Customize Request Timeout Message in IBM Worklight v6.0 - worklight-studio

When the request to the worklight server from the Mobile device times-out, I get the following Error and it looks like it is being pushed from the Worklight framework
http://serveraddress:portno/console/apps/services/api/app_title...
Make sure the host address is available to the app (especially relevant for android and iphone apps
Now It's not ideal to reveal the server address to the end user. And I'm not able to figure out as to where this can be customized. Need suggestion on how to modify this error Message

AFSIK Try Change the log level from your wlInitOptions to error and check the logs to disable the timeout error messages
`var wlInitOptions = {
connectOnStartup : true,
timeout : 60000,
logger : {enabled: true, level: 'error', stringify: true, pretty: false,
tag: {level: false, pkg: true}, whitelist: [], blacklist: []},
analytics : {
enabled: false
}
};`

Related

NesJS RabbitMQ with #golevelup/nestjs-rabbitmq no connection when using new connectioninit

Using #golevelup/nestjs-rabbitmq I tried the connection manager to not wait for a connection. According to the readme it can handle reconnections and wait for a connection without crashing the app. However, when I use the connectionInitOptions as stated and set wait to false, I get a connection error. When I don't use it (default behavior setting wait to true) , it connects to the RabbitMQ server. Below are examples importing the RabbitMQModule in a NestJS module.
This works and connects to the RabbitMQ server
RabbitMQModule.forRoot(RabbitMQModule, {
exchanges: [{ type: 'topic', name: 'main' }],
uri: 'amqp://guest:guest#localhost:5672',
}
This doesn't work and won't connect
RabbitMQModule.forRoot(RabbitMQModule, {
exchanges: [{ type: 'topic', name: 'main' }],
uri: 'amqp://guest:guest#localhost:5672',
connectionInitOptions: {
wait: false,
},
With the second option I get the following error:
Error: AMQP connection is not available
at AmqpConnection.publish (/home/xxx/node_modules/#golevelup/nestjs-rabbitmq/src/amqp/connection.ts:424:13)
at BootstrapService.onApplicationBootstrap (/home/xxx/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.service.ts:20:25)
at MapIterator.iteratee (/home/xxx/node_modules/#nestjs/core/hooks/on-app-bootstrap.hook.js:22:43)
at MapIterator.next (/home/xxx/node_modules/iterare/src/map.ts:9:39)
at IteratorWithOperators.next (/home/xxx/node_modules/iterare/src/iterate.ts:19:28)
at Function.from (<anonymous>)
at IteratorWithOperators.toArray (/home/xxx/node_modules/iterare/src/iterate.ts:227:22)
at callOperator (/home/xxx/node_modules/#nestjs/core/hooks/on-app-bootstrap.hook.js:23:10)
at callModuleBootstrapHook (/home/xxx/node_modules/#nestjs/core/hooks/on-app-bootstrap.hook.js:43:23)
at NestApplication.callBootstrapHook (/home/xxx/node_modules/#nestjs/core/nest-application-context.js:199:55)
at NestApplication.init (/home/xxx/node_modules/#nestjs/core/nest-application.js:98:9)
at NestApplication.listen (/home/xxx/node_modules/#nestjs/core/nest-application.js:155:33)
at bootstrap (/home/xxx/src/main.ts:12:3)
The last line (main.ts:12:3) is the app.listen(3000) statement.
There are other options you can set with the connectionInitOptions (reject and timeout) and I've tried the combinations but still no connection.
RabbitMQ is running in a docker container on Linux but that should be no problem. I posted the same question on NestJS discord but got no reply, so hopefully someone on SO has an idea.
Any idea what could be the cause?
Found the problem, I was using the connection in a onApplicationBootstrap method and then the connection is apparently not present yet.
you can wait for connection asynchronously 'onApplicationBootstrap':
or on :
async onModuleInit() {
await this.amqpConnection.managedChannel.waitForConnect(async () => {
await this.assertQueueAndBindToExchange(
transferRequestQueueName,
transferRequestExchangeName,
createdRoutingKey
);

WebdriverIO: Retrieving browser logging

According to WebdriverIO-Dokumentation I can integrate the output of browser console logging into webdriverio-logging. My call is then browser.getLogs('browser'). However, only log messages issued with console.warn() are retrieved. All console.log() messages are ignored. How can I manage that and include all of console messages into my webriverio report?
If you are using a recent version of Chrome and find that you only get warning and error messages in your logs, but you want INFO as well, add the following into your wdio.conf.js:
exports.config = {
capabilities: [{
...
"goog:loggingPrefs": { // <-- Add this
browser: "ALL",
},
}],
};

