KineticJS - Dynamically Creating Shapes - dynamic

so I am trying to dynamically create shapes based on a number pulled from a database. I've tried the most logical way of wrapping a for loop around creating a shape and subsequently adding the shape into a layer. But for some reason unknown to me, it keeps re-modifying the same shape even though the shapes stored in the layer should be at different positions (and different attributes).
My code is the following:
function graph(w) {
barLayer.removeChildren();
var bar = new Array();
for (var i = 1; i <= array.length; i++) {
var pos = i * Math.PI / 30;
var scaleUp = (i / array.length) * 2.5;
bar[i-1] = new Kinetic.Shape({
drawFunc: function(context) {
context.beginPath();
context.moveTo(radius2, radius2);
context.arc(radius2, radius2, scaleUp * radius2, (- Math.PI / 2) - w + pos, (- Math.PI / 2) - w + (Math.PI / 30) + pos, false);
context.closePath();
this.stroke(context);
this.fill(context);
},
fill: "#333",
stroke: "#000",
strokeWidth: 4,
x: centerX,
y: centerY,
offset: [200,200],
});
console.log("Starting: ", (- Math.PI / 2) - w + pos, "/ Ending: ", (- Math.PI / 2) - w + (Math.PI / 30) + pos);
}
for (var n = 0; n < bar.length; n++) {
barLayer.add(bar[n]);
}
barLayer.draw();
}
I've tried everything from putting the shapes in an Array to just creating a new shape and adding it in within the for loop. I'm definitely missing something.
I have done a bit of searching regarding this topic and I found one comment relevant to what I'm trying to do:
Basically, you need need to keep an array of shape objects and push new objects onto the array when you add a new shape. Within the setDrawStage() method of the kin object, just loop through the array and draw each object. I’ll let you know when I get the lab published.
I've looked all over for a setDrawStage() method and I can't find much data associated with it. He also stated to put the for loop inside the method which is a bit confusing as I do not only want to draw the shape but also store it in a layer (as I have done for every other shape).
Does anyone possibly have a solution? Much appreciated in advanced.

I think you're having a JavaScript closure problem. More on that:
How do JavaScript closures work?
Try moving all of the logic inside the for loop into a function to induce scope. Also, instead of using Kinetic.Shape, why not use Kinetic.Circle?

X and Y in your script do not change as far as I can tell so your shape will always start from the same position?

Related

Unable to detect if a rectangle is touched in libgdx

I have a rectangle with a sprite on it and I have to detect if the touch position lies within the rectangle.
This is my code,
if (Gdx.input.isTouched())
{
int x1 = Gdx.input.getX();
int y1 = Gdx.input.getY();
Vector3 inputs = new Vector3(x1, y1, 0);
gamecam.unproject(inputs);
Gdx.app.log("x" + inputs.x, "y" + inputs.y);
Gdx.app.log("rect" + rectangle.x, "rect" + rectangle.y);
if(rectangle.contains(inputs.x,inputs.y))
{
Gdx.app.log("x" + inputs.x, "y" + inputs.y);
Gdx.app.log("rect" + rectangle, "rect" + rectangle.y);
}
}
Rectangle definition,
BodyDef bdef = new BodyDef();
bdef.type = BodyDef.BodyType.StaticBody;
b2body = screen.getWorld().createBody(bdef);
rectangle = new Rectangle();
rectangle.setHeight(55);
rectangle.setWidth(55);
PolygonShape head = new PolygonShape();
rectangle.setX(300);
rectangle.setY(10);
bdef.position.set((rectangle.getX() - rectangle.getWidth() / 2) / MyJungleGame.PPM, (rectangle.getY() - rectangle.getHeight() / 2) / MyJungleGame.PPM);
head.setAsBox(rectangle.getWidth() / 2 / MyJungleGame.PPM, rectangle.getHeight() / 2 / MyJungleGame.PPM);
FixtureDef fdef = new FixtureDef();
fdef.shape = head;
setPosition(b2body.getPosition().x - getWidth() / 2, b2body.getPosition().y - getHeight() / 2);
This is my output,
The small rectangle at the bottom of the screen is the rectangle I created. But, nothing happens when I click it. I checked the coordinates and here is the log,
x-0.925: y-0.5625
rect300.0: rect10.0
x-0.925: y-0.5625
rect300.0: rect10.0
x-0.925: y-0.5625
I tried checking the touch using the below method,
if (inputs.x > sprite.getX() && inputs.x < sprite.getX() + sprite.getWidth())
{
if (inputs.y > sprite.getY() && inputs.y < sprite.getY() + sprite.getHeight())
{
Gdx.app.log("sprite touched", "");
}
}
This too doesn't work. Any idea where I made the mistake ? Please help . Thanks in advance
Since you are using Box2D, to detect collisions via the common way is more complicated to new users.
However, looking on your code...
I would advice taking this coordinates in consideration with PPM of your world :
int x1 = Gdx.input.getX();
int y1 = Gdx.input.getY();
Vector3 inputs = new Vector3(x1, y1, 0);
Also, If you are going to build a collision system with box2d, you should use this : http://www.aurelienribon.com/blog/2011/07/box2d-tutorial-collision-filtering/

