I'm trying to pre-populate create defect popup and I'm not clear on what key/values I can pass. The documentation says the keys should be 'Name' and 'Description' but they are not being picked up. However, after looking around I noticed that it's picking up 'defaultName'.
Any help is appreciated!
`
function onAddNewPreCreate(addNew, eventArgs)
{
eventArgs.item["defaultName"] = "name";
eventArgs.item["Description"] = "description";
eventArgs.item["defaultDescription"] = "description123";
}
function onLoad() {
var rallyDataSource = new rally.sdk.data.RallyDataSource('__WORKSPACE_OID__',
'__PROJECT_OID__',
'__PROJECT_SCOPING_UP__',
'__PROJECT_SCOPING_DOWN__');
var addNewConfig = {
types : ["Defect"]
};
var addNew = new rally.sdk.ui.AddNewArtifact(addNewConfig, rallyDataSource);
addNew.addEventListener('onPreCreate', onAddNewPreCreate);;
addNew.display("addNewDiv");
}
rally.addOnLoad(onLoad);
`
Unfortunately, the list of fields supported for the AddNewArtifact (as well as rally.sdk.util.Navigation.popupCreatePage) is not well-documented. Description is not one of the fields supported for pre-population into the editor window. The fields that are supported for pre-population are:
User Story:
defaultName
rank
iteration
release
parent
dpyOid {dependency}
Defect:
defaultName
defectSuiteOid {Defect Suites}
testCaseResult
testCase
requirement
iteration
Defect Suite:
defaultName
rank
iteration
Portfolio Item:
defaultName
rank
parent
Task:
workProduct
Test Case:
testfolderOid {Test Folder}
artifactOid {Artifact}
Test Set:
iteration
release
Related
I have a before load user event function on an invoice record that create a button called 'create vendor bill'.
When this button is pressed, a new vendor bill record is opened. The UE script:
/**
*#NApiVersion 2.x
*#NScriptType UserEventScript
*/
define([
"N/url",
"N/record",
"N/runtime",
"N/ui/serverWidget",
"N/redirect",
], function (url, record, runtime, serverWidget, redirect) {
var exports = {};
/**
* #param {UserEventContext.beforeLoad} context
*/
function beforeLoad(context) {
if (
context.type == context.UserEventType.EDIT ||
context.type == context.UserEventType.VIEW
) {
var record = context.newRecord;
var recordId = record.id;
var recordType = record.type;
var customer = record.getValue({ fieldId: "entity" });
log.debug("entity", customer);
var scriptObj = runtime.getCurrentScript();
var customForm = scriptObj.getParameter({
name: "custscript_custom_form_vb",
});
var recordSublist = record.getSublist({ sublistId: "item" });
log.debug("item", recordSublist);
var form = context.form;
log.debug("form", form);
var userVarStr = record;
log.debug("uservarstr", userVarStr);
var userVarURL = url.resolveRecord({
recordType: "vendorbill",
params: {
entity: parseInt(customer),
supportcase: recordId,
cf: parseInt(customForm),
},
});
form.addButton({
id: "custpage_button_test",
label: "Create Vendor Bill",
functionName: "getDetails('" + userVarURL + "')",
});
}
}
exports.beforeLoad = beforeLoad;
return exports;
});
Once the page redirects to the vendor bill form, a client script (deployed on the form), sets the field values on the body of the vendor bill using the parameters passed in the url
This is working as expected.
Where I am getting stuck is trying to work out how to pass the 'item' sublist values to from the invoice to the vendor bill?
Would I pass this as an array?
From what I understand, there is a limit to the number of characters that can be passed via the url.
I can't find anything online or in the Netsuite documentation that deals with passing sublist values between records
For starters I would want to see the Client Script.
One option would be to only pass the Invoice Record ID and Type. Then you can create a Suitelet to be used as a proxy and get the sublist data by a saved search.
Something to keep in mind is that if the sublist is very very long you may reach a execution timeout so you may want to consider triggering a MapReduce script to populate the sublist again you would pass it the recType and ID of the invoice and vendor bill and then use a saved search to get the data.
There are other approaches but I would need to see the client script.
for (i in 0 until result.size){ result[i].config= addConfig(taskNames!![i],processKeys!![i]) }
Here result is a list of class which has datamember config and tasNames and processKeys are list of string.
