTITY_ON_HAND, WAREHOUSE_NAME
FROM WAREHOUSES
NATURAL JOIN INVENTORIES
NATURAL JOIN PRODUCT_INFORMATION
ORDER BY PRODUCT_NAME;
Now I don't know what to do. For me it doesn't make sense to replace natural join by cross join or isn't even possible?!
Please help.
Diagram:
The cross join can be seen also as a cartesian product: so every row of the first table is combined with a row on the second one, so the resulting number of rows will be rows(TableA) * rows(TableB).
To emulate a natural join with a cross join you'll need to compare the foreign/primary key of the different tables to see if they are the same like this:
SELECT PRODUCT_NAME, QUANTITY_ON_HAND, WAREHOUSE_NAME
FROM WAREHOUSES
CROSS JOIN INVENTORIES
CROSS JOIN PRODUCT_INFORMATION
WHERE WAREHOUSES.WAREHOUSES_ID = INVENTORIES.WAREHOUSE_ID AND
INVENTORIES.PRODUCT_ID = PRODUCT_INFORMATION.PRODUCT_ID
ORDER BY PRODUCT_NAME;
If you need more information about cross-join or natural join.
If it can help you try to think at it like this:
First you create a table with all the possible combination of rows
between the three tables
Than you start compare on each row the common and repetitive field, you've on each row 2 PRODUCT_ID and WAREHOUSE_ID columns, each of them coming from his specific table (try to execute the query taking all the columns with * to see this).
After that you take only the rows where the 2 type of columns have the same value (Emulating a natural join)
You're just doing a normal join....with extra steps.
This is the schema for my questions
Hi, I don't have experience in SQL Developer and I'm trying to build a query for the following question:
I need that for each DVD in the catalog, display the title, length, release_date, and how many times it has been checked out by all customers across all libraries.
Also I want to include those that have not been checked out yet displaying 0, and sort results by title.
So far I have this in the query but I'm stock here:
--Question C. ************* VERIFY
Select
Catalog_Item.Title,
DVD.Length,
Catalog_Item.Release_Date,
(
Select
Count(Transaction.Transaction_ID)
From Transaction
Where
DVD.Catalog_Item_ID = Physical_Item.Catalog_Item_ID
And Physical_Item.Physical_Item_ID = Transaction.Physical_Item_ID
) as "Total_DVD"
From
Catalog_Item,DVD,
Physical_Item
Group by
Catalog_Item.Title,
DVD.Length,
Catalog_Item.Release_Date
If I run this exact query I get error
Not a Group By Expression
And if I exclude the GROUP BY, I get results by doesn't look like the correct outputs.
Any suggestions on what syntax I can use to achieve the desired output? Thanks!
You put three tables to the query but you missed to link them. If you don't link them, you will see too much-duplicated rows.
Also, your sub-query links were wrong, I assume you tried to put the links here that you missed in the main query.
I believe you need something like that:
Select
CI.Title
,DVD.Length
,CI.Release_Date
,NVL(TR.TotalTransactions,0) TotalTransactions
From Catalog_Item CI
INNER JOIN DVD ON DVD.Catalog_Item_ID = CI.Catalog_Item_ID
LEFT JOIN Physical_Item PHI ON CI.Catalog_Item_ID = PHI.Catalog_Item_ID
LEFT JOIN (SELECT Physical_Item_ID
, Count(Transaction_ID) TotalTransactions
FROM Transaction
GROUP BY Physical_Item_ID
) TR ON PHI.Physical_Item_ID = TR.Physical_Item_ID
For a start, join Catalog_Item, Physical_Item and DVD together. Without appropriate join conditions, these three tables will join using a cartesian product join - which is probably one of the reasons why you are seeing unexpected results.
I have been struggling with the concept of combining results of two queries together via a join on a common table and I was hoping I could gain some assistance. The following is a rough guide to the tables:
dbo.Asset (not returned in the SELECT statement, used for joins only)
- dbo.Asset.AssetID
- dbo.Asset.CatalogueID
dbo.WorkOrder
- WorkOrderID
- AssetID
- WorkOrderNumber
dbo.WorkOrderSpare
- WorkOrderID
- WorkOrderSpareID
- WorkOrderSpareDescription
- ActualQuantity
- CreatedDateTime
dbo.Catalogue
- CatalogueID (PK)
- CatalogueNumber
- CatalogueDescription
- CatalogueGroupID
dbo.CatalogueGroup
- CatalogueGroupID
- CatalogueGroupNumber
First Query:
SELECT CatalogueGroup.CatalogueGroupName,
Catalogue.CatalogueNumber,
Catalogue.CatalogueDescription,
Catalogue.CatalogueID,
Asset.IsActive
FROM CatalogueGroup
INNER JOIN Catalogue
ON CatalogueGroup.CatalogueGroupID = Catalogue.CatalogueGroupID
INNER JOIN Asset
ON Catalogue.CatalogueID = Asset.CatalogueID
Second Query:
SELECT WorkOrder.WorkOrderNumber,
WorkOrderSpare.WorkOrderSpareDescription,
WorkOrderSpare.ActualQuantity,
WorkOrderSpare.CreatedDateTime
FROM WorkOrder
INNER JOIN WorkOrderSpare
ON WorkOrder.WorkOrderID = WorkOrderSpare.WorkOrderID
Now I can do the above easily enough in Access (WYSIWYG) by joining Asset/Catalogue/CatalogueGroup together and then joining Asset.AssetID onto WorkOrder.AssetID. I can't seem to get anything similar to work via raw code, I think I have my logic correct for the joins (INNER JOIN on the results of both) but then I am new to this.