How to overlap a buffer in Objective-C

I'm trying to do FFT on the iPhone, and I realised that I had not overlapped my input prior to windowing. I was wondering if anyone could give me some insight on to how to properly overlap my input buffer.
I am wanting to overlap bufferSamples by a factor of 4, and I understand that it is to be done using memove functions, but I can't figure out how to get it to work in regard to overlapping.
enum
{
frameSize = 2048,
overlap = 4,
range = 8192,
step = frameSize/overlap,
};
static COMPLEX_SPLIT A;
// For each sample in buffer...
for (int j = 0; j < audioBufferList.mNumberBuffers; j++)
{
// Declaring samples from audio buffer list
SInt16 *bufferSamples = (SInt16*)audioBufferList.mBuffers[j].mData;
// Overlapping here?
////////////////////////
//// vDSP FUNCTIONS ////
////////////////////////
// Creating Hann window function
for (int i = 0; i < frameSize; i++)
{
double window = 0.5 * (1.0 - cos((2.0 * M_PI * i) / (frameSize - 1)));
// Applying window to each sample
A.realp[i] = window * bufferSamples[i];
A.imagp[i] = 0;
}
// Further DSP...
To get an overlap factor of 4, you need to save the last 75% of the data that, before windowing, was input to the previous FFT. Then use that saved data as the first 75% of the current FFT, with only the last 25% from current or not yet used data. memmove can be used to copy data to and from the temporary save data buffers. Repeat as necessary to use up the data available.

game maker random cave generation

I want to make a cave explorer game in game maker 8.0.
I've made a block object and an generator But I'm stuck. Here is my code for the generator
var r;
r = random_range(0, 1);
repeat(room_width/16) {
repeat(room_height/16) {
if (r == 1) {
instance_create(x, y, obj_block)
}
y += 16;
}
x += 16;
}
now i always get a blank frame
You need to use irandom(1) so you get an integer. You also should put it inside the loop so it generates a new value each time.
In the second statement, you are generating a random real value and storing it in r. What you actually require is choosing one of the two values. I recommend that you use the function choose(...) for this. Here goes the corrected statement:
r = choose(0,1); //Choose either 0 or 1 and store it in r
Also, move the above statement to the inner loop. (Because you want to decide whether you want to place a block at the said (x,y) location at every spot, right?)
Also, I recommend that you substitute sprite_width and sprite_height instead of using the value 16 directly, so that any changes you make to the sprite will adjust the resulting layout of the blocks accordingly.
Here is the code with corrections:
var r;
repeat(room_width/sprite_width) {
repeat(room_height/sprite_height) {
r = choose(0, 1);
if (r == 1)
instance_create(x, y, obj_block);
y += sprite_height;
}
x += sprite_width;
}
That should work. I hope that helps!
Looks like you are only creating a instance if r==1. Shouldn't you create a instance every time?
Variable assignment r = random_range(0, 1); is outside the loop. Therefore performed only once before starting the loop.
random_range(0, 1) returns a random real number between 0 and 1 (not integer!). But you have if (r == 1) - the probability of getting 1 is a very small.
as example:
repeat(room_width/16) {
repeat(room_height/16) {
if (irandom(1)) {
instance_create(x, y, obj_block)
}
y += 16;
}
x += 16;
}
Here's a possible, maybe even better solution:
length = room_width/16;
height = room_height/16;
for(xx = 0; xx < length; xx+=1)
{
for(yy = 0; yy < height; yy+=1)
{
if choose(0, 1) = 1 {
instance_create(xx*16, yy*16, obj_block); }
}
}
if you want random caves, you should probably delete random sections of those blocks,
not just single ones.
For bonus points, you could use a seed value for the random cave generation. You can also have a pathway random generation that will have a guaranteed path to the finish with random openings and fake paths that generate randomly from that path. Then you can fill in the extra spaces with other random pieces.
But in regards to your code, you must redefine the random number each time you are placing a block, which is why all of them are the same. It should be called inside of the loops, and should be an integer instead of a decimal value.
Problem is on the first line, you need to put r = something in the for cycle

Looping with iterator vs temp object gives different result graphically (Libgdx/Java)

