I would like to SUM() while also using a WHERE but when there are no records found for a certain ID I would like it to return NULL instead of just not returning anything.
Initial Code:
SELECT
ID,
SUM(CASE WHEN EVENTS = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END)
FROM Events_ID
WHERE
YEAR = 2012
GROUP BY ID
This would not return an ID if there were no events for it in 2012.
I then changed it to the following that appears to work but is around 100x slower!
SELECT
ID,
(SELECT
SUM(CASE WHEN EVENTS = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END)
FROM EVENTS_ID r WHERE r.ID = t.ID AND r.YEAR = 2012)
FROM (SELECT * FROM Events_ID GROUP BY ID) as t;
Is there anyway to get the output of the second query nearer to the speed of the first?
Is this what you want?
SELECT ID,
SUM(CASE WHEN EVENTS = 3 AND YEAR = 2012 THEN 1 END)
FROM Events_ID
GROUP BY ID;
This will return all ids, with a NULL as a second value if no events match both conditions.
Related
My requirement is to get id for missing status from SQL table. I will get a list of status for each id, say A,B,C,D. In a scenario, I have to check status B exists or not. Table gets updated everyday and each time new Id will be created
Conditions,
If status A exists and other statuses such as C and D does not
exists, then don't need to get id.
If status A and B exists and other statuses such as C or D does not exists, then don't need to get id .
If status A exists and B not exists, other
statuses such as C or D exists, then I should get the id of that
record
If status A and B exists, other
statuses such as C or D exists (all status exists), then I don't need to get the id of that
record
Table1:
Id StatusCode
1 A
1 C
2 A
2 B
2 C
3 A
3 C
3 D
How do I get Id 1 and 3 using SQL query?, Seems simple but as I am new to SQL I could not able to get it in SQL.
select statement in this screenshot works fine when there is only one id, it fails on multiple id. I tried many other way, but no use
Try this
SELECT DISTINCT ID
FROM T1
WHERE Statuscode = 'A' AND ID NOT IN (SELECT ID FROM T1 WHERE Statuscode = 'B' )
AND (ID IN (SELECT ID FROM T1 WHERE Statuscode = 'C' ) OR ID IN (SELECT ID FROM T1 WHERE Statuscode = 'D' ))
FIDDLE DEMO
Also, To correct Gordon Linoff's answer, we need to add one more where criteria there
SELECT Id
FROM T1
GROUP BY Id
HAVING SUM(CASE WHEN Statuscode = 'A' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) > 0 AND
SUM(CASE WHEN Statuscode = 'B' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) = 0 AND
SUM(CASE WHEN Statuscode IN ('C', 'D') THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) > 0;
FIDDLE DEMO
This answers the original version of the question.
I think you can use aggregation:
select id
from t
group by id
having sum(case when status = 'A' then 1 else 0 end) > 0 and
sum(case when status in ('C', 'D') then 1 else 0 end) > 0;
SELECT id
FROM t
GROUP BY
Id
HAVING MAX(status) = CHAR(64 + COUNT(*))
--char(64+1) = A, char(64+2) = B etc
The logic behind this is that it will take all count the same types of id. So if you have 3 rows you will need abc. If you have an id with 4 rows you will have ABCD. Generally the max status should always be the same as the number of rows.
This is true of course if you have no duplicate between id and status code.
select distinct id from t where t.statuscode = 'C' or t.statuscode = 'D' group by t.id
I have the following table trn_ReceiptLog
I am wondering if it's possible to update amount of entry #1 to have same as entry #2 IF amount of entry #1 is 0?
I have over 5000 of these entries that need to be updated, basically something like:
UPDATE trn_ReceiptLog SET amount = (SELECT amount FROM trn_ReceiptLog WHERE receipt_type = 0) WHERE amount = 0
But I am not sure how to do it for all entries individually, do I need some sort of loop?
Condition 1: Receipt type will always be 0 of the one where amount needs to be taken from.
Condition 2: person_id will always be identical across two of these.