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated, any pointers on where I can read further into problems like this would be great.
EDIT: This is what I was trying to use to no avail, I should also mention I am trying to do this in ms-sql, not Access (trying to move away from drag and drop):
SELECT CatalogueGroup.CatalogueGroupName,
Catalogue.CatalogueNumber,
Catalogue.CatalogueDescription,
Catalogue.CatalogueID,
Asset.IsActive,
WorkOrderSpare.WorkOrderSpareDescription,
WorkOrderSpare.ActualQuantity,
WorkOrderSpare.CreatedDateTime,
WorkOrder.WorkOrderNumber
FROM (((CatalogueGroup
INNER JOIN Catalogue
ON CatalogueGroup.CatalogueGroupID = Catalogue.CatalogueGroupID)
INNER JOIN Asset ON Catalogue.CatalogueID = Asset.CatalogueID)
INNER JOIN WorkOrderSpare
ON WorkOrder.WorkOrderID = WorkOrderSpare.WorkOrderID)
INNER JOIN WorkOrder ON Asset.AssetID = WorkOrder.AssetID
Think I see the issue. Assuming that the joins themselves are correct (ie your columns do relate to each other), the order of your joins is a little off - when you join WorkOrder to WorkOrderSpare, neither of those two tables relate back to any table you've identified up until that point in the query. Think of it as joining two tables separately from the chain of joins you have going so far - it's almost like doing two separate join queries. If you switch the last two it should work, that way WorkOrder will join to Asset (which you've already defined) and then you can join WorkOrderSpare to WorkOrder. I've also taken the liberty of removing parentheses on the joins, that's an Access thing.
SELECT CatalogueGroup.CatalogueGroupName,
Catalogue.CatalogueNumber,
Catalogue.CatalogueDescription,
Catalogue.CatalogueID,
Asset.IsActive,
WorkOrderSpare.WorkOrderSpareDescription,
WorkOrderSpare.ActualQuantity,
WorkOrderSpare.CreatedDateTime,
WorkOrder.WorkOrderNumber
FROM CatalogueGroup
INNER JOIN Catalogue ON CatalogueGroup.CatalogueGroupID = Catalogue.CatalogueGroupID
INNER JOIN Asset ON Catalogue.CatalogueID = Asset.CatalogueID
INNER JOIN WorkOrder ON Asset.AssetID = WorkOrder.AssetID
INNER JOIN WorkOrderSpare ON WorkOrder.WorkOrderID = WorkOrderSpare.WorkOrderID
I think you were close. As a slightly different approach to joining, try this:
SELECT CatalogueGroup.CatalogueGroupName,
Catalogue.CatalogueNumber,
Catalogue.CatalogueDescription,
Catalogue.CatalogueID,
Asset.IsActive,
WorkOrderSpare.WorkOrderSpareDescription,
WorkOrderSpare.ActualQuantity,
WorkOrderSpare.CreatedDateTime,
WorkOrder.WorkOrderNumber
FROM
CatalogueGroup, Catalogue, Asset, WorkOrder, WorkOrderSpare
WHERE CatalogueGroup.CatalogueGroupID = Catalogue.CatalogueGroupID
and Catalogue.CatalogueID = Asset.CatalogueID
and Asset.AssetID = WorkOrder.AssetID
and WorkOrder.WorkOrderID = WorkOrderSpare.WorkOrderID
It looks like it should work, but not having data, hard to know if simple joins all the way through is what you want. (It's a matter of personal preference whether to use the and clauses rather than the inner join syntax. While on style preferences, I like table aliases if supported, so FROM CatalogueGroup cg for example, so that you can refer to cg.CatalogueGroupID etc, rather than writing out the full table name every time.)
Ok. so the error that you noted in a comment
The multi-part identifier "WorkOrder.WorkOrderID" could not be bound
is usually when you have an alias for a table and instead of using alias in JOIN you use the table name or when you are using the wrong column name or table name.
Ideally in SQL server your query should look like this
SELECT
cg.CatalogueGroupName,
c.CatalogueNumber,
c.CatalogueDescription,
c.CatalogueID,
A.IsActive,
Wo.WorkOrderNumber,
WoS.WorkOrderSpareDescription,
WoS.ActualQuantity,
WoS.CreatedDateTime
FROM CatalogueGroup cg
INNER JOIN Catalogue c ON cg.CatalogueGroupID = c.CatalogueGroupID
INNER JOIN Asset A ON c.CatalogueID = A.CatalogueID
INNER JOIN WorkOrder Wo ON Wo.AssetID= A.AssetID
INNER JOIN WorkOrderSpare WoS ON Wo.WorkOrderID = WoS.WorkOrderID
I am learning SQL (bit by bit!) trying to perform a query on our database and adding in a count function to show the total orders that appear against a customers id by counting in a inner join query.