I've got a particle "engine" whom I've implementing a Pool system to and I've tested two different ways of rendering every Particle in a list. Please note that the Pooling really doesn't have anything with the problem to do. I just followed a tutorial and tried to use the second method when I noticed that they behaved differently.
The first way:
for (int i = 0; i < particleList.size(); i++) {
Iterator<Particle> it = particleList.iterator();
while (it.hasNext()) {
Particle p = it.next();
if (p.isDead()){
it.remove();
}
p.render(batch, delta);
}
}
Which works just fine. My particles are sharp and they move with the correct speed.
The second way:
Particle p;
for (int i = 0; i < particleList.size(); i++) {
p = particleList.get(i);
p.render(batch, delta);
if (p.isDead()) {
particleList.remove(i);
bulletPool.free(p);
}
}
Which makes all my particles blurry and moving really slow!
The render method for my particles look like this:
public void render(SpriteBatch batch, float delta) {
sprite.setX(sprite.getX() + (dx * speed) * delta * Assets.FPS);
sprite.setY(sprite.getY() + (dy * speed) * delta * Assets.FPS);
ttl--;
sprite.setScale(sprite.getScaleX() - 0.002f);
if (ttl <= 0 || sprite.getScaleX() <= 0)
isDead = true;
sprite.draw(batch);
}
Why do the different rendering methods provide different results?
Thanks in advance
You are mutating (removing elements from) a list while iterating over it. This is a classic way to make a mess.
The Iterator must have code to handle the delete case correctly. But your index-based for loop does not. Specifically when you call particleList.remove(i) the i is now "out of sync" with the content of the list. Consider what happens when you remove the element at index 3: 'i' will increment to 4, but the old element 4 got shuffled down into index 3, so it will get skipped.
I assume you're avoiding the Iterator to avoid memory allocations. So, one way to side-step this issue is to reverse the loop (go from particleList.size() down to 0). Alternatively, you can only increment i for non-dead particles.

Dynamic grid using FlashDevelop & Actionscript 2.0

I'm new to actionscript. What I'm tryin to do is simulate traffic flow near a 2 lane intersection, following Wolfram's rule 184. To begin with, I'm trying to create a grid (8x8 of which the intersection is between the middle two rows and the middle two columns, like a plus sign) whose cells have the following attributes:
color = white;
car = false;
when clicked:
color = red;
car = true (a car is present);
So, after the user clicks cells to position the cars initially and presses the start button, the simulation will begin.
Here's my code so far (apologies for incorrect formatting):
class Main
{
private var parent:MovieClip;
public static function main(mc:MovieClip)
{
var app = new Main(mc);
}
public function Main(mc:MovieClip)
{
this.parent = mc;
//grid settings
var Cell:MovieClip = mc.createEmptyMovieClip("cell", mc.getNextHighestDepth());
var x:Number = 0;
var y:Number = 0;
var color:Number = 0xffffff;
var car:Boolean = false;
for (y = 0; y < 3 * Stage.height / 8; y += Stage.height / 8)
{
for (x = 3*Stage.width/8; x < 5*Stage.width/8; x+=Stage.width/8)
{
UI.drawRect(Cell, x, y, (Stage.width / 8) - 5, (Stage.height / 8) - 5, color, 100);
}
}
for (y = 3*Stage.height/8; y < 5 * Stage.height / 8; y += Stage.height / 8)
{
for (x = 0; x < Stage.width; x+=Stage.width/8)
{
UI.drawRect(Cell, x, y, (Stage.width / 8)-5, (Stage.height / 8)-5, color, 100);
}
}
for (y = 5*Stage.height/8; y < Stage.height; y += Stage.height / 8)
{
for (x = 3*Stage.width/8; x < 5*Stage.width/8; x+=Stage.width/8)
{
UI.drawRect(Cell, x, y, (Stage.width / 8)-5, (Stage.height / 8)-5, color, 100);
}
}
Cell.onMouseDown()
{
Cell.color = UI.RED;
Cell.car = true;
}
}
}
I know there's quite a few things gone wrong here. First of all, the cell color doesn't change on mouse down. Do i need to make movie clip for each cell in the for loops? I think it would be easier to make a grid of objects with given attributes, but i don't know how to do that. Would really appreciate if someone helps me out.
From what I can tell, issue with your current approach is that using drawRect() literally draws pixels on to the stage, which means you'll have no reference to those shapes in future frames. right now, you've got one MovieClip that has been drawn many times. What you need is a lot of MovieClips so you have a reference to each cell that you can update/edit every frame.
Your best bet is to do the following (I'll just provide pseudo because I'm a bit shaky on AS2 syntax):
A) Create an array to hold all of the Cells. Call it:
var Cells:Array = new Array();
B) During each step of the loops in your constructor, do 4 things.
1) Create a new MovieClip `var tempCell:MovieClip = new MovieClip();
2) Draw a rectangle on to each MovieClip: A tutorial for the graphics API in AS2 http://www.actionscript.org/resources/articles/727/1/Drawing-shapes-with-AS2/Page1.html
3) Add an event listenerto each MovieClip that points to a common event handler. This listener listens for mouse clicks on that MovieClip (or MOUSE_DOWN)
4) and use Cells.push(tempClip) to add that new MovieClip to your array so you now have one object that contains a reference to all of your cells.
C) Create an click event handler that redraws the cell that has been clicked. Try MouseEvent.target
You have another option to using the graphics API to draw rectangles, and that is to simply add and remove stock graphics from your Flash library. You'll have to draw these graphics in Flash and then 'Export for Actionscript' to call them up.
Hope this points you in the right direction!
J