I use API to make a programs. It runs pretty well on Windows 7 (with debug file .exe), but it doesn't when I run it on Windows XP. Are there any ways to solve this problem?
I suppose you are using Visual C++, according the the message you get.
Your project is set up (by default) to link the Microsoft C++ Runtime Librairy dynamically, so it saves up space in your final executable, but you need the dynamic linked libraries to be in your system or in your executable's folder.
To solve this in Visual C++, without any afford from who are executing the program in their machines, you can change how MSVC link their runtime library to your executable, that is, if you set it to be linked statically, all the dependencies will be linked inside your final .exe, with no need of additional .dlls.
To change this option, refer to /MD, /MT, /LD (Use Run-Time Library) - MSDN.
Or in short: Project Properties>Configuration Properties>C/C++>Code Generation>Runtime Library
If in debug mode, use /MTd, otherwise use /MT.
Related
I have a DLL written in C# and set for COM visibility. I have it setup as a side-by-side assembly and can successfully deploy the application to client PCs registration free. My question is related to the development PC. Is it possible to compile against the DLL in a similar registration-free manner or is registration required on the development machine? I have tried adding the DLL directly though the Project -> References menu and get an error stating "Can't add a reference to the specific file." The DLL is sitting in the same directory as the .vbp file and I have tried adding the DLL both with and without the client app manifest being present.
I have tried adding the DLL directly though the Project -> References menu
That adds a reference to a type library. A type library is a language-independent description of the types in a COM component, VB6 uses it to know how generate efficient code and to provide type checking and auto-completion. A type library is the exact equivalent of metadata in a .NET assembly.
Traditionally, and the way VB6 did it, the type library was embedded as a resource in a DLL. So you are probably used to picking a DLL in the dialog. That however doesn't work so well when the DLL is generated by C#, the type library can only be generated after the C# code is compiled. You have to pick the .tlb file in the VB6 dialog. The traditional way starts with the COM component being described in the IDL language, the type library can be generated before the code is compiled so can easily be embedded in the final DLL. It is technically possible to do it in C# as well, but the build steps are very laborious and painful, you essentially have to build the DLL twice with different build commands.
The type library for a C# library is normally generated in one of three ways:
Using Project + Properties, Build tab, "Register for COM interop" option. This requires VS to run elevated so it can write to the registry. You start VS elevated by right-clicking its shortcut and picking "Run as Administrator"
By running Regasm.exe, using the /tlb:filename option. An alternative for the 1st bullet and necessary if you don't want to run VS elevated for some reason. Using the /codebase option on your dev machine is also wise to make it work exactly like the 1st bullet and not require putting the DLL into the GAC with gacutil.exe
By running the Tlbexp.exe utility, the type library exporter for .NET assemblies. No registration is done, it only generates the .tlb file.
The first bullet is the normal choice and very desirable because you can never forget to update the type library this way. It is perfectly fine on a dev machine since you only really care about reg-free deployment on the user's machine. You probably got into trouble by not doing this anymore.
Using the 3rd choice is okay and more compatible with your goals, run Tlbexp from the Visual Studio Command Prompt. Just keep in mind that you have to do it again when you make changes to your C# code. Forgetting this once and losing clumps of head-hair trying to figure out why your C# changes don't seem to be effective or getting hard-to-diagnose error codes gives you lots of reasons to consider the 1st bullet again :) You can emulate the reg-free scenario by running Regasm.exe with the /uninstall option.
I have Visual Studio 2010 installed and have a project I got from someone else which I can build successfully without any errors. I get a Wrapper.dll,
which I would like to access using JNA.
I am using Win7 64-bit.
But I get the error: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: Unable to load library 'Wrapper': The specified module could not be found.
Wrapper.dll of course is in the correct folder and it is a 32-bit dll and my Java program also uses a JRE with 32-bit, so this is not the cause of the error.
I used DependencyWalker to check whether *.dlls are missing:
MSVCP80.DLL
MSVCR80.DLL
GPSVC.DLL
IESHIMS.DLL
And yes there are some missing.
Can I conclude that the error is related with that these DLLs are missing?
But why does Visual Studio compile correctly then and does not throw an error?
How to solve this in order to access these functions in Wrapper.dll?
I also read that downloading dll's might not be the right thing to do!
(I know that Wrapper.dll relies on another dll or sourcecode which was built in Visual Studio 2005, if that is of interest.)
EDIT:
I found out, that Wrapper.dll relies on three other dlls which probably were built on MSVS2005. These require the above mentioned DLL's (checked with dependencywalker) and I guess therefore Wrapper.dll also links them.
So what do I actually do to get rid of these old dll's?
Would I need to build the other three DLLs with VS2010 or
is this a problem which always will appear, meaning, that you need to copy paste old DLLs in order to use the precompiled Libraries which are dependent on those.
Is there a way, that the program would run on any other system as well without copy pasting these DLL's?
All required DLLs must be available to the system for loading. If you define jna.library.path, that is where JNA will look for the initially loaded DLL, as well as any dependent DLLs. In addition, java.library.path (which is essentially PATH) will be searched for dependent DLLs.
MSVS often uses paths in addition to PATH when building, debugging, and running code within that environment.
Solutions:
a) remove dependencies you don't really need; this may include telling MSVS to build your DLL differently
b) include non-system DLLs next to your custom DLL (or include their location in PATH/java.library.path)
EDIT
a) you can include the offending DLLs in the same directory as yours. this is fairly low impact on the target system, but if they are DLLs that are expected to be on any system, you shouldn't have to do so. It's preferable to adjust java.library.path so that all system DLLs are accessible.
b) you can recompile your dependent DLLs and be more careful about backward compatibility and explicit linkage. Depending on features used by the DLLs, though, you may not be able to remove the dependencies.