Somehow it is pooling all the data together onto one customer with the count function though.
Can someone please suggest where I am going wrong?
SELECT tbl_customers.*, tbl_stateprov.stprv_Name, tbl_custstate.CustSt_Destination, COUNT(order_id) as total
FROM tbl_stateprov
INNER JOIN (tbl_customers
INNER JOIN (tbl_custstate
INNER JOIN tbl_orders ON tbl_orders.order_CustomerID = tbl_custstate.CustSt_Cust_ID)
ON tbl_customers.cst_ID = tbl_custstate.CustSt_Cust_ID)
ON tbl_stateprov.stprv_ID = tbl_custstate.CustSt_StPrv_ID
WHERE tbl_custstate.CustSt_Destination='BillTo'
AND cst_LastName LIKE '#URL.Alpha#%'
You need a GROUP BY clause in this statement in order to get what you want. You need to figure out what level you want to group it by in order to select which fields to add to the group by clause. If you just wanted to see it on a per customer basis, and the customers table had an id field, it would look like this (at the very end of your sql):
GROUP BY tbl_customers.id
Now you can certainly group by more fields, it just depends how you want to slice the results.
In your select statement you are using format like tableName.ColumnName but not for COUNT(order_id)
It should be COUNT(tableOrAlias.order_id)
Hope that helps.
As you are new to SQL it might also be worth considering the readability of your joins - the nested / bracketed joins you mentioned above are quite hard to read, and I would also personally alias your tables to make the query that bit more accessible:
SELECT
tbl_customers.customer_id
,tbl_stateprov.stprv_Name
,tbl_custstate.CustSt_Destination
,COUNT(order_id) as total
FROM tbl_stateprov statep
INNER JOIN tbl_custstate state ON statep.stprv_ID = state.CustSt_StPrv_ID
INNER JOIN tbl_customers customer ON customer.cst_ID = state.CustSt_Cust_ID
INNER JOIN tbl_orders orders ON orders.order_CustomerID = state.CustSt_Cust_ID
WHERE tbl_custstate.CustSt_Destination='BillTo'
AND cst_LastName LIKE '#URL.Alpha#%'
GROUP BY
tbl_customers.customer_id
,tbl_stateprov.stprv_Name
,tbl_custstate.CustSt_Destination
--And any other columns you want to include the count for
Can you guys help me please in understanding the SQL specifications on join. I don't understand it. I kept getting errors called Unknown column list on on clause.
I got this error over my SQL syntax, I almost rubbed it in my face I just can't understand why it is not working, I have read some article regarding that it is because of precedence etc but I am really confused on what I have done wrong here.
select product.name , product.price from product inner join product_category on
(product_category.product_no = product.product_no ) where product_category.sub_category =
"COFFIN";
I know this question have been ask a hudred and million times here, but the ones I saw are complicated nowhere close in this very basic sql syntax.
THanks for helping me out.
EDIT:
I just had realize that I have product_category not a direct child to my product table so
I just have typed
select * from product
join specifications
join product_category on ( specifications.product_no = product_category.product_no);
But this still gave me an error, unknown column product_category.
I've read and followed some instruction similarly to this sites:
MYSQL unknown clause join column in next join
Unknown column {0} in on clause
MySQL "Unknown Column in On Clause"
I am really frustrated. I really can't get it to work.
For each new table you join in your query, each table must have at least one ON clause. It's hard to know exactly what you're trying to do without knowing the schema (table names, columns, etc), but here's an example
select *
from product p
join specifications s
on p.product_no = s.product_no
join product_category pc
on pc.spec_no = p.spec_no
Check out this link on table aliases as well. Gives a good example on joins + really useful info on how to increase the readability of your SQL
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187455(v=sql.90).aspx
I found this article useful as well as it visually displays the different types of joins
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2007/10/a-visual-explanation-of-sql-joins.html
You are missing the part where you specify the joining conditions between product and specifcations.
select * from product
join specifications YOU NEED SOMETHING HERE
join product_category on etc
I modified the SQL syntax to look like this, I have overlook a key that connects product_category onto specification so I made necessary link and it worked!!!
SELECT *
FROM product
JOIN specifications ON ( product.product_no = specifications.product_no )
JOIN product_category ON ( specifications.spec_no = product_category.spec_no )
WHERE product_category.sub_category = "COFFIN"
LIMIT 0 , 30
Also thanks for the heads up on missing joining condition on specifications. Heck this carelessness cost so much time.
Thank you so much!
The default join type is an inner join. So if you write join, the database reads inner join, and insist that you include an on clause.
If you'd like to join without a condition, specify the cross join explicitly:
select *
from product p
cross join
specifications s
inner join
product_category pc
on pc.product_no = p.product_no
left join
some_other_table sot
on 1=1
The last join, with the on 1=1 condition, is another way to do a cross join. It's subtly different in that it will return rows from the left table even if the right table is empty.
Example at SQL Fiddle.