I am using an iron.io node.js worker. I have ant as a dependency. How can I install this?
I could only see the instructions for language specific dependencies installations (like node modules).
Thanks
You can probably include the linux x64 binary distribution along with your worker by including the
"dir" command in your .worker file. Something like:
dir "apache-ant-1.9.4"
That will include the entire directory in your worker package.
Hit us up at get.iron.io/chat for help.
Related
I've just started using the Yarn package manager and I downloaded a starter Ionic 2 project.
In this project, we have a lot of help from scripts that compile, minify, lint and bundle our code. All of this is provided by ionic-app-scripts, which has several dependencies which it uses to run commands.
The problem is when I use Yarn to install, the node_modules/.bin/ folder does not contain all the necessary executables, like tslint, which is a dependency of ionic-app-scripts, so it is not directly in my package.json.
The result is that when I use Yarn, ionic-app-scripts doesn't work because it expects that the .bin folder contains a tslint executable!
What can I do? Are the ionic-app-scripts's definitions a problem?
[note]: npm install works, but Yarn is much faster!
This is a known issue, and there's a pull request with more information.
In short, if you want to fix this now, you'll have to explicitly include the packages from which you need binaries in your dependencies.
I had this issue but a different solution.
The solution was from this ticket https://github.com/yarnpkg/yarn/issues/992#issuecomment-318996260
... my workaround is going to file manager, right click on /node_modules main folder, selecting properties, and check-uncheck "read-only". You can do it also using attrib in command line. Then you retry installation and it works.
I am trying to build a .deb package for an application my company (and me) have been developing.
I'm trying to create a 64bit package on my 32bit ubuntu (12.04 LTS) using dpkg-buildpackage and I get the following warnings/errors:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning/error: couldn't find library X needed by Y.so (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: 'some/path/that/does/not/exist')
When X is one of our compiled shared libraries, we get a warning. When it's a system library (like libgcc_s.so.1 and libstdc++.so.6) we get an error.
Why is the RPATH refers to a path that does not exist?
By the way, when I make a 32bit package (on our files that were compiled for 32bit of course) it only shows warnings (only about our proprietary .so files) but creates the .deb file.
If I could, I would have posted my debian folder content but I cant take files out of our network. I can type the relevant parts if its needed.
You need to install the 64-bits version of the library with apt-get (actually anything do, but this is the most easy):
sudo apt-get install libyouneed-dev:amd64
The trick here is the :amd64, which tells the package manager to install the 64-bit version of that package. The same applies for 32-bits libraries in 64-bit systems. It's called multiarch.
The package is looking at that path because that is where the libraries of 64-bits (or 32-bits) gets stored, but since you don't have it installed the path do not exist.
Install an amd64 chroot environment and build your package in there. This way you avoid the various multi-arch pitfalls, with the added benefit of having a clean, reproducible build.
There is a tool that makes this very easy: mk-sbuild.
You need to install ubuntu-dev-tools and sbuild.
Then, run mk-sbuild --arch=amd64 precise, which will setup the build environment for you.
Add yourself to the sbuild group: adduser <your user name> sbuild
Log out and log back in so your group membership will be reflected.
You can then build your package in the chroot:
sbuild -d precise --arch=amd64 name_of_package.dsc
This assumes you've already build the source package with debuild -S or similar.
When building the project from command line using mvn clean install everything builds without any issues.
When running some tests that use precompiled C libraries from IntelliJ, tests fail with java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError
I may be completely off here, but does IntelliJ not see the .so file? Is so, how can it be added please?
Shared library fails to load with UnsatisfiedLinkError if:
it's not in the working directory configured in the test run configuration.
it's not in PATH environment (on Mac Terminal and GUI apps have different environment, see this answer). Run IDEA from the Terminal open -a /Applications/IntelliJ\ IDEA\ 12.app/ to make environment the same.
it's not in the location specified using -Djava.library.path VM option.
.so depends on some other library that is not found for any of the 1-3 reasons (or the dependency of that dependency is not found, etc).
I've used standard maven command mvn clean install and according to logs (in the same console window) dependencies were loaded and artifacts were installed to my dedicated directory for maven repository P:\.m2\repository. Maven build process succeeded.
I'm using maven 2.2.1
Here is the problem. Repository directory is empty. What I'm missing?
Thanks.
Some reasons:
Someone deleted the folder (or it's content)
Maven installed the files in a different place
I suggest to run mvn again with the option -X. Running mvn clean -X should be enough to see the paths which it uses to locate dependencies (install will download many more files but we need to see only one).
Note: P:\ sounds like a network drive. Even if this is your home folder (i.e. not shared with other people), this isn't a very good idea since it will cause a lot of network traffic and make your builds slow and brittle (in case of network problems).
Did you change the repository location in your m2_install_dir/conf/settings.xml?
If not, try to locate your files in something like:
C:\Documents & Settings\your_username.m2
or C:\Users\your_username.m2
I think you are using something like gitbash and its stripping off the backslashes in your repo value. run maven install with -X. check if you have a directory called P:\.m2repository
I would like to use an iron.io worker to stich panoramas and create HDRs using the OpenSource Hugin and libpano13 toolkits. The programs needed are all command-line (no GUI is needed) but I'm not entirely sure how I go about building a worker that includes the correct binaries for using the Hugin panotools.
Can I pre-compile the right binaries for the iron.io worker OS (Ubuntu Linux)? I can create a VM and install Ubuntu on it to get a set of binaries built that I include in my worker. But is there a better way using the "build" directive in the worker file? The problem I see right away is that Hugin is a cmake-based build so I'd need to create something that uses autoconf/automake, right?
I don't really need all of Hugin, either. I just need the control point finder utility and the enfuse/enblend utilities for doing the actual stitching. I don't need any of the GUI stuff, which is wxWidgets based.
Can anyone shed light on how I would go about this? Thanks!
You really need only statically compiled x64 binaries, find them anywhere - and you're done.
Possible solutions:
Install stuff on local Ubuntu x64 (IronWorker using 12.04 TLS x64) and include required files into worker's package (which is just .zip file after uploading) (and probably extend PATH at start of a worker)
Use build command to do any installation procedures remotely (you're still limited to non-root operations though)
Use deb command to install existing .deb packages.
.worker file example (including custom version of imagemagick):
runtime 'binary'
exec 'run.sh'
full_remote_build true
deb 'http://mirror.pnl.gov/ubuntu//pool/main/i/imagemagick/libmagickcore5_6.7.7.10-2ubuntu4_amd64.deb'
deb 'http://mirror.pnl.gov/ubuntu//pool/main/i/imagemagick/libmagickwand5_6.7.7.10-2ubuntu4_amd64.deb'
deb 'http://mirror.pnl.gov/ubuntu//pool/main/i/imagemagick/imagemagick_6.7.7.10-2ubuntu4_amd64.deb'