Condition 3 (Optional): Only perform this update IF there is only one receipt_type = 9 (Sometimes there might be 3 or 4 entries with same person_id and being receipt_type 9
You can use window functions to calculate the information needed for the conditions. Then the logic is simple:
with toupdate as (
select t.*,
max(case when receipt_type = 9 then amount else 0 end) over (partition by person_id) as amount_9,
sum(case when receipt_type = 9 then 1 else 0 end) over (partition by person_id) as num_9s
from t
)
update toupdate
set amount = amount_9
where receipt_type = 0;
With a self join:
update t
set t.amount = tt.amount
from trn_ReceiptLog t inner join trn_ReceiptLog tt
on tt.person_id = t.person_id
where t.receipt_type = 9 and tt.receipt_type = 0 and t.amount = 0
and not exists (
select 1 from trn_ReceiptLog
where entry_id <> t.entry_id and person_id = t.person_id and receipt_type = 9
)
The last part of the WHERE clause with AND NOT EXISTS... is the 3d optional condition.
See a simplified demo.
This question already has an answer here:
How to use an Alias in a Calculation for Another Field
(1 answer)
Closed 3 years ago.
In my query below I am counting occurrences in a table based on the Status column. I also want to perform calculations based on the counts I am returning. For example, let's say I want to add 100 to the Snoozed value... how do I do this? Below is what I thought would do it:
SELECT
pu.ID Id, pu.Name Name,
COUNT(*) LeadCount,
SUM(CASE WHEN Status = 'Working' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS Working,
SUM(CASE WHEN Status = 'Uninterested' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS Uninterested,
SUM(CASE WHEN Status = 'Converted' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS Converted,
SUM(CASE WHEN SnoozedId > 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS Snoozed,
Snoozed + 100 AS Test
FROM
Prospects p
INNER JOIN
ProspectsUsers pu on p.OwnerId = pu.SalesForceId
WHERE
p.Store = '108'
GROUP BY
pu.Name, pu.Id
ORDER BY
Name
I get this error:
Invalid column name 'Snoozed'.
How can I take the value of the previous SUM statement, add 100 to it, and return it as another column? What I was aiming for is an additional column labeled Test that has the Snooze count + 100.
You can't use one column to create another column in the same way that you are attempting. You have 2 options:
Do the full calculation (as #forpas has mentioned in the comments above)
Use a temp table or table variable to store the data, this way you can get the first 5 columns, and then you can add the last column or you can select from the temp table and do the last column calculations from there.
You can not use an alias as a column reference in the same query. The correct script is:
SELECT
pu.ID Id, pu.Name Name,
COUNT(*) LeadCount,
SUM(CASE WHEN Status = 'Working' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS Working,
SUM(CASE WHEN Status = 'Uninterested' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS Uninterested,
SUM(CASE WHEN Status = 'Converted' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS Converted,
SUM(CASE WHEN SnoozedId > 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END)+100 AS Snoozed
FROM
Prospects p
INNER JOIN
ProspectsUsers pu on p.OwnerId = pu.SalesForceId
WHERE
p.Store = '108'
GROUP BY
pu.Name, pu.Id
ORDER BY
Name
MSSQL does not allow you to reference fields (or aliases) in the SELECT statement from within the same SELECT statement.
To work around this:
Use a CTE. Define the columns you want to select from in the CTE, and then select from them outside the CTE.
;WITH OurCte AS (
SELECT
5 + 5 - 3 AS OurInitialValue
)
SELECT
OurInitialValue / 2 AS OurFinalValue
FROM OurCte
Use a temp table. This is very similar in functionality to using a CTE, however, it does have different performance implications.
SELECT
5 + 5 - 3 AS OurInitialValue
INTO #OurTempTable
SELECT
OurInitialValue / 2 AS OurFinalValue
FROM #OurTempTable
Use a subquery. This tends to be more difficult to read than the above. I'm not certain what the advantage is to this - maybe someone in the comments can enlighten me.
SELECT
5 + 5 - 3 AS OurInitialValue
FROM (
SELECT
OurInitialValue / 2 AS OurFinalValue
) OurSubquery
Embed your calculations. opinion warning This is really sloppy, and not a great approach as you end up having to duplicate code, and can easily throw columns out-of-sync if you update the calculation in one location and not the other.