Simple peer different network calling Issue

I am using simple peer for my video call web application. when I call people in the same network video call is working perfectly. But in the different networks, it is not working. I also added ICE servers(stun/turn) to simple peer. Still, the same issue is happening can anyone please help me out. I am getting this issue in the console
Error: Connection failed. at h (index.js:17)at f.value (index.js:654) at RTCPeerConnection.t._pc.onconnectionstatechange (index.js:119)
const peer = new Peer({
initiator: true,
trickle: false,
stream,
config: {
iceServers: [
{
urls: "stun:numb.viagenie.ca",
username: "************",
credential: "************"
},
{
urls: "turn:numb.viagenie.ca",
username: "************",
credential: "************"
}
]
}
});
I had facing through the same issue.
I'm not sure if that has to do with those specific iceServers but I replace them with this ones on it works
iceServers: [
{ urls: 'stun:stun.l.google.com:19302' },
{ urls: 'stun:stun1.l.google.com:19302' },
{ urls: 'stun:stun2.l.google.com:19302' },
{ urls: 'stun:stun3.l.google.com:19302' },
{ urls: 'stun:stun4.l.google.com:19302' },
{
url: 'turn:turn.bistri.com:80',
credential: 'homeo',
username: 'homeo',
},
{
url: 'turn:turn.anyfirewall.com:443?transport=tcp',
credential: 'webrtc',
username: 'webrtc',
},
Everything is working good but now my problem is that safari is not working just chrome with iOS
If someone knows how to handle this compatibility please contact me! :D
my issue here was with the stun/turn server.we can check the status of servers using
https://webrtc.github.io/samples/src/content/peerconnection/trickle-ice/
If you test a STUN server, it works if you can gather a candidate with type "srflx". If you test a TURN server, it works if you can gather a candidate with type "relay".
check you are getting this

How to ask to the service worker to ignore requests matching a specific URL pattern in Polymer?

My application is built on Polymer v2 and uses the Firebase Auth service for authentication. Actually, I use the login-fire element. For a better experience on mobile devices, I choose to sign-in with redirect.
In the "network" tab of the DevTool (in Chrome) I see that a request containing the /__/auth/handler? pattern is sent for requesting Google authentication (for example, if the provider used is Google).
With the service workers enabled, this request is caught and the response is the login page of my application. No login attempted, the response comes from the service worker and I get a Network Error from Firebase API because of a timeout.
When I deploy the app without service workers the authentication process is working and I can reach the app.
I tried many ways to config the service workers to ignore all requests to a URL with the /auth/ pattern but I failed.
See the last version of my config file bellow.
sw-precache-config.js
module.exports = {
globPatterns: ['**\/*.{html,js,css,ico}'],
staticFileGlobs: [
'bower_components/webcomponentsjs/webcomponents-loader.js',
'images/*',
'manifest.json',
],
clientsClaim: true,
skipWaiting: true,
navigateFallback: 'index.html',
runtimeCaching: [
{
urlPattern: /\/auth\//,
handler: 'networkOnly',
},
{
urlPattern: /\/bower_components\/webcomponentsjs\/.*.js/,
handler: 'fastest',
options: {
cache: {
name: 'webcomponentsjs-polyfills-cache',
},
},
},
{
urlPattern: /\/images\//,
handler: 'cacheFirst',
options: {
cacheableResponse: {
statuses: [0, 200],
},
},
},
],
};
Do you have a better solution? Do you notice what I missed?
Thank you for your help.
You can add this to your sw-precache-config.js file
navigateFallbackWhitelist: [/^(?!\/auth\/)/],
You should only whitelist the paths of your application. This should be known to you.
So everything you do not whitelist, will not be served from the serviceworker.
navigateFallbackWhitelist: [/^\/news\//,/^\/msg\//, /^\/settings\//],
With this example, only news/*, msg/*,settings/* will be delivered.
/auth/*,/api/*,... will not be caught.

WebRTC Ice Servers Issue

Uncaught DOMException: Failed to construct 'RTCPeerConnection': Both username and credential are required when the URL scheme is "turn" or "turns".
i have getting this error her is my using ice servers:
var servers =
{'iceServers': [
{url:'turn:numb.viagenie.ca'},
{url:'stun:stun01.sipphone.com'},
{url:'stun:stun.ekiga.net'},
{url:'stun:stun.fwdnet.net'},
{url:'stun:stun.ideasip.com'},
{url:'stun:stun.iptel.org'},
{url:'stun:stun.rixtelecom.se'},
{url:'stun:stun.schlund.de'},
{url:'stun:stun.l.google.com:19302'},
{url:'stun:stun1.l.google.com:19302'},
{url:'stun:stun2.l.google.com:19302'},
{url:'stun:stun3.l.google.com:19302'},
{url:'stun:stun4.l.google.com:19302'},
{url:'stun:stunserver.org'},
{url:'stun:stun.softjoys.com'},
{url:'stun:stun.voiparound.com'},
{url:'stun:stun.voipbuster.com'},
{url:'stun:stun.voipstunt.com'},
{url:'stun:stun.voxgratia.org'},
{url:'stun:stun.xten.com'},
{
url: 'turn:numb.viagenie.ca',
credential: 'muazkh',
username: 'webrtc#live.com'
},
{
url: 'turn:192.158.29.39:3478?transport=udp',
credential: 'JZEOEt2V3Qb0y27GRntt2u2PAYA=',
username: '28224511:1379330808'
},
{
url: 'turn:192.158.29.39:3478?transport=tcp',
credential: 'JZEOEt2V3Qb0y27GRntt2u2PAYA=',
username: '28224511:1379330808'
}
]
};
where is my falt?What can i do?
What the error message says. The first server in your list specifies no username or credentials:
{url:'turn:numb.viagenie.ca'},
You also repeat the same server further down, this time with credentials.
These also look like non-working turn servers cut'n'pasted off the internet. Free turn servers is a lie.
Also waaaaay too many servers. One or two stun and/or turn will do. Too many slows down ICE.