Is there a way in kotlin to map result.config with respective taskNames and processKeys without using traditional loop and mentioning length of result.I am new to kotlin.
class Process {
var processKey: String? = null
var task: List<Task>? = null}
class Task {
var taskName: String? = null
var processVariables: List<ProcessVariable>? = null}
class ProcessVariable {
var name: String? = null
var label: String? = null
var applicableValue: List<String>? = null}
Result is already present with datamember config pf type ProcessVariable
If I understand your problem correctly, you need to combine 3 lists.
So iterating over the lists may be easier to understand than some clever way of list transformations.
You can get rid of the traditional for loop, so you don't need to calculate the size of the loop:
result.forEachIndexed {
i, resultData -> resultData.config = addConfig(taskNames[i], processKeys[i])
}
If you want to combine two lists, you can use the zip method:
val configList = taskNames.zip(processKeys) {tsk, prc -> addConfig(tsk, prc)}
In your example, the result-object was already existing. Maybe it is easier to create new result-objects:
val results = configList.map {
Result(config = it)
}
jsonStoreInit = function(pSuccess, pFailure){
collections={};
collections['objects'] = {};
var options = {};
options.localKeyGen = false;
options.clear = false;
options.username = app.username;
options.password = app.password;
options.additionalSearchFields = {key: 'string'};
WL.JSONStore.init(collections, options)
.then(pSuccess)
.fail(pFailure);
};
putObject = function(pObject) {
var keyValue = pObject.getKey();
var object = {myObject : pObject.getKey()};
var options = {};
//options.additionalSearchFields = {key : keyValue};
WL.JSONStore.get("objects")
.add(object, options);
};
I'm on WL 6.0 FP 1
In the code sample above jsonStoreInit is what I use to init my store including the options.additionalSearchFields.
When I come to add the objects in the putObject funciton it works fine with the additionalSearchFields commented out, but when I uncomment it to add the additional fields I get an error
[wl.jsonstore] {"src":"store","err":21,"msg":"INVALID_ADD_INDEX_KEY","col":"objects","usr":"xxxx","doc":{},"res":{}}
When I look this error message up all I get is
21 INVALID_ADD_INDEX_KEY
Problem with additional search fields.
Which I had kinda figured ... can anyone provide any help on this ...
I don't need to you fix my code but if you could point me to a working example that would be excellent.
Many thanks, ownimage
The person that asked the question solved it, but I'm leaving this answer in case someone is wondering how to pass data that uses additionalSearchFields.
Example:
var data = {hello: 'world'};
WL.JSONStore.get('collection').add(data, {additionalSearchFields: {key: 'value'}})
The example assumes the collection was created with a search field for hello as string and an additional search field for key as string. It also assumes there's a collection initialized called collection.
So I want to allow the user to conditionally turn columns on/off in a Cardboard app I built. I have two problems.
I tried using the 'columns' attribute in the config but I can't seem to find a default value for it that would allow ALL columns to display(All check boxes checked) based on the attribute, ie. the default behavior if I don't include 'columns' in the config object at all (tried null, [] but that displays NO columns).
So that gets to my second problem, if there is no default value is there a simple way to only change that value in the config object or do I have to encapsulate the entire variable in 'if-else' statements?
Finally if I have to manually build the string I need to parse the values of an existing custom attribute (a drop list) we have on the portfolio object. I can't seem to get the rally.forEach loop syntax right. Does someone have a simple example?
Thanks
Dax - Autodesk
I found a example in the online SDK from Rally that I could modify to answer the second part (This assumes a custom attribute on Portfolio item called "ADSK Kanban State" and will output values to console) :
var showAttributeValues = function(results) {
for (var property in results) {
for (var i=0 ; i < results[property].length ; i++) {
console.log("Attribute Value : " + results[property][i]);
}
}
};
var queryConfig = [];
queryConfig[0] = {
type: 'Portfolio Item',
key : 'eKanbanState',
attribute: 'ADSK Kanban State'
};
rallyDataSource.findAll(queryConfig, showAttributeValues);
rally.forEach loops over each key in the first argument and will execute the function passed as the second argument each time.
It will work with either objects or arrays.