SELECT
5 + 5 - 3 AS OurInitialValue
, (5 + 5 - 3) / 2 AS OurFinalValue
You can't use a column alias in the same select. The column alias do not precedence / sequence; they are all created after the eval of the select result, just before group by and order by.
You must repeat code :
SELECT
pu.ID Id,pu.Name Name,
COUNT(*) LeadCount,
SUM(CASE WHEN Status = 'Working' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS Working,
SUM(CASE WHEN Status = 'Uninterested' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS Uninterested,
SUM(CASE WHEN Status = 'Converted' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS Converted,
SUM(CASE WHEN SnoozedId > 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS Snoozed,
SUM(CASE WHEN SnoozedId > 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END)+ 100 AS Test
FROM
Prospects p
INNER JOIN
ProspectsUsers pu on p.OwnerId = pu.SalesForceId
WHERE
p.Store = '108'
GROUP BY
pu.Name, pu.Id
ORDER BY
Name
If you don't want to repeat the code, use a subquery
SELECT
ID, Name, LeadCount, Working, Uninterested,Converted, Snoozed, Snoozed +100 AS test
FROM
(SELECT
pu.ID Id,pu.Name Name,
COUNT(*) LeadCount,
SUM(CASE WHEN Status = 'Working' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS Working,
SUM(CASE WHEN Status = 'Uninterested' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS Uninterested,
SUM(CASE WHEN Status = 'Converted' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS Converted,
SUM(CASE WHEN SnoozedId > 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS Snoozed
FROM Prospects p
INNER JOIN ProspectsUsers pu on p.OwnerId = pu.SalesForceId
WHERE p.Store = '108'
GROUP BY pu.Name, pu.Id) t
ORDER BY Name
or a view
I have these columns
Id Status
----------
1 pass
1 fail
2 pass
3 pass
How do I select all that only have a status of pass but if the Id has at least one fail it will not be selected as well.
If same id can have multiple passes
SELECT id
from table
WHERE status = 'pass'
and id NOT IN (SELECT id FROM table WHERE status = 'fail')
You need to use GROUP BY & HAVING clause
SELECT Id
FROM yourtable
GROUP BY Id
HAVING Sum(case when status ='pass' then 1 else 0 end) = count(status)
HAVING clause can be changed to
HAVING Count(case when status ='pass' then 1 end) = count(status)
I just hate chatty case statement, so
SELECT Id
FROM table1
GROUP BY Id
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT [Status]) = 1 AND MIN([Status]) = 'pass'
or
SELECT Id
FROM table1
GROUP BY Id
HAVING COUNT(NULLIF([Status], 'fail')) = 1 AND COUNT(NULLIF([Status], 'pass')) = 0
The second query only works when status has two values 'pass' and 'fail'.
I want to do something like this:
select id,
count(*) as total,
FOR temp IN SELECT DISTINCT somerow FROM mytable ORDER BY somerow LOOP
sum(case when somerow = temp then 1 else 0 end) temp,
END LOOP;
from mytable
group by id
order by id
I created working select:
select id,
count(*) as total,
sum(case when somerow = 'a' then 1 else 0 end) somerow_a,
sum(case when somerow = 'b' then 1 else 0 end) somerow_b,
sum(case when somerow = 'c' then 1 else 0 end) somerow_c,
sum(case when somerow = 'd' then 1 else 0 end) somerow_d,
sum(case when somerow = 'e' then 1 else 0 end) somerow_e,
sum(case when somerow = 'f' then 1 else 0 end) somerow_f,
sum(case when somerow = 'g' then 1 else 0 end) somerow_g,
sum(case when somerow = 'h' then 1 else 0 end) somerow_h,
sum(case when somerow = 'i' then 1 else 0 end) somerow_i,
sum(case when somerow = 'j' then 1 else 0 end) somerow_j,
sum(case when somerow = 'k' then 1 else 0 end) somerow_k
from mytable
group by id
order by id
this works, but it is 'static' - if some new value will be added to 'somerow' I will have to change sql manually to get all the values from somerow column, and that is why I'm wondering if it is possible to do something with for loop.