MSVC[RP]80.DLL are C and C++ runtimes, respectively; you may or may not be able to link against a previous version.
IESHIMS.DLL is part of IE and should be on the system, but likely in a path inaccessible to your program.
GPSVC.DLL has to do with group security policy, so it should be available on the system (modulo whenever the DLL was introduced).
I wrote a program in C++ using Visual Studio 2010
But when I run it on some computers with WinXP it says
"Cannot start because MSVCP100.dll wasn't found"
How do I prevent such dependencies on dlls that do not come with windows?
Thank you.
you cannot prevent this dependency, as it's the core runtime library of Visual C++. Instead, include the Visual C++ 2010 Redistributable package with your application (usually a separate link is enough since most people have it installed already)
However, if in fact your program cannot start because a dll with D at the end such as MSVCP100D.dll then you need to build your program in release mode, which by default switches the run time to a non-debug version. You need to be careful to nut out any other included static and dynamic libraries you're including in your project to make sure all debug or all release versions match for your builds.
If you are having trouble finding which sub-projects are referencing the debug versions, you can download and run depends.exe and browse through the exe file to see.
Sorry for the late respones, but yes you can prevent this dependency, just go to solution property of yopur project, go to C/C++ > Code Generator and in Runtime Library change it from MDd to MTd, will include statically the dependent libraries, and not in run time, like this avoid Run time errors while try to run the Dll.
I have a mex64 dll compiled on my machine. I used Matlab 2009b with VS2008 Pro to compile the dll. The dll works fine on my Matlab installation.
I want a colleague to use the dll so I sent it to him and he gets the following error message when trying to use the dll:
??? Invalid MEX-file 'filename.mexw64': The specified module could not be found.
My current assumption is that this is caused because he uses an older Matlab version or missing a dll that I have. I ran dependency checker and asked him to check that he has all the listed dlls.
I am still waiting for him to confirm his Matlab version.
What other reasons can cause this and can the Matlab version make a difference? (I mean R2009a when I have R2009B and not a huge version diff)
The other person has Matlab R2009a. Shouldn't the mex just work if I compile it on my computer and deliver it to him?
Does this only leave a missing dependent dll?
The issue is strange, but I can confirm it exists.
Using pre-built libraries for matlab that are correctly installed and in the path, I sometimes get the same error. If I type in the function name at the command-line, the function is visible and will auto-complete. However, the function will not initialize until I 'cd' into the directory with the .mexw64 library file.
>> AndorInitialize('')
Invalid MEX-file 'C:\Program
Files\MATLAB\R2011b\toolbox\andor\AndorInitialize.mexw64': The
specified module could not be found.
>> path
MATLABPATH
C:\Program Files\MATLAB\R2011b\toolbox\andor
C:\Program Files\MATLAB\R2011b\toolbox\andor\camera files
C:\Program Files\MATLAB\R2011b\toolbox\andor\m files
... etc
It turns out this is due to missing dependencies, which shouldn't be missing. To resolve the issue, use dependency walker (free, lightweight) to identify what's missing. The mathworks explains this.
http://www.mathworks.com/support/solutions/en/data/1-2RQL4L/
In my case, two DLL's weren't showing up properly, even though they were on my system and in the path. I copied the DLL's into the windows/system32 folder and the library functions now work correctly. What's particularly strange is that the same library worked on my computer a few days ago (prior to the moving the DLL's).
In general, MEX files should work across different versions of Matlab; in particular, they should be forward-compatible. You're right; sounds like a dll problem.
If you built it with Visual Studio, it may be linked to the Visual C++ Runtime. This is a set of libraries that is not installed on Windows by default. The "redistributable" for it can be downloaded here; having your coworker install that could resolve the problem. If that doesn't work, you can use Dependency Walker to check for other unsatisfied DLL dependencies.
Normally, configuring Matlab's "mex -setup" to use the Lcc compiler that's distributed with Matlab could be a way around this, but it's not supported for 64-bit Windows AFAIK.
Also, are you sure he has the 64-bit version of Windows?
Another possible source of the problem could be that you compiled in debug mode. The Visual C++ redistributables only support release mode.
The Dll was a wrapper for MySql access. We ended up using Matlab's ODBC and the MySql Connector.
I am creating a wrapper around a native lib, which comes in both 32 & 64 bit flavors. I have a fairly complex C++/CLR project that includes a number of header files from the native libs. I got it to work fine on x32, but now I'm not sure how to provide an alternative x64 build.
Can someone outline the steps to create such project?
Various defines depend on _WIN32 / _WIN64, so must be multiple projects?
Both x32/x64 native libs have identical file names. Currently the lib ref is done with #pragma comment (lib, "xxxxxx.lib"). How should this be changed?
Lastly - VS2008 has only Win32 platform listed, not Win64 (I do have x64 VS2008 component installed).
Thanks!
Normally it is sufficient to select the drop down which says win32 (next to the Debug/Release one on the toolbar) and selected "Configuration Manager". Then open the "Active Solution Platform" drop down and select New. Choose x64 type (which if it doesn't exist then 64bit compilers are not installed) and copy solution from the orignal Win32 one. Now your project can be built selectively by changing the drop down on the toolbar.
Normally it works more or less as is but you might want to consider tweaking a few pre-processor defines if only for the intellisense.
As for libraries, for platform ones (supplied as part of VS/PSDK) then you dont need to change anything. For your libraries you are wrapping then change the Additional Library Directories in the project properties to point to the 64bit directory.
Visual studio doesn't always install the 64 bit options.
It can be fixed by running the VS installer, choosing add/remove features, and checking the x64 feature.