For an array:
var array = [1];
rally.forEach(array, function(value, i) {
//value = 1
//i = 0
});
For an object:
var obj = {
foo: 'bar'
};
rally.forEach(obj, function(value, key) {
//value = 'bar'
//key = 'foo'
});
I think that the code to dynamically build a config using the "results" collection created by your query above and passed to your sample showAttributeValues callback, is going to look a lot like the example of dynamically building a set of Table columns as shown in:
Rally App SDK: Is there a way to have variable columns for table?
I'm envisioning something like the following:
// Dynamically build column config array for cardboard config
var columnsArray = new Array();
for (var property in results) {
for (var i=0 ; i < results[property].length ; i++) {
columnsArray.push("'" + results[property][i] + "'");
}
}
var cardboardConfig = {
{
attribute: 'eKanbanState',
columns: columnsArray,
// .. rest of config here
}
// .. (re)-construct cardboard...
Sounds like you're building a neat board. You'll have to provide the board with the list of columns to show each time (destroying the old board and creating a new one).
Example config:
{
attribute: 'ScheduleState'
columns: [
'In-Progress',
'Completed'
]
}
I have a dijit.form.NumberTextBox input field that starts out with these parms:
new dijit.form.NumberTextBox({
id: din1,
style: "width:60px",
constraints: {
places: 0,
pattern: '######'
}
},
din1);
Everything works great..My question is I would like to change 'places' and 'pattern' parms on the fly. So I wrote this to change 'places' and 'patterns' parms:
var myFldObj = dijit.byId(din1);
if (myFldObj) {
var myConstObj = myFldObj.attr('constraints');
if (myConstObj) {
myConstObj.places = 2;
myConstObj.pattern = '#####.0';
}
}
So, after I show the form again, I'd expect the entry field to allow 2 decimal places but the form still acts like places=0 and pattern='######'. When I check the values of 'places' and 'pattern' I get what I'd expect (2 and #####.0). My question:
Can you change these values on the fly??
OR
Do you have to destroy the original dijit object and recreate with new parms??
Thx!!
So, here is what worked for me:
First, I think this is a bug because an input field that starts out like
new dijit.form.NumberTextBox({
id: "fieldID",
style: "width:60px",
constraints: {
places: 0
}
},
"fieldID");
that is then changed on the fly with code like:
NOTE: ntbArry - Array of dijit.form.NumberTextBox objs tied to a html
input tag id.
for (var x=0;x < ntbArry.length;x++) {
var handle = ntbArry[x];
if (handle) {
handle.attr('constraints').places = 2;
handle.attr('constraints').pattern = '#####.0#';
}
}
Does not exhibit the same behavior as a field created this way (no constraints mods on the fly):
new dijit.form.NumberTextBox({
id: "fieldID",
style: "width: 60px",
constraints: {
places: 2,
pattern: '#####.0#'
}
},
"fieldID");
It's close in behavior but every time you type a decimal point, the error message pops up stating invalid entry. This message doesn't pop up when typing the decimal point on a field that was originally created with the constraints places=2 and pattern '#####.0#'.
So, to get original behavior I wanted:
fieldIDEvents is an array of dojo events tied to NumberTextBox fields.
Before continuing disconnect dojo events
for (var x=0;x < fieldIDEvents.length;x++) {
var handle = fieldIDEvents[x];
if (handle) {
dojo.disconnect(handle);
}
}
then destroy the NumberTextBox dojo objects
for (var x=0;x < ntbArry.length;x++) {
var handle = ntbArry[x];
if (handle) {
handle.destroy();
ntbArry[x] = null;
}
}
Next, place the input tag back into the html because it gets destroyed:
NOTE: tdtag and an id on a html td tag which should contain the input tag.
var fld1 = this.document.getElementById("tdtag");
if (fld1) {
//alert("\""+fld1.innerHTML+"\"");
fld1.innerHTML = "<input id=\"fieldID\">";
}
Now, create the NumberTextBox object again:
ntbArry[0] = new dijit.form.NumberTextBox({
id: "fieldID",
style: "width: 60px",
constraints: {
places: 2,
pattern: '#####.0#'
}
},
"fieldID");
It's a few extra steps but, at least I know this is what works for me..If I'm missing something basic, let me know, it's easy to miss the small details with this stuff.
I use Dojo 1.3 and I can see that dijit.form.NumberTextBox has no pattern and places properties, but has editOptions property. So I would try to change the constraints like this:
myConstObj.editOption.places = 2;