So what I want to get is this:
id somerow_a somerow_b ....
0 3 2 ....
1 2 10 ....
2 19 3 ....
. ... ...
. ... ...
. ... ...
So what I'd like to do is to count all the rows which has some specific letter in it and group it by id (this id isn't primary key, but it is repeating - for id there are about 80 different values possible).
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!15/18feb/2
Are arrays good for you? (SQL Fiddle)
select
id,
sum(totalcol) as total,
array_agg(somecol) as somecol,
array_agg(totalcol) as totalcol
from (
select id, somecol, count(*) as totalcol
from mytable
group by id, somecol
) s
group by id
;
id | total | somecol | totalcol
----+-------+---------+----------
1 | 6 | {b,a,c} | {2,1,3}
2 | 5 | {d,f} | {2,3}
In 9.2 it is possible to have a set of JSON objects (Fiddle)
select row_to_json(s)
from (
select
id,
sum(totalcol) as total,
array_agg(somecol) as somecol,
array_agg(totalcol) as totalcol
from (
select id, somecol, count(*) as totalcol
from mytable
group by id, somecol
) s
group by id
) s
;
row_to_json
---------------------------------------------------------------
{"id":1,"total":6,"somecol":["b","a","c"],"totalcol":[2,1,3]}
{"id":2,"total":5,"somecol":["d","f"],"totalcol":[2,3]}
In 9.3, with the addition of lateral, a single object (Fiddle)
select to_json(format('{%s}', (string_agg(j, ','))))
from (
select format('%s:%s', to_json(id), to_json(c)) as j
from
(
select
id,
sum(totalcol) as total_sum,
array_agg(somecol) as somecol_array,
array_agg(totalcol) as totalcol_array
from (
select id, somecol, count(*) as totalcol
from mytable
group by id, somecol
) s
group by id
) s
cross join lateral
(
select
total_sum as total,
somecol_array as somecol,
totalcol_array as totalcol
) c
) s
;
to_json
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"{1:{\"total\":6,\"somecol\":[\"b\",\"a\",\"c\"],\"totalcol\":[2,1,3]},2:{\"total\":5,\"somecol\":[\"d\",\"f\"],\"totalcol\":[2,3]}}"
In 9.2 it is also possible to have a single object in a more convoluted way using subqueries in instead of lateral
SQL is very rigid about the return type. It demands to know what to return beforehand.
For a completely dynamic number of resulting values, you can only use arrays like #Clodoaldo posted. Effectively a static return type, you do not get individual columns for each value.
If you know the number of columns at call time ("semi-dynamic"), you can create a function taking (and returning) polymorphic parameters. Closely related answer with lots of details:
Dynamic alternative to pivot with CASE and GROUP BY
(You also find a related answer with arrays from #Clodoaldo there.)
Your remaining option is to use two round-trips to the server. The first to determine the the actual query with the actual return type. The second to execute the query based on the first call.
Else, you have to go with a static query. While doing that, I see two nicer options for what you have right now:
1. Simpler expression
select id
, count(*) AS total
, count(somecol = 'a' OR NULL) AS somerow_a
, count(somecol = 'b' OR NULL) AS somerow_b
, ...
from mytable
group by id
order by id;
How does it work?
Compute percents from SUM() in the same SELECT sql query
SQL Fiddle.
2. crosstab()
crosstab() is more complex at first, but written in C, optimized for the task and shorter for long lists. You need the additional module tablefunc installed. Read the basics here if you are not familiar:
PostgreSQL Crosstab Query
SELECT * FROM crosstab(
$$
SELECT id
, count(*) OVER (PARTITION BY id)::int AS total
, somecol
, count(*)::int AS ct -- casting to int, don't think you need bigint?
FROM mytable
GROUP BY 1,3
ORDER BY 1,3
$$
,
$$SELECT unnest('{a,b,c,d}'::text[])$$
) AS f (id int, total int, a int, b int, c int